477
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Examining the Effects of a Professional Development Initiative on English Learning and Economically Disadvantaged Adolescents’ Scores on a High-Stakes Science Test

, , &

References

  • Adamson, K., Santau, A., & Lee, O. (2013). The impact of professional development on elementary teachers’ strategies for teaching science with diverse student groups in urban elementary schools. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 553–571. doi:10.1007/s10972-012-9306-z
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, NY: Oxford Press.
  • American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
  • Ardasheva, Y., & Tretter, T. R. (2017). Developing science-specific, technical vocabulary of high school newcomer English learners. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(3), 252–271. doi:10.1080/13670050.2015.1042356
  • August, D., Artzi, L., & Barr, C. (2016). Helping ELLs meet standards in English language arts and science: An intervention focused on academic vocabulary. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 32(4), 373–396. doi:10.1080/10573569.2015.1039738
  • August, D., Branum-Martin, L., Cardenas-Hagan, E., & Francis, D. J. (2009). The impact of an instructional intervention on the science and language learning of middle grade English language learners. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(4), 345–376. doi:10.1080/19345740903217623
  • August, D., & Shanahan, T. (Eds.). (2006). Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on language-minority children and youth. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. doi:10.2167/le129b.0
  • Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins, effectiveness, and applications. BSCS Executive Summary. Colorado Springs, CO: Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (BSCS). Retrieved from https://bscs.org/bscs-5e-instructional-model
  • Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Collier, V. P., & Thomas, W. P. (1989). How quickly can immigrants become proficient in school English? Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, 5, 26–38.
  • Cuevas, P., Lee, O., Hart, J., & Deaktor, R. (2005). Improving science inquiry with elementary students of diverse backgrounds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(3), 337–357. doi:10.1002/tea.20053
  • Cummins, J. (1981). Empirical and theoretical underpinnings of bilingual education. The Journal of Education, 163(1), 16–29. doi:10.1177/002205748116300104
  • Echevarria, J., Richards-Tutor, C., Canges, R., & Francis, D. (2011). Using the SIOP model to promote the acquisition of language and science concepts with English learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 34(3), 334–351. doi:10.1080/15235882.2011.623600
  • Fang, Z. (2006). The language demands of science reading in middle school. International Journal of Science Education, 28(5), 491–520. doi:10.1080/09500690500339092
  • Fang, Z., & Wei, Y. (2010). Improving middle school students’ science literacy through reading infusion. Journal of Educational Research, 103(4), 262–273. doi:10.1080/00220670903383051
  • Gee, J. P. (2004). Language in the science classroom: Academic social languages as the heart of school-based literacy. In Establishing scientific classroom discourse communities (pp. 19–37). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. doi:10.4324/9781410611734
  • Graves, M. (2006). The vocabulary book: Learning and instruction. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Graves, M., Baumann, J., Blachowicz, C., Manyok, P., Bates, A., Cieply, C., & Von Gunten, H. (2014). Words, words, everywhere, but which ones do we teach?. The Reading Teacher, 67(5), 333–346. doi:10.1002/trtr.1228
  • Grissom, R. J., & Kim, J. J. (2005). Effect sizes for research: A broad practical approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Jackson, J. (2018). Build an interactive word wall: Connecting scientific concepts with academic vocabulary. The Science Teacher, 85(1), 42–46.
  • Jackson, J., & Ash, G. (2012). Science achievement for all: Improving science performance and closing achievement gaps. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(7), 723–744. doi: 10.1007/s10972-011-9238-z
  • Jackson, J., & Durham, A. (2016). Put your walls to work: Planning and using interactive word walls to support science and reading instruction. Science and Children, 54(3), 78–84.
  • Jackson, J., & Narvaez, R. (2013). Interactive word walls: Create a tool to increase science vocabulary in five easy steps. Science and Children, 51(1), 42–49.
  • Jackson, J., Wise, E., Zurbuchen, K., & Gardner, N. (2017). Interactive word walls: Visual scaffolds that transform vocabulary instruction. Science Scope, 40(9), 72–79.
  • Kieffer, M. J., Lesaux, N. K., Rivera, M., & Francis, D. J. (2009). Accommodations for English language learners taking large-scale assessments: A meta-analysis on effectiveness and validity. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1168–1201. doi:10.3102/0034654309332490
  • Kohlhaas, K., Lin, -H.-H., & Chu, K.-L. (2010). Disaggregated outcomes of gender, ethnicity, and poverty on fifth grade science performance. Research in Middle Level Education Online, 33(7), 1–12. doi:10.1080/19404476.2010.11462070
  • Lara-Alecio, R., Tong, F., Irby, B. J., Guerrero, C., Huerta, M., & Fan, Y. (2012). The effect of an instructional intervention on middle school English learners’ science and English reading achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(8), 987–1011. doi:10.1002/tea.21031
  • Lee, O., Deaktor, R. A., Hart, J. E., Cuevas, P., & Enders, C. (2005). An instructional intervention’s impact on the science and literacy achievement of culturally and linguistically diverse elementary students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(8), 857–887. doi:10.1002/tea.20071
  • Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • Lesaux, N. K., & Kieffer, M. J. (2010). Exploring sources of reading comprehension difficulties among language minority learners and their classmates in early adolescence. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 596–632. doi:10.3102/0002831209355469
  • Lynch, S., Kuipers, J., Pyke, C., & Szesze, M. (2005). Examining the effects of a highly rated science curriculum unit on diverse students: Results from a planning grant. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(8), 912–946. doi:10.1002/tea.20080
  • Maerten-Rivera, J., Ahn, S., Lanier, K., Diaz, J., & Lee, O. (2016). Effect of a multiyear intervention on science achievement of all students including English language learners. The Elementary School Journal, 116(4), 600–624. doi:10.1086/686250
  • Mangiante, E. S. (2018). Planning for reform-based science: Case studies of two urban elementary teachers. Research in Science Education, 48(1), 207–232. doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9566-2
  • McFarland, J., Hussar, W., DeBrey, C., Snyder, T., Wang, X., Wilkinson-Flicker, S., & Hinz, S. (2017). The condition of education 2017 (NCES 2017-144). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. doi:10.1037/e492172006-019
  • Muller, P. A., Stage, F. K., & Kinzie, J. (2001). Science achievement growth trajectories: Understanding factors related to gender and racial-ethnic differences in precollege science achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 981–1012. doi:10.3102/00028312038004981
  • Nation, K., Cocksey, J., Taylor, J. S., & Bishop, D. V. (2010). A longitudinal investigation of early reading and language skills in children with poor reading comprehension. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(9), 1031–1039. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02254.x
  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from www.nextgenscience.org/
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). Education at a glance 2014: OECD indicators. Paris, France: Author. doi:10.1787/eag-2014-en
  • Quinn, H., Lee, O., & Valdés, G. (2012). Language demands and opportunities in relation to Next Generation Science Standards for English language learners: What teachers need to know. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Understanding Language Initiative at Stanford University (ell.stanford.edu).
  • Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Shavelson, R. J., Hamilton, L., & Klein, S. (2002). On the evaluation of systemic science education reform: Searching for instructional sensitivity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(5), 369–393. doi:10.1002/tea.10027
  • Santau, A. O., Secada, W., Maerten-Rivera, J., Cone, N., & Lee, O. (2010). US urban elementary teachers’ knowledge and practices in teaching science to English language learners: Results from the first year of a professional development intervention. International Journal of Science Education, 32(15), 2007–2032. doi:10.1080/09500690903280588
  • Scarcella, R. (2003). Academic English: A conceptual framework (Technical Report 2003-1). Berkeley, CA: University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED531333). Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/6pd082d4
  • Shaw, J. M., Lyon, E. G., Stoddart, T., Mosqueda, E., & Menon, P. (2014). Improving science and literacy learning for English language learners: Evidence from a pre-service teacher preparation intervention. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(5), 621–643. doi:10.1007/s10972-013-9376-6
  • Texas Education Agency [TEA]. (2012). STARR ECO external validity studies. Retrieved from https://tea.texas.gov/staar/vldstd.aspx
  • Texas Education Agency [TEA]. (2015). Glossary of terms, 2007-08: Division of research and analysis. Retrieved from https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/acctres/gloss0708.html
  • Thompson, B. (2008). Foundations of behavioral statistics: An insight-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Tong, F., Irby, B. J., Lara-Alecio, R., Guerrero, C., Fan, Y., & Huerta, M. (2014). A randomized study of a literacy-integrated science intervention for low-socio-economic status middle school students: Findings from first-year implementation. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 2083–2109. doi:10.1080/09500693.2014.883107

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.