Is Engineering Inspiring Change in Secondary Chemistry Teachers’ Practices?

References

• Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., Malzahn, K. A., Campbell, K. M., & Weis, A. M. (2013). Report of the 2012 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612–637. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R. L., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction. The Science Teacher, 72(7), 30–33.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, M. R., Southerland, S. A., & Granger, E. M. (2009). No silver bullet for inquiry: Making sense of teacher change following an inquiry‐based research experience for teachers. Science Education, 93(2), 322–360. doi:10.1002/sce.v93:2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boesdorfer, S. B. (2017). CET research brief: High school chemistry teachers’ views of engineering and engineering inclusion before and after a professional development program. Retrieved from https://cet.uni.edu/sites/default/files/boesdorfer_brief_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boesdorfer, S. B., & Greenhalgh, S. (2014). Make room for engineering: Strategies to overcome anxieties about adding engineering to your curriculum. The Science Teacher, 81(9), 51–55. doi:10.2505/4/tst14_081_09_51
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D. E. (1992). Using examples and analogies to remediate misconceptions in physics: Factors influencing conceptual change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(1), 17–34. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P. C., Roediger, H. L., III, & McDaniel, M. A. (2014). Make it stick: The science of successful learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Carlson Powell, J., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Colorado Springs, CO: Biological Sciences Curriculum Study.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), Handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 61–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Chief State School Officers. (2012). Survey of instructional practices, teacher survey, grades K-12, science. Retrieved from https://secure.wceruw.org/seconline/resources.asp?sec=2
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613–642. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Crismond, D. (2013). Design practices and misconceptions. The Science Teacher, 80(1), 50–54.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, C. M., & Carlsen, W. S. (2014). Teaching engineering practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 197–210. doi:10.1007/s10972-014-9380-5
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Teacher learning: What matters? How Teachers Learn, 66(5), 46–53.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession. Washington, DC: National Staff Development Council.
   Google Scholar
• Daugherty, J. (2012). Infusing engineering concepts: Teaching engineering design. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED537384.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Daugherty, M., & Custer, R. (2003). STEM flow chart. Retrieved from http://1.usa.gov/1o0Bbhi
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K. S. (2003). “Change is hard”: What science teachers are telling us about reform and teacher learning of innovative practices. Science Education, 87(1), 3–30. doi:10.1002/sce.10037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demircioglu, G., Ayas, A., & Demircioglu, H. (2005). Conceptual change achieved through a new teaching program on acids and bases. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 6(1), 36–51. doi:10.1039/B4RP90003K
   Google Scholar
• Duch, B. J., Groh, S. E., & Allen, D. E. (2001). The power of problem-based learning: A practical “how to” for teaching undergraduate courses in any discipline. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. doi:10.3102/00028312038004915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstone, R., & Son, J. Y. (2005). The transfer of scientific principles: Using concrete and idealized simulations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 69–110. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1401_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haag, S., & Megowan, C. (2015). Next Generation Science Standards: A national mixed-methods study on teacher readiness. School Science and Mathematics, 115(8), 416–426. doi:10.1111/ssm.2015.115.issue-8
   Google Scholar
• Hauck, N., & Campbell, T. (2014, January). Effects of 3-year sustained professional development on the classroom instruction of elementary school teachers. Paper presented at the 2014 Association for Science Teacher Education International Conference, San Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Herrington, D. G., Luxford, K., & Yezierski, E. J. (2012). Target inquiry: Helping teachers use a research experience to transform their teaching practices. Journal of Chemical Education, 89, 442–448. doi:10.1021/ed1006458
   Google Scholar
• Hewson, P. W. (2007). Teacher professional development in science. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 1177–1202). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., & Leagon, M. (2014). Science teacher attitudes and beliefs: Reforming practice. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 830–847). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keys, C. W., & Bryan, L. A. (2001). Co‐constructing inquiry‐based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 631–645. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169–204. doi:10.1080/03057260903142285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klocke, M., Daemicke, R., Wagner, M., Kruse, J., & Wilcox, J. (2017, January). Changes in elementary teachers’ planning for engineering with professional development support. Paper presented at the 2017 Association for Science Teacher Education International Conference, Des Moines, IA.
   Google Scholar
• Kyle, W. C., Family, E. D. L., & Shymansky, J. A. (1989). Enhancing learning through conceptual change teaching (Research Matters—to the Science Teacher No. 8902). Retrieved from http://www.narst.org/publications/research/concept.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E., & Luft, J. A. (2008). Experienced secondary science teachers’ representation of pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1343–1363. doi:10.1080/09500690802187058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotter, C., Harwood, W. S., & Bonner, J. J. (2007). The influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers’ use of inquiry teaching practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1318–1347. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Love, N., & Hewson, P. W. (2010). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luft, J. A., & Hewson, P. W. (2014). Research on teacher professional development programs in science. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 889–910). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Luft, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2007). Capturing science teachers’ epistemological beliefs: The development of the teacher beliefs interview. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 11(2), 38–63. Retrieved from http://ejse.southwestern.edu/volumes/v11n2/articles/art03_luft.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mansour, N. (2009). Science teachers’ beliefs and practices: Issues, implications and research agenda. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(1), 25–48.
   Google Scholar
• Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophic and practical guide. Philadelphia, PA: Routledge/Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, J. A. (2002). Understanding statistics in the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Mulnix, A. (n.d.). Nine characteristics of student-centered learning. Retrieved from http://www.pulsecommunity.org/page/characteristics-of-student-centered-learning
   Google Scholar
• Museum of Science, Boston. (2014). Research and evaluation results for the engineering is elementary project 2004-2014. Retrieved from http://www.eie.org/sites/default/files/executive_summary_2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2015). Science teachers’ learning: Enhancing opportunities, creating supportive contexts. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/21836
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oregon Technology in Education Council. (2007). Learning theories and transfer of learning. Retrieved from http://otec.uoregon.edu/learning_theory.htm
   Google Scholar
• Pimentel, D. S., & McNeill, K. L. (2013). Conducting talk in secondary science classrooms: Investigating instructional moves and teachers’ beliefs. Science Education, 97(3), 367–394. doi:10.1002/sce.2013.97.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 221–227. doi:10.1002/sce.3730660207
   Google Scholar
• Roehrig, G. H., & Kruse, R. A. (2005). The role of teachers’ beliefs and knowledge in the adoption of a reform‐based curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 105(8), 412–422. doi:10.1111/ssm.2005.105.issue-8
   Google Scholar
• Roehrig, G. H., Kruse, R. A., & Kern, A. (2007). Teacher and school characteristics and their influence on curriculum implementation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 883–907. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2014). Learning to teach science. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 871–888). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ruston, G. T., Lotter, C., & Singer, J. (2011). Chemistry teachers’ emerging expertise in inquiry teaching: The effects of a professional development model on beliefs and practice. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 23–52. doi:10.1007/s10972-010-9224-x
   Google Scholar
• Savasci, F., & Berlin, D. F. (2012). Science teacher beliefs and classroom practice related to constructivism in different school settings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(1), 65–86. doi:10.1007/s10972-011-9262-z
   Google Scholar
• Singer, J., Lotter, C., Feller, R., & Gates, H. (2011). Exploring a model of situated professional development: Impact on classroom practice. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(3), 203–227. doi:10.1007/s10972-011-9229-0
   Google Scholar
• Southerland, S. A., Sowell, S., Blanchard, M., & Granger, E. M. (2011). Exploring the construct of pedagogical discontentment: A tool to understand science teachers’ openness to reform. Research in Science Education, 41(3), 299–317. doi:10.1007/s11165-010-9166-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TeachEngineering. (n.d.). Engineering design process. Retrieved from https://www.teachengineering.org/k12engineering/designprocess
   Google Scholar
• Van Driel, J. H., Berry, A., & Meirink, J. (2014). Research on science teacher knowledge. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 848–870). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woodbury, S., & Gess-Newsome, J. (2002). Overcoming the paradox of change without difference: A model of change in the arena of fundamental school reform. Educational Policy, 16(5), 763–782. doi:10.1177/089590402237312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. Y., Diefes-Dux, H., & Strobel, J. (2013). First-year effects of an engineering professional development program on elementary teachers. American Journal of Engineering Education, 4(1), 67–84. doi:10.19030/ajee.v4i1
   Google Scholar