Connecting Science Instruction and Teachers’ Self-Efficacy and Beliefs in STEM Education

References

• American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). This year in school science 1990: Assessment in the service of instruction. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Angle, J., & Moseley, C. (2009). Science teacher efficacy and outcome expectancy as predictors of students’ End of instruction (EOI) Biology I test scores. School Science and Mathematics, 109(8), 473–483. doi:10.1111/ssm.2009.109.issue-8
   Google Scholar
• Appleton, K., & Kindt, I. (2002). Beginning elementary teachers: Development as teachers of science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 43–61. doi:10.1023/A:1015181809961
   Google Scholar
• Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). “Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren’s constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617–639. doi:10.1002/sce.20399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2013). Not girly, not sexy, not glamorous: Primary school girls’ and parents’ constructions of science aspirations. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 21(1), 171–194. doi:10.1080/14681366.2012.748676
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy. In A. S. R. Manstead & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Blackwell encyclopedia of social psychology (pp. 453–454). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bencze, J. L., Bowen, G. M., & Alsop, S. (2006). Teachers’ tendencies to promote student-led science projects: Associations with their views about science. Science Education, 90(3), 400–419. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, B. R., & Moore, S. J. (2011). Enhancing teachers’ application of inquiry-based strategies using a constructivist sociocultural professional development model. International Journal of Science Education, 33(7), 889–913. doi:10.1080/09500691003739374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiner, J., Harkness, M., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3–11. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x
   Google Scholar
• Conference Board of Canada. (2013, March). Education and skills: Percentage of graduates in science, math, computer science, and engineering. Retrieved from www.conferenceboard.ca/hcp/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Council of Canadian Academies. (2015). Some assembly required: STEM skills and Canada’s economic productivity. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, C. M., & Carlsen, W. S. (2014). Teaching engineering practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 197–210. doi:10.1007/s10972-014-9380-5
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review Educational Research, 76(4), 607–651. doi:10.3102/00346543076004607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCoito, I. (2016a). STEM education in Canada: A knowledge synthesis. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(2), 114–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCoito, I. (2016b). A longitudinal study: Investigating the impact of an outreach program on students’ future course selection and STEM career choices, Phase III. London: Western University.
   Google Scholar
• DeCoito, I., Myszkal, P., Richardson, T., DiLucia, D., & Florence, S. (2014). Teaching for relevance: Linking science instruction to STEM career awareness. Paper presented at the International Conference of STEM in Education, Vancouver, BC, July 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• DeJarnette, N. (2012). America’s children: Providing early exposure to STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) initiatives. Education, 133(1), 77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Duran, E., Ballone-Duran, L., Haney, J., & Beltyukova, S. (2009). The impact of a professional development program integrating informal science education on early childhood teachers’ self-efficacy and beliefs about inquiry-based science teaching. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(4), 53–70. doi:10.1007/BF03182357
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R., Schweingruber, H., & Shouse, A. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K–8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ejiwale, J. A. (2012). Facilitating teaching and learning across STEM fields. Journal of STEM Education, 13(3), 87–94.
   Google Scholar
• Enochs, L. G., & Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A preservice elementary scale. School Science and Mathematics, 90(8), 694–706. doi:10.1111/ssm.1990.90.issue-8
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, D., & Miller, R. (2011). Slow off the mark: Elementary school teachers and the crisis in STEM education. Education Digest, 77(1), 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Erkut, S., & Marx, F. (2005). 4 schools for WIE (Evaluation report). Retrieved from http://www.coe.neu.edu/Groups/stemteams/evaluation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fioriello, P. (2010). Understanding the basics of STEM education. Retrieved from http://drpfconsults.com/understandingthe-basics-of-stem-education/
   Google Scholar
• Franz-Odendaal, T., Blotnicky, K., French, F., & Joy, P. (2016). Experiences and perceptions of STEM subjects, careers, and engagement in STEM activities among middle school students in the maritime provinces. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(2), 153–168. doi:10.1080/14926156.2016.1166291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friday Institute for Educational Innovation. (2012). Teacher efficacy and attitudes toward STEM survey. Raleigh, NC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, L. (2008). Studying STEM: What are the barriers? London, UK: Institute of Engineering and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Hechter, R. P. (2011). Changes in preservice elementary teachers’ personal science teaching efficacy and science teaching outcome expectancies: The influence of context. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(2), 187–202. doi:10.1007/s10972-010-9199-7
   Google Scholar
• Homish, G. G., Edwards, E. P., Eiden, R. D., & Leonard, K. E. (2011). Analyzing family data: A GEE approach for substance use researchers. Addictive Behaviours, 35(6), 558–563. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard-Brown, B., & Martinez, D. (2012). Engaging diverse learners through the provision of STEM education opportunities (Briefing paper). SEDL, Southeast Comprehensive Centre, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ireland, J. E., Watters, J. J., Brownlee, J., & Lupton, M. (2012). Elementary teacher’s conceptions of inquiry teaching: Messages for teacher development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(2), 159–175. doi:10.1007/s10972-011-9251-2
   Google Scholar
• Khourey-Bowers, C., & Simonis, D. G. (2004). Longitudinal study of middle grades chemistry professional development: Enhancement of personal science teaching self-efficacy and outcome expectancy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(3), 175–195. doi:10.1023/B:JSTE.0000047083.14197.b8
   Google Scholar
• Kim, C., & Fortner, R. (2007). Educators’ views of collaboration with scientists. American Secondary Education, 35(3), 29–53. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41406088
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N., & Lederman, J. (2013). Is it STEM or “S & M” that we truly love? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(8), 1237–1240. doi:10.1007/s10972-013-9370-z
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Herzog, T. A., Meade, C. D., Webb, M. S., & Brandon, T. H. (2007). The use of GEE for analyzing longitudinal binomial data: A primer using data from a tobacco intervention. Addictive Behaviours, 32(1), 187–193. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.03.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luera, G. R., & Otto, C. A. (2005). Development and evaluation of an inquiry-based elementary science teacher education program reflecting current reform movements. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16(3), 241–258. doi:10.1007/s10972-005-4585-2
   Google Scholar
• Marrero, M., Gunning, A., & Germain-Williams, T. (2014). What is STEM education? Global Education Review, 1(4), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. (2016). Solving the STEM crisis: Business’s role. Retrieved from http://www.hrmagazine.co.uk/article-details/solving-the-stem-crisis-businesss-role-1
   Google Scholar
• Menon, D., & Sadler, T. D. (2016). Preservice elementary teachers’ science self-efficacy beliefs and science content knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(6), 649–673. doi:10.1007/s10972-016-9479-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaels, S., Shouse, A. W., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2008). Ready, set, science! Putting research to work in K-8 science classrooms. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, J. M., Durepos, G., & Wiebe, E. (2010). Encyclopedia of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mishagina, N. (2012). The state of STEM labor markets in Canada Literature Review. Project Report 2012RP-08. Montreal, QC: CIRANO.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, R., & Kirby, C. (2016). The UK STEM education landscape. London, UK: Royal Academy of Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Mullholland, J., & Wallace, J. (1996). Breaking the cycle: Preparing elementary teachers to teach science. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 8(1), 17–38. doi:10.1007/BF03173739
   Google Scholar
• Nadelson, L. S., Callahan, J., Pyke, P., Hay, A., Dance, M., & Pfiester, J. (2013). Teacher STEM perception and preparation: Inquiry-based STEM professional development for elementary teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 106(2), 157–168. doi:10.1080/00220671.2012.667014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadelson, L. S., Seifert, A., Moll, A., & Coats, B. (2012). i-STEM summer institute: An integrated approach to teacher professional development in STEM. Journal of STEM Education: Innovation and Outreach, 13(2), 69–83.
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine. (2011). Expanding underrepresented minority participation: America’s science and technology talent at the crossroads. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2010). Preparing teachers: Building evidence for sound policy. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2013). Monitoring progress toward successful K-12 STEM education: A nation advancing? Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. (2010). Women in science and engineering in Canada. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation. (2008). Comments on outreach from the mathematical and physical sciences advisory committee. Retrieved from www.nsf.gov/attachments/110624/public/CommentsonOutreach.pdf
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Chief Scientist. (2013). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics in the national interest: A strategic approach. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Education. (2007). The Ontario curriculum grades 1-8: Science and technology. Retrieved from https://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/elementary/scientec18currb.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Orpwood, G., Schmidt, B., & Jun, H. (2012). Competing in the 21st century skills race. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Council of Chief Executives.
   Google Scholar
• Rahm, J., Martel‐Reny, M. P., & Moore, J. C. (2005). The role of afterschool and community science programs in the lives of urban youth. School Science and Mathematics, 105(6), 283–291. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18129.x
   Google Scholar
• Reiser, B. J. (2013). What professional development strategies are needed for successful implementation of the next generation science standards? Paper prepared for K12 center at ETS invitational symposium on science assessment, Washington, DC. http://www.k12center.org/rsc/pdf/reiser.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Riggs, I. M., & Enochs, L. G. (1990). Toward the development of an elementary teacher’s science teaching efficacy belief instrument. Science Education, 74(6), 625–637. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20–26.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, W. H. (2011). STEM reform: Which way to go? Retrieved from http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_072642.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schutz, P. A., Chambless, C. B., & DeCuir, J. T. (2004). Multimethods research. In K. B. deMarrais & S. D. Lapan (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences: Frameworks for knowing and doing (pp. 267–281). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Science, Technology and Innovation Council. (2015). State of the nation 2014: Canada’s innovation challenges and opportunities. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stohlmann, M., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2(1), 28–34. doi:10.5703/1288284314653
   Google Scholar
• Swarat, S., Ortony, A., & Revelle, W. (2012). Activity matters: Understanding student interest in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(4), 515–537. doi:10.1002/tea.v49.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomasian, J. (2011). Building a science, technology, engineering, and math education agenda. Washington, DC: National Governors Association, Center for Best Practices.
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783–805. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, C., Tuan, H., & Chin, C. (2013). How to help teachers develop inquiry teaching: Perspectives from experienced science teachers. Research in Science Education, 43, 809–825. doi:10.1007/s11165-012-9292-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM integration: Teacher perceptions and practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1(2), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. M. (2011). Effective STEM teacher preparation, induction, and professional development. Retrieved from http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/STEM_Schools_Workshop_Paper_Wilson.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Woolfolk, A. E., Winne, P. H., Perry, N. E., & Shapka, J. (2009). Educational psychology (4th Canadian ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, C. M., Carini, R. M., & Kuh, G. D. (2005). Searching for the peach blossom Shangri-la: Student engagement of men and women SMET majors. Review of Higher Education, 28(4), 503–525. doi:10.1353/rhe.2005.0054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar