Effects of targeting reading interventions: Testing a skill-by-treatment interaction in an applied setting

References

• Brown, J. D., & Schmidt, J. (2019). Matching reading data to interventions: A simple tool for elementary educators. Eye on Education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429275234
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K. J., Patrick, K. C., Fields, M. K., & Craig, G. T. (2021). Phonological awareness materials in Utah kindergartens: A case study in the science of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56, S249–S272. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, M. K., Codding, R. S., Boice, C. H., & Lukito, G. (2010). Meta-analysis of acquisition and fluency math interventions with instructional and frustration level skills: Evidence for a skill by treatment interaction. School Psychology Review, 39(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2010.12087791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, M. K., Coolong-Chaffin, M., & Kanive, R. (2017). Addressing academic skills problems. Cognitive therapy with children and adolescents: A casebook for clinical practice., 273–299.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, M. K., Maki, K. E., Brann, K. L., McComas, J. J., & Helman, L. A. (2020). Comparison of reading growth among students with severe reading deficits who received intervention to typically achieving students and students receiving special education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(6), 444–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420918840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, M. K., Maki, E. E., Karich, A. C., Hall, M., McComas, J. J., & Helman, L. (2016). Problem-analysis at tier 2: Using data to find the category of the problem. In S. Jimerson, M. K. Burns, & A. M. VanDerHeyden (Eds.) Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (2nd ed., pp. 293–308). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7568-3_17
   Google Scholar
• Burns, M. K., Riley-Tillman, T. C., & VanDerHeyden, A. M. (2012).  RTI applications: Academic and behavioral interventions.  (Vol. 1). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, M. K., Young, H., McCollom, E. M., Stevens, M. A., & Izumi, J. T. (2022). Predicting intervention effects with pre-intervention measures of decoding: Evidence for a skill-by-treatment interaction with kindergarten and first-grade students. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 45(4), 320–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ, T., L., Davie, J. (2009). Empirical evaluation of read naturally effects: A randomized control trial. University of Minnesota. http://www.readnaturally.com/pdf/UofMnReadNaturallyStudy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., & Katch, L. E. (2004). Beyond the reading wars: Exploring the effect of child-instruction interactions on growth in early reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8(4), 305–336. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0804_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton, C. A. (2012). Response to intervention for reading difficulties in the primary grades: Some answers and lingering questions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(3), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194112442155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton, C. A., Tolar, T. D., Fletcher, J. M., Barth, A. E., Vaughn, S., & Francis, D. J. (2013). Effects of tier 3 intervention for students with persistent reading difficulties and characteristics of inadequate responders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 633–648. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. K., & Bond, J. B. (2016). Research on educational innovations. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Florida Center for Reading Research (2004). Florida Center for Reading Research: Fundations [Report]. http://www.wilsonlanguage.com/wpcontent/uploads/2015/04/FCRR_Fundations_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2005). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Promoting word recognition, fluency, and reading comprehension in young children. The Journal of Special Education, 39(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669050390010401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Malone, A. S. (2017). The taxonomy of intervention intensity. Teaching Exceptional Children, 50(4), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059917703962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Thompson, A., Svenson, E., Yen, L., Al Otaiba, S., & Saenz, L. (2001). Peer-assisted learning strategies in reading: Extensions for kindergarten, first grade, and high school. Remedial and Special Education, 22(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250102200103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Haymond, K., Newman-Gonchar, R., Dimino, J., & Jayanthi, M. (2020). Meta-analysis of the impact of reading interventions for students in the primary grades. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(2), 401–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2019.1689591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, D. H. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Heinemann Educational Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, M. S., & Burns, M. K. (2018). Meta-analysis of targeted small-group reading interventions. Journal of School Psychology, 66, 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S. L. (2011). Jumpstart RTI: Using RTI in your elementary school right now. Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hasbrouck, J. E., Ihnot, C., & Rogers, G. H. (1999). “Read Naturally”: A strategy to increase oral reading fluency. Literacy Research and Instruction, 39(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388079909558310
   Google Scholar
• Heggerty, M. (2017). Phonemic awareness: The skills that they need to help them succeed!. Literacy Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, J. J., & Soltero-González, L. (2018). Educator preparation for developing culturally and linguistically responsive MTSS in rural community elementary schools. Teacher Education and Special Education, 41(3), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406417753689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, D. A. (2019). The phonological awareness screening test (PAST). Available online at https://thepasttest.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, D. A., McInnis, P. J. (n.d). The phonological awareness screening test (PAST): An initial report. https://education.ohio.gov/getattachment/Topics/Learning-in-Ohio/Literacy/Striving-Readers-Comprehensive-Literacy-Grant/Literacy-Academy/4-PAST-Reliability-and-Validity-Data.pdf.aspx?lang=en-US
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, J. R., Deacon, S. H., Bowers, P. N., Izenberg, L., Wade-Woolley, L., & Parrila, R. (2012). Children’s morphological awareness and reading ability. Reading and Writing, 25, 389–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9276-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lervåg, A., & Aukrust, V. G. (2010). Vocabulary knowledge is a critical determinant of the difference in reading comprehension growth between first and second language learners. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 51(5), 612–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02185.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCandliss, B., Beck, I. L., Sandak, R., & Perfetti, C. (2003). Focusing attention on decoding for children with poor reading skills: Design and preliminary tests of the word building intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(1), 75–104. 10.1207/S1532799XSSR0701_05.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMaster, K. L., Van den Broek, P., Espin, C. A., White, M. J., Rapp, D. N., Kendeou, P., Bohn-Gettler, C. M., & Carlson, S. (2012). Making the right connections: Differential effects of reading intervention for subgroups of comprehenders. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(1), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Noell, G. H. (2014). Research examining the relationships among consultation process, treatment integrity, and outcomes. In Handbook of research in school consultation (pp. 335–354). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, D. C., & Burns, M. K. (2014). Using the instructional level as a criterion to target reading interventions. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 30(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2012.702047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PRESS Research Group (2014). Path to reading excellence in school sites intervention manual. Minnesota Center for Reading Research, University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Scholin, S., & Burns, M. K. (2012). Relationship between pre-intervention data and post-intervention reading fluency and growth: A meta-analysis of assessment data for individual students. Psychology in the Schools, 49(2), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21599
   Google Scholar
• Szadokierski, I., Burns, M. K., & McComas, J. J. (2017). Predicting intervention effectiveness from reading accuracy and rate measures through the instructional hierarchy: Evidence for a skill-by-treatment interaction. School Psychology Review, 46(2), 190–200. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toste, J. R., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Gilbert, J. K., Cho, E., … Bouton, B. D. (2014). Understanding unresponsiveness to Tier 2 reading intervention: Exploring the classification and profiles of adequate and inadequate responders in first grade. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(4), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948713518336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, C., & Jones, D. (2010). Response to intervention: Increasing fluency, rate, and accuracy for students at risk for reading failure. National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal, 28(1), 28–47.
   Google Scholar
• Vadasy, P. F., Jenkins, J. R., Antil, L. R., Phillips, N. B., & Pool, K. (1997). The research-to-practice ball game: Classwide peer tutoring. And Teacher Interest, Implementation, and Modifications. Remedial and Special Education, 18(3), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259701800303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadasy, P., Wayne, S., O’Connor, R., Jenkins, J., Pool, K., Firebaugh, M., & Peyton, J. (2005). Sound Partners: A tutoring program in phonics-based early reading. Sopris West Educational Services.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., Murray, C. S., Scammacca, N., Linan-Thompson, S., & Woodruff, A. L. (2009). Response to early reading intervention examining higher and lower responders. Exceptional Children, 75(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290907500203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• What Works Clearinghouse. (2014). Procedures and standards handbook (version 3.0). https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/referenceresources/wwc_procedures_v3_0_ standards_handbook.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. (2017). Wilson Fundations. Overview. http://www.wilsonlanguage.com/programs/fundations/overview/
   Google Scholar
• Wilson Language Training Corporation. (2014). Fundations overview and studies of program effectiveness. http://www.wilsonlanguage.com/wpcontent/uploads/2015/04/Fundations-Overview-and-Studies-of-ProgramEffectiveness.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, S. (2010). Predicting performance on state achievement tests using curriculum-based measurement in reading: A multilevel meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 31(6), 412–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508327463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar