Supporting Beginning Teacher Planning of Investigation-Based Science Discussions

References

• Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. M., Smith, D. C., & Peasley, K. (2000). Integrating learner and learning concerns: Prospective elementary science teachers’ paths and progress. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5), 547–574. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00017-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appleton, K., & Kindt, I. (2002). Beginning elementary teachers’ development as teachers of science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 43–61. doi:10.1023/A:1015181809961
   Google Scholar
• Arias, A. (2015). Learning to teach elementary students to construct evidence-based claims of natural phenomena (Unpublished Doctor of Philosophy: Educational Studies). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Arias, A., & Davis, E. A. (2017). Supporting children to construct evidence-based claims in science: Individual learning trajectories in a practice-based program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 204–218.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In Teaching as the learning profession (pp. 3–31). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497–511. doi:10.1177/0022487109348479
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., Sleep, L., Boerst, T. A., & Bass, H. (2009). Combining the development of practice and the practice of development in teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 458–474. doi:10.1086/596996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching what makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. doi:10.1177/0022487108324554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., Malzahn, K. A., Campbell, K. M., & Weis, A. M. (2013). Report of the 2012 national survey of science and mathematics education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Benedict-Chambers, A. (2016). Using tools to promote novice teacher noticing of science teaching practices in post-rehearsal discussions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 28–44. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93(1), 26–55. doi:10.1002/sce.v93:1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerst, T., Sleep, L., Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2011). Preparing teachers to lead mathematics discussions. Teachers College Record, 113(12), 2844–2877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2011). Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education. Science Education, 95(4), 639–669. doi:10.1002/sce.20449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.
   Google Scholar
• Cartier, J. L., Smith, M. S., Stein, M. K., & Ross, D. K. (2013). 5 practices for orchestrating productive task-based discussions in science. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M., & Wertsch, J. V. (1996). Beyond the individual-social antinomy in discussions of Piaget and Vygotsky. Human Development, 39(5), 250–256. doi:10.1159/000278475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colley, C., & Windschitl, M. (2016). Rigor in elementary science students’ discourse: The role of responsiveness and supportive conditions for talk. Science Education, 100(6), 1009–1038. doi:10.1002/sce.2016.100.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916–937. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613–642. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A. (2016). Evolving goals, practices, and identities as an elementary science teacher educator: Prioritizing practice. In G. Buck & V. Akerson (Eds.), Allowing our professional knowledge of pre-service science teacher education to be enhanced by self-study research: Turning a critical eye on our practice (pp. 151–176). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A., & Boerst, T. A. (2014). Designing elementary teacher education to prepare wellstarted beginners (TeachingWorks Working Papers). University of Michigan, TeachingWorks, Ann Arbor, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 607–651.
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (1994). Interviewing: The art of science. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M. (2012). Linking a learning progression for natural selection to teachers’ enactment of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1181–1210.
   Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (1993). Preservice biology teachers’ knowledge structures as a function of professional teacher education: A yearlong assessment. Science Education, 77(1), 25–45. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotwals, A. W., & Birmingham, D. (2016). Eliciting, identifying, interpreting, and responding to students’ ideas: Teacher candidates’ growth in formative assessment practices. Research in Science Education, 46(3), 365–388. doi:10.1007/s11165-015-9461-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. The Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273–289. doi:10.1080/13540600902875340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haefner, L. A., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2004). Learning by doing? prospective elementary teachers’ developing understandings of scientific inquiry and science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 26(13), 1653–1674. doi:10.1080/0950069042000230709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kademian, S. (2017). Supporting beginning teacher planning and enactment of investigation-based science discussions: The design and use of tools within practice-based teacher education (Unpublished dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar
• Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Cunard, A., & Turrou, A. (2016). Getting inside rehearsals: Insights from teacher educators to support work on complex practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(1), 18–31. doi:10.1177/0022487115615191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloser, M. (2014). Identifying a core set of science teaching practices: A Delphi expert panel approach. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(9), 1185–1217. doi:10.1002/tea.v51.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucan, L., & Palincsar, A. S. (2013). Comprehension instruction through text-based discussion. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., Gess-Newsome, J., & Latz, M. S. (1994). The nature and development of preservice science teachers’ conceptions of subject matter and pedagogy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 129–146. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, S. J., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 91–126). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• McDiarmid, G. W., Ball, D. L., & Anderson, C. W. (1989). Why staying one chapter ahead doesn’t really work; subject specific pedagogy. In M. C. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher (pp. 193–205). New York, NY: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L. (2009). Teachers’ use of curriculum to support students in writing scientific arguments to explain phenomena. Science Education, 93(2), 233–268. doi:10.1002/sce.v93:2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., & Pimentel, D. S. (2010). Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation. Science Education, 94((2)), 203–229.
   Google Scholar
• Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnick, L. B. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), 283–297. doi:10.1007/s11217-007-9071-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods source (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Minogue, J., Madden, L., Bedward, J., Wiebe, E., & Carter, M. (2010). The cross-case analyses of elementary students’ engagement in the strands of science proficiency. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(5), 559–587. doi:10.1007/s10972-010-9195-y
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academics.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. M. (2011). Approximations of practice in the preparation of prospective elementary science teachers (Unpublished dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M., Wu, L. L., Gamoran, A., Zeiser, S., & Long, D. A. (2003). Questions in time: Investigating the structure and dynamics of unfolding classroom discourse. Discourse Processes, 35(2), 135–198. doi:10.1207/S15326950DP3502_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, D. K. (2014). Examining pre-service science teachers’ developing pedagogical design capacity for planning and supporting task-based classroom discussions. (Unpublished Doctor of Philosophy: Science Education). University of Pittsburg, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, D. K., & Cartier, J. L. (2015). Developing pre-service elementary teachers’ pedagogical practices while planning using the learning cycle. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(6), 573–591. doi:10.1007/s10972-015-9439-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. P. (2011). Argument Driven inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study. Science Education, 95(2), 217–257. doi:10.1002/sce.20421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassi, A., Bopardikar, A., Kimball, A., & Michaels, S. (2013). From “sharing out” to “working through ideas”: Helping teaches transition to more productive science talk. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Puerto Rico.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, A. M. (2011). Practicing the practice: Learning to guide elementary science discussions in a practice-oriented science methods course. (Unpublished Doctor of Philosophy: Educational Studies). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), 235–260. doi:10.1080/09500690500336957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzen & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J., Windschitl, M., & Braaten, M. (2013). Developing a theory of ambitious early career teacher practice. American Educational Research Journal, 50(3), 574–615. doi:10.3102/0002831213476334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of high psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2011). Ambitious pedagogy by novice teachers: Who benefits from tool-supported collaborative inquiry into practice and why? Teachers College Record (1970), 113(7), 1311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96(5), 878–903. doi:10.1002/sce.v96.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zangori, L., & Forbes, C. T. (2013). Preservice elementary teachers and explanation construction: Knowledge for practice and knowledge in practice. Science Education, 97(2), 310–330. doi:10.1002/sce.2013.97.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembal-Saul, C., Blumenfeld, P., & Krajcik, J. (2000). Influence of guided cycles of planning, teaching, and reflection on prospective elementary teachers’ science content representations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 318–339. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembal-Saul, C., McNeill, K. L., & Hershberger, K. (2013). What’s your evidence? Engaging K-5 children in constructing explanations in science. Columbus, OH: Pearson.
   Google Scholar