Addressing anti-Gypsyism with context-dependent psychological tools: Research review, meta-analysis and secondary analysis of prejudice against the Roma

References

• Albzour, M., Penic, S., Nasser, R., & Green, E. G. (2019). Support for ‘normalization’ of relations between Palestinians and Israelis, and how it relates to contact and resistance in the West Bank. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 7(2), 978–996. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v7i2.877
   Google Scholar
• Allport, G. W. (1954). On the nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Ame Panzh. (2023). Az Ébresztőkönyv. Tea Kiadó Kft.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, F. K., Paolini, S., Pedersen, A., Hornsey, M. J., Radke, H. R., Harwood, J., Rubin, M., & Sibley, C. G. (2012). The contact caveat: Negative contact predicts increased prejudice more than positive contact predicts reduced prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(12), 1629–1643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212457953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bou Zeineddine, F., Saab, R., Lášticová, B., Kende, A., & Ayanian, A. H. (2022). “Some uninteresting data from a faraway country”: Inequity and coloniality in international social psychological publications. Journal of Social Issues, 78(2), 320–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., & Harvey, R. D. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(1), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, C. (1998). Counting backwards: The Roma ‘numbers game’ in Central and Eastern Europe. Radical Statistics, 69, 35–46. https://www.radstats.org.uk/no069/article4.html
   Google Scholar
• Crandall, C. S., & Eshleman, A. (2003). A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 414–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crandall, C. S., Miller, J. M., & White, M. H. (2018). Changing Norms Following the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(2), 186–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617750735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisp, R. J., & Hewstone, M. (1999). Differential evaluation of crossed category groups: Patterns, processes, and reducing intergroup bias. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2(4), 307–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430299024001
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, R. J., Stathi, S., Turner, R. N., & Husnu, S. (2009). Imagined intergroup contact: Theory, paradigm and practice. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00155.x
   Google Scholar
• Cuddy, A. J., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, N., & Asgari, S. (2004). Seeing is believing: Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on the malleability of automatic gender stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(5), 642–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, J., Durrheim, K., Tredoux, C., Tropp, L., Clack, B., & Eaton, L. (2010). A paradox of integration? Interracial contact, prejudice reduction, and perceptions of racial discrimination. Journal of Social Issues, 66(2), 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01652.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, J., Tropp, L. R., Durrheim, K., & Tredoux, C. (2010). “Let them eat harmony”: Prejudice-reduction strategies and attitudes of historically disadvantaged groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(2), 76–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410363366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2004). Aversive racism. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 36, pp. 1–52). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(04)36001-6
   Google Scholar
• Droogendyk, L., Wright, S. C., Lubensky, M., & Louis, W. R. (2016). Acting in solidarity: Cross-group contact between disadvantaged group members and advantaged group allies. Journal of Social Issues, 72(2), 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durrheim, K. (2023). Conversational silencing of racism in psychological science: Toward decolonization in practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 19(1), 244–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916231182922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durrheim, K., Quayle, M., & Dixon, J. (2016). The struggle for the nature of “prejudice”: “prejudice” expression as identity performance. Political Psychology, 37(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECRI (European Commission Against Racism and Intolerance. (2011). ECRI general policy recommendation no. 13 on combating anti-Gypsyism and discrimination against Roma. https://www.coe.int/en/web/european-commission-against-racism-and-intolerance/recommendation-no.13
   Google Scholar
• Er‐Rafiy, A., & Brauer, M. (2013). Modifying perceived variability: Four laboratory and field experiments show the effectiveness of a ready‐to‐be‐used prejudice intervention. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(4), 840–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch, H., & Bolin, J. (2017). Multilevel modelling using MPlus. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Findor, A., Lášticová, B., Hruška, M., Popper, M., & Váradi, L. (2020). The impact of response instruction and target group on the BIAS Map. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–17. art. no. 566725. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firat, M., & Ataca, B. (2020). When does imagined contact reduce prejudice? Social Psychology, 51(4), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FRA (European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2022). Roma in 10 European countries – main results, https://fra.europa.eu/en/news/2022/80-roma-live-poverty
   Google Scholar
• Gaddis, J. L. (1986). The long peace: Elements of stability in the postwar international system. International Security, 10(4), 99–142. https://doi.org/10.2307/2538951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giroud, A., Visintin, E. P., Green, E. G., & Durrheim, K. (2021). ‘I don’t feel insulted’: Constructions of prejudice and identity performance among Roma in Bulgaria. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 31(4), 396–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorodzeisky, A., & Semyonov, M. (2016). Not only competitive threat but also racial prejudice: Sources of anti-immigrant attitudes in European societies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 28(3), 331–354. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edv024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hablicsek, L. (2008). The development and the spatial characteristics of the Roma population in Hungary-experimental population projections till 2021. Demográfia English Edition, 51(5), 85–123.
   Google Scholar
• Hadarics, M. (2022). Perceived outgroup characteristics as antecedents and consequences of moral exclusion. The Social Science Journal, 59(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2019.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadarics, M., & Kende, A. (2018). The dimensions of generalized prejudice within the dual-process model: The mediating role of moral foundations. Current Psychology, 37(4), 731–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9544-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadarics, M., & Kende, A. (2019). Negative stereotypes as motivated justifications for moral exclusion. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159(3), 257–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1456396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, I. (2018). Responses to the Porrajmos: The Romani Holocaust 1. In Is the Holocaust unique? (pp. 75–101). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429495137-8
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, I. F. (2002). We are the Romani people (Vol. 28). University of Hertfordshire Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargašová, L., Lášticová, B., Poslon, X. D., & Belán, D. (2021). Analýza intervencií na zmierňovanie predsudkov voči Rómom na Slovensku z pohľadu sociálnopsychologického poznania. Slovenský národopis / Slovak Ethnology, 69(1), 116–136. https://doi.org/10.2478/se-2021-0007
   Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/466029a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (2019). Shared reality: What makes us strong and tears us apart. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hox, J., van de Schoot, R., & Matthijsse, S. (2012). How few countries will do? Comparative survey analysis from a Bayesian perspective. Survey Research Methods, 6, 87–93. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0802_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huedo-Medina, T. B., Sánchez-Meca, J., Marín-Martínez, F., & Botella, J. (2006). Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index? Psychological Methods, 11(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasinskaja‐Lahti, I., Liebkind, K., & Solheim, E. (2009). To identify or not to identify? National disidentification as an alternative reaction to perceived ethnic discrimination. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 58(1), 105–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00384.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karácsony, G., & Róna, D. (2011). The secret of Jobbik. Reasons behind the rise of the Hungarian radical right. Journal of East European & Asian Studies, 2(1), 61–92. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48610459
   Google Scholar
• Katz, K. (2007). Story, history and memory: A case study of the Roma at the Komarom camp in Hungary. In R. Stauber & R. Vago (Eds.), The Roma: A minority in Europe. Historical, political and social perspectives (pp. 67–87). CEU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kende, J., Hadarics, M., Bigazzi, S., Boza, M., Kunst, J. R., Lantos, N. A., Lášticová, B., Minescu, A., Pivetti, M., & Urbiola, A. (2021). The last acceptable prejudice in Europe? Anti-Gypsyism as the obstacle to Roma inclusion. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(3), 388–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220907701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kende, A., Hadarics, M., & Lášticová, B. (2017). Anti-Roma attitudes as expressions of dominant social norms in Eastern Europe. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 60, 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2017.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kende, A., & Krekó, P. (2020). Xenophobia, prejudice, and right-wing populism in East-Central Europe. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 29–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kende, A., & Lášticová, B. (2024). Anti-Gypsyism as a historically lasting form of prejudice in politically unstable societies. In A. Kende & B. Lášticová (Eds.), The psychology of politically unstable societies (pp. 153–168). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kende, A., & McGarty, C. (2019). A model for predicting prejudice and stigma expression by understanding target perceptions: The effects of visibility, politicization, responsibility, and entitativity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(5), 839–856. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kende, J., Phalet, K., Van den Noortgate, W., Kara, A., & Fischer, R. (2018). Equality revisited: A cultural meta-analysis of intergroup contact and prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(8), 887–895. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617728993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kende, A., Sam Nariman, H., Ayanian, A. H., Halabi, S., Ivan, C., Karić, T., Mihić, V., Nyúl, B., Pántya, J., da Silva, C., & Hopkins, N. (2024). ‘We’re still here’: Misrecognition and the quest for dual identification of Roma people. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kende, A., Sam Nariman, H., Nyúl, B., Badea, C., Lášticová, B., Mahfud, Y., Gruev-Vintila, A., Minescu, A., O’Connor, A., Boza, M., Poslon, X. D., Popper, M., & Hadarics, M. (2023). “Put a little love in your heart”: Acceptance of paternalistic and ally political discourses both predict pro-Roma solidarity intentions through moral inclusion. Political Psychology, 44(5), 1077–1095. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kende, A., Tropp, L., & Lantos, N. A. (2017). Testing a contact intervention based on intergroup friendship between Roma and non‐Roma Hungarians: Reducing bias through institutional support in a non‐supportive societal context. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kligman, G. (2001). On the social construction of “otherness” identifying “the Roma” in post-socialist communities. Review of Sociology, 7(2), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1556/revsoc.7.2001.2.4
   Google Scholar
• Kóczé, A., & Rövid, M. (2017). Roma and the politics of double discourse in contemporary Europe. Identities, 24(6), 684–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2017.1380338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kteily, N., Bruneau, E., Waytz, A., & Cotterill, S. (2015). The ascent of man: Theoretical and empirical evidence for blatant dehumanization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(5), 901–931. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuchenbrandt, D., Eyssel, F., & Seidel, S. K. (2013). Cooperation makes it happen: Imagined intergroup cooperation enhances the positive effects of imagined contact. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(5), 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212470172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantos, N. A., Kende, A., Becker, J. C., & McGarty, C. (2020). Pity for economically disadvantaged groups motivates donation and ally collective action intentions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(7), 1478–1499. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantos, N. A., Macher, J., & Kende, A. (2018). Előítélet-csökkentés és mobilizáció a romák érdekében. A Tollfosztás-workshop hatásvizsgálata. Alkalmazott pszichológia, 18, 35–55. https://doi.org/10.17627/ALKPSZICH.2018.4.35
   Google Scholar
• Lášticová, B., & Findor, A. (2016). Developing explicit measures of stereotypes and anti-Roma prejudice in Slovakia: Conceptual and methodological challenges. Human Affairs, 26(3), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2016-0022
   Google Scholar
• Lášticová, B., Gruev-Vintila, A., & Csaba, S. (2020). Themes, resources, and effects of political discourses about the Roma: Comparative report. https://polrom.eu/themes-resources-and-effects-of-political-discourses-about-the-roma-comparative-report/
   Google Scholar
• Lášticová, B., & Kende, A. (2024). The psychology of politically unstable societies: An Introduction. In A. Kende & B. Lášticová (Eds.), The psychology of politically unstable societies (pp. 1–14). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lášticová, B., Popper, M., Findor, A., Hruška, M., & Petrjánošová, M. (2021). Intergroup context‐sensitive adaptation and validation of the BIAS map for measuring stereotypes of the Roma in Slovakia: The case for an emic‐etic mixed methods approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51(2), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, R. T., Perez, A. D., Boykin, C. M., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Montazeri, A. (2019). On the prevalence of racial discrimination in the United States. PLOS ONE, 14(1), e0210698. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenhard, W., & Lenhard, A. (2022). Computation of effect sizes. Psychometrica. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17823.92329
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Loveland, M. T., & Popescu, D. (2016). The gypsy threat narrative: Explaining anti-Roma attitudes in the European Union. Humanity & Society, 40(3), 329–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160597615601715
   Google Scholar
• Lukacs, M. (2016). The critical ones: Another tale of slavery. AnALize: Revista de studii feministe, 7(21), 67–80.
   Google Scholar
• Matache, M. (2017). Biased elites, unfit policies: Reflections on the lacunae of Roma integration strategies. European Review, 25(4), 588–607. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798717000254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConahay, J. B., Hardee, B. B., & Batts, V. (1981). Has racism declined in America? It depends on who is asking and what is asked. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 25(4), 563–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200278102500401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meneghini, A. M., Morandini, S., Sánchez-Castelló, M., Colledani, D., López-Rodríguez, L., & Navas, M. (2023). The distinctive role of morality in fostering behavioural tendencies of facilitation towards Romanian Roma and immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 94, 101787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2023.101787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, E., & Crisp, R. J. (2014). A meta-analytic test of the imagined contact hypothesis. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213510573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nyúl, B., Faragó, L., & Kende, A. (2020). & 8222; Soha ne ítélj meg egy másik embert, míg egy mérföldet nem jártál a cipőjében!”: A perspektívaváltás hatékonyságának mérése a romaellenesség és a szexizmus csökkentésében. Alkalmazott pszichológia, 20(4), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.17627/ALKPSZICH.2020.4.79
   Google Scholar
• Oľhová, S., Lášticová, B., Kundrát, J., & Kanovský, M. (2023). Using fiction to improve intergroup attitudes: Testing indirect contact interventions in a school context. Social Psychology of Education, 26(1), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09708-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opotow, S. (1990). Moral exclusion and injustice: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 46(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb00268.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E. … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International Journal of Surgery, 88, 105906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paluck, E. L., Porat, R., Clark, C. S., & Green, D. P. (2021). Prejudice Reduction: Progress and Challenges. Annual Review of Psychology, 72(1), 533–560. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-071620-030619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrík, J., & Broniš, P. (2017). Anywhere but here: Attempts to reduce prejudice with imagined contact technique in Slovakia. In J. Kanovská-Halamová (Ed.), Komunitná psychológia na Slovensku (pp. 92–103). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320876665_Anywhere_But_Here_Attempts_to_Reduce_Prejudice_with_Imagined_Contact_Technique_in_Slovakia
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F., Christ, O., Wagner, U., Meertens, R. W., Van Dick, R., & Zick, A. (2008). Relative deprivation and intergroup prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 64(2), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00567.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F., Wagner, U., & Christ, O. (2010). Population ratios and prejudice: Modelling both contact and threat effects. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(4), 635–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830903516034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phinney, J. S., Horenczyk, G., Liebkind, K., & Vedder, P. (2001). Ethnic identity, immigration, and well-being: An interactional perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 57(3), 493–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pivetti, M., Melotti, G., Meneghini, A. M., Puntin, E., & Villano, P. (2022). Human, animal and automata attributions: An investigation of the multidimensionality of the ontologization process. Human Arenas, 7(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-022-00277-8
   Google Scholar
• Plant, E. A., & Devine, P. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 811–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podolinská, T., & Hrustič, T. (2015). Čierno-biele svety. Rómovia v majoritnej spoločnosti. Veda & Ústav etnológie SAV.
   Google Scholar
• Poslon, X. D., Lášticová, B., Popper, M., & Kende, A. (2019). Political discourse perception predicts Roma stereotype endorsement. In I. Farkaš & M. Takáč (Eds.), Kognícia a umelý život 2019 () (pp. 87–88). Comeinus University.
   Google Scholar
• Reicher, S. (2012). From perception to mobilization: The shifting paradigm of prejudice. In J. Dixon & M. Levine (Eds.), Beyond prejudice: Extending the social psychology of conflict, inequality and social change (pp. 27–48). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, C., Hopkins, N., Ahluwalia‐McMeddes, A., Dobai, A., Pehrson, S., & Reicher, S. (2023). On the misrecognition of identity: Muslims’ everyday experiences in Scotland. Political Psychology, 44(4), 769–787. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(3), 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigona, N. (2005). Locating ‘The Gypsy Problem’. The Roma in Italy: Stereotyping, Labelling and ‘Nomad Camps’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31(4), 741–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830500109969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonovits, G., Kezdi, G., & Kardos, P. (2018). Seeing the world through the other’s eye: An online intervention reducing ethnic prejudice. American Political Science Review, 112(1), 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skorinko, J. L., & Sinclair, S. A. (2013). Perspective taking can increase stereotyping: The role of apparent stereotype confirmation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subert, M. (2019). Motives and legacies behind 2008–2009 Hungarian Roma murders and apologies. Contemporary Justice Review, 22(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2019.1576127
   Google Scholar
• Szabó, Z. P. (2020). Studied and understudied collective victim beliefs. In J. R. Vollhardt (Ed.), The social psychology of collective victimhood (pp. 163–185). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szekeres, H. (2020). Kedvelni vagy tisztelni?: Az előítéletek csökkentése a melegszívűség és kompetencia dimenzióiban. Alkalmazott pszichológia, 20(4), 15–49. https://doi.org/10.17627/ALKPSZICH.2020.4.15
   Google Scholar
• Szekeres, H., Lantos, N. A., Faragó, L., Nyúl, B., & Kende, A. (2024). When the shoe does not fit: The role of perspective‐taking orientation in a perspective‐taking prejudice reduction intervention. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), e2785. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Tropp, L. R., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2005). Differential relationships between intergroup contact and affective and cognitive dimensions of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(8), 1145–1158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205274854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Assche, J., Swart, H., Schmid, K., Dhont, K., Al Ramiah, A., Christ, O., Kauff, M., Rothmann, S., Savelkoul, M., Tausch, N., Wölfer, R., Zahreddine, S., Saleem, M., & Hewstone, M. (2023). Intergroup contact is reliably associated with reduced prejudice, even in the face of group threat and discrimination. American Psychologist, 78(6), 761–774. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Váradi, L., Barna, I., & Németh, R. (2021). Whose norms, whose prejudice? The dynamics of perceived group norms and prejudice in new secondary school classes. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 3621. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.524547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vescio, T. K., Sechrist, G. B., & Paolucci, M. P. (2003). Perspective taking and prejudice reduction: The mediational role of empathy arousal and situational attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(4), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vezzali, L., Crisp, R. J., Stathi, S., & Giovannini, D. (2013). The affective consequences of imagined contact: A review and some suggestions for future research. TPM: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 20, 343–363. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM20.4.4
   Google Scholar
• Vidra, Z., & Fox, J. (2014). Mainstreaming of racist anti-Roma discourses in the media in Hungary. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 12(4), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2014.914265
   Google Scholar
• Villano, P., Fontanella, L., Fontanella, S., & DiDonato, M. (2017). Stereotyping Roma people in Italy: IRT models for ambivalent prejudice measurement. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 57, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2017.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollhardt, J. R., Cohrs, J. C., Szabó, Z., Winiewski, M., Twali, M. S., Hadjiandreou, E., & McNeill, A. (2021). The role of comparative victim beliefs in predicting support for hostile versus prosocial intergroup outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(3), 505–524. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2010
   Google Scholar
• White, M. H., & Crandall, C. S. (2023). Perceived authenticity as a vicarious justification for prejudice. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 26(3), 534–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302221080466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohl, M. J., Squires, E. C., & Caouette, J. (2012). We were, we are, will we be? The social psychology of collective angst. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(5), 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00437.x
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. C., & Lubensky, M. E. (2009). The struggle for social equality: Collective action versus prejudice reduction. In S. Demoulin, J. P. Leyens, & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), Intergroup misunderstandings: Impact of divergent social realities (pp. 291–310). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar