Designing for the Next Generation Science Standards: Educative Curriculum Materials and Measures of Teacher Knowledge

References

• Achieve, Inc. (2014). Educators evaluating the quality of instructional products (EQuIP) rubric for lessons and units: Science (Version 2.0). Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/ngss/files/EQuIP%20Rubric%20for%20Science%20052714.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Achieve, Inc. (2015). Next Generation Science Standards: Primary evaluation of essential criteria for alignment. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/default/files/Draft_PEEC-Alignment%20May%202015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Achieve, Inc. (2016). Educators evaluating the quality of instructional products (EQuIP) rubric for lessons and units: Science (Version 3.0). Retrieved http://www.nextgenscience.org/resources/equip-rubric-lessons-units-science
   Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2005). Project 2061 curriculum materials analysis procedure. Retrieved from http://www.project2061.org/publications/textbook/hsbio/report/crit-used.htm
   Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science. (In press). Toward high school biology. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is—or might be—the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6–8, 14.
   Google Scholar
• Banilower, E. R., Nelson, M. M., Trygstad, P. J., Smith, A. A., & Smith, P. S. (2013). Instructional materials to support the Next Generation Science Standards: Results of a proof-of-concept study. Retrieved from http://www.horizon-research.com/aim/wp-content/uploads/AIM-NARST-2013-paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, C., & Davis, E. (2009). Investigating teacher learning supports in high school biology curricular programs to inform the design of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 977–998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bismack, A. S., Arias, A. M., Davis, E. A., & Palincsar, A. S. (2015). Examining student work for evidence of teacher uptake of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(6), 816–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(4), 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H. (2007). Curriculum research: Toward a framework for “research-based curricula.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(1), 35–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• DeBoer, G. E., Herrmann-Abell, C. F., Gogos, A., Michiels, A., Regan, T., & Wilson, P. (2008). Assessment linked to science learning goals: Probing student thinking through assessment. In J. Coffey, R. Douglas, & C. Stearns (Eds.), Assessing student learning: Perspectives from research and practice (pp. 231–252). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drake, C., Land, T. J., & Tyminski, A. M. (2014). Using educative curriculum materials to support the development of prospective teachers’ knowledge. Educational Researcher, 43(3), 154–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children’s ideas. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, J. C., Herrmann-Abell, C. F., & Roseman, J. E. (2013, April). Developing and evaluating an eighth grade curriculum unit that links foundational chemistry to biological growth. Paper 5: Using teacher measures to evaluate the promise of the intervention. Paper presented at the annual international conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Rio Grande, Puerto Rico.
   Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann-Abell, C. F., Koppal, M., & Roseman, J. E. (2016). Toward high school biology: Helping middle school students understand chemical reactions and conservation of mass in non-living and living systems. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15(4). doi:10.1187/cbe.16-03-0112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann-Abell, C. F., & Roseman, J. E. (2016). Comparing the year 3 and year 4 versions of Toward High School Biology. Retrieved from http://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/THSB%20Research%20Summary%202016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Horizon Research, Inc. (2013). 2012 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education: Highlights report. Chapel Hill, NC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, V., Lamb, L., & Philipp, R. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kali, Y., Koppal, M., Linn, M., & Roseman, J. E. (2008). Preface. In Y. Kali, M. C. Linn, & J. E. Roseman (Eds.), Designing coherent science education: Implications for curriculum, instruction, and policy (pp. xi–xxi). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kersting, N. (2008). Using video clips of mathematics classroom instruction as item prompts to measure teachers’ knowledge of teaching mathematics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 845–861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesidou, S., & Roseman, J. E. (2002). How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061’s curriculum review study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 522–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse, R., Howes, E. V., Carlson, J., Roth, K., & Bourdélat-Parks, B. (2013, April). Developing and evaluating an eighth grade curriculum unit that links foundational chemistry to biological growth. Paper 3: Designing professional development to support teaching. Paper presented at the annual international conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Rio Grande, Puerto Rico.
   Google Scholar
• Land, T. J., Tyminski, A. M., & Drake, C. (2015). Examining pre-service elementary mathematics teachers’ reading of educative curriculum materials. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 16–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. (2008). Teachers’ use of curriculum to support students in writing scientific arguments to explain phenomena. Science Education, 93(2), 233–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2008). Scientific explanations: Characterizing and evaluating the effects of teachers’ instructional practices on student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 53–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards (English Language Arts Standards: Science and technical subjects, grade 6–8). Washington, DC: Authors. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/RST/6-8/
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching in science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2015). Guide to implementing the Next Generation Science Standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, C. C., & Crespo, S. M. (2006). Learning to teach with mathematics textbooks: How preservice teachers interpret and use curriculum materials. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(3), 331–355.
   Google Scholar
• Pashler, H., Bain, P., Bottge, B., Graesser, A., Koedinger, K., McDaniel, M., & Metcalfe, J. (2007). Organizing instruction and study to improve student learning (NCER 2007-2004). Retrieved from the Institute of Education Sciences website: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/practiceguides/20072004.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reiser, B.J., (2013), September. What professional development strategies are needed for successful implementation of the Next Generation Science Standards? Paper presented at the Invitational Research Symposium on Science Assessment, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roseman, J. E., Fortus, D., Krajcik, J., & Reiser, B. J. (2015, April). Curriculum materials for Next Generation Science Standards: What the science education research community can do. Retrieved from http://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/2015_Roseman_Fortus_Krajcik_Reiser_NARST.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Roseman, J. E., Herrmann-Abell, C. F., & Kruse, R. (2016, April). Integrating NGSS core ideas and practices: Supporting and studying teachers’ implementation. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Roseman, J. E., Stern, L., & Koppal, M. (2010). A method for analyzing the coherence of biology textbooks: A study of its application to the topic of matter and energy transformations in four textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(1), 47–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, K. J., Druker, S. L., Garnier, H. E., Lemmens, M., Chen, C., Kawanaka, T., … Gallimore, R. (2006). Teaching science in five countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 Video Study (NCES 2006-011). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R. J. (2002). What large-scale, survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: Insights from the prospectus study of elementary schools (CPRE Research Report Series RR-051). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Coyle, H. P., Cook-Smith, N., & Miller, J. L. (2013). The influence of teachers’ knowledge on student learning in middle school physical science classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 1020–1049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santagata, R., Zannoni, C., & Stigler, J. (2007). The role of lesson analysis in pre-service teacher education: An empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(2), 123–140.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, R., & Krajcik, J. (2002). Supporting science teacher learning: The role of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(3), 221–245.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, R. M., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2000). The role of educative curriculum materials in reforming science education. In B. J. Fishman & S. F. O’Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 54–61). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C., Gunckel, K., Smith, E., Covitt, B., Bae, M., Enfield, M., & Tsurusaki, B. (2008). Helping elementary preservice teachers learn to use curriculum materials for effective science teaching. Science Education, 92(2), 345–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C., Reiser, B., Davis, B., Kenyon, L., Acher, A., Fortus, D., … Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 46, 632–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2005). Using video to support teachers’ ability to notice classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13, 475–491.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, L., & Roseman, J. E. (2004). Can middle school science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from Project 2061’s curriculum evaluation study: Life science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41, 538–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar