Investigating Elementary Preservice Teachers’ Designs for Integrated Science/Literacy Instruction Highlighting Similar Cognitive Processes

References

• Akerson, V. L. (2008). Using action research projects to help preservice elementary teachers effectively use interdisciplinary language arts and science instruction. In V. L. Akerson (Ed.), Interdisciplinary language arts and science instruction in elementary classrooms: Applying research to practice (pp. 279–293). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1965). Science, a process approach. Washington, D. C.: AAAS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. W. (2003). Teaching science for motivation and understanding. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, L. (1991). Metacognition, reading, and science education. In C. M. Santa & D. E. Alvermann (Eds.), Science learning: Processing and applications (pp. 2–13). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, L. U. (2014). Linking science and language arts: A review of the literature which compares integrated versus non-integrated approaches. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 465–488. doi:10.1007/s10972-013-9368-6
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Carlson Powell, J., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2005). The BSCS 5E instructional model: An executive summary. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cervetti, G. N., Barber, J., Dorph, R., Pearson, P. D., & Goldschmidt, P. G. (2012). The impact of an integrated approach to science and literacy in elementary classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(5), 631–658. doi:10.1002/tea.21015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervetti, G. N., Pearson, P. D., Bravo, M. A., & Barber, J. (2005). Reading and writing in the service of inquiry-based science. (Working paper). Retrieved from http://www-pub.naz.edu/~sprouts/general/Science_Literacy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among the five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A., & Smithey, J. (2009). Beginning teachers moving effectively toward inquiry science teaching. Science Education, 93, 745–770. doi:10.1002/sce.20311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes, C. T. (2011). Curriculum-dependent and curriculum-independent factors in preservice elementary teachers’ adaptation of science curriculum materials for inquiry-based science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24, 179–197. doi:10.1007/s10972-011-9245-0
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, C. T., & Davis, E. A. (2010). Beginning elementary teachers’ beliefs about the use of anchoring questions in science: A longitudinal study. Science Education, 94, 365–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgia Department of Education. (2005). Georgia performance standards for science. Retrieved from https://www.georgiastandards.org/Pages/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Goldston, M. J. F., & Downey, L. (2012). Your science classroom: Becoming an elementary/middle school science teacher. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gunckel, K. (2011). Mediators of a preservice teacher’s use of the inquiry-application instructional model. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 79–100. doi:10.1007/s10972-010-9223-y
   Google Scholar
• Holliday, W. G., Yore, L. D., & Alvermann, D. E. (1994). The reading–Science learning–Writing connection: Breakthroughs, barriers, and promises. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 877–893. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howes, E. V., Lim, M., & Campos, J. (2009). Journeys into inquiry-based elementary science: Literacy practices, questioning, and empirical study. Science Education, 93, 189–217. doi:10.1002/sce.v93:2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keys, C. W. (1993).The interaction between a collaborative writing intervention and the development of science understandings in a ninth grade classooom. Unpublished doct. diss, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. S., Lee, J. T., Keene, K. A., Holstein, K., Eley, P., & Early, M. ( undated). Pedagogical content moves in an inquiry-oriented differential equations class: Purposeful decisions to further mathematical discourse. Retrieved from http://sigmaa.maa.org/rume/crume2009/HLee_LONG.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/13165
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224–240. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowicki, B. L., Sullivan-Watts, B., Shim, M. K., Young, B., & Pockalny, R. (2013). Factors influencing science content accuracy in elementary inquiry science lessons. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 1135–1154. doi:10.1007/s11165-012-9303-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padilla, M. J., Okey, J. R., & Garrard, K. (1984). The effects of instruction on integrated science process skill achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(3), 277–287. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palincsar, A. S., & Magnusson, S. J. (2001). The interplay of firsthand and text-based investigations to model and support the development of scientific knowledge and reasoning. In S. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty five years of progress (pp. 151–194). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell-Gates, V., Duke, N. K., & Martineau, J. A. (2007). Learning to read and write genre-specific text: Roles of authentic experience and explicit teaching. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(1), 8–45. doi:10.1598/RRQ.42.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246. doi:10.3102/00346543075002211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romance, N. R., & Vitale, M. R. (1992). A curriculum strategy that expands time for in-depth elementary science instruction by using science-based reading strategies: Effects of a year-long study in grade four. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 545–554. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romance, N. R., & Vitale, M. R. (2001). Implementing an in-depth expanded science model in elementary schools: Multi-year findings, research issues, and policy implications. International Journal of Science Education, 23(4), 373–404. doi:10.1080/09500690116738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C. (2009). Developing elementary preservice teachers’ knowledge and practices through model-centered inquiry. Science Education, 93, 720–744. doi:10.1002/sce.20324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørvik, G. O., Blikstad-Balas, M., & Ødegaard, M. (2014). Do books like these have authors? New roles for text and new demands on students in integrated science-literacy instruction in primary school. Science Education. doi:10.1002/sce.21143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan-Watts, B., Nowicki, B. L., Minusk, K. S., & Young, B. J. (2013). Sustaining reform-based science teaching of preservice and inservice elementary school teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(5), 879–905. doi:10.1007/S109972-012-9313-0
   Google Scholar
• Thier, M., Daviss, B., & Pratt, H. (2002). The new science literacy. Portsmouth, RI: Heinnemann.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87, 112–143. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zangori, L., Forbes, C. T., & Biggers, M. (2013). Fostering student sense-making in elementary science learning environments: Elementary teachers’ use of science curriculum materials to promote explanation construction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(8), 989–1017. doi:10.1002/tea.v50.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar