22,109
Views
117
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Integrating who “we” are with what “we” (will not) stand for: A further extension of the Social Identity Model of Collective Action

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 122-160 | Received 08 Sep 2017, Accepted 18 May 2018, Published online: 07 Jun 2018

References

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
  • Becker, J. C., & Tausch, N. (2015). A dynamic model of engagement in normative and non-normative collective action: Psychological antecedents, consequences, and barriers. European Review of Social Psychology, 26, 43–92.
  • Becker, J. C., Tausch, N., & Wagner, U. (2011). Emotional consequences of collective action participation: Differentiating self-directed from out-group-directed emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1587–1598.
  • Becker, J. C., & Wagner, U. (2009). Doing gender differently: The interplay of strength of gender identification and content of gender identity in predicting women’s endorsement of sexist beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 487–508.
  • Cakal, H., Hewstone, M., Schwär, G., & Heath, A. (2011). An investigation of the social identity model of collective action and the ‘sedative’ effect of intergroup contact among black and white students in South Africa. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 606–627.
  • CESCR—Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. (2002). General comment no. 15. The right to water. New York, NY: UN Economic and Social Council.
  • Cohen-Chen, S., & Van Zomeren, M. (2018). Yes we can? Group efficacy beliefs predict collective action, but only when hope is high. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 77, 50–59.
  • Cohrs, J. C., Maes, J., Moschner, B., & Kielmann, S. (2007). Determinants of human rights attitudes and behaviour: A comparison and integration of psychological perspectives. Political Psychology, 28, 441–469.
  • Cross, W. E. (1971). Toward a psychology of Black liberation: The Negro-to-Black conversion experience. Black World, 20(9), 13–27.
  • Dost, B., & Kraaijpoel, D. (2013). The august 16, 2012 earthquake near Huizinge, Groningen. KNMI, de Bildt. Retrieved 2014, April 4, from http://www.archieven.nl/nl/zoeken?mivast=0&mizig=210&miadt=5&miaet=14&micode=1957&minr=7893705&miview=inv2&milang=nl
  • Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (1998). On the nature of contemporary prejudice: The causes, consequences, and challenges of aversive racism. In J. L. Eberhardt & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Confronting racism: The problem and the response (pp. 3–32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2005). Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 35–58.
  • Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2009). Collective psychological empowerment as a model of social change: Researching crowds and power. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 707–725.
  • Duncan, L. E. (2012). The psychology of collective action. In K. Deaux & M. Snyder (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 781–803). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Ellemers, N., Pagliaro, S., Barreto, M., & Leach, C. W. (2008). Is it better to be moral than smart? The effects of morality and competence norms on the decision to work at group status improvement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1397.
  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77–83.
  • Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 1–26.
  • Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Goldenberg, A., Halperin, E., van Zomeren, M., & Gross, J. J. (2016). The process model of group-based emotion: Integrating intergroup emotion and emotion regulation perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20(2), 118–141.
  • Guy, A. (2011). Vocational choice and attitudes towards welfare policy. British Journal of Social Work, 41, 1321–1339.
  • Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. I. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121–140.
  • Hornsey, M. J., Blackwood, L., Louis, W., Fielding, K., Mavor, K., Morton, T., … White, K. M. (2006). Why do people engage in collective action? Revisiting the role of perceived effectiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 1701–1722.
  • Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Klandermans, P. G. (2014). Identity politics and politicized identities: Identity processes and the dynamics of protest. Political Psychology, 35, 1–22.
  • Klavina, L., & Van Zomeren, M. (2018). Collective action to protect us or them? Testing the Social Identity Model of Collective Action in Three-Group Contexts. Manuscript under review.
  • Kutlaca, M., van Zomeren, M., & Epstude, K. (2017). Our right to a steady ground: Perceived rights violations motivate collective action against human-caused earthquakes. Environment and Behavior. doi:10.1177/0013916517747658
  • Kutlaca, M., Van Zomeren, M., & Epstude, K. (2016). Preaching to, or beyond, the choir: The politicizing effects of fitting value-identity communication in ideologically heterogeneous groups. Social Psychology, 47, 15–28.
  • Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234–249.
  • Livingstone, A. G. (2014). Why the psychology of collective action requires qualitative transformation as well as quantitative change. Contemporary Social Science, 9, 121–134.
  • Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and Power. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • Maio, G. R. (2010). Mental representations of social values. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 1–43.
  • Maio, G. R., Hahn, U., Frost, J., & Cheung, W. (2009). Applying the value of equality unequally: Effects of value instantiations that vary in typicality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 598–614.
  • Mazzoni, D., Van Zomeren, M., & Cicognani, E. (2015). The motivating role of perceived right violation and efficacy beliefs in identification with the Italian Water Movement. Political Psychology, 36, 315–330.
  • McGarty, C., Bliuc, A. M., Thomas, E. F., & Bongiorno, R. (2009). Collective action as the material expression of opinion‐based group membership. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 839–857.
  • Merritt, A. C., Effron, D. A., & Monin, B. (2010). Moral self‐licensing: When being good frees us to be bad. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 344–357.
  • Mummendey, A., Kessler, T., Klink, A., & Mielke, R. (1999). Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 229–245.
  • Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Olson, M. (1967). The logic of collective action. In Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.
  • Reynolds, K. J., Bizumic, B., Subasic, E., Turner, J. C., Branscombe, N., Mavor, K. I., & Batalha, L. (2012). Social identity and personality processes: Non‐aboriginal Australian identity and neuroticism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 252–262.
  • Sabucedo, J.-M., Dono, M., Alzate, M., & Seoane, G. (2018). The importance of protesters’ morals: Moral obligation as a key variable to understand collective action. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 418.
  • Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (2001). Value hierarchies across cultures: Taking a similarities perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 268–290.
  • Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., & Vecchione, M. (2010). Basic personal values, core political values, and voting: A longitudinal analysis. Political Psychology, 31, 421–452.
  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 25 (pp. 1–65). San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
  • Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56, 319–331.
  • Simon, B., Loewy, M., StüRmer, S., Weber, U., Freytag, P., Habig, C., … Spahlinger, P. (1998). Collective identification and social movement participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 646–658.
  • Simon, B., & Ruhs, D. (2008). Identity and politicization among Turkish migrants in Germany: The role of dual identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1354–1366.
  • Skitka, L. J. (2002). Do the means always justify the ends, or do the ends sometimes justify the means? A value protection model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 588–597.
  • Skitka, L. J. (2010). The psychology of moral conviction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 267–281.
  • Skitka, L. J., & Bauman, C. W. (2008). Moral conviction and political engagement. Political Psychology, 29, 29–54.
  • Skitka, L. J., & Mullen, E. (2002). Understanding judgments of fairness in a real-world political context: A test of the value protection model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1419–1429.
  • Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Jr, Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51, 464–481. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095581
  • Staerklé, C., & Clémence, A. (2004). Why people are committed to human rights and still tolerate their violation: A contextual analysis of the principle–Application gap. Social Justice Research, 17, 389–406.
  • StüRmer, S., & Simon, B. (2004). Collective action: Towards a dual-pathway model. European Review of Social Psychology, 15, 59–99.
  • Subašić, E., & Reynolds, K. J. (2009). Beyond “practical” reconciliation: Intergroup inequality and the meaning of non-indigenous Identity. Political Psychology, 30, 243–267.
  • Subašić, E., Reynolds, K. J., & Turner, J. C. (2008). The political solidarity model of social change: Dynamics of self-categorization in intergroup power relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 330–352.
  • Tabri, N., & Conway, M. (2011). Negative expectancies for the group’s outcomes undermine normative collective action: Conflict between Christian and Muslim groups in Lebanon. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 649–669.
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Tausch, N., Becker, J. C., Spears, R., Christ, O., Saab, R., Singh, P., & Siddiqui, R. N. (2011). Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 129–148.
  • Tetlock, P. E. (2002). Social functionalist frameworks for judgment and choice: Intuitive politicians, theologians, and prosecutors. Psychological Review, 109, 451–471.
  • Tetlock, P. E., Kirstel, O. V., Elson, S. B., Green, M. C., & Lerner, J. S. (2000). The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates and heretic counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 853–870.
  • Thomas, E. F., Mavor, K. I., & McGarty, C. (2012). Social identities facilitate and encapsulate action-relevant constructs: A test of the social identity model of collective action. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 15, 75–88.
  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorisation perspective. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Turner-Zwinkels, F. M. (2018). It’s not us, it’s them! How politicized and oppositional identity content impacted empathy and collective action in the US Presidential elections. Manuscript under review.
  • Turner-Zwinkels, F. M., Van Zomeren, M., & Postmes, T. (2015). Politicization during the 2012 U.S. Presidential elections: Bridging the personal and the political through an identity content approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 433–445.
  • Turner-Zwinkels, F. M., Van Zomeren, M., & Postmes, T. (2017). The moral dimension of politicized identity: Exploring identity content during the 2012 Presidential Elections in the USA. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56(2), 416–436.
  • Van der Voort, N., & Vanclay, F. (2015). Social impacts of earthquakes caused by gas extraction in the Province of Groningen, The Netherlands. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 50, 1–15.
  • Van Stekelenburg, J., Klandermans, B., & Van Dijk, W. W. (2009). Context matters: Explaining how and why mobilizing context influences motivational dynamics. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 815–838.
  • Van Zomeren, M. (2013). Four core social-psychological motivations to undertake collective action. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 378–388.
  • Van Zomeren, M. (2015). Collective action as relational interaction: A new relational hypothesis on how non-activists become activists. New Ideas in Psychology, 39, 1–11.
  • Van Zomeren, M. (2016a). Building a tower of Babel? Integrating core motivations and features of the social structure in the political psychology of political action. Advances in Political Psychology, 37, 1–28.
  • Van Zomeren, M. (2016b). From self to social relationships: An essentially relational perspective on human motivation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Van Zomeren, M., Leach, C. W., & Spears, R. (2010). Does group efficacy increase group identification? Resolving their paradoxical relationship. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1055–1060.
  • Van Zomeren, M., & Louis, W. R. (2017). Culture meets collective action: Exciting synergies and some lessons to learn for the future. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 20, 277–284.
  • Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative Social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio- psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504–535.
  • Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2012). On conviction`s collective consequences: Integrating moral conviction with a social identity model of collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 52–71.
  • Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Bettache, K. (2011). Can moral convictions motivate the advantaged to challenge social inequality? Extending the social identity model of collective action. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 14, 735–754.
  • Van Zomeren, M., Saguy, T., Mazzoni, D., & Cicognani, E. (in press). The curious, context- dependent case of anger: explaining voting intentions in three different national elections. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
  • van Zomeren, M., Saguy, T., & Schellhaas, F. M. (2013). Believing in “making a difference” to collective efforts: participative efficacy beliefs as a unique predictor of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 618–634.
  • Van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A. H., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 649–664.
  • Wermser, F., Van Zomeren, M., Pliskin, R., & Halperin, E. (2018). Towards a More Comprehensive Social Identity Model of Collective Action: Testing Different Motivational Profiles of Activists and Non-Activists. Unpublished manuscript