Advanced search
Publication Cover
European Review of Social Psychology Volume 34, 2023 - Issue 2
Submit an article Journal homepage
3,332
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Relativity in Social Cognition: Basic processes and novel applications of social comparisons

Christian Unkelbacha Social Cognition Center Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, GermanyCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
Hans Alvesb Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bocham, GermanyView further author information
,
Matthew Baldwinc Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainsville, FL, USAView further author information
,
Jan Crusiusd School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The NetherlandsView further author information
,
Kathi Dielb Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bocham, GermanyView further author information
,
Adam D. Galinskye Columbia Business School, Columbia University, NY, USAView further author information
,
Anne Gasta Social Cognition Center Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, GermanyView further author information
,
Wilhelm Hofmannb Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bocham, GermanyView further author information
,
Roland Imhofff Department of Psychology, University of Mainz, Mainz, GermanyView further author information
,
Oliver Genschowa Social Cognition Center Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, GermanyView further author information
,
Joris Lammersa Social Cognition Center Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, GermanyView further author information
,
Eileen Pauelsa Social Cognition Center Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, GermanyView further author information
,
Iris Schneidera Social Cognition Center Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, GermanyView further author information
,
Sascha Topolinskia Social Cognition Center Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, GermanyView further author information
,
Mareike Westfala Social Cognition Center Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, GermanyView further author information
&
Thomas Mussweilerg London Business School, London, UKView further author information
 show all
Pages 387-440 | Received 24 Sep 2021, Accepted 14 Dec 2022, Published online: 10 Jan 2023

References

  • Alves, H., Högden, F., Gast, A., Aust, F., & Unkelbach, C. (2020). Attitudes from mere co-occurrences are guided by differentiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(3), 560–581. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000193
  • Alves, H., Koch, A., & Unkelbach, C. (2016). My friends are all alike — The relation between liking and perceived similarity in person perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 62, 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.011
  • Alves, H., Koch, A., & Unkelbach, C. (2017a). The “common good” phenomenon: Why similarities are positive and differences are negative. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(4), 512–528. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000276
  • Alves, H., Koch, A., & Unkelbach, C. (2017b). Why good is more alike than bad: Processing implications. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(2), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.12.006
  • Alves, H., Koch, A., & Unkelbach, C. (2018). A cognitive-ecological explanation of intergroup biases. Psychological Science, 29(7), 1126–1133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618756862
  • Atkinson, J. W., & Feather, N. T. (1966). A theory of achievement motivation. Wiley.
  • Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211(4489), 1390–1396. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7466396
  • Baldwin, M., & Lammers, J. (2016). Past-focused environmental comparisons promote proenvironmental outcomes for conservatives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(52), 14953–14957. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1610834113
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
  • Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Intention, awareness, efficiency, and control as separate issues. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 1–40). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Barker, P., Dotsch, R., & Imhoff, R. (2020). Assimilation and contrast in spontaneous comparisons: Heterogeneous effects of standard extremity in facial evaluations. International Review of Social Psychology, 33(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.402
  • Barker, P., & Imhoff, R. (2021). The dynamic interactive pattern of assimilation and contrast: Accounting for standard extremity in comparative evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 97, 104190. Article 104190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104190
  • Becker, D. V., Unkelbach, C., & Fiedler, K. (2021). Inference in social cognition. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.834
  • Biernat, M. (2003). Toward a broader view of social stereotyping. The American Psychologist, 58(12), 1019–1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.12.1019
  • Bird, G., Leighton, J., Press, C., & Heyes, C. (2007). Intact automatic imitation of human and robot actions in autism spectrum disorders. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 274(1628), 3027–3031. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.1019
  • Bless, H., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Context effects in political judgement: Assimilation and contrast as a function of categorization processes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199803/04)28:2<159:AID-EJSP860>3.0.CO;2-4
  • Bless, H., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Mental construal and the emergence of assimilation and contrast effects: The inclusion/exclusion model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 319–373. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/S0065-2601(10)42006-7
  • Bortoletto, M., Mattingley, J. B., Cunnington, R., & Avenanti, A. (2013). Effects of context on visuomotor interference depends on the perspective of observed actions. PLoS One, 8(1), e53248. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053248
  • Boucher, J., & Osgood, C. E. (1969). The Pollyanna hypothesis. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 8(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80002-2
  • Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A., & Prinz, W. (2000). Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: Comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain and Cognition, 44(2), 124–143. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.2000.1225
  • Brass, M., & Heyes, C. (2005). Imitation: Is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(10), 489–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.007
  • Brehm, J. W., & Self, E. A. (1989). The intensity of motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 40(1), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.40.020189.000545
  • Brewer, M. B., & Weber, J. G. (1994). Self-evaluation effects of interpersonal versus intergroup social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(2), 268–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.2.268
  • Brunswik, E. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62(3), 193–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047470
  • Buunk, B. P., Collins, R. L., Taylor, S. E., Van Yperen, N. W., & Dakof, G. A. (1990). The affective consequences of social comparison: Either direction has its ups and downs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1238–1249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1238
  • Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950
  • Cappella, J. N., & Planalp, S. (1981). Talk and silence sequences in informal conversations III: Interspeaker influence. Human Communication Research, 7(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1981.tb00564.x
  • Carver, C. S. (2004). Self-regulation of action and affect. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 13–39). Guilford Press.
  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior. Springer.
  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1982). Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality–social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 92(1), 111–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.92.1.111
  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.19
  • Casasanto, D. (2008). Similarity and proximity: When does close in space mean close in mind? Memory & Cognition, 36(6), 1047–1056. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.6.1047
  • Chartrand, T. L., & Dalton, A. N. (2009). Mimicry: Its ubiquity, importance, and functionality. In E. Morales, P. M. Gollwitzer, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Vol. 2. Mechanisms of human action (pp. 893–910). Oxford University Press.
  • Choplin, J. M., & Hummel, J. E. (2002). Magnitude comparisons distort mental representations of magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 270–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.131.2.270
  • Cilibrasi, R. L., & Vitanyi, P. M. B. (2007). The Google similarity distance. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 19(3), 370–383. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2007.48
  • Cook, R., Bird, G., Catmur, C., Press, C., & Heyes, C. (2014). Mirror neurons: From origin to function. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13000903
  • Corcoran, K., Crusius, J., & Mussweiler, T. (2011). Social comparison: Motives, standards, and mechanisms. In D. Chadee (Ed.), Theories in social psychology (pp. 119–139). Wiley Blackwell.
  • Coren, S., & Enns, J. T. (1993). Size contrast as a function of conceptual similarity between test and inducers. Perception & Psychophysics, 54(5), 579–588. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211782
  • Cracco, E., Bardi, L., Desmet, C., Genschow, O., Rigoni, D., De Coster, L., Radkova, I., Deschrijver, E., Brass, M. (2018). Automatic imitation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 144(5), 453–500. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000143
  • Cracco, E., Genschow, O., Radkova, I., & Brass, M. (2018). Automatic imitation of pro- and antisocial gestures: Is implicit social behavior censored? Cognition, 170, 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.09.019
  • Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957
  • Crusius, J., Corcoran, K., & Mussweiler, T. (2022). Social comparison: A review of theory, research, and applications. In D. Chadee (Ed.), Theories in social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 165–187). Wiley.
  • De Cremer, D., van Dick, R., & Murnighan, J.K., (Eds.), (2011). Power: A central force governing psychological, social, and organizational life. Social psychology and organizations (pp. 49–70). Routledge.
  • Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122(3), 371–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371
  • Denrell, J. (2005). Why most people disapprove of me: Experience sampling in impression formation. Psychological Review, 112(4), 951–978. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.951
  • De Souter, L., Braem, S., Genschow, O., Brass, M., & Cracco, E. (2021). Social group membership does not modulate automatic imitation in a contrastive multi-agent paradigm. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(4), 746–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820986528
  • Diel, K., Broeker, L., Raab, M., & Hofmann, W. (2021). Motivational and emotional effects of social comparison in sports. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 57, 102048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.102048
  • Diel, K., Grelle, S., & Hofmann, W. (2021). A motivational framework of social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(6), 1415–1430. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000204
  • Diel, K., & Hofmann, W. (2019). Inspired to perspire: The interplay of social comparison direction and standard extremity in the context of challenging exercising goals. Social Cognition, 37(3), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2019.37.3.247
  • Dijksterhuis, A., Spears, R., Postmes, T., Stapel, D., Koomen, W., van Knippenberg, A., & Scheepers, D. (1998). Seeing one thing and doing another: Contrast effects in automatic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 862–871. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.862
  • Dimberg, U. (1982). Facial reactions to facial expressions. Psychophysiology, 19(6), 643–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1982.tb02516.x
  • Dunning, D., & Hayes, A. F. (1996). Evidence for egocentric comparison in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.213
  • Efferson, C., Lalive, R., & Fehr, E. (2008). The coevolution of cultural groups and ingroup favoritism. Science, 321(5897), 1844–1849. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155805
  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
  • Festinger, L. (1980). Retrospections on social psychology. Oxford University Press.
  • Fischer, M. H. (2006). The future for SNARC could be stark. Cortex, 42(8), 1066–1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70218-1
  • Fischer, M. H. (2012). A hierarchical view of grounded, embodied, and situated numerical cognition. Cognitive Processing, 13(Suppl 1), S161–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0477-5
  • Fleischmann, A., Lammers, J., Diel, K., Hofmann, W., & Galinsky, A. D. (2021). More threatening and more diagnostic: How moral comparisons differ from social comparisons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(5), 1057–1078. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000361
  • Fulford, D., Johnson, S. L., Llabre, M. M., & Carver, C. S. (2010). Pushing and coasting in dynamic goal pursuit: Coasting is attenuated in bipolar disorder. Psychological Science, 21(7), 1021–1027. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610373372
  • Genschow, O., & Brass, M. (2015). The predictive chameleon: Evidence for anticipated social action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(2), 265–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000035
  • Genschow, O., Cracco, E., Verbeke, P., Westfal, M., & Crusius, J. (2021). A direct test of the similarity assumption — Focusing on differences as compared with similarities decreases automatic imitation. Cognition, 215, 104824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104824
  • Genschow, O., & Florack, A. (2014). Attention on the source of influence reverses the impact of cross-contextual imitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(3), 904–907. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035430
  • Genschow, O., Florack, A., & Wänke, M. (2013). The power of movement: Evidence for context-independent movement imitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(3), 763–773. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029795
  • Genschow, O., & Groß-Bölting, J. (2021). The role of attention in anticipated action effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 47(3), 323–330. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000883
  • Genschow, O., Klomfar, S., D’Haene, I., Brass, M., & Avenanti, A. (2018). Mimicking and anticipating others’ actions is linked to social information processing. PLoS One, 13(3), e0193743. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193743
  • Genschow, O., Paules, E., Krugmann., K., Winter, A., (2022). Group membership does not modulate goal-versus movement-based imitation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218221132842
  • Genschow, O., & Schindler, S. (2016). The influence of group membership on cross-contextual imitation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1257–1265. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0983-4
  • Genschow, O., Westfal, M., Cracco, E., & Crusius, J. (2021). Group membership does not modulate automatic imitation. Psychological Research, 86, 780–791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01526-1
  • Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1994). Structural alignment in comparison: No difference without similarity. Psychological Science, 5(3), 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00652.x
  • Gerber, J. P., Wheeler, L., & Suls, J. (2018). A social comparison theory meta-analysis 60+ years on. Psychological Bulletin, 144(2), 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000127
  • Gerten, J., & Topolinski, S. (2020). SNARC compatibility triggers positive affect. Cognition & Emotion, 35, 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2020.1846018
  • Gilbert, D. T., Giesler, R. B., & Morris, K. A. (1995). When comparisons arise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(2), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.2.227
  • Gino, F., Ayal, S., & Ariely, D. (2009). Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior: The effect of one bad apple on the barrel. Psychological Science, 20(3), 393–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02306.x
  • Gino, F., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). Vicarious dishonesty: When psychological closeness creates distance from one’s moral compass. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.03.011
  • Goethals, G. R., & Darley, J. M. (1977). Social comparison theory: An attributional approach. In J. M. Suls & R. L. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 259–278). Hemisphere.
  • Greene, J. D., & Haidt, J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(12), 517–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)02011-9
  • Greenwald, A. G. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77(2), 73–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028689
  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
  • Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998–1002. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137651
  • Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20(1), 98–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z
  • Hakmiller, K. L. (1966). Threat as a determinant of downward comparison. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(66)90063-1
  • Herr, P. M. (1986). Consequences of priming: Judgment and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1106–1115. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1106
  • Herr, P. M., Sherman, S. J., & Fazio, R. H. (1983). On the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19(4), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(83)90026-4
  • Hess, U., & Fischer, A. (2016). Emotional mimicry in social context. Cambridge University Press.
  • Heyes, C. (2010). Where do mirror neurons come from? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(4), 575–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.11.007
  • Heyes, C. (2011). Automatic imitation. Psychological Bulletin, 137(3), 463–483. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022288
  • Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319
  • Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). Guilford Press.
  • Higgins, E. T., & Lurie, L. (1983). Context, categorization, and recall: The “change-of-standard” effect. Cognitive Psychology, 15(4), 525–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(83)90018-X
  • Higgins, E. T., Strauman, T., & Klein, R. (1986). Standards and the process of self-evaluation: Multiple affects from multiple stages. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 23–63). Guilford Press.
  • James, W. (1890). Principles of Psychology, Vol.2. Henry Holt and Company. https://doi.org/10.1037/11059-000
  • Jones, M. N., & Mewhort, D. J. (2007). Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon. Psychological Review, 114(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.1
  • Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93(2), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.136
  • Kim, I., Hammond, M. D., & Milfont, T. L. (2021). Do past-focused environmental messages promote pro-environmentalism to conservatives? A pre-registered replication. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 73, 101547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101547
  • Kirk, R. (1953). The conservative mind: From Burke to Eliot. Avon Books.
  • Klinger, E. (1975). Consequences of commitment to and disengagement from incentives. Psychological Review, 82(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076171
  • Koch, A., Alves, H., Krüger, T., & Unkelbach, C. (2016). A general valence asymmetry in similarity: Good is more alike than bad. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(8), 1171–1192. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000243
  • Koch, A., Imhoff, R., Unkelbach, C., Nicolas, G., Fiske, S., Terache, J., Carrier, A., Yzerbyt, V. (2020). Groups’ warmth is a personal matter: Understanding consensus on stereotype dimensions reconciles adversarial models of social evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 89, 103995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103995
  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive developmental approach to socialization. In Goslin, D., Tran,(Eds.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • LaFrance, M. (1982). Posture mirroring and rapport. In M. Davis (Ed.), Interaction rhythms: Periodicity in communicative behavior (pp. 279–298). Human Sciences Press.
  • Lakin, J. L., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychological Science, 14(4), 334–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.14481
  • Lamm, C., Batson, C. D., & Decety, J. (2007). The neural substrate of human empathy: Effects of perspective-taking and cognitive appraisal. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(1), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.1.42
  • Lammers, J., & Baldwin, M. (2018). Past-focused temporal communication overcomes conservatives’ resistance to liberal political ideas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(4), 599–619. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000121
  • Lewin, K. (1951). Field theories in social science. selected theoretical papers. Harpers.
  • Liepelt, R., & Brass, M. (2010). Top-down modulation of motor priming by belief about animacy. Experimental Psychology, 57(3), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000028
  • Lockwood, P., & Kunda, Z. (1997). Superstars and me: Predicting the impact of role models on the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.91
  • Löffler, C. S., Gerten, J., Mamporia, M., Müller, J., Neu, T., Rumpf, J., Schiller, M., Schneider, Y., Wozniak, M., & Topolinski, S. (2022). Bright on the right feels right: SQUARC compatibility is hedonically marked. Cognition & Emotion, 36(4), 767–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2022.2053660
  • Longo, M. R., & Bertenthal, B. I. (2009). Attention modulates the specificity of automatic imitation to human actors. Experimental Brain Research, 192(4), 739–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1649-5
  • Lyubomirsky, S., Sousa, L., & Dickerhoof, R. (2006). The costs and benefits of writing, talking, and thinking about life's triumphs and defeats. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 692–708. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.692
  • Major, B., Testa, M., & Bylsma, W. H. (1991). Responses to upward and downward comparisons: The impact of esteem-relevance and perceived control. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 237–260). Erlbaum.
  • Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (1996). Commonalities and differences in similarity comparisons. Memory & Cognition, 24(2), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200884
  • Matlin, M. W., & Stang, D. J. (1978). The Pollyanna principle: Selectivity in language, memory, and thought. Shenkman.
  • McDermott, R. (2004). Prospect theory in political science: Gains and losses from the first decade. Political Psychology, 25(2), 289–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00372.x
  • Medin, D. L., Goldstone, R. L., & Gentner, D. (1993). Respects for similarity. Psychological Review, 100(2), 254–278. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.254
  • Meehl, P. E. (1990). Appraising and amending theories: The strategy of Lakatosian defense and two principles that warrant it. Psychological Inquiry, 1(2), 108–141. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0102_1
  • Miller, D. T., & Prentice, D. A. (1996). The construction of social norms and standards. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 799–829). Guilford Press.
  • Möller, J., & Marsh, H. W. (2013). Dimensional comparison theory. Psychological Review, 120(3), 544–560. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032459
  • Monin, B. (2007). Holier than me? Threatening social comparison in the moral domain. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 20(1), 53–68. https://www.cairn.info/revue--2007-1-page-53.htm
  • Mussweiler, T. (2003). Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review, 110(3), 472–489. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.472
  • Mussweiler, T., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2002). I know you are, but what am I? Self-evaluative consequences of judging in-group and out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.19
  • Mussweiler, T., & Gentner, D. (2007). On apples and oranges: Structural alignment in the selection of social comparison standards. Journal of Cognitive Science, 8(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.17791/jcs.2007.8.1.1
  • Nelson, L. D., & Norton, M. I. (2005). From student to superhero: Situational primes shape future helping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(4), 423–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.08.003
  • Peeters, G., & Czapinski, J. (1990). Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. European Review of Social Psychology, 1(1), 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779108401856
  • Plous, S. (1989). Thinking the unthinkable: The effects of anchoring on likelihood estimates of nuclear war. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19(1), 67–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1989.tb01221.x
  • Popper, K. R. (1934). The logic of scientific discovery. Springer.
  • Press, C., Bird, G., Flach, R. D., & Heyes, C. (2005). Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(3), 632–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.08.020
  • Prinz, W. (1990). A common coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action (pp. 167–201). Springer Verlag.
  • Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(2), 129–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/713752551
  • Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., & LaPrelle, J. (1985). Social comparison after success and failure: Biased search for information consistent with a self-serving conclusion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21(2), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(85)90015-0
  • Quattrone, G. A., & Tversky, A. (1988). Contrasting rational and psychological analyses of political choice. The American Political Science Review, 82(3), 719–736. https://doi.org/10.2307/1962487
  • Ray, E., & Heyes, C. (2011). Imitation in infancy: The wealth of the stimulus. Developmental Science, 14(1), 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00961.x
  • Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364–382. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
  • Ritov, I. (2000). The role of expectations in comparisons. Psychological Review, 107(2), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.107.2.345
  • Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 532–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90021-3
  • Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8(3), 382–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-X
  • Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296–320. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2
  • Schneider, I. K., & Mattes, A. (2022). The effect of spatial distance between objects on categorization level. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29, 230–242. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-01949-2
  • Schubert, T. W. (2005). Your highness: Vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.1.1
  • Schwarz, N. (1994). Judgment in a social context: Biases, shortcomings, and the logic of conversation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 123–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60153-7
  • Scruton, R. (1980). The meaning of conservatism. Macmillan.
  • Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). Reading space into numbers–a cross-linguistic comparison of the SNARC effect. Cognition, 108(2), 590–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.001
  • Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. Yale University Press.
  • Sherman, S. J., Houston, D. A., & Eddy, D. (1999). Cancellation and focus: A feature-matching model of choice. European Review of Social Psychology, 10(1), 169–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779943000053
  • Shweder, R. A., Mahapatra, M., & Miller, J. G. (1987). Culture and moral development. In J. Kagan & S. Lamb (Eds.), The emergence of morality in young children (pp. 1–83). University of Chicago Press.
  • Simmons, J. P., LeBoeuf, R. A., & Nelson, L. D. (2010). The effect of accuracy motivation on anchoring and adjustment: Do people adjust from provided anchors? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(6), 917–932. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021540
  • Smith, E. R., & Zárate, M. A. (1992). Exemplar-based model of social judgment. Psychological Review, 99(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.3
  • Spinoza, B. (1994). The ethics and other works: A Spinoza reader ( A. M. Curley, Ed. & Trans.). Princeton University Press. ( Original work published 1677).
  • Stanley, S. K., Klas, A., Clarke, E. J. R., Walker, I., & Davis, T. (2021). The effects of a temporal framing manipulation on environmentalism: A replication and extension. Plos One, 16(2), e0246058. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246058
  • Strack, F., & Mussweiler, T. (1997). Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mechanisms of selective accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 437–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.437
  • Suitner, C., & Maass, A. (2016). Spatial agency bias: Representing people in space. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 245–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.09.004
  • Suls, J., Martin, R., & Wheeler, L. (2002). Social comparison: Why, with whom, and with what effect? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00191
  • Taylor, S. E., & Lobel, M. (1989). Social comparison activity under threat: Downward evaluation and upward contacts. Psychological Review, 96(4), 569–575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.569
  • Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 181–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60227-0
  • Tetlock, P. E. (2003). Thinking the unthinkable: Sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(7), 320–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00135-9
  • Todorov, A., Dotsch, R., Porter, J. M., Oosterhof, N. N., & Falvello, V. B. (2013). Validation of data-driven computational models of social perception of faces. Emotion, 13(4), 724–738. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032335
  • Topolinski, S., Likowski, K. U., Weyers, P., & Strack, F. (2009). The face of fluency: Semantic coherence automatically elicits a specific pattern of facial muscle reactions. Cognition and Emotion, 23(2), 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930801994112
  • Trope, Y. (1986). Self-enhancement and self-assessment in achievement behavior. In R. M. Sorrentino, Higgins, E. T (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 350–378). Guilford Press.
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
  • Unkelbach, C. (2012). Positivity advantages in social information processing. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(1), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00407.x
  • Unkelbach, C., Alves, H., & Koch, A. (2020). Negativity bias, positivity bias, and valence asymmetries: Explaining the differential processing of positive and negative information. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 62, 115–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2020.04.005
  • Unkelbach, C., Fiedler, K., Bayer, M., Stegmüller, M., & Danner, D. (2008). Why positive information is processed faster: The density hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.36
  • Unkelbach, C., Koch, A., & Alves, H. (2019). The evaluative information ecology: On the frequency and diversity of “good” and “bad”. European Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), 216–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2019.1688474
  • Vogt, S., Taylor, P., & Hopkins, B. (2003). Visuomotor priming by pictures of hand postures: Perspective matters. Neuropsychologia, 41(8), 941–951. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00319-6
  • Wagemans, J., Feldman, J., Gepshtein, S., Kimchi, R., Pomerantz, J. R., Van der Helm, P. A., & Van Leeuwen, C. (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: II. Conceptual and theoretical foundations. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1218–1252. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029334
  • Wang, Y., & Hamilton, A. F. D. C. (2012). Social top-down response modulation (STORM): A model of the control of mimicry in social interaction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00153
  • Wertheimer, M. (1938). Laws of organization in perceptual forms. In W. D. Ellis (Ed.), A source book of Gestalt psychology (pp. 71–88). Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Company.
  • Weyers, P., Mühlberger, A., Kund, A., Hess, U., & Pauli, P. (2009). Modulation of facial reactions to avatar emotional faces by nonconscious competition priming. Psychophysiology, 46(2), 328–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00771.x
  • Wheeler, L., Martin, R., & Suls, J. (1997). The proxy model of social comparison for self-assessment of ability. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(1), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0101_4
  • Wills, T. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90(2), 245–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.90.2.245
  • Wood, J. V. (1989). Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.231
  • Wood, G., Willmes, K., Nuerk, H. -C., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). On the cognitive link between space and number: A meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychology Science, 50, 489–525.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.