References
- Albers, A. E., & Greer, R. D. (1991). Is the three-term contingency trial a predictor of effective instruction?Journal of Behavioral Education, 1(3), 337–354. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00947188
- Anderson-Butcher, D., Iachini, A., Riley, A., Wade-Mdivanian, R., Davis, J., & Amorose, J. (2013). Exploring the impact of a summer sport-based youth development program. Evaluation and Program Planning, 37, 64–69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.01.002
- Aspiranti, K. B., McCallum, E., & Schmitt, A. J. (2019). Taped Problems intervention components: A meta-analysis. Contemporary School Psychology, 23(4), 412–422. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-018-0200-3
- Begeny, J. C., Daly, E. J., & Valleley, R. J. (2006). Improving oral reading fluency through response opportunities: A comparison of phrase drill error correction with repeated readings. Journal of Behavioral Education, 15(4), 229–235. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-006-9028-4
- Black, M. P., Skinner, C. H., Forbes, B. E., McCurdy, M., Coleman, M. B., Davis, K., & Gettelfinger, M. (2016). Cumulative instructional time and relative effectiveness conclusions: Extending research on response intervals, learning, and measurement scale. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9(1), 58–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0114-3
- Blackwell, A. J., & McLaughlin, T. F. (2005). Using guided notes, choral responding, and response cards to increase student performance. International Journal of Special Education, 20(2), 1–5.
- Bliss, S. L., Skinner, C. H., McCallum, E., Saecker, L. B., Rowland-Bryant, E., & Brown, K. S. (2010). A comparison of taped problems with and without a brief post-treatment assessment on multiplication fluency. Journal of Behavioral Education, 19(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-010-9106-5
- Blood, E., & Gulchak, D. (2013). Embedding “Clickers” into classroom instruction: Benefits and strategies. Intervention in School and Clinic, 48(4), 246–253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451212462878
- Bramlett, R., Cates, G. L., Savina, E., & Lauinger, B. (2009). Assessing effectiveness and efficiency of academic interventions in school psychology journals: 1995-2005. Psychology in the Schools, 47(2), 125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20457
- Browder, D. M., & Spooner, F. H. (2011). Teaching students with moderate and severe disabilities. Guilford Press.
- Cameron, C. E., Connor, C. M., & Morrison, F. J. (2005). Effects of variation in teacher organization on classroom functioning. Journal of School Psychology, 43(1), 61–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2004.12.002
- Cates, G. L. (2005). Effects of peer versus computer-assisted drill on mathematics response rates. Psychology in the Schools, 42(6), 637–646. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20105
- Cates, G. L., Burns, M. K., & Joseph, L. (2009). Introduction to the special issue: Instructional efficiency and the impact on learning and data‐based decision making. Psychology in the Schools, 47(2), 113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20456
- Cates, G. L., Dunne, M., Erkfritz, K. N., Kivisto, A., Lee, N., & Wierzbicki, J. (2007). Differential effects of two spelling procedures on acquisition, maintenance and adaptation to reading. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-006-9019-5
- Cates, G. L., Skinner, C. H., Watson, T. W., Meadows, T. J., Weaver, A., & Jackson, B. (2003). Instructional effectiveness and instructional efficiency as considerations for data-based decision making: An evaluation of interspersing procedures. School Psychology Review, 32(4), 601–616. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2003.12086223
- Cazzell, S., Skinner, C., Taylor, K., McCurdy, M., Ciancio, D., Cihak, D., Skinner, A., & Moore, T. (2020). Comparing computer-based sight-word interventions in students with intellectual disability: Self-determined versus fixed response intervals. Journal of Behavioral Education, 29(3), 469–489. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-019-09335-8
- Clarke, L. S., Haydon, T., Bauer, A., & Epperly, A. C. (2016). Inclusion of students with an intellectual disability in the general education classroom with the use of response cards. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 60(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2014.966801
- Codding, R. S., Shiyko, M., Russo, M., Birch, S., Fanning, E., & Jaspen, D. (2007). Comparing mathematics interventions: Does initial level of fluency predict intervention effectiveness?Journal of School Psychology, 45(6), 603–617. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.06.005
- Codding, R., Volpe, R. J., Martin, R. J., & Krebs, G. (2019). Enhancing mathematics fluency: Comparing the spacing of practice sessions with the number of opportunities to respond. School Psychology Review, 48(1), 88–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2018-0010.V48-1
- Cook, B. G., Buysse, V., Klingner, J. K., Landrum, T. J., McWilliam, R. A., Tankersley, M., & Test, D. W. (2015). CEC’s standards for classifying the evidence base of practices in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 36, 220–234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514557271
