Assessment of strategy instruction and self-regulation in reading comprehension: A review of the literature

References

• Biancarosa, C., & Snow, C. E. (2006). Reading next—A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York (2nd ed.) Alliance for Excellent Education.
   Google Scholar
• Boardman, A. G., Boelé, A. L., & Klingner, J. K. (2018). Strategy instruction shifts teacher and student interactions during text-based discussions. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(2), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briesch, A. M., & Chafouleas, S. M. (2009). Children’s usage rating profile (actual). University of Connecticut.
   Google Scholar
• Bruning, R. (1985). Review of degress of reading power. In J. V. Mitchell (Ed.), The ninth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 442–444). Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, Y., & Kim, Y. G. (2021). Is retell a valid measure of reading comprehension? Educational Research Review, 32, 100375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Cirino, P. T., Miciak, J., Gerst, E., Barnes, M. A., Vaughn, S., Child, A., & Huston-Warren, E. (2017). Executive function, self-regulated learning, and reading comprehension: A training study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(4), 450–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coob, J. B. (2017). Investigating reading metacognitive strategy awareness of elementary children: A developmental continuum emerges. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 31, 401–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council for Exceptional Children. (2014). Council for Exceptional Children standards for evidence-based practices in special education. https://www.cec.sped.org/∼/media/Files/Standards/Evidence%20based%20Practices%20and%20Practice/EBP%20FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cranney, A. G. (1972). The construction of two types of cloze reading tests for college students. Journal of Reading Behavior, 5(1), 60–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862967209547022
   Google Scholar
• *Ennis, R. P. (2016). Using self-regulated strategy development to help high school students with EBD summarize informational text in social studies. Education and Treatment of Children, 39(4), 545–568. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2016.0024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Maxwell, L. (1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education, 9(2), 0–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258800900206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garwood, J. D. (2018). Literacy interventions for secondary students formally identified with emotional and behavioral disorders: Trends and gaps in the research. Journal of Behavioral Education, 27(1), 23–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-017-9278-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garwood, J. D., Werts, M. G., Mason, L. H., Harris, B., Austin, M. B., Ciullo, S., Magner, K. M., Koppenhaver, D. A., & Shin, M. (2019). Improving persuasive science writing for secondary students with emotional and behavioral disorders educated in residential treatment facilities. Behavioral Disorders, 44(4), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742918809341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaumer Erickson, A. S., & Noonan, P. M. (2018). Self-regulation formative questionnaire. In A. S. Gaumer Erickson & P. M. Noonan (Eds.), The skills that matter: Teaching interpersonal and intrapersonal competencies in any classroom (pp. 177–178). Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 279–320. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071002279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2018). An examination of the design principles underlying a self- regulated strategy development study. Journal of Writing Research, 10(2), 139–187. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2018.10.02.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Reid, R. (1992). Developing self-regulated learners. Focus on Exceptional Children, 24(6), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.17161/foec.v24i6.7539
   Google Scholar
• *Graham, L., & Wong, B. Y. L. (1993). Comparing two modes of teaching a question-answering strategy for enhancing reading comprehension: Didactic and self-instructional training. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26(4), 270–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949302600407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutherie, J. T. (1973). Reading comprehension and syntactic responses in good and poor readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 294–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Y., Sun, S., Breit-Smith, A., Morrison, F. J., & Connor, C. M. (2015). Behavioral engagement and reading achievement in elementary-school-age children: A longitudinal cross-lagged analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 332–347. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hagaman, J. L., Casey, K. J., & Reid, R. (2012). The effects of the paraphrasing strategy on the reading comprehension of younger students. Remedial and Special Education, 33(2), 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510364548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagan-Burke, S., Kwok, O., Zou, Y., Johnson, C., Simmons, D., & Coyne, M. D. (2011). An examination of problem behaviors and reading outcomes in kindergarten students. The Journal of Special Education, 45(3), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466909359425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1999). Programmatic intervention research: Illustrations from the evolution of self-regulated strategy development. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22(4), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hedin, L. R., Mason, L. H., & Gaffney, J. S. (2011). Comprehension strategy instruction for two students with attention-related disabilities. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 55(3), 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2010.499393
   Google Scholar
• Hessels-Schlatter, C., Hessels, M. G. P., Godin, H., & Spillmann-Rojas, H. (2017). Fostering self-regulated learning: From clinical to whole class interventions. Educational and Child Psychology, 34, 110–125.
   Google Scholar
• *Howorth, S., Lopata, C., Thomeer, M., & Rodgers, J. (2016). Effects of the TWA strategy on expository reading comprehension of students with autism. British Journal of Special Education, 43(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff, J. D., & Nietfeld, J. L. (2009). Using strategy instruction and confidence judgments to improve metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and Learning, 4(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-009-9042-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Jitendra, A. K., Hoppes, M. K., & Xin, Y. P. (2000). Enhancing main idea comprehension for students with learning problems: The role of a summarization strategy and self-monitoring instruction. The Journal of Special Education, 34(3), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246690003400302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Johnson, L., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1997). The effects of goal setting and self-instruction on learning a reading comprehension strategy: A study of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(1), 80–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keenan, J. M., & Meenan, C. E. (2014). Test differences in diagnosing reading comprehension deficits. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(2), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412439326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingner, J. K., Vaugh, S., & Boardman, A. (2015). Teaching reading comprehension to students with learning disabilities. Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Loyd, B. H., & Steele, J. L. (1986). Assessment of reading comprehension: A comparison of constructs. Reading Psychology, 7(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/0270271860070102
   Google Scholar
• Marcotte, A. M., & Hintze, J. M. (2009). Incremental and predictive utility of formative assessment methods of reading comprehension. Journal of School Psychology, 47(5), 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2009.04.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mason, L. H., Snyder, K. H., Sukhram, D. P., & Kedem, Y. (2006). TWA + PLANS strategies for expository reading and writing: Effects for nine fourth-grade students. Exceptional Children, 73(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290607300104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1997). Best practices in promoting reading comprehension in students with learning disabilities 1976 to 1996. Remedial and Special Education, 18(4), 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259701800402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maughan, B., Pickles, A., Hagell, A., Rutter, M., & Yule, W. (1996). Reading problems and antisocial behavior. Developmental trends in comorbidity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37(4), 405–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1996.tb01421.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuley, E., Duncan, T., & Tammen, V. V. (1989). Psychometric properties for the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1989.10607413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, D. W., Rosanbalm, K., & Christopoulos, C. (2015). Self-regulation and toxic stress report 4: Implications for programs and practice [OPRE Report # 2016-97]. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• National Association for Educational Progress. (2017). https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implication for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. National Institute of Child Health and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, R., Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. (1989). Combining informal teacher judgment and objective test scores to make cross-classroom reading group placements [Resource Consultant Training Program Research Rep. No. 4]. University of Oregon, College of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., Borkwski, J. G., & Schneider, W. (1989). Good information processing: What it is and how education can promote it. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(8), 857–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90069-4
   Google Scholar
• Reed, D. K., Vaughn, S., & Petscher, Y. (2012). The validity of a holistically scored retell protocol for determining the reading comprehension of middle school students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 35(2), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948711432509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Rogevich, E., & Perin, D. (2008). Effects on science summarization of a reading comprehension intervention for adolescents with behavior and attention disorders. Exceptional Children, 74(2), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290807400201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sanders, S. (2020). Using the self-regulated strategy development framework to teach reading comprehension strategies to elementary students with disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 43(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-020-00009-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sanders, S., Ennis, R. P., & Losinski, M. (2018). Effects of TWA on science text comprehension of students with emotional and behavior disorders in a special day school. Education and Treatment of Children, 41(4), 483–505. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2018.0026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sanders, S., Losinski, M., Ennis, R. P., Lane, J., White, W., & Teagarden, J. (2020). Use of self-regulated strategy development to improve comprehension of elementary students with and at-risk for E/BD. Education and Treatment of Children, 43(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-020-00003-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, S., Losinski, M., Ennis, R. P., White, W., Teagarden, J., & Lane, J. (2019). A meta-analysis of self-regulated strategy development reading interventions to improve the reading comprehension of students with disabilities. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 35(4), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2018.1545616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sanders, S., Jolivette, K., & Harris, C. (2021a). Improving the reading comprehension skills of systems-involved youth: A preliminary investigation of an underserved population. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 36(3), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, S., Jolivette, K., Rollins, L. H., & Shaw, A. (2021b). How to “TRAP” information: A reading comprehension strategy for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Teaching Exceptional Children, 53(6), 450–458. 2https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059920981099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, S., Rollins, L. H., Mason, L. H., Shaw, A., & Jolivette, K. (2021c). Intensification and individualization of self-regulation components within self-regulated strategy development. Intervention in School and Clinic, 56(3), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451220941414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sanders, S., Rollins, L. H., Michael, E., & Jolivette, K. (2022). “TRAP is legit!” Using self-regulated strategy development to teach reading comprehension in a residential treatment facility. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 66(1), 89–98. (https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2021.1972921
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (2005). Commentary on self-regulation in school contexts. Learning and Instruction, 15(2), 173–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2003). Self-regulation and learning. In W. M. Reynolds & G. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 59–78). John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• *Solis, M., Scammacca, N., Barth, A. E., & Roberts, G. J. (2017). Text-based vocabulary intervention training study: Supporting fourth graders with low reading comprehension and learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 15, 103–115.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, K. A. D. (2004). Proof, practice, and promise: Comprehension strategy instruction in the primary grades. Reading Teacher, 57, 598–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, J. M., Schuck, S., Porter, M. M., Carlson, C., Hartman, C. A., Sergeant, J. A., Clevenger, W., Wasdell, M., McCleary, R., Lakes, K., & Wigal, T. (2012). Categorical and dimensional definitions and evaluations of symptoms of ADHD: History of the SNAP and SWAN rating scales. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 10(1), 51–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Troyer, M., Kim, J. S., Hale, E., Wantchekon, K. A., & Armstrong, C. (2019). Relations among intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation, reading amount, and comprehension: A conceptual replication. Reading and Writing, 32(5), 1197–1218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9907-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom intervention strategies. In T. R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Advances in school psychology (Vol. 4., pp. 251–288). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Yakimowski, M. E., Faggella-Luby, M., Kim, Y., & Wei, Y. (2016). Reading achievement in the middle school years: A study investigating growth patterns by high incidence disability. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 21(2), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2016.1147962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1996). Enhancing student academic and health functioning: A self-regulatory perspective. School Psychology Quarterly, 11(1), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar