Flexibility mindsets: Reducing biases that result from spontaneous processing

References

• Amodio, D. M. (2014). The neuroscience of prejudice and stereotyping. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 15(10), 670–682. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35(1), 124–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(85)90049-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamber, D. (1969). Reaction times and error rates for “same”-“different” judgments of multidimensional stimull. Perception & Psychophysics, 6(3), 169–174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. A. (1999). The cognitive monster: The case against the controllability of automatic stereotype effects. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 361–382). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bar-Tal, D., Sharvit, K., Halperin, E., & Zafran, A. (2012). Ethos of conflict: The concept and its measurement. Peace and Conflict, 18(1), 40–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026860
   Google Scholar
• Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (2011). Co-opetition. Crown Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67(6), 380–400. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, S. H., Higgins, D. M., & Peterson, J. B. (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 499–506. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. G. Press (ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, R. J., & Turner, R. N. (2011). Cognitive adaptation to the experience of social and cultural diversity. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 242–266. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.2675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A., & Baas, M. (2011). Behavioral activation links to creativity because of increased cognitive flexibility. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(1), 72–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610381789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhont, K., & van Hiel, A. (2011). Direct contact and authoritarianism as moderators between extended contact and reduced prejudice: Lower threat and greater trust as mediators. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 14(2), 223–237. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210391121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditrich, L., Landkammer, F., & Sassenberg, K. (2019). What if my colleague was wrong and I was right? The impact of counterfactual mindsets and interpersonal focus on written communication and decision making in a hidden profile task. Acta Psychologica, 192, 118–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 41–113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80004-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudschig, C., & Kaup, B. (2018). How does “not left” become “right”? Electrophysiological evidence for a dynamic conflict-bound negation processing account. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 44(5), 716–728. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (2017). From needs to goals and representations: Foundations for a unified theory of motivation, personality, and development. Psychological Review, 124(6), 689–719. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernando, J. W., O’Brien, L. V., Burden, N. J., Judge, M., & Kashima, Y. (2020). Greens or space invaders: Prominent utopian themes and effects on social change motivation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(2), 278–291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finke, R. A. (1996). Imagery, creativity, and emergent structure. Consciousness and Cognition, 5(3), 381–393. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.1996.0024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1001–1013. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaither, S. E., Remedios, J. D., Sanchez, D. T., & Sommers, S. R. (2015). Thinking outside the box: Multiple identity mind-sets affect creative problem solving. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(5), 596–603. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614568866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Counterfactuals as behavioral primes: Priming the simulation heuristic and consideration of alternatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(4), 384–409. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galinsky, A. D., Moskowitz, G. B., & Skurnik, I. (2000). Counterfactuals as self-generated primes: The effect of prior counterfactual activation on person perception judgments. Social Cognition, 18(3), 252–280. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2000.18.3.252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Why Heuristics Work. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00058.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gocłowska, M. A., Baas, M., Crisp, R. J., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2014). Whether social schema violations help or hurt creativity depends on need for structure. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(8), 959–971. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214533132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gocłowska, M. A., & Crisp, R. J. (2013). On counter-stereotypes and creative cognition: When interventions for reducing prejudice can boost divergent thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8(1), 72–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer, P. M., Heckhausen, H., & Steller, B. (1990). Deliberative and implemental mind-sets: Cognitive tuning toward congruous thoughts and information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1119–1127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.59.6.1119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greitemeyer, T., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2003). Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: Beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.84.2.322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameiri, B., Bar-Tal, D., & Halperin, E. (2019). Paradoxical thinking interventions: A paradigm for societal change. Social Issues and Policy Review, 13(1), 36–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameiri, B., Nabet, E., Bar-Tal, D., & Halperin, E. (2018). Paradoxical thinking as a conflict-resolution intervention: Comparison to alternative interventions and examination of psychological mechanisms. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(1), 122–139. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217736048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameiri, B., Porat, R., Bar-Tal, D., Bieler, A., & Halperin, E. (2014). Paradoxical thinking as a new avenue of intervention to promote peace. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(30), 10996–11001. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1407055111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T., & Higgins. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280–1300. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kaup, B., Lüdtke, J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2007). The experimental view of language comprehension: How is negation represented? In F. Schmalhofer & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Higher level language processes in the brain. inference and comprehension processes (pp. 255–288). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kleiman, T., & Enisman, M. (2018). The conflict mindset: How internal conflicts affect self‐regulation. Scoial and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(5), e12387. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleiman, T., & Hassin, R. R. (2013). When conflicts are good: Nonconscious goal conflicts reduce confirmatory thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(3), 374–387. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleiman, T., Hassin, R. R., & Trope, Y. (2014). The control-freak mind: Stereotypical biases are eliminated following conflict-activated cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 143(2), 498–503. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleiman, T., Stern, C., & Trope, Y. (2016). When the spatial and ideological collide: Metaphorical conflict shapes social perception. Psychological Science, 27(3), 375–383. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615624029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knab, N., Winter, K., & Steffens, M. C. (2021). Flexing the extremes: Increasing cognitive flexibility with a paradoxical leading questions intervention. Social Cognition, 39(2), 225–242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2021.39.2.225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kray, L. J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2003). The debiasing effect of counterfactual mind-sets: Increasing the search for disconfirmatory information in group decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00534-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kray, L. J., Galinsky, A. D., & Wong, E. M. (2006). Thinking within the box: The relational processing style elicited by counterfactual mind-sets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanaj, K., Daisy Chang, C. H., & Johnson, R. E. (2012). Regulatory focus and work-related outcomes: A review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(5), 998–1034. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landkammer, F., & Sassenberg, K. (2016). Competing while cooperating with the same others: The consequences of conflicting demands in co-opetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 145(12), 1670–1686. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landkammer, F., Winter, K., Thiel, A., & Sassenberg, K. (2019). Team sports off the field: Competing excludes cooperating for individual but not for team athletes. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02470
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leung, A. K. Y., Maddux, W. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Chiu, C. (2008). Multicultural experience enhances creativity. American Psychologist, 63(3), 169–181. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman, N., Idson, L. C., Camacho, C. J., & Higgins, E. T. (1999). Promotion and prevention choices between stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1135–1145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liljenquist, K. A., Galinsky, A. D., & Kray, L. J. (2004). Exploring the rabbit hole of possibilities by myself or with my group: The benefits and liabilities of activating counterfactual mind-sets for information sharing and group coordination. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17(4), 263–279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macrae, C. N., Milne, A. B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (1994). Stereotypes as energy-saving devices: A peek inside the cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markman, K. D., Lindberg, M. J., Kray, L. J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2007). Implications of counterfactual structure for creative generation and analytical problem solving. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 312–324. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206296106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, R. L., Bink, M. L., & Hicks, J. L. (1999). Conceptual priming in a generative problem-solving task. Memory & Cognition, 27(2), 355–363. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, R. L., Landau, J. D., & Hicks, J. L. (1996). How examples may (and may not) constrain creativity. Memory & Cognition, 24(5), 669–680. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, R. L., Ward, T. B., & Landau, J. D. (1999). The inadvertent use of prior knowledge in a generative cognitive task. Memory & Cognition, 27(1), 94–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, P. L., Baron, R. S., Marti, M. W., & Yoon, K. (1997). The eyes have it: Minority influence in face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(5), 706–718. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.82.5.706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220–232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molden, D. C., & Hui, C. M. (2011). Promoting de-escalation of commitment: A regulatory-focus perspective on sunk costs. Psychological Science, 22(1), 8–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610390386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskowitz, G.B., & Vitriol, J.A. (2022). A social cognition model of bias reduction. In A. Nordstrom & W. Goodfriend (Eds.), Innovative stigma and discrimination reduction programs (pp. 1–39). Oxon, UK: Taylor and Francis
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
   Google Scholar
• Noor, M., Brown, R. J., & Prentice, G. (2008). Precursors and mediators of intergroup reconciliation in Northern Ireland: A new model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(3), 481–495. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1348/014466607X238751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. R., Kilduff, G. J., Galinsky, A. D., & Sivanathan, N. (2013). From glue to gasoline: How competition turns perspective takers unethical. Psychological Science, 24(10), 1986–1994. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613482144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees, L., Rothman, N. B., Lehavy, R., & Sanchez-Burks, J. (2013). The ambivalent mind can be a wise mind: Emotional ambivalence increases judgment accuracy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 360–367. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roese, N. J., & Epstude, K. (2017). The functional theory of counterfactual thinking: New evidence, new challenges, new insights. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 1–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2017.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 104(3), 192–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, N. B., & Melwani, S. (2017). Feeling mixed, ambivalent, and in flux: The social functions of emotional complexity for leaders. Academy of Management Review, 42(2), 259–282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. C., Stoltzfus, E. R., & Wall, K. L. (1991). The abstraction of form in semantic categories. Memory & Cognition, 19(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassenberg, K., Kessler, T., & Mummendey, A. (2003). Less negative = more positive? Social discrimination as avoidance or approach. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00519-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassenberg, K., Landkammer, F., & Jacoby, J. (2014). The influence of regulatory focus and group vs. individual goals on the evaluation bias in the context of group decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 153–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassenberg, K., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2005). Don’t stereotype, think different! Overcoming automatic stereotype activation by mindset priming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(5), 506–514. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassenberg, K., Moskowitz, G. B., Fetterman, A., & Kessler, T. (2017). Priming creativity as a strategy to increase creative performance by facilitating the activation and use of remote associations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 128–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassenberg, K., Moskowitz, G. B., Jacoby, J., & Hansen, N. (2007). The carry-over effect of competition: The impact of competition on prejudice towards uninvolved outgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(4), 529–538. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz-Hardt, S., Brodbeck, F. C., Mojzisch, A., Kerschreiter, R., & Frey, D. (2006). Group decision making in hidden profile situations: Dissent as a facilitator for decision quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 1080–1093. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibt, B., & Förster, J. (2004). Stereotype threat and performance: How self-stereotypes influence processing by inducing regulatory foci. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(1), 38–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, J. Y., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2002). Priming against your will: How accessible alternatives affect goal pursuit. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(4), 368–383. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00005-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (1999). Creativity as blind variation and selective retention: Is the creative process Darwinian? Psychological Inquiry, 10(4), 309–328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1004_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Schumacher, J. S. (1993). Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task. Memory & Cognition, 21(6), 837–845. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 1467–1478. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinel, W., Utz, S., & Koning, L. (2010). The good, the bad and the ugly thing to do when sharing information: Revealing, concealing and lying depend on social motivation, distribution and importance of information. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113(2), 85–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, C., & Kleiman, T. (2015). Know thy outgroup: Promoting accurate judgments of political attitude differences through a conflict mindset. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(8), 950–958. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615596209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 220–247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadmor, C. T., Galinsky, A. D., & Maddux, W. W. (2012). Getting the most out of living abroad: Biculturalism and integrative complexity as key drivers of creative and professional success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(3), 520–542. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Shafir, E. (1992). The disjunction effect in choice under uncertainty. Psychological Science, 3(5), 305–309. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00678.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008–1022. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasiljevic, M., Crisp, R. J., & Avenanti, A. (2013). Tolerance by surprise: Evidence for a generalized reduction in prejudice and increased egalitarianism through novel category combination. PLoS ONE, 8(3), e57106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, D., Hagger, M. S., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2020). Ironic effects of thought suppression: A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(3), 778–793. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619898795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, R., & Crocker, J. (1983). Cognitive processes in the revision of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(5), 961–977. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.5.961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101(1), 34–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.101.1.34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisberg, R. W. (1999). Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 226–250). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, K., Scholl, A., & Sassenberg, K. (2021a). A matter of flexibility: Changing outgroup attitudes through messages with negations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(4), 956–976. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, K., Scholl, A., & Sassenberg, K. (2021b). Flexible minds make more moderate views: Subtractive counterfactuals mitigate strong views about immigrants’ trustworthiness. Unpublished Manuscript. Leibniz-Institut Für Wissensmedien.
   Google Scholar
• Wittenbrink, B., Correll, J., & Ma, D. S. (2019). Implicit Prejudice. In K. Sassenberg & M. L. W. Vliek (Eds.), Social Psychology in Action (pp. 163–177). Springer.
   Google Scholar