414
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Teacher Candidate Tool-Supported Video Analysis of Students’ Science Thinking

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Anderson, L. W., Krathwoho, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., ... Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives, abridged edition. White Plains, NY: Longman.
  • Ball, D., & Forzani, F. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497–511. doi:10.1177/0022487109348479
  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. doi:10.1177/0022487108324554
  • Barnhart, T., & van Es, E. (2015). Studying teacher noticing: Examining the relationship among preservice science teachers’ ability to attend, analyze and respond to student thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 83–93. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.005
  • Berliner, D. C. (1994). Expertise: The wonder of exemplary performances. In J. N. Mangieri & C. C. Block (Eds.), Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students (pp. 141–186). Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Berliner, D. C. (2001). Learning about and learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 463–482. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00004-6
  • Brophy, J. (2004). Using video in teacher education. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
  • Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D. M., & Grant, T. (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1109–1136. doi:10.1002/tea.20440
  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2007). Powerful teacher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., Hammerness, K., Grossman, P., Rust, F., & Shulman, L. (2005). The design of teacher education programs. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 390–441). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. doi:10.1080/13639080020028747
  • Engeström, Y. (2014). Learning by expanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Forsythe, M., & Johnson, H. J. (2017). What to see, what to say: Tips for participating in teacher video clubs. Tools for Learning Schools, 20(2).
  • Forzani, F. M. (2014). Understanding “core practices” and “practice-based” teacher education: Learning from the past. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 357–368. doi:10.1177/0022487114533800
  • Greeno, J. G. (2006). Learning in activity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 79–96). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Greeno, J. G., Collins, A., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition in learning. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15–46). New York, NY: Macmillan.
  • Greeno, J. G., & Engeström, Y. (2014). Learning in activity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 128–149). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re‐imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273–289. doi:10.1080/13540600902875340
  • Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184–205. doi:10.3102/0002831207312906
  • Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied Thematic Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Hammer, D. (2000). Teacher inquiry. In J. Minstrell & E. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 184–215). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
  • Hammer, D., & van Zee, E. (2006). Seeing the science in children’s thinking: Case studies of student inquiry in physical science. Portsmouth, HN: Heinemann Educational Books.
  • Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford with Berliner. D., Cochran-Smith, M., McDonald, M., & Zeichner, K. (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 358–389). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Horn, I. S. (2015). Teachers learning together: Pedagogical reasoning in mathematics teachers’ collaborative conversations. In Selected Regular Lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 333–342). Springer, Cham.
  • Hundley, M., Palmeri, A., Hostetler, A. L., Johnson, H. J., Dunleavy, T., & Self, E. (2018). A thing to be learned: Developmental trajectories, disciplinary practices, and sites of practice in novice teacher learning. In D. Polly, M. Putnam, T. M. Petty, and A. J. Good (Eds.), Handbook of research on professional development for quality teaching and learning (pp. 153–180). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169–202.
  • Johnson, H. J., & Cotterman, M. (2015). Developing preservice teachers' knowledge of science teaching through video clubs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(4), 393–417. doi:10.1007/s10972-015-9429-0
  • Kang, H., & Anderson, C. W. (2015). Supporting preservice science teachers’ ability to attend and respond to student thinking by design. Science Education, 99, 863–895. doi:10.1002/sce.2015.99.issue-5
  • Kang, H., & van Es, E. A. (2018). Articulating design principles for productive use of video in preservice education. Journal of Teacher Education, doi:10.1177/0022487118778549
  • Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, 2, 63–82.
  • Lave, J., Wenger, E., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (Vol. 2, pp. 63–82). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • Levin, D. M., Hammer, D., & Coffey, J. E. (2009). Novice teachers’ attention to student thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(2), 142–154. doi:10.1177/0022487108330245
  • Linsenmeier, K. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2009). What makes a video clip interesting? Teaching Children Mathematics, 15(7), 418–422.
  • Little, J. W. (2002). Locating learning in teachers’ communities of practice: Opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 917–946. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00052-5
  • Mawyer, K. K. N. (2017). Science talk in the classroom: A way into ambitious science teaching. In D. Stroupe & H. Kang (Eds.), Proceedings of the Science Education at the Crossroads Conference (pp. 26–27). San Antonio, TX.
  • McDonald, M., Kazemi, E., & Kavanagh, S. S. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: A call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 378–386. doi:10.1177/0022487113493807
  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Nolen, S. B., Horn, I. S., Ward, C. J., & Childers, S. (2011). Novice teacher learning and motivation across contexts: Assessment tools as boundary objects. Cognition & Instruction, 27(1), 88–122. doi:10.1080/07370008.2010.533221
  • Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X029001004
  • Roth, K. J., Garnier, H. E., Chen, C., Lemmens, M., Schwille, K., & Wickler, N. (2011). Videobased lesson analysis: Effective science PD for teacher and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 117–148. doi:10.1002/tea.20408
  • Roth McDuffie, A., Foote, M. Q., Bolson, C., Turner, E. E., Aguirre, J. M., Bartell, T. G., ... Land, T. (2014). Using video analysis to support prospective K-8 teachers' noticing of students' multiple mathematical knowledge bases. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17, 245–270. doi:10.1007/s10857-013-9257-0
  • Russ, R. S., Sherin, B. L., & Sherin, M. G. (2016). What constitutes teacher learning. In D. Gitomer & C. Bell (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 391–438). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Russ, R. S., & Sherin, M. G. (2013). Using interviews to explore student ideas in science. Science Scope, 36(5), 19–23.
  • Sabers, D. S., Cushing, K. S., & Berliner, D. C. (1991). Differences among teachers in a task characterized by simultaneity, multidimensionality, and immediacy. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 63–88.
  • Santagata, R., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2005). The use of video for teacher education and professional development. In C. Brasidas (Ed.), Glass GV preparing teachers to teach with technology (pp. 151–167).
  • Santagata, R., & Guarino, J. (2011). Using video to teach future teachers to learn from teaching. ZDM the International Journal of Mathematics Education, 43(1), 133–145. doi:10.1007/s11858-010-0292-3
  • Sherin, M., Jacobs, V., & Philipp, R. (Eds.). (2011). Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2005). Using video to support teachers' ability to notice classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(3), 475–491.
  • Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers' professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20–37.
  • Sherin, M. G., & Han, S. Y. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 163–183. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2003.08.001
  • Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning, and Equity [SCALE]. (2017). edTPA. Retrieved from http://edtpa.aacte.org
  • Star, J. R., Lynch, K. H., & Perova, N. (2011). Using video to improve mathematics’ teachers’ abilities to attend to classroom features: A replication study. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Phillips (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 117–133). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Star, J. R., & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 107–125. doi:10.1007/s10857-007-9063-7
  • Stroupe, D. (2014). Examining classroom science practice communities: How teachers and students negotiate epistemic agency and learn science‐as‐practice. Science Education, 98(3), 487–516. doi:10.1002/sce.21112
  • Stroupe, D. (2016). Beginning teachers’ use of resources to enact and learn from ambitious instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 34(1), 51–77. doi:10.1080/07370008.2015.1129337
  • Tekkumru-Kisa, M., Stein, M. K., & Coker, R. (2018). Teachers’ learning to facilitate high‐level student thinking: Impact of a video‐based professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(4), 479–502. doi:10.1002/tea.v55.4
  • Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2009). Learning progression as vision tools for advancing novice teachers’ pedagogical performance. In Learning progressions in science (LeaPS) Conference. Iowa City, IA.
  • Thompson, J., Windschitl, M., & Braaten, M. (2013). Developing a theory of ambitious early-career teacher practice. American Educational Research Journal, 50(3), 574–615. doi:10.3102/0002831213476334
  • van Es, E. A. (2011). A framework for learning to notice. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 134–151). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • van Es, E. A., Cashen, M., Barnhart, T., & Auger, A. (2017). Learning to notice mathematics instruction: Using video to develop preservice teachers’ vision of ambitious pedagogy. Cognition and Instruction, 35(3), 165–187. doi:10.1080/07370008.2017.1317125
  • van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571–596.
  • van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’“learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244–276. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.005
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Windschitl, M., & Thompson, J. (2015). Rapid survey of student thinking. Retrieved from https://ambitiousscienceteaching.org/rapid-survey-of-student-thinking-rsst/
  • Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2011). Ambitious pedagogy by novice teachers? Who benefits from tool-supported collaborative inquiry into practice and why. Teachers College Record, 113(7), 1311–1360.
  • Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2018). Ambitious science teaching. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
  • Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96, 878–903. doi:10.1002/sce.v96.5
  • Zeichner, K. (2012). The turn once again toward practice-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(5), 376–382. doi:10.1177/0022487112445789

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.