References
- Baker J. M. & Zigmond N. (1995). The meaning and practice of inclusion for students with learning disabilities: Themes and implications from the five cases. The Journal of Special Education, 29, 109–115.
- Bal, A., Thorius, K. K., & Kozleski, E. (2012). Culturally responsive positive behavioral support matters. Equity Alliance. Retrieved from http://www.equityallianceatasu.org/sites/default/files/CRPBIS_Matters.pdf
- Baltar, F., & Brunet, I. (2012). Social research 2.0: Virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook. Internet Research, 22(1), 57–74. doi:10.1108/10662241211199960
- Bellanca, J. A., Fogarty, R. J., & Pete, B. M. (2012). How to teach thinking skills within the common core: 7 key student proficiencies of the new national standards. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Center for Applied Special Technology (CAST). (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2. Retrieved from http://udlguidelines.cast.org
- Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSS). (2018). Common core state standards initiative: Preparing America’s students for college & career. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/
- Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
- Dai, D. Y. (2010). The nature and nurture of giftedness: A new framework for understanding gifted education. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Dixon, F. A., Yssel, N., McConnell, J. M., & Hardin, T. (2014). Differentiated instruction, professional development, and teacher efficacy. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37(2), 111–127. doi:10.1177/0162353214529042
- Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Wehby, J., Schumacher, R. F., Gersten, R., & Jordan, N. C. (2015). Inclusion versus specialized intervention for very-low-performing students: What does access mean in an era of academic challenge? Exceptional Children, 81(2), 134–157. doi:10.1177/0014402914551743
- Haager, D., & Vaughn, S. (2013). The common core state standards and reading: Interpretations and implications for elementary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28(1), 5–16. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12000
- Hall, T., Strangman, N., & Meyer, A. (2003). Differentiated instruction and implications for UDL implementation: Effective classroom practices report. National Center of Accessing the General Curriculum (NCAC). Retrieved from http://sde.ok.gov/sde/sites/ok.gov.sde/files/DI_UDL.pdf
- Harris, E. (2015). New York will trim common core exams after many students skipped them. New York Times, September 17. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/17/nyregion/new-york-will-trim-common-core-exams-after-many-students-skipped-them.html
- Heckathorn, D. D. (1997). Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 44(2), 174–199. doi: 10.1525/sp.1997.44.2.03x0221m
- Johnsen, S. K., Sulak, T. N., & Rollins, K. (2012). Serving gifted students within an RtI framework: A practical guide. Waco, TX: Prufrock.
- Kaplan, S. N. (2011). Advocacy: Differentiating the differentiated curriculum. Gifted Child Today, 34(4), 59–60. doi:10.1177/1076217511418069
- Kettler, T. (2014). Critical thinking schools among elementary school students: Comparing identified gifted and general education student performance. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(2), 127–136. doi:10.1177/0016986214522508
- Lazonder, A. W., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects and guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681–718. doi:10.3102/0034654315627366
- Mastropieri, M. A. & Scruggs, T. E. (2005). Feasibility and consequences of response to intervention: Examination of the issues and scientific evidence as a model for the identification of individuals with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 525–531. doi:10.1177/00222194050380060801
- National Association for Gifted Children (NAGC). (2018). Common core state standards, national science standards and gifted education. Retrieved from http://www.nagc.org/common-core-state -standards-national-science-standards-and-gifted-education
- National Association for Gifted Children (NAGC). (2010). 2010 pre-K-grade 12 gifted programming standards. Retrieved from http://www.nagc.org/sites/default/files/standards/K-12%20programming%20standards.pdf
- New York State Common Core Task Force. (2015). Final report. Retrieved from https://www.governor.ny.gov/sites/governor.ny.gov/files/atoms/files/NewYorkCommonCoreTaskForceFinalReport_Update.pdf
- New York State Education Department (NYSED). (2018). New York State’s final Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) plan summary. Retrieved from http://www.p12.nysed.gov/accountability/documents/Attachment2ESEAPublicFacing053018-2.pdf
- New York State Education Department (NYSED). (2017). New York State next generation English language arts and mathematics learning standards. Retrieved from http://www.nysed.gov/next-generation-learning-standards
- New York State Education Department (NYSED). (2011). New York State P-12 common core learning standards for English language arts and literacy. Retrieved from http://www.p12.nysed.gov/ciai/common_core_standards/pdfdocs/nysp12cclsela.pdf
- New York State Education Department (NYSED). (2011). New York State P-12 common core learning standards for mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.p12.nysed.gov/ciai/common_core_standards/pdfdocs/nysp12cclsmath.pdf
- Norton, A., & Boyce, S. (2013). A cognitive core for common state standards. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(2), 266–279. doi:10.1016/J.JMATHB.2013.01.001
- Powell, S. R., & Stecker, P. M. (2014). Using data-based individualization to intensify mathematics intervention for students with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46(4) 31–37. doi:10.1177/0040059914523735
- Schiever, S. W., & Maker, C. J. (2003). New directions in enrichment and acceleration. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Ed.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 163–173). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
- Stewart, C., & Varner, L. (2012). Common core and the rural student. National Teacher Education Journal, 5(4), 67–73. Education Research Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed July 12, 2018).
- Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
- Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). Mapping a route toward differentiated instruction. Educational Leadership, 57(1), 12–16.
- Tomlinson, C. A., & Allan, S. D. (2000). Leadership for differentiating schools and classrooms. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
- VanTassel-Baska, J. (2014). Performance-based assessment: The road to authentic learning for the gifted. Gifted Child Today, 37(1), 41–47. doi:10.1177/1076217513509618
- Strauss, V. (2017). What N.Y. parents should know about 2017 Common Core standardized tests. Washington Post, March 30. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2017/03/30/what-n-y-parents-should-know-about-2017-common-core-standardized-tests/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.e8a875ebe1dd
- Zhao, Y. (2012). Mass localism for improving America’s education. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 48(1), 17–22. doi:10.1080/00228958.2012.654714