- Common, E. A., Lane, K. L., Cantwell, E. D., Brunsting, N. C., Oakes, W. P., Germer, K. A., & Bross, L. A. (2020). Teacher-delivered strategies to increase students’ opportunities to respond: A systematic methodological review. Behavioral Disorders, 45(2), 67–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742919828310
- Cuvo, A. J., Ashley, K. M., Marso, K. J., Zhang, B. L., & Fry, T. A. (1995). Effect of response practice variables on learning spelling and sight vocabulary. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28(2), 155–173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1995.28-155
- Dallimore, E. J., Hertenstein, J. H., & Platt, M. B. (2006). Nonvoluntary class participation in graduate discussion courses: Effects of grading and cold calling. Journal of Management Education, 30(2), 354–377. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562905277031
- Dallimore, E. J., Hertenstein, J. H., & Platt, M. B. (2013). Impact of cold-calling on student voluntary participation. Journal of Management Education, 37(3), 305–341. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562912446067
- Darch, C., & Gersten, R. (1985). The effects of teacher presentation rates and praise on LD students’ oral reading performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 55(3), 295–303. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1985.tb02635.x
- Delquadri, J., Greenwood, C. R., Whorton, D., Carta, J. J., & Hall, R. V. (1986). Classwide peer tutoring. Exceptional Children, 52(6), 535–542. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298605200606
- Didion, L. A., Toste, J. R., & Wehby, J. H. (2020). Response cards to increase engagement and active participation of middle school students with EBD. Remedial and Special Education, 41(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518800807
- Duchaine, E. L., Jolivette, K., Fredrick, L. D., & Alberto, P. A. (2018). Increase engagement and achievement with response cards: Science and mathematics inclusion classes. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 16(2), 157–176.
- Duhon, G. J., Poncy, B. C., Krawiec, C., Ellis-Hervey, N., & Skinner, C. H. (2020). Toward a more comprehensive evaluation of interventions: A dose curve analysis of an explicit timing intervention. School Psychology Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2020.1789435
- Fisher, C. W., Berliner, D. C., Filby, N. N., Marliave, R., Cahen, L. S., & Dishaw, M. M. (1981). Teaching behaviors, academic learning time, and student achievement: An overview. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 17, 2–15.
- Fudge, D. L., Skinner, C. H., Williams, J. L., Cowden, D., Clark, J., & Bliss, S. L. (2008). The Color Wheel classroom management system: Increasing on-task behavior in every student in a second-grade classroom. Journal of School Psychology, 46(5), 575–592. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2008.06.003
- Gersten, R., Haymond, K., Newman-Gonchar, R., Dimino, J., & Jayanthi, M. (2020). Meta-analysis of the impact of reading interventions for students in the primary grades. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(2), 401–427. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2019.1689591
- Gilbertson, D., Maxfield, J., & Hughes, J. (2007). Evaluating responsiveness to intervention for English-language learners: A comparison of response modes on letter naming rates. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16(3), 259–279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-007-9039-9
- Grafman, J. M., & Cates, G. L. (2009). The differential effects of two self-managed math instruction procedures: Cover, copy and compare versus copy, cover, and compare. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20459
- Grays, S. D., Rhymer, K. N., & Swartzmiller, M. D. (2017). Moderating effects of mathematics anxiety on the effectiveness of explicit timing. Journal of Behavioral Education, 26(2), 188–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-016-9251-6
- Greenwood, C. R., & Delquadri, J. (1995). classwide peer tutoring and the prevention of school failure. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 39(4), 21–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.1995.9944638
- Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J., & Hall, R. V. (1984). Opportunity to respond and student academic performance. In W. L. Heward, T. E. Heron, J. Trap-Porter, & D. S. Hill (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 58–88). Charles Merrill.
- Grskovic, J. A., & Belfiore, P. J. (1996). Improving the spelling performance of students with disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 6(3), 343–354. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02110135
- Hale, A. D., Skinner, C. H., Winn, B. D., Oliver, R., Allin, J. D., & Molloy, C. C. M. (2005). An investigation of listening and listening-while-reading accommodations on reading comprehension levels and rates in students with emotional disorders. Psychology in the Schools, 42(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20027
- Haring, N. G., & Eaton, M. D. (1978). Systematic instructional procedures: An instructional hierarchy. In N. G. Haring, T. C. Lovitt, M. D. Eaton, & C. L. Hansen (Eds.), The fourth R: Research in the classroom (pp. 23–40). Merrill.
- Haydon, T., Conroy, M. A., Scott, T. M., Sindelar, P. T., Barber, B. R., & Orlando, A. M. (2010). A comparison of three types of opportunities to respond on student academic and social behaviors. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 18(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426609333448
- Haydon, T., Marsicano, R., & Scott, T. M. (2013). A comparison of choral and individual responding: A review of the literature. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 57(4), 181–188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2012.682184
- Heward, W. L. (1994). Three “low-tech” strategies for increasing the frequency of active student response during group instruction. In R. Gardner, D. M. Sainato, J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. Eshleman, & T. A. Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 283–320). Brooks/Cole.
- Hilton, A. N., Hopkins, M. B., Skinner, C. H., & McCane-Bowling, S. (2011). Enhancing sight-word reading in second-grade students using a computer-based sight-word reading system. Journal of Evidence-Based Practices in the Schools, 12, 205–218.
- Holt, N., Kingsley, B., Tink, L., & Scherer, J. (2011). Benefits and challenges associated with sports participation by children and parents from low income families. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12(5), 490–499. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.05.007
- Ignacio, P. L., McCurdy, M., White, J., Auge, M. B., Skinner, C. H., & Schwartz‐Micheaux, J. (2019). The effects of explicit timing on middle‐school students’ writing production across 5‐and 15‐min sessions. Psychology in the Schools, 56(9), 1482–1492. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22286
- Ingram, J., & Elliott, V. (2016). A critical analysis of the role of wait time in classroom interactions and the effects on student and teacher interactional behaviours. Cambridge Journal of Education, 46(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2015.1009365
- Joseph, L., Eveleigh, E., Konrad, M., Neef, N., & Volpe, R. (2012). Comparison of the efficiency of two flashcard drill methods on children’s reading performance. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 28(4), 317–337. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2012.669742
- Joseph, L. M., & Nist, L. M. (2006). Comparing the effects of unknown-known ratios on word reading learning versus learning rates. Journal of Behavioral Education, 15(2), 69–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-006-9008-8
- Kart, A., & Kart, M. (2021). Academic and social effects of inclusion on students without disabilities: A review of the literature. Education Sciences, 11(1), 16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010016
- Kirby, M. (2017). Implicit assumptions in special education policy: Promoting full inclusion for students with learning disabilities. Child & Youth Care Forum, 46(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-016-9382-x
- Konrad, M., Helf, S., & Joseph, L. M. (2011). Evidence-based instruction is not enough: Strategies for increasing instructional efficiency. Intervention in School and Clinic, 47(2), 67–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451211414192
- Kovaleski, J. F., VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Shapiro, E. S. (2013). The RTI approach to evaluating learning disabilities. The Guilford Press.
- Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. What Works Clearinghouse website: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf.
- Kuhfeld, M., Soland, J., Tarasawa, B., Johnson, A., Ruzek, E., & Liu, J. (2020). Projecting the potential impact of COVID-19 school closures on academic achievement. Educational Researcher, 49(8), 549–565. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20965918
- Kupzyk, S., Daly, E. J., III, & Andersen, M. N. (2011). A comparison of two flash-card methods for improving sight-word reading. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(4), 781–792. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-781
- Lambert, M. C., Cartledge, G., Heward, W. L., & Lo, Y. (2006). Effects of response cards on disruptive behavior and academic responding during math lessons by fourth-grade urban students. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8(2), 88–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007060080020701
- Levin, H. M., McEwan, P. J., Belfield, C., Bowden, A. B., & Shand, R. (2018). Economic evaluation in education: Cost-effectiveness and benefit-cost analysis (3rd ed.).Sage.
- Madden, N. A., & Slavin, R. E. (1983). Mainstreaming students with mild handicaps: Academic and social outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 519–569. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543053004519
- McCurdy, M., Skinner, C. H., McClurg, V., Whitsitt, L., & Moore, T. (2020). Bonus rewards for everyone: Enhancing mathematics performance with supplemental interdependent group contingencies. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 64(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2019.1678008
- McLaughlin, T. F., Mabee, S. W., Byram, B., & Reiter, S. (1987). Effects of academic positive practice and response cost on writing legibility of behaviorally disordered and learning disabled junior high school students. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy, 4(3), 216–221.
- Moore Partin, T. C., Robertson, R. E., Maggin, D. M., Oliver, R. M., & Wehby, J. H. (2009). Using teacher praise and opportunities to respond to promote appropriate student behavior. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 54(3), 172–178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10459880903493179
- Nist, L., & Joseph, L. M. (2008). Effectiveness and efficiency of flashcard drill instructional methods on urban first-graders’ word recognition, acquisition, maintenance, and generalization. School Psychology Review, 37(3), 294–308. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2008.12087877
- Oh-Young, C., & Filler, J. (2015). A meta-analysis of the effects of placement on academic and social skill outcome measures of students with disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 47, 80–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.08.014
- Poncy, B. C., Jaspers, K. E., Hansmann, P., Bui, L., & Matthew, W. B. (2015). A comparison of taped-problems interventions to increase math fact fluency: Does the length of time delay impact student learning rates?Journal of Applied School Psychology, 31(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2014.963273
- Poncy, B. C., Solomon, G. E., Duhon, G. J., Skinner, C. H., Moore, K., & Simons, S. (2015). An analysis of learning rate and curricular scope: Caution when choosing academic interventions based on aggregated outcomes. School Psychology Review, 44(3), 289–305. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17105/spr-14-0044.1
- Premack, D. (1965). Reinforcement theory. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 13, pp. 123–180). University of Nebraska Press.
- Remón, J., Sebastián, V., Romero, E., & Arauzo, J. (2017). Effect of using smartphones as clickers and tablets as digital whiteboards on students’ engagement and learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417707618
- Rhymer, K. N., Dittmer, K. I., Skinner, C. H., & Jackson, B. (2000). Effectiveness of a multi-component treatment for improving mathematics fluency. School Psychology Quarterly, 15(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088777
- Riley, J. P. (1986). The effects of teachers’ wait‐time and knowledge comprehension questioning on science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(4), 335–342. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660230407
- Roth, J., Linver, M., Hofferth, S., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2003). What happens during the school day? Time diaries from a national sample of elementary school teachers. Teachers College Record, 105(3), 317–343. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00242
- Rowe, M. B. (1986). Wait time: Slowing down may be a way of speeding up!. Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718603700110
- Schisler, R., Joseph, L. M., Konrad, M., & Alber‐Morgan, S. (2010). Comparison of the effectiveness and efficiency of oral and written retellings and passage review as strategies for comprehending text. Psychology in the Schools, 47(2), 135–152.
- Schnorr, C. I., Freeman-Green, S., & Test, D. W. (2016). Response cards as a strategy for increasing opportunities to respond: An examination of the evidence. Remedial and Special Education, 37(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515575614
- Schutte, G. (2015). Evaluating the role of programming common stimuli in declarative and procedural skills to promote generalization of basic math skills [Doctoral Dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. Oklahoma State University.
- Schutte, G. M., Duhon, G. J., Solomon, B. G., Poncy, B. C., Moore, K., & Story, B. (2015). A comparative analysis of massed vs. distributed practice on basic math fact fluency growth rates. Journal of School Psychology, 53(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2014.12.003
- Skinner, C. H. (1993, May). Increasing learning rates in children with mild disabilities [Paper presentation]. Presented at the Annual Convention of the Association for Applied Behavior Analysis: International, Chicago, IL.
- Skinner, C. H., Belfiore, P. B., & Watson, T. S. (1995). Assessing the relative effects of interventions in students with mild disabilities: Assessing instructional time. Assessment in Rehabilitation and Exceptionality, 2, 207–220. (Reprinted in Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20, 345–356, 2002). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/073428290202000403
- Skinner, C. H., Fletcher, P. A., & Henington, C. (1996). Increasing learning trial rates by increasing student response rates. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 313–325. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088937
- Skinner, C. H. (1998). Preventing academic skills deficits. In T. S. Watson & F. Gresham (Eds.), Handbook of child behavior therapy: Ecological considerations in assessment, treatment, and evaluation (pp. 61–83). Plenum.
- Skinner, C. H. (2008). Theoretical and applied implications of precisely measuring learning rates. School Psychology Review, 37(3), 309–315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2008.12087878
- Skinner, C. H. (2009). Applied comparative effectiveness researchers must measure learning rates: A commentary on efficiency articles. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20461
- Skinner, C. H. (2013). Contextual validity: Knowing what works is necessary, but not sufficient. The School Psychologist, 67(1), 14–21.
- Skinner, C. H., Belfiore, P. J., Mace, H. W., Williams-Wilson, S., & Johns, G. A. (1997). Altering response topography to increase response efficiency and learning rates. School Psychology Quarterly, 12(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088947
- Skinner, C. H., & Daly, E. J. (2010). Improving generalization of academic skills: Commentary on the special series. Journal of Behavioral Education, 19(1), 106–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-010-9100-y
- Skinner, C. H., Ford, J. M., & Yunker, B. D. (1991). A comparison of instructional response requirements on the multiplication performance of behavior disordered students. Behavioral Disorders, 17(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/019874299101700107
- Skinner, C. H., McCleary, D. F., Poncy, B. C., Cates, G. L., & Skolits, G. J. (2013). Emerging opportunities for school psychologists to enhance our remediation procedure evidence base as we apply response to intervention. Psychology in the Schools, 50(3), 272–289. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21676
- Skinner, C. H., McLaughlin, T. F., & Logan, P. (1997). Cover, copy, and compare: A self-managed academic intervention effective across skills, students, and settings. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7(3), 295–306. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022823522040
- Skinner, C. H., Pappas, D. N., & Davis, K. A. (2005). Enhancing academic engagement: Providing opportunities for responding and influencing students to choose to respond. Psychology in the Schools, 42(4), 389–403. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20065
- Skinner, C. H., Smith, E. S., & McLean, J. E. (1994). The effects of intertrial interval duration on sight-word learning rates in children with behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 19(2), 98–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/019874299401900207
- Skinner, C. H., Williams, R. L., & Neddenriep, C. E. (2004). Using interdependent group-oriented reinforcement to enhance academic performance in general education classrooms. School Psychology Review, 33(3), 384–397. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2004.12086255
- Solomon, B. G., & Poncy, B. C. (2019). Growth under intervention by means of instructional time expended: Empirical illustrations of applicable models. School Psychology (Washington, D.C.), 34(5), 566–575. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000327
- Solomon, B. G., Poncy, B. C., Caravello, D. J., & Schweiger, E. M. (2018). Examining learning rates in the evaluation of academic interventions that target reading fluency. Psychology in the Schools, 55(2), 151–114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22100
- Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10(2), 349–367. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1977.10-349
- Swehla, S. E., Burns, M. K., Zaslofsky, A. F., Hall, M. S., Varma, S., & Volpe, R. J. (2016). Examining the use of spacing effect to increase the efficiency of incremental rehearsal. Psychology in the Schools, 53(4), 404–415. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21909
- Taylor, E. A. P., Skinner, C. H., McCallum, E., Poncy, B. C., & Orsega, M. (2013). Enhancing basic academic skills with audio-recordings. Educational Research Quarterly, 27(2), 22–60.
- Tennessee Department of Education. (2021). Gov. Bill Lee Announces Intervention for Tennessee Students. https://www.tn.gov/education/news/2021/1/14/gov–bill-lee-announces-intervention-for-tennessee-students.html
- Van Houten, R., & Little, G. (1982). Increasing response rate in special education children following an abrupt reduction in time limit. Education and Treatment of Children, 5, 23–32.
- Van Houten, R., & Thompson, C. (1976). The effects of explicit timing on math performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9(2), 227–230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1976.9-227
- VanMaaren, V. G., Daniels, S. K., Ignacio, P. L., McCurdy, M., & Skinner, C. H. (2020). Reducing hallway disruptions in elementary students using interdependent group rewards: Evaluating a modified Timely Transitions Game. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 22(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300719857187
- Volpe, R. J., Mulé, C. M., Briesch, A. M., Joseph, L. M., & Burns, M. K. (2011). A comparison of two flashcard drill methods targeting word recognition. Journal of Behavioral Education, 20(2), 117–237. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-011-9124-y
- Wallace, M. A., Cox, E. A., & Skinner, C. H. (2003). Increasing independent seat-work: Breaking large assignments into smaller assignments and teaching a student with retardation to recruit reinforcement. School Psychology Review, 23, 132–142.
- Watkins, C. L., & Slocum, T. A. (2004). The components of direct instruction. In N. E. Marchand-Martella, T. A. Slocum, & R. C. Martella (Eds.), Introduction to direct instruction (pp. 28–65). Pearson.
- Whitney, T., Cooper, J. T., & Lingo, A. S. (2015). Providing student opportunities to respond in reading and mathematics: A look across grade levels. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 59(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2014.919138
- Wright, S., Skinner, C. H., Kirkpatrick, B. A., Daniels, S., Moore, T., & Crewdson, M. (2021). Using Tootling to enhance first-grade students use of a social skill: Evaluating the Catching Compliments Game. Education and Treatment of Children, 44, 101–113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-021-00039-1
- Yaw, J., Skinner, C. H., Maurer, K., Skinner, A. L., Cihak, D., Wilhoit, B., Delisle, J., & Booher, J. (2014). Measurement scale influences in the evaluation of sight-word reading interventions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47(2), 360–379. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.126