Negotiating Coherent Science Teacher Professional Learning Experiences Across a University and Partner School Settings

References

• Achieve, Inc. (2017). Primary evaluation of essential criteria (PEEC) for next generation science standards instructional materials design. Retrieved February 24, 2018, from https://www.nextgenscience.org/peec
   Google Scholar
• Anagnostopoulos, D., Levine, T., Roselle, R., & Lombardi, A. (2018). Learning to redesign teacher education: A conceptual framework to support program change. Teaching Education, 29(1), 61–80. doi:10.1080/10476210.2017.1349744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevin, B., & Penuel, W. R. (2018). Connecting research and practice for educational improvement. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X033008003
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141–178. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289–325). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Bullough, R., Burrell, J., Young, J., Clark, D., Erickson, L., Earle, R., … Egan, W. M. (1999). Paradise unrealized: Teacher education and the costs and benefits of school-university partnerships. Journal of Teacher Education, 50, 381–390. doi:10.1177/002248719905000511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullough, R., Hobbs, S., Kauchak, D., Crow, N., & Stokes, D. (1997). Long-term PDS development in research universities and the clinicalization of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 48, 85–93. doi:10.1177/0022487197048002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, T., Verma, G., Puvirajah, A., Villagra, A., & Tokarski, C. (2017). Connecticut Science Center’s Teen Innovation Program: Supporting teens’ STEM communication competence. Hartford, CT: Connecticut Science Center.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., Confrey, J., DiSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13. doi:10.3102/0013189X032001009
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., & Penuel, W. R. (2016). Research–Practice partnerships in education: Outcomes, dynamics, and open questions. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 48–54. doi:10.3102/0013189X16631750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., Penuel, W. R., & Geil, K. (2013). Research-practice partnerships at the district level: A new strategy for leveraging research for educational improvement. Berkeley, CA and Boulder, CO: University of California and University of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O’Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15–22). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, M. S., & Snow, C. (2018). Sustaining research-practice partnerships: Benefits and challenges of a long-term research and development agenda. In B. Bevin & W. R. Penuel (Eds.), Connecting research and practice for educational improvement (pp. 33–50). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, M. S., Wigdor, A. K., & Snow, C. (Eds.). (2003). Strategic education research partnership. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fazio, X., & Volante, L. (2011). Preservice science teachers' perceptions of their practicum classrooms. The Teacher Educator, 46(2), 126–144.
   Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945. doi:10.3102/00028312038004915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenewald, T. (2004). A phenomenological research design illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 1–25. doi:10.1177/160940690400300104
   Google Scholar
• Krajcik, J. (2015). Three-dimensional instruction: Using a new type of teaching in the science classroom. The Science Teacher, 83(8), 50–52.
   Google Scholar
• Krajcik, J., Codere, S., Dahsah, C., Bayer, R., & Mun, K. (2014). Planning instruction to meet the intent of the next generation science standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 157–175. doi:10.1007/s10972-014-9383-2
   Google Scholar
• Lampert, M. (2010). Learning teaching in, from, and for practice: What do we mean? Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 21–34. doi:10.1177/0022487109347321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, T. J., Schilling, V., Campbell, T., & UConn Mentor Teacher Collaborative. (2017). How can mentor teachers and university educators support preservice science teachers? STEM Teaching Tools. http://stemteachingtools.org/brief/49
   Google Scholar
• Moon, J., Passmore, C., Reiser, B. J., & Michaels, S. (2014). Beyond comparisons of online versus face-to-face PD: Commentary in response to Fishman et al., “Comparing the impact of online and face-to-face professional development in the context of curriculum implementation.” Journal of Teacher Education, 65(2), 172–176. doi:10.1177/0022487113511497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine [NASEM]. (2015). Science teachers’ learning: Enhancing opportunities creating supportive contexts. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine [NASEM]. (2018). Design, selection, and implementation of instructional materials for the next generation science standards (NGSS): Proceedings of a workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council [NRC]. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., Bell, P., Bevan, B., Buffington, P., & Falk, J. (2016). Enhancing use of learning sciences research in planning for and supporting educational change: Leveraging and building social networks. Journal of Educational Change, 17(2), 251–278. doi:10.1007/s10833-015-9266-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., Coburn, C. E., & Gallagher, D. J. (2013). Negotiating problems of practice in research–Practice design partnerships. National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, 112(2), 237–255.
   Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., Harris, C. J., & Debarger, A. H. (2015). Implementing the next generation science standards. Phi Delta Kappan, 96(6), 45–49. doi:10.1177/0031721715575299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X029001004
   Google Scholar
• Reiser, B. J. (2013, September). What professional development strategies are needed for successful implementation of the next generation science standards. Paper presented at the Invitational Research Symposium on Science Assessment. K-12 Center at ETS, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Research + Practice Collaboratory. (2015). Activity: Negotiating a focus for joint work in an RPP. Retrieved April 11, 2018, from http://researchandpractice.org/resource/negotiating-and-understanding-a-focus-for-joint-work/
   Google Scholar
• Ross, D., Campbell, T., McKenna, T. J., Schilling, V., Rodriguez, L., & UConn Mentor Teacher Collaborative. (2018). Supporting preservice teachers with task-based instruction. STEM Teaching Tools. http://stemteachingtools.org/brief/53
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A. (2004). Developing learning theory by refining conjectures embodied in educational designs. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 213–223. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3904_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A. (2014). Conjecture mapping: An approach to systematic educational design research. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(1), 18–36. doi:10.1080/10508406.2013.778204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, V., McKenna, T. J., Campbell, T., & UConn Mentor Teacher Collaborative. (2017). Orienting preservice teachers to students’ ideas and sensemaking. STEM Teaching Tools. http://stemteachingtools.org/brief/50
   Google Scholar
• Severance, S., Penuel, W. R., Sumner, T., & Leary, H. (2017). Organizing for teacher agency in curricular co-design. Journal of Learning Sciences, 25(4), 531–564. doi:10.1080/10508406.2016.1207541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroupe, D., & Windschitl, M. (2015). Supporting ambitious instruction by beginning teachers with specialized tools and practices. In J. Luft, & S. Dubois (Eds.), Newly hired teachers of science: A better beginning (pp.181–196). The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• The Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32, 5–8. doi:10.3102/0013189X032001005
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, T., Hagenah, S., Kang, H., Stroupe, D., Braaten, M., Colley, C., & Windschitl, M. (2016). Rigor and responsiveness in classroom activity. Teachers College Record, 118(5), 1–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, V., Fleischman, S., & Quintero, E. (2018). Democratizing evidence in education. In B. Bevin & W. R. Penuel (Eds.), Connecting research and practice for educational improvement (pp. 3–16). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. M. (2013). Professional development for science teachers. Science, 340(6130), 310–313. doi:10.1126/science.1230725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisniewski, R. (1982). Three scenarios for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 33(2), 2–6. doi:10.1177/002248718203300201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K. (2007). Professional development schools in a culture of evidence and accountability. School-University Partnerships, 1(1), 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 89–99. doi:10.1177/0022487109347671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar