399
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

An Insight Into How a Constructivist Professional Development Program Can Influence Practice in Six High School Chemistry Classrooms

ORCID Icon

References

  • Beasley, W. F. (1992). Curriculum innovation and teacher development—The unbalanced chemical education equation. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(1), 57–58. doi:10.1021/ed069p57
  • Bell, B., & Gilbert, J. (1996). Teacher development: A model from science education. London, UK: Falmer Press.
  • Bennett, J., & Lubben, F. (2006). Context-based chemistry: The Salters approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 999–1015. doi:10.1080/09500690600702496
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(5), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Bubb, S., & Earley, P. (2008). Helping staff develop in schools. London, UK: Sage.
  • Capps, D. K., Crawford, B. A., & Contas, M. A. (2012). A review of empirical literature on inquiry professional development: Alignment with best practices and a critique of the findings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(3), 291–318. doi:10.1007/s10972-012-9275-2
  • Choi, J. I., & Hannafin, M. (1995). Situated cognition and learning environments: Roles, structures, and implications for design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(2), 53–69. doi:10.1007/BF02300472
  • Claesgens, J., Daubenmire, P. L., Scalise, K. M., Balicki, S., Gochyyev, P., & Stacy, A. M. (2014). What does a student know who earns a top score on the advanced placement chemistry exam? Journal of Chemical Education, 91(2), 472–479. doi:10.1021/ed300796r
  • Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967.
  • Coenders, F., & Terlouw, C. (2015). A model for in-service teacher learning in the context of an innovation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26, 451–470. doi:10.1007/s10972-015-9432-5
  • Coenders, F., Terlouw, C., & Dijkstra, S. (2008). Assessing teachers’ beliefs to facilitate the transition to a new chemistry curriculum: What do the teachers want? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19, 317–335. doi:10.1007/s10972-008-9096-5
  • Coenders, F., Terlouw, C., Dijkstra, S., & Pieters, J. (2010). The effects of the design and development of a chemistry curriculum reform on teachers’ professional growth: A case study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 535–557. doi:10.1007/s10972-010-9194-z
  • Cumming, J. (2002). Working together as a profession. Unicorn, 28(2), 1–4.
  • Davis, D., Evans, M., Jadad, A., Perrier, L., Rath, D., Ryan, D., & Zwarenstein, M. (2013). Learning in practice: The case for knowledge translation: Shortening the journey from evidence to effect. British Medical Journal, 327, 33–35. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7405.33
  • Department of Education and Skills. (1999). Leaving certificate chemistry syllabus. Dublin, Ireland: Government of Ireland.
  • Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: MacMillan.
  • Evers, W. J. G., Brouwers, A., & Tomic, E. (2002). Burnout and self-efficacy: A study on teachers’ beliefs when implementing an innovative educational system in The Netherlands. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 227–243. doi:10.1348/000709902158865
  • Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. doi:10.1177/160940690600500107
  • Fishman, B. J., Marx, R. W., Best, S., & Tal, R. T. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systematic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 643–658. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00059-3
  • Fraser, C., Kennedy, A., Reid, L., & Mckinney, S. (2007). Teachers’ continuing professional development: Contested concepts, understandings and models. Journal of In-Service Education, 33(2), 153–169. doi:10.1080/13674580701292913
  • Friedman, A., & Phillips, M. (2004). Continuing professional development: Developing a vision. Journal of Education and Work, 17(3), 361–376. doi:10.1080/1363908042000267432
  • Fullan, M. G. (1998). The new meaning of educational change. London, UK: Cassell.
  • Furtak, E. M., & Heredia, S. C. (2014). Exploring the influence of learning progressions in two teacher communities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(8), 982–1020. doi:10.1002/tea.v51.8
  • Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L., Birman, B., & Yoon, K. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. doi:10.3102/00028312038004915
  • Guskey, T. R. (2002). Does it make a difference? Evaluating professional development. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 45–51.
  • Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Hatano, G. (1993). Time to merge Vygotskian and constructivist conceptions of knowledge acquisition. In E. Forman, N. Minick, & C. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning (pp. 153–166). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Herrington, D. G., Luxford, K., & Yezierski, E. J. (2012). Target inquiry: Helping teachers use a research experience to transform their teaching practices. Journal of Chemical Education, 89, 442–448. doi:10.1021/ed1006458
  • Herrington, D. G., & Yezierski, E. J. (2014). Professional development aligned with AP chemistry curriculum: Promoting science practices and facilitating enduring conceptual understanding. Journal of Chemical Education, 91, 1368–1374. doi:10.1021/ed5000668
  • Hill, H. C., Blazar, D., & Lynch, K. (2015). Resources for teaching: Examining personal and institutional predictors of high-quality instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, National Center for Teacher Effectiveness.
  • Holland, H. (2005). Teaching teachers: Professional development to improve student achievement. American Educational Research Association, 3, 1–4.
  • Howe, A. C., & Stubbs, H. S. (1996). Empowering science teachers: A model for professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8(3), 167–182. doi:10.1023/A:1009487417488
  • Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1980). Improving in-service training: The messages of research. Educational Leadership, 37, 379–385.
  • Karplus, R., & Thier, H. (1967). A new look at elementary school science. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
  • Kennedy, A. (2005). Models of continuing professional development (CPD): A framework for analysis. Journal of In-Service Education, 31(2), 235–250. doi:10.1080/13674580500200277
  • King, F. (2014). Evaluating the impact of teacher professional development: An evidence-based framework. Professional Development in Education, 40(1), 89–111. doi:10.1080/19415257.2013.823099
  • Kriek, J., & Grayson, D. (2009). A holistic professional development model for South African physical science teachers. South African Journal of Education, 29, 185–203.
  • Kupari, P. (2003). Instructional practices and teachers’ beliefs in Finnish mathematics education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 29, 243–257. doi:10.1016/S0191-491X(03)90012-5
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Little, J. W., & Curry, M. (2008). Structuring talk about teaching and learning: The use of evidence in protocol-based conversation. In L. M. Earl & H. Timperley (Eds.), Professional learning conversations: Challenges in using evidence for improvement (pp. 29–42). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Madden, C. A., & Mitchell, V. A. (1993). Professions, standards and competence: A survey of continuing education for the professions. Bristol, UK: University of Bristol.
  • McKinney, S., Carroll, M., Christie, D., Fraser, C., Kennedy, A., Reid, L., & Wilson, A. (2005, November), AERS: Learners, Learning and Teaching Network Project 2—Progress report. Paper presented at the Scottish Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Perth, Scotland.
  • Mundry, S. (2005). Changing perspectives in professional development. Science Educator, 14(1), 9–15.
  • National Council for Curriculum and Assessment. (2014). Draft specification for junior cycle science. Dublin, Ireland: Author.
  • New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2014). The New Zealand curriculum online—Science. Retrieved from http://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/The-New-Zealand-Curriculum/Learning-areas/Science
  • Next Generation Science Standards. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/
  • Nielson, B. L. (2012). Science teachers’ meaning-making when involved in a school-based professional development project. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 621–649. doi:10.1007/s10972-012-9300-5
  • O’ Dwyer, A., & Childs, P. E. (2014). Organic Chemistry in Action! Developing an intervention program for introductory organic chemistry to improve learners’ understanding, interest and attitudes. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(7), 987–993. doi:10.1021/ed400538p
  • O’ Dwyer, A., & Childs, P. E. (2015). Organic Chemistry in Action! What is the reaction? Journal of Chemical Education, 92(7), 1159–1170. doi:10.1021/ed5006163
  • Office for Standards in Education. (2006). The logical chain: Continuing professional development in effective schools. Retrieved from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/5999/
  • Paine, L. W., & Fang, Y. (2006). Reform as hybrid model of teaching and teacher development in China. International Journal of Educational Research, 45, 279–289. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2007.02.006
  • Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teacher beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332. doi:10.3102/00346543062003307
  • Parchmann, I., Grasel, C., Baer, A., Nentwig, P., Demuth, R., & Ralle, B.; the ChiK Project Group. (2006). “Chemie im Kontext”: A symbiotic implementation of a context-based teaching and learning approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 1041–1062. doi:10.1080/09500690600702512
  • Park, S., Lee, S. Y., Oliver, J. S., & Crammond, B. (2006). Changes in Korean science teachers’ perceptions of creativity and science teaching after participating in an overseas professional development program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17, 37–64. doi:10.1007/s10972-006-9009-4
  • Patton, K., Parker, M., & Pratt, E. (2013). Meaningful learning in professional development: Teaching without telling. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 32, 441–459. doi:10.1123/jtpe.32.4.441
  • Peters-Burton, E. E., Merz, S. A., Ramirez, E. M., & Saroughi, M. (2015). The effect of cognitive apprenticeship-based professional development on teacher self-efficacy of science teaching, motivation, knowledge calibration, and perceptions of inquiry-based learning. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26, 525–548. doi:10.1007/s10972-015-9436-1
  • Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent: The future of education. New York, NY: Grossman.
  • Pitsoe, V. J., & Maila, W. M. (2012). Towards constructivist teacher professional development. Journal of Social Sciences, 8(3), 318–324. doi:10.3844/jssp.2012.318.324
  • Price, P. D., & Kugel, R. W. (2014). The new AP chemistry exam: Its rationale, content, and scoring. Journal of Chemical Education, 91, 1340–1346. doi:10.1021/ed500034t
  • Ratcliffe, M. (2002). What’s difficult about A-level chemistry? Education in Chemistry, 39(3), 76–80.
  • Rushton, G. T., Lotter, C., & Singer, J. (2011). Chemistry teachers’ emerging expertise in inquiry teaching: The effect of a professional development model on beliefs and practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 23–52. doi:10.1007/s10972-010-9224-x
  • Sarquis, A. M. (2001). Recommendations for offering successful professional development programs for teachers. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(6), 820–823. doi:10.1021/ed078p820
  • Smyth, E., & Banks, J. (2012). High stakes testing and student perspectives on teaching and learning in the Republic of Ireland. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 24(4), 283–306. doi:10.1007/s11092-012-9154-6
  • Szteinberg, G., Balicki, S., Banks, G., Clinchot, M., Cullipher, S., Huie, R., & Sevian, H. (2014). Collaborative professional development in chemistry education research: Bridging the gap between research and practice. Journal of Chemical Education, 91, 1401–1408. doi:10.1021/ed5003042
  • Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education.
  • Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. J. (1996). Cultural myths as constraints to the enacted science curriculum. Science Education, 80, 223–241. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199604)80:2<>1.0.CO;2-O
  • Tudge, J., & Winterhoff, P. (1993). Vygotsky, Piaget and Bandura: Perspectives on the relations between the social world and cognitive development. Human Development, 36, 61–81. doi:10.1159/000277297
  • Van Duzor, A. G. (2011). Capitalizing on teacher expertise: Motivations for contemplating transfer from professional development to the classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 363–374. doi:10.1007/s10956-010-9258-z
  • Van Duzor, A. G. (2012). Evidence that teacher interactions with pedagogical contexts facilitate chemistry-content learning in K-8 professional development. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23, 481–502.
  • VanDriel, J. H., Bijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 137–158. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<137::AID-TEA1001>3.0.CO;2-U
  • Visser, T. C., Coenders, F., Terlouw, C., & Pieters, J. M. (2010). Essential characteristics for a professional development program for promoting the implementation of a multidisciplinary science module. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 623–642. doi:10.1007/s10972-010-9212-1
  • Visser, T. C., Coenders, F., Terlouw, C., & Pieters, J. (2013). Evaluating a professional development programme for implementation of a multidisciplinary science subject. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 1(2), 89–102. doi:10.11114/jets.v1i2.132
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (chap. 6). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wallace, C. S., & Kang, N. H. (2004). An investigation of experienced secondary science teachers’ beliefs about inquiry: An examination of competing belief sets. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(9), 936–960. doi:10.1002/tea.20032
  • Whitehurst, G. J. (2012). The value of experiments in education. Education Finance and Policy, 7(2), 107–123. doi:10.1162/EDFP_a_00058
  • Zakaria, E., & Daud, M. Y. (2009). Assessing mathematics teachers’ professional development needs. European Journal of Social Sciences, 8, 225–231.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.