Collectively constructing gender-inclusive work cultures in STEM

References

• Abrams, D., Crisp, R. J., Marques, S., Fagg, E., Bedford, L., & Provias, D. (2008). Threat inoculation: Experienced and imagined intergenerational contact prevents stereotype threat effects on older people’s math performance. Psychology and Aging, 23(4), 934. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfadhli, K., Drury, J., Drury, J., & Drury, J. (2019). The role of emergent shared identity in psychosocial support among refugees of conflict in developing countries. International Review of Social Psychology, 32(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apfelbaum, E. P., Stephens, N. M., & Reagans, R. E. (2016). Beyond one-size-fits-all: Tailoring diversity approaches to the representation of social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(4), 547. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronson, J., & Dee, T. (2012). Stereotype threat in the real world stereotype threat. T. Schmader & M. Inzlicht ed., Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732449.003.0017
   Google Scholar
• Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow, (Ed.), Groups, Leadership, and Men, 177–190.
   Google Scholar
• Asgari, S., Dasgupta, N., & Cote, N. G. (2010). When does contact with successful ingroup members change self-stereotypes. Social Psychology, 41(3), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atran, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2004). Religion’s evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(6), 713–730. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X04000172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakshy, E., Rosenn, I., Marlow, C., & Adamic, L. (2012). The role of social networks in information diffusion. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web (WWW '12) (pp. 519–528). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2187836.2187907
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., & McClelland, D. C. (1977). Social learning theory (pp. 1). Englewood Cliffs Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Barling, J., & Phillips, M. (1993). Interactional, formal, and distributive justice in the workplace: An exploratory study. The Journal of Psychology, 127(6), 649–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1993.9914904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, A. S., Schmader, T., Cvencek, D., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2014). The gendered self-concept: How implicit gender stereotypes and attitudes shape self-definition. In Leman, P. J., Tenenbaum, H. R. (Eds.), Gender and Development (pp. 109–132). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
   Google Scholar
• Belmore, S. M., & Hubbard, M. L. (1987). The role of advance expectancies in person memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berdahl, J. L. (2007). The sexual harassment of uppity women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 425. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergsieker, H. B., Shelton, J. N., & Richeson, J. A. (2010). To be liked versus respected: Divergent goals in interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(2), 248–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettencourt, L. A., & Brown, S. W. (1997). Contact employees: Relationships among workplace fairness, job satisfaction and prosocial service behaviors. Journal of Retailing, 73(1), 39–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(97)90014-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, K., Hall, W. M., Schmader, T., Inness, M., & Croft, E. (2018). Should I stay or should I go? Women’s implicit stereotypic associations predict their commitment and fit in STEM. Social Psychology, 49(4), 243. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S., & Janicik, G. A. (1996). Social contagion and social structure. In D. Iacobucci (Ed.), Networks in Marketing (pp. 32–49). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830030103
   Google Scholar
• Carli, L. L. (1990). Gender, language, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 941. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casad, B. J., & Bryant, W. J. (2016). Addressing stereotype threat is critical to diversity and inclusion in organizational psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 8–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, E. H., Milkman, K. L., Gromet, D. M., Rebele, R. W., Massey, C., Duckworth, A. L., & Grant, A. M. (2019). The mixed effects of online diversity training. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(16), 7778–7783. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1816076116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlesworth, T. E. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2019a). Gender in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Issues, causes, solutions. Journal of Neuroscience, 39(37), 7228–7243. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0475-18.2019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlesworth, T. E. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2019b). Patterns of implicit and explicit attitudes: I. Long-term change and stability from 2007 to 2016. Psychological Science, 30(2), 174–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618813087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheryan, S., & Markus, H. R. (2020). Masculine defaults: Identifying and mitigating hidden cultural biases. Psychological Review, 127(6), 1022. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others. Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chudek, M., Heller, S., Birch, S., & Henrich, J. (2012). Prestige-biased cultural learning: Bystander’s differential attention to potential models influences children’s learning. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chudek, M., & Henrich, J. (2011). Culture–gene coevolution, norm-psychology and the emergence of human prosociality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(5), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B. (1993). The psychology of persuasion. New York.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(4), 105–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. (Vol. 24, pp. 201–234). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, C. J. (2020). Punks, bulldaggers, and welfare queens: The radical potential of queer politics. In Black Queer Studies (pp. 21–51). Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822387220-004
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. L., & Garcia, J. (2008). Identity, belonging, and achievement: A model, interventions, implications. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(6), 365–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00607.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. The American Psychologist, 64(3), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conger, K. (2021). Hundreds of google employees unionize, culminating years of activism. New York Times[online]. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/04/technology/google-employees-union.html
   Google Scholar
• Conway, L. G.,sIII, & Schaller, M. (2007). How communication shapes culture. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Social Communication (pp. 107–127). New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, H., & Patall, E. A. (2009). The relative benefits of Meta-Analysis conducted with individual participant data versus aggregated data. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortina, L. M. (2008). Unseen injustice: Incivility as modern discrimination in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.27745097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crandall, C. S., & Eshleman, A. (2003). A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 414. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
   Google Scholar
• Cvencek, D., Brečić, R., Gaćeša, D., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2021). Development of math attitudes and math Self-Concepts: Gender differences, Implicit–Explicit dissociations, and relations to math achievement. Child Development, 92(5), e940–e956. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyr, E. N., Bergsieker, H. B., Dennehy, T. C., & Schmader, T. (2021). Mapping social exclusion in STEM to men’s implicit bias and women’s career costs. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 118(40), 1. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2026308118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danbold, F., & Huo, Y. J. (2017). Men’s defense of their prototypicality undermines the success of women in STEM initiatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dannals, J. E., Reit, E. S., & Miller, D. T. (2020). From whom do we learn group norms? Low-ranking group members are perceived as the best sources. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, N., Scircle, M. M., & Hunsinger, M. (2015). Female peers in small work groups enhance women’s motivation, verbal participation, and career aspirations in engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(16), 4988–4993. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1422822112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Souza, L., & Schmader, T. (2021). The misjudgment of men: Does pluralistic ignorance inhibit allyship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(2), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, P. G., Forscher, P. S., Austin, A. J., & Cox, W. T. L. (2012). Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(6), 1267–1278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekman, A. B., Steinberg, M., Brown, E. R., Belanger, A. L., & Clark, E. K. (2017). A goal congruity model of role entry, engagement, and exit: Understanding communal goal processes in STEM gender gaps. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(2), 142–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316642141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbin, F., & Kalev, A. (2015). Why firms need diversity managers and task forces. In A. Forsyth, H. Sheikh, & F. Sperotti (Eds.), How Global Migration Changes the Workforce Diversity Equation (pp. 170–198). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dover, T. L., Kaiser, C. R., & Major, B. (2020). Mixed signals: The unintended effects of diversity initiatives. Social Issues and Policy Review, 14(1), 152–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., & Gaertner, S. L. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 62. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drury, J., Carter, H., Cocking, C., Ntontis, E., Tekin Guven, S., & Amlôt, R. (2019). Facilitating collective psychosocial resilience in the public in emergencies: Twelve recommendations based on the social identity approach. Frontiers in Public Health, 7, 141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H. (2016). When passionate advocates meet research on diversity, does the honest broker stand a chance. Journal of Social Issues, 72(1), 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddleston, K. A., Baldridge, D. C., & Veiga, J. F. (2004). Toward modeling the predictors of managerial career success: Does gender matter. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(4), 360–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940410537936
   Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N. (2018). Gender Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 275–298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N., & Rink, F. (2016). Diversity in work groups. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, K. T. U., & Murphy, M. C. (2014). Identity threat at work: How social identity threat and situational cues contribute to racial and ethnic disparities in the workplace. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20(4), 508. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Institute for Gender Equality. (2017). How gender equality in STEM education leads to economic growth. European Institute for Gender Equality.
   Google Scholar
• Expert Panel on Innovation. (2009). Innovation and business strategy: Why Canada falls short. Council of Canadian Academies.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, L., Petzel, Z. W., McCormack, T., Turner, R. N., Rafferty, K., & Latu, I. M. (2021). When you put it that way: Framing gender equality initiatives to improve engagement among STEM academics. Bioscience, 71(3), 292–304. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaa136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farris, G. F. (1971). A predictive study of turnover. Personnel Psychology, 24(2), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1971.tb02479.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. Stanford University Press. Oxford, UK: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Fiol, C. M., Pratt, M. G., & O’Connor, E. J. (2009). Managing Intractable Identity Conflicts. Academy of Management Review, 34(1), 32–55. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.35713276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flood, M., Dragiewicz, M., & Pease, B. (2021). Resistance and backlash to gender equality. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes, C. E., Cox, C. L., Schmader, T., & Ryan, L. (2012). Negative stereotype activation alters interaction between neural correlates of arousal, inhibition and cognitive control. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(7), 771–781. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes, C. E., & Schmader, T. (2010). Retraining attitudes and stereotypes to affect motivation and cognitive capacity under stereotype threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 740. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouad, N. A., Chang, W.-H., Wan, M., & Singh, R. (2017). Women’s reasons for leaving the engineering field. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, J. L., Birsky, J., & Cavoukian, A. (1980). Environmental determinants of behavioral contagion: density and number. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1(2), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp0102_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, F. X., Etcheverry, P. E., Stock, M. L., Gerrard, M., Weng, C.-Y., Kiviniemi, M., & O’Hara, R. E. (2010). Exploring the link between racial discrimination and substance use: What mediates? What buffers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 785–801. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gino, F., Wilmuth, C. A., & Brooks, A. W. (2015). Compared to men, women view professional advancement as equally attainable, but less desirable. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(40), 12354–12359. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1502567112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goff, P. A., Steele, C. M., & Davies, P. G. (2008). The space between us: Stereotype threat and distance in interracial contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(1), 91. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 393–417. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24351328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, T. K., & Kalev, A. (2008). Discrimination-Reducing measures at the relational level. The Hastings Law Journal, 59(6), 1423.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G. (1981). Self and Memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 201–236). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2017). The implicit revolution: Reconceiving the relation between conscious and unconscious. American Psychologist, 72(9), 861–871. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, W., Schmader, T., Aday, A., & Croft, E. (2019). Decoding the dynamics of social identity threat in the workplace: A Within-Person analysis of women’s and men’s interactions in STEM. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(4), 542–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618772582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, W., Schmader, T., Aday, A., Inness, M., & Croft, E. (2018). Climate control: The relationship between social identity threat and cues to an identity-safe culture. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(3), 446. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, W. M., Schmader, T., & Croft, E. (2015). Engineering exchanges: Daily social identity threat predicts burnout among female engineers. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(5), 528–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615572637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, W. M., Schmader, T., Inness, M., & Croft, E. (2021). Climate change: An increase in norms for inclusion predicts greater fit and commitment for women in STEM. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 136843022110354. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211035438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. (2007). Identity entrepreneurship and the consequences of identity failure: The dynamics of leadership in the BBC prison study. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70(2), 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250707000204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J. (2015). Leadership: Theory and practice. In P. R. Shaver, J. F. Dovidio, M. Mikulincer & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), APA Handbooks in Psychology, volume 2: Group processes (pp. 67–94). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14342-003
   Google Scholar
• He, J. C., Agarwal, G., & Kang, S. K. (2022). Applying behavioral insights to cultivate diversity and inclusion. In N. Mazar & D. Soman (Eds.), Behavioral science in the wild. Rotman-UTP Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., & Stathatos, P. (1997). The affirmative action stigma of incompetence: Effects of performance information ambiguity. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 603–625. https://doi.org/10.2307/257055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekman, D. R., Johnson, S. K., Foo, M.-D., & Yang, W. (2016). Does Diversity-Valuing behavior result in diminished performance ratings for Non-White and female leaders. Academy of Management Journal, 60(2), 771–797. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helms, J. E., Jernigan, M., & Mascher, J. (2005). The meaning of race in psychology and how to change it: A methodological perspective. The American Psychologist, 60(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.1.27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich, J. (2009). The evolution of costly displays, cooperation and religion. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(4), 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich, J. (2015). The Secret of Our Success. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, M. C., & Kram, K. E. (2001). Reconceptualizing mentoring at work: A developmental network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 264–288. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrand, L. K., Jusuf, C. C., & Monteith, M. J. (2020). Ally confrontations as identity‐safety cues for marginalized individuals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(6), 1318–1333. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hippel, C. V., Issa, M., Ma, R., & Stokes, A. (2011). Stereotype threat: Antecedents and consequences for working women. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, G., Crisp, R. J., Meleady, R., & Earle, M. (2018). Intergroup contact as an agent of cognitive liberalization. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(5), 523–548. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617752324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holleran, S. E., Whitehead, J., Schmader, T., & Mehl, M. R. (2011). Talking shop and shooting the breeze: A study of workplace conversation and job disengagement among STEM faculty. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(1), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610379921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurtado, A. (1989). Relating to privilege: Seduction and rejection in the subordination of white women and women of color. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 14(4), 833–855. https://doi.org/10.1086/494546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarra, H., & Andrews, S. B. (1993). Power, social influence, and sense making: effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(2), 277–303. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inzlicht, M., & Ben-Zeev, T. (2000). A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing Problem-Solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science, 11(5), 365–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A., Turner, R., & Latu, I. M. (2021). Resistance towards increasing gender diversity in masculine domains: The role of intergroup threat. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, C. R., Major, B., Jurcevic, I., Dover, T. L., Brady, L. M., & Shapiro, J. R. (2013). Presumed fair: Ironic effects of organizational diversity structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(3), 504. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, C. R., & Miller, C. T. (2001). Stop complaining! The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(2), 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201272010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, C. R., Vick, S. B., & Major, B. (2006). Prejudice expectations moderate preconscious attention to cues that are threatening to social identity. Psychological Science, 17(4), 332–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01707.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalev, A., Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review, 71(4), 589–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinoski, Z. T., Steele-Johnson, D., Peyton, E. J., Leas, K. A., Steinke, J., & Bowling, N. A. (2013). A meta-analytic evaluation of diversity training outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(8), 1076–1104. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalokerinos, E. K., von Hippel, C., & Zacher, H. (2014). Is stereotype threat a useful construct for organizational psychology research and practice. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7(3), 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/iops.12167
   Google Scholar
• Kay, A. C., & Friesen, J. (2011). On social stability and social change: Understanding when system justification does and does not occur. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(6), 360–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411422059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D. A., Hwong, A. R., Stafford, D., Hughes, D. A., O’Malley, A. J., Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2015). Social network targeting to maximise population behaviour change: A cluster randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 386(9989), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60095-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kincaid, D. L. (2004). From innovation to social norm: Bounded normative influence. Journal of Health Communication, 9(sup1), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730490271511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., & Uchida, Y. (2007). Self as cultural mode of being. In S. Kitayama & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of Cultural Psychology (pp. 136–174). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kopietz, R., Hellmann, J. H., Higgins, E. T., & Echterhoff, G. (2010). Shared-reality effects on memory: Communicating to fulfill epistemic needs. Social Cognition, 28(3), 353–378. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2010.28.3.353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koudenburg, N., Kannegieter, A., Postmes, T., & Kashima, Y. (2020). The subtle spreading of sexist norms. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Kray, L. J., Thompson, L., & Galinsky, A. (2001). Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 942. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroeper, K. M., Williams, H. E., & Murphy, M. C. (2020). Counterfeit diversity: How strategically misrepresenting gender diversity dampens organizations’ perceived sincerity and elevates women’s identity threat concerns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(3), 399–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuchynka, S. L., Bosson, J. K., Vandello, J. A., & Puryear, C. (2018). Zero-Sum thinking and the masculinity contest: perceived intergroup competition and workplace gender bias. Journal of Social Issues, 74(3), 529–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z., Davies, P. G., Adams, B. D., & Spencer, S. J. (2002). The dynamic time course of stereotype activation: Activation, dissipation, and resurrection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latu, I. M., Mast, M. S., & Stewart, T. L. (2015). Gender biases in (Inter) action: The role of interviewers’ and applicants’ implicit and explicit stereotypes in predicting women’s job interview outcomes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39(4), 539–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315577383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie, S.-J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347(6219), 262–265. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, K., & Frontiers in Group Dynamics: II. (1947). Channels of group life; social planning and action research. Human Relations, 1(2), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674700100201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipman, J. (2018). How Diversity Training Infuriates Men and Fails Women. Time. https://time.com/5118035/diversity-training-infuriates-men-fails-women
   Google Scholar
• Logel, C., Walton, G. M., Spencer, S. J., Iserman, E. C., von Hippel, W., & Bell, A. E. (2009). Interacting with sexist men triggers social identity threat among female engineers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(6), 1089–1103. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallett, R. K., Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2008). Expect the unexpected: Failure to anticipate similarities leads to an intergroup forecasting error. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.94.2.265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610375557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, H. R., Steele, C. M., & Steele, D. M. (2000). Colorblindness as a barrier to inclusion: Assimilation and nonimmigrant minorities. Daedalus, 129(4), 233–259. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20027672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 397–422. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. I., Eagly, A. H., & Linn, M. C. (2015). Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 631. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, K. R., Plaut, V. C., & Ybarra, O. (2010). Predicting whether multiculturalism positively or negatively influences white Americans’ intergroup attitudes: The role of ethnic identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(12), 1648–1661. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210386118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16474–16479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. C., & Reeves, S. L. (2019). Personal and organizational mindsets at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 39, 100121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2020.100121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. C., Steele, C. M., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18(10), 879–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. C., & Taylor, V. J. (2012). The role of situational cues in signaling and maintaining stereotype threat. In T. Schmader & M. Inzlicht (Eds.), Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and application (pp. 17–33). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muthukrishna, M., Shulman, B. W., Vasilescu, V., & Henrich, J. (2014). Sociality influences cultural complexity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1774), 20132511. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newson, L., Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2007). Cultural evolution and the shaping of cultural diversity. In S. Kitayama & D. K. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of Cultural Psychology (pp. 454–476). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, C. (2018). The Google walkout offers a playbook for successful corporate protests. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2018/11/2/18054222/google-walkout-protest-success-metoo
   Google Scholar
• Nishii, L. H. (2013). The benefits of climate for inclusion for gender-diverse groups. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6), 1754–1774. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norenzayan, A., Atran, S., Faulkner, J., & Schaller, M. (2006). Memory and mystery: The cultural selection of minimally counterintuitive narratives. Cognitive Science, 30(3), 531–553. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Hansen, J. J., Devos, T., Lindner, N. M., Ranganath, K. A., Smith, C. T., Olson, K. R., Chugh, D., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 18(1), 36–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280701489053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., Bar-Anan, Y., Bergh, R., Cai, H., Gonsalkorale, K., Kesebir, S., Maliszewski, N., Neto, F., Olli, E., Park, J., Schnabel, K., Shiomura, K., Tulbure, B. T., Wiers, R. W., … Greenwald, A. G. (2009). National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10593–10597. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0809921106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ovseiko, P. V., Chapple, A., Edmunds, L. D., & Ziebland, S. (2017). Advancing gender equality through the athena SWAN charter for women in science: An exploratory study of women’s and men’s perceptions. Health Research Policy and Systems, 15(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0177-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paluck, E. L. (2006). Diversity training and intergroup contact: A call to action research. Journal of Social Issues, 62(3), 577–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00474.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paluck, E. L., & Shepherd, H. (2012). The salience of social referents: A field experiment on collective norms and harassment behavior in a school social network. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(6), 899–915. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paluck, E. L., Shepherd, H., & Aronow, P. M. (2016). Changing climates of conflict: A social network experiment in 56 schools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(3), 566–571. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514483113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paluck, E. L., Shepherd, H., & Aronow, P. M. (2018). Correction for Paluck et al., changing climates of conflict: A social network experiment in 56 schools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(15), E3598. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804429115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardal, V., Alger, M., & Latu, I. (2020). Implicit and explicit gender stereotypes at the bargaining table: Male counterparts’ stereotypes predict women’s lower performance in dyadic Face-to-Face negotiations. Sex Roles, 83(5–6), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01112-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, B. K., Vuletich, H. A., & Lundberg, K. B. (2017). The bias of crowds: How implicit bias bridges personal and systemic prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 28(4), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2017.1335568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2015). Emotion and persuasion: Cognitive and meta-cognitive processes impact attitudes. Cognition and Emotion, 29(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.967183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 1–24). New York: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1996). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, K. W., Medin, D., Lee, C. D., Bang, M., Bishop, S., & Lee, D. N. (2014). How diversity works. Scientific American, 311(4), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1014-42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinel, E. C., Long, A. E., Landau, M. J., Alexander, K., & Pyszczynski, T. (2006). Seeing I to I: A pathway to interpersonal connectedness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(2), 243. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinter, B., & Greenwald, A. G. (2004). Exploring implicit partisanship: Enigmatic (But genuine) group identification and attraction. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7(3), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430204046112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitts, D., Marvel, J., & Fernandez, S. (2011). So hard to say goodbye? Turnover intention among U.S. federal employees. Public Administration Review, 71(5), 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02414.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plant, E. A., & Devine, P. G. (2003). The antecedents and implications of interracial anxiety. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(6), 790–801. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029006011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdie-Vaughns, V., Steele, C. M., Davies, P. G., Ditlmann, R., & Crosby, J. R. (2008). Social identity contingencies: How diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2010). Who confronts prejudice? The role of implicit theories in the motivation to confront prejudice. Psychological Science, 21(7), 952–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610374740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2018). What happens after prejudice is confronted in the workplace? how mindsets affect minorities’ and women’s outlook on future social relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(6), 676–687. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Régner, I., Thinus-Blanc, C., Netter, A., Schmader, T., & Huguet, P. (2019). Committees with implicit biases promote fewer women when they do not believe gender bias exists. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(11), 1171–1179. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0686-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richeson, J. A., & Shelton, J. N. (2012). Stereotype threat in interracial interactions. In T. Schmader & M. Inzlicht (Eds.), Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and application (pp. 231–245). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richeson, J. A., & Trawalter, S. (2005). Why do interracial interactions impair executive function? A resource depletion account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(6), 934–947. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimé, B., Mesquita, B., Boca, S., & Philippot, P. (1991). Beyond the emotional event: Six studies on the social sharing of emotion. Cognition & Emotion, 5(5–6), 435–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939108411052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosser, S. V., & Lane, E. O. (2002). Key barriers for academic institutions seeking to retain female scientists and engineers: Family-Unfriendly policies. low numbers, stereotypes, and harassment. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v8.i2.40
   Google Scholar
• Rottmann, C., Sacks, R., & Reeve, D. (2015). Engineering leadership: Grounding leadership theory in engineers’ professional identities. Leadership, 11(3), 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715014543581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvatore, J., & Shelton, J. N. (2007). Cognitive costs of exposure to racial prejudice. Psychological Science, 18(9), 810–815. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01984.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaller, M., Conway, L. G.,sIII, & Tanchuk, T. L. (2002). Selective pressures on the once and future contents of ethnic stereotypes: Effects of the communicability of traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 861. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schein, E. H. (2017). Organizational culture and leadership. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Schmader, T., Bergsieker, H. B., & Hall, W. M. (2020). Cracking the culture code. J. P. Forgas, W. D. Crano, & K. Fiedler, (pp. 334–355). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Forbes, C. (2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115(2), 336. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmader, T., & Sedikides, C. (2018). State authenticity as fit to environment: The implications of social identity for fit, authenticity, and Self-Segregation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(3), 228–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317734080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seron, C., Silbey, S. S., Cech, E., & Rubineau, B. (2016). Persistence is cultural: Professional socialization and the reproduction of sex segregation. Work and Occupations, 43(2), 178–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888415618728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton, J. N., & Richeson, J. A. (2006). Interracial interactions: A relational approach. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 121–181). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38003-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton, J. N., Richeson, J. A., & Salvatore, J. (2005). Expecting to be the target of prejudice: Implications for interethnic interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(9), 1189–1202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205274894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, M., & Uranowitz, S. W. (1980). Reconstructing the past: Some cognitive consequences of person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(9), 941. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.9.941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparkman, G., & Walton, G. M. (2017). Dynamic norms promote sustainable behavior, even if it is counternormative. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1663–1674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617719950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, S. J., Logel, C., & Davies, P. G. (2016). Stereotype threat. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1), 415–437. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-073115-103235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.1373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sriram, N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2009). The brief implicit association test. Experimental Psychology, 56(4), 283. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 379–440). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(02)80009-0
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, N. M., Rivera, L. A., & Townsend, S. S. M. (2020). The cycle of workplace bias and how to interrupt it. Research in Organizational Behavior, 40, 100137. doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2021.100137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, F. G., Plaut, V. C., & Sanchez-Burks, J. (2008). Unlocking the benefits of diversity: All-Inclusive multiculturalism and positive organizational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44(1), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886308314460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subašić, E., Hardacre, S., Elton, B., Branscombe, N. R., Ryan, M. K., & Reynolds, K. J. (2018). “We for she”: Mobilising men and women to act in solidarity for gender equality. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(5), 707–724. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218763272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subašić, E., Reynolds, K. J., Reicher, S. D., & Klandermans, B. (2012). Where to from here for the psychology of social change? Future directions for theory and practice. Political Psychology, 33(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00864.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of inter-group conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of inter-group relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P. E., & Mitchell, G. (2009). Implicit bias and accountability systems: what must organizations do to prevent discrimination. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29, 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2009.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta‐analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46(2), 259–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00874.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Toorn, J., Nail, P. R., Liviatan, I., & Jost, J. T. (2014). My country, right or wrong: Does activating system justification motivation eliminate the liberal-conservative gap in patriotism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldman, J., Van Laar, C., Meeussen, L., & Lo Bue, S. (2021). Daily coping with social identity threat in Outgroup-Dominated contexts: Self-Group distancing among female soldiers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(1), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220921054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vial, A. C., Brescoll, V. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2018). Third-party prejudice accommodation increases gender discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, J. (2021). Amazon denies stories of workers peeing in bottles, receives a flood of evidence in return. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2021/3/25/22350337/amazon-peeing-in-bottles-workers-exploitation-twitter-response-evidence
   Google Scholar
• Vorauer, J. (2013). The case for and against perspective-taking. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 59–115). Elsevier Academic Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2013-25351-002
   Google Scholar
• Wakabayashi, D., Griffith, E., Tsang, A., & Conger, K. (2018). Google walkout: employees stage protest over handling of sexual harassment. The New York Times. Retrieved June 27, 2021, from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/01/technology/google-walkout-sexual-harassment.html
   Google Scholar
• Walster, E., Aronson, E., & Abrahams, D. (1966). On increasing the persuasiveness of a low prestige communicator. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2(4), 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(66)90026-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, G. M., & Carr, P. B. (2012). Social belonging and the motivation and intellectual achievement of negatively stereotyped students. In M. Inzlicht & T. Schmader (Eds.), Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and application (pp. 89–106). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 82. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, G. M., Murphy, M. C., & Ryan, A. M. (2015). Stereotype threat in organizations: Implications for equity and performance. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 523–550. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111322
   Google Scholar
• Walton, G. M., & Spencer, S. J. (2009). Latent ability: Grades and test scores systematically underestimate the intellectual ability of negatively stereotyped students. Psychological Science, 20(9), 1132–1139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02417.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, G. M., & Yeager, D. S. (2020). Seed and soil: Psychological affordances in contexts help to explain where wise interventions succeed or fail. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(3), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420904453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittington, K. B., & Smith-Doerr, L. (2008). Women inventors in context: Disparities in patenting across academia and industry. Gender & Society, 22(2), 194–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243207313928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. S., Ostrom, E., & Cox, M. E. (2013). Generalizing the core design principles for the efficacy of groups. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 90, S21–S32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilton, L. S., Sanchez, D. T., Unzueta, M. M., Kaiser, C., & Caluori, N. (2019). In good company: When gender diversity boosts a company’s reputation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684318800264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Word, C. O., Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. (1974). The nonverbal mediation of self-fulfilling prophecies in interracial interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(74)90059-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S. C., & Baray, G. (2012). Models of social change in social psychology: Collective action or prejudice reduction? Conflict or harmony. In J. Dixon & M. Levine (Eds.), Beyond prejudice: Extending the social psychology of conflict, inequality and social change (pp. 225–247). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. C., & Lubensky, M. E. (2009). The struggle for social equality: Collective action versus prejudice reduction. In S. Demoulin, J.-P. Leyens, & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), Intergroup misunderstandings: Impact of divergent social realities (pp. 291–310). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. C., & Taylor, D. M. (1998). Responding to tokenism: Individual action in the face of collective injustice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(4), 647–667. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199807/08)28:4<647::AID-EJSP887>3.0.CO;2-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 994. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, A.-C. (2019). Social contagion model induced by the effect of distinct social contexts. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 519, 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, S. J., & Paluck, E. L. (2020). Participatory practices at work change attitudes and behavior toward societal authority and justice. Nature Communications, 11(1), 2633. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16383-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida, E., Peach, J. M., Zanna, M. P., & Spencer, S. J. (2012). Not all automatic associations are created equal: How implicit normative evaluations are distinct from implicit attitudes and uniquely predict meaningful behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 694–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2, Pt.2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zigerell, L. J. (2017). Potential publication bias in the stereotype threat literature: Comment on nguyen and ryan (2008). Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(8), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar