Using the Case Method to Foster Preservice Biology Teachers’ Content Knowledge and Pedagogical Content Knowledge Related to Models and Modeling

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2005). Developing deeper understandings of nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 15–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1057–1095. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Abell, S. K. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1405–1416. doi:10.1080/09500690802187041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295–317. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailer-Jones, D. (2003). When scientific models represent. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 17(1), 59–74. doi:10.1080/02698590305238
   Google Scholar
• Bailer-Jones, D. M. (2009). Scientific models in philosophy of science. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., … Tsai, Y. M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, A., Depaepe, F., & Van Driel, J. (2016). Pedagogical content knowledge in teacher education. In J. Loughran & M. L. Hamilton (Eds.), International handbook of teacher education (pp. 347–386). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Blömeke, S. (2002). Universität und Lehrerausbildung [University and teacher education]. Bad Heilbrunn/OBB., Germany: Klinkhardt.
   Google Scholar
• Blömeke, S., & Suhl, U. (2010). Modellierung von Lehrerkompetenzen: Nutzung unterschiedlicher IRT-Skalierungen zur Diagnose von Stärken und Schwächen deutscher Referendarinnen und Referendare im internationalen Vergleich [Modeling teacher competencies: Using different IRT-scales to diagnose strengths and weaknesses of German teacher trainees in an international comparison]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 13(3), 473–505.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, T., Oh, P., Maughn, M., Kiriazis, N., & Zuwallack, R. (2015). A review of modeling pedagogies: Pedagogical functions, discursive acts, and technology in modeling instruction. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 159–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough, M. (2011). The story behind the science: Bringing science and scientists to life in post-secondary science education. Science & Education, 20(7), 701–717. doi:10.1007/s11191-010-9310-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19(2), 2–10. doi:10.3102/0013189X019006002
   Google Scholar
• Cortina, K. S., & Thames, M. H. (2013). Teacher education in Germany. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers: Results from the COACTIV project (pp. 49–62). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. A., & Cullin, M. J. (2005). Dynamic assessments of preservice teachers’ knowledge of models and modelling. In K. Boersma, M. Goedhart, O. de Jong, & H. Eijkelhof (Eds.), Research and the quality of education (pp. 309–323). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). How teacher education matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 166–173. doi:10.1177/0022487100051003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Holtzmann, D. J., Gatlin, S. J., & Heilig, J. V. (2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification, teach for America, and teacher effectiveness. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(42), 1–51. doi:10.14507/epaa.v13n42.2005
   Google Scholar
• Döbert, H. (2015). Germany. In W. Höner, H. Döbert, B. von Kopp, & W. Mitter (Eds.), (2007). The education systems of Europe (pp. 305–333). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, A. (2014). Epidemiology. Science, 346(6215), 1294–1295. doi:10.1126/science.1255826
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London, Great Britain: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fleige, J., Seegers, A., Upmeier zu Belzen, A., & Krüger, D. (2012). Förderung von Modellkompetenz im Biologieunterricht [Fostering model competence in biology education]. MNU, 65(1), 19–28.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrichsen, P. J., Abdell, S., Pareja, E., Brown, P., Lankford, D., & Volkmann, M. (2009). Does teaching experience matter? Examining biology teachers’ prior knowledge for teaching in an alternative certification program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(4), 357–383. doi:10.1002/tea.20283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2016). Models in science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2016 ed.). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/models-science/
   Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 3–17). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK summit. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–42). London: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giere, R. (2004). How models are used to represent reality. Philosophy of Science, 71(5), 742–752. doi:10.1086/425063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K., & Justi, R. (2016). Modelling-based teaching in science education. Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gouvea, J., & Passmore, C. (2017). `Models of´ versus `Models for´: Toward an agent-based conception of modeling in the science classroom. Science & Education, 26(1–2), 49–63. doi:10.1007/s11191-017-9884-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E., & Smith, C. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 799–822. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Großschedl, J., Harms, U., Kleickmann, T., & Glowinski, I. (2015). Preservice biology teachers´ professional knowledge: Structure and learning opportunities. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(3), 291–318. doi:10.1007/s10972-015-9423-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grünkorn, J., Upmeier zu Belzen, A., & Krüger, D. (2014). Assessing Students’ Understandings of Biological Models and their Use in Science to Evaluate a Theoretical Framework. International Journal of Science Education, 36(10), 1651–1684.
   Google Scholar
• Günther, S. L., Fleige, J., Krüger, D., & Upmeier zu Belzen, A. (2014). Developing preservice biology teachers´ diagnostic and teaching skills with regard to biological models. Paper presented at the conference “Education and training for european teachers: Competence models, curricular objectives and harmonising theory and practice„ January 20th and 21st 2014, Zollverein Essen - World Heritage Site. Organiser: Hochschulrektorenkonferenz, Projekt nexus.
   Google Scholar
• Günther, S. L, Fleige, J., Upmeier zu Belzen, A., & Krüger, D. (2017). Interventionsstudie mit angehenden lehrkräften zur förderung von modellkompetenz im unterrichtsfach biologie [Intervention study with preservice biology teachers to foster model competence in biology education]. In C. Gräsel, & K. Trempler (Eds.), Entwicklung von Professionalität pädagogischen Personals. Interdisziplinäre Betrachtungen, Befunde und Perspektiven (pp. 215–236). Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., & Shulman, L. (2002). Toward expert thinking: How curriculum case writing prompts the development of theory-based professional knowledge in student teachers. Teaching Education, 13(2), 219–243. doi:10.1080/1047621022000007594
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). A typology of school science models. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1011–1026. doi:10.1080/095006900416884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Henze, I., Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2007). Science teachers´ knowledge about teaching models and modelling in the context of new syllabus on public understanding of science. Research in Science Education, 37(2), 99–122. doi:10.1007/s11165-006-9017-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henze, I., Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2008). Development of experienced science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of models of the solar system and the universe. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1321‐1342. doi:10.1080/09500690802187017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. (2014). Learning science, learning about science, doing science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2534–2553. doi:10.1080/09500693.2014.899722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justi, R. S., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002). Modelling, teachers’ views on the nature of modelling and implications for the education of modellers. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 369–387. doi:10.1080/09500690110110142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justi, R. S., & Gilbert, J. K. (2003). Teachers’ views on the nature of models. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1369–1386. doi:10.1080/0950069032000070324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justi, R. S., & Van Driel, J. (2005). The development of science teachers’ knowledge on models and modelling: Promoting, characterizing, and understanding the process. International Journal of Science Education, 27(5), 549–573. doi:10.1080/0950069042000323773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katajavuori, N., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Hirvonen, J. (2006). The significance of practical training in linking theoretical studies with practice. Higher Education, 51(3), 439–464. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-6391-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, S. (2011). What’s missing in model-based teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(6), 535–560. doi:10.1007/s10972-011-9248-x
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, S. (2013). Modellierung und Analyse des Professionswissens von Physiklehrkräften [Modelling and analysing physics teachers´ professional knowledge]. Berlin, Germany: Logos.
   Google Scholar
• Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2013). Teachers´ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: The role of structural differences in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(1), 90–106. doi:10.1177/0022487112460398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinfeld, J. (1991). Changes in problem solving abilities of students taught through case methods. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, S., Krell, M., & Krüger, D. (2016). Förderung von modellkompetenz durch den einsatz einer blackbox [Fostering model competence with the use of a black box]. Erkenntnisweg Biologiedidaktik, 14, 93–108.
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, S., Baumert, J., & Blum, W. (2008). Secondary mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge: Validation of the COACTIV constructs. International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(5), 873–892.
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, S., Kunter, M., Brunner, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., & Neubrand, M. (2004). COACTIV: Professionswissen von Lehrkräften, kognitiv aktivierender Mathematikunterricht und die Entwicklung von mathematischer Kompetenz [COACTIV: Teachers´ professional knowledge, cognitively activating instruction, and the development of students’ mathematical literacy]. In J. Doll & M. Prenzel (Eds.), Die Bildungsqualität von Schule: Lehrerprofessionalisierung, Unterrichtsentwicklung und Schülerförderung als Strategien der Qualitätsverbesserung (pp. 31–53). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Krell, M., Upmeier zu Belzen, A., & Krüger, D. (2012). Students’ understanding of the purpose of models in different biological contexts. International Journal of Biology Education, 2(2),1–34. Retrieved from http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/ijobed/article/view/5000115839/5000107805
   Google Scholar
• Krell, M., & Krüger, D. (2017). University students’ meta-modelling knowledge. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(3), 261–273. doi:10.1080/02635143.2016.1274724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A. (1999). Survey research. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 537–567. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laubichler, M., & Müller, G. (Eds.). (2007). Modeling biology: Structures, behaviors, evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, B. B. (1995). Using the case method in teacher education: The role of discussion and experience in teachers’ thinking about cases. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 63–79. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(94)00013-V
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughran, L., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2008). Exploring pedagogical content knowledge in science teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1301–1320. doi:10.1080/09500690802187009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teacher. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Mahr, B. (2008). Modelle. In U. Dirks & E. Knobloch (Eds.), Ein Modell des Modellseins. Ein Beitrag zur Aufklärung des Modellbegriffs [Model of model-being. Clarification of the concept of the term model] (pp. 187–218). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Mahr, B. (2011). On the epistemology of models. In G. Abel & J. Conant (Eds.), Rethinking Epistemology (pp. 301–352). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2002). Qualitative content analysis. In M. Kiegelmann (Ed.), The role of the researcher in qualitative psychology (pp. 139–148). Tübingen, Germany: Ingeborg Huber.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken [Qualitative content analysis. Principles and techniques]. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Merkel, R. (2012). Förderung des vernetzten Denkens. Einsatz der Fallmethode im Master of Education [Fostering cross-linked thinking abilities. Use of the case method in the master of education] (Doctoral dissertation, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät I der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin). Retrieved from https://edoc.hu-berlin.de/bitstream/handle/18452/17270/merkel.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• Merseth, K. K. (1996). Case and case methods in teacher education. In J. P. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education. A project of the association of teacher educators (pp. 722–744). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Moosbrugger, H., & Kelava, A. (2012). Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion [Test theory and design of questionnaires]. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Munby, H., & Russell, T. (1994). The authority of experience in learning to teach: Messages from a physics methods class. Journal of Teacher Education, 45(2), 86–95. doi:10.1177/0022487194045002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, P., & Loughran, J. (2012). Exploring the development of pre-service science elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(7), 699–721. doi:10.1007/s10972-011-9239-y
   Google Scholar
• Odenbaugh, J. (2005). Idealized, inaccurate but successful: A pragmatic approach to evaluating models in theoretical ecology. Biology and Philosophy, 20(2), 231–255. doi:10.1007/s10539-004-0478-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S., & Oliver, S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261–284. doi:10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passmore, C., Svoboda Gouvea, J., & Giere, R. (2014). Models in science and in learning science. In M. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 1171–1202). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchey, T. (2012). Outline for a morphology of modelling methods: Contribution to a general theory of modelling. Acta Morphologica Generalis. On-line Journal of the Swedish Morphological Society, 1(1), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Rivkin, S., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometria, 73(2), 417–458. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockoff, J. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement. Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94(2), 247–252. doi:10.1257/0002828041302244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidel, T., Blomberg, G., & Renkl, A. (2013). Instructional strategies for using video in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 56–65. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekretariat der Ständigen Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der BRD. (2005). Bildungsstandards im Fach Biologie für den Mittleren Schulabschluss [Biology education standards for the Mittlere Schulabschluss]. München, Germany: Wolters Kluwer Deutschland. Retrieved from http://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/veroeffentlichungen_beschluesse/2004/2004_12_16-Bildungsstandards-Biologie.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Wissenschaft (Eds.). (2014). Handbuch Vorbereitungsdienst [Manual traineeship]. Berlin, Germany: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1992). Toward a pedagogy of cases. In J. H. Shulman (Ed.), Case methods in teacher education (pp. 1–30). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1996). Just in case: Reflections on learning from experience. In J. A. Colbert, P. Desherg, & K. Trimble (Eds.), The case of education. Contemporary for using case methods (pp. 197–217). Boston, MA: Allyn Bacon Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (2004). Just in case. The wisdom of practice. In L. S. Shulman (Ed.), Essays on teaching, learning and learning to teach (pp. 263–482). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (2015). PCK: Its genesis and exodus. In A. K. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 3–13). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sykes, G., & Bird, T. (1992). Teacher education and the case idea. Review of Research and Education, 18(1), 457–521.
   Google Scholar
• Syring, M., Bohl, T., Kleinknecht, M., Kuntze, S., Rehm, M., & Schneider, J. (2016). Fallarbeit als Angebot - fallbasiertes Lernen als Nutzung: Empirische Ergebnisse zur kognitiven Belastung, Motivation und Emotionen bei der Arbeit mit Unterrichtsfällen [Casework as offer – Case-based learning as use: Empirical results on cognitive stress, motivation and emotions when working with teaching cases]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 62(1), 86–108.
   Google Scholar
• Upmeier zu Belzen, A., & Krüger, D. (2010). Modellkompetenz im Biologieunterricht. Struktur und Entwicklung. [Model Competence in Biology Education. Structure and Development]. ZfDN, 16, pp. 41–57. Retrieved from http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/zfdn/pdf/16_Upmeier.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Van Driel, J., & Verloop, N. (1999). Teachers’ knowledge of models and modelling in science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(11), 1141–1154. doi:10.1080/095006999290110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2002). Experienced teachers` knowledge of teaching and learning of models and modeling in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 24(12), 1255–1272. doi:10.1080/09500690210126711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model‐based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941–967. doi:10.1002/sce.v92:5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar