Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Peer Dialogues between Pre-Service Biology Teachers in the Planning of Science Lessons. Results of an Intervention Study

References

• Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945–1969. doi:10.1080/09500690701749305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, K.-H., Gröschner, A., & Hascher, T. (2014). Pedagogical field experiences in teacher education. Theoretical foundations, programmes, processes, and effects. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Aydin, S., Demirdogen, B., Tarkin, A., Kutucu, S., Ekiz, B., Akin, F. N., … Uzuntiryaki, E. (2013). Providing a set of research-based practices to support preservice teachers’ long-term professional development as learners of science teaching. Science Education, 97(6), 903–935. doi:10.1002/sce.2013.97.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangerter, A., & Clark, H. H. (2003). Navigating joint projects with dialogue. Cognitive Science, 27(2), 195–225. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2702_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bölsterli, K., Wilhelm, M., & Rehm, M. (2015). Standards kompetenzorientierter Schulbücher für die Naturwissenschaften [Standards for competence oriented school books in science education.]. Chemkon, 22(1), 23–28. doi:10.1002/ckon.201410238
   Google Scholar
• Börlin, J. (2012). Das Experiment als Lerngelegenheit: Vom interkulturellen Vergleich des Physikunterrichts zu Merkmalen seiner Qualität [The experiment as a learning opportunity: From the intercultural comparison of physics teaching to characteristics of its quality]. Berlin, Germany: Logos.
   Google Scholar
• Britton, L. R., & Anderson, K. A. (2010). Peer coaching and pre-service teachers: Examining an underutilised concept. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 306–314. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capps, D. K., & Crawford, B. A. (2013). Inquiry-based professional development: What does it take to support teachers in learning about inquiry and nature of science? International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 1947–1978. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.760209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, S., Evans, R., Honda, M., Jay, E., & Unger, C. (1989). An experiment is when you try it and see if it works: A study of grade 7 students’ understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 514–529. doi:10.1080/0950069890110504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chabalengula, V. M., Mumba, F., & Mbewe, S. (2012). How pre-service teachers understand and perform science process skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(3), 167–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. A. (2014). From inquiry to scientific practices in the science classroom. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, Volume II (pp. 515–541). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, O. (2000). The teacher trainer as researcher: Exploring the initial pedagogical content concerns of prospective teachers. European Journal of Teacher Education, 23(2), 127–137. doi:10.1080/713667273
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, O., & Van Driel, J. H. (2001). The development of prospective teachers’ concerns about teaching chemistry topics at a macro-micro-symbolic interface. In H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Graber, M. Komorek, A. Kross, & P. Reiska (Eds.), Research in science education: Past, present, and future (pp. 271–276). Dordrecht, The Neatherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Donegan, M. M., Ostrosky, M. M., & Fowler, S. A. (2000). Peer coaching. Young Exceptional Children, 3(9), 9–16. doi:10.1177/109625060000300302
   Google Scholar
• Duit, R., Gropengiesser, H., Kattmann, U., Komorek, M., & Parchmann, I. (2012). The model of educational reconstruction. A framework for improving teaching and learning science. In D. Jorde & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science education research and practice in Europe (pp. 13–38). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• EDK. (2011). Grundkompetenzen für die Naturwissenschaften. Nationale Bildungsstandards [Basic competences for the natural sciences. National educational standards]. Bern, Switzerland: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ehmer, M. (2008). Förderung von kognitiven Fähigkeiten beim Experimentieren im Biologieunterricht der 6. Klasse: Eine Untersuchung zur Wirksamkeit von methodischem, epistemologischem und negativem Wissen [Promoting cognitive skills when experimenting in 6th grade biology classes: A study on the effectiveness of methodological, epistemological and negative knowledge]. Retrieved from http://d-nb.info/101954225X/
   Google Scholar
• Evens, M., Elen, J., & Depaepe, F. (2015). Developing pedagogical content knowledge: Lessons learned from intervention studies. Education Research International, 23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, X., Melville, W., & Bartley, A. (2010). The problematic nature of the practicum: A key determinant of pre-service teachers’ emerging inquiry-based science practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(6), 665–681. doi:10.1007/s10972-010-9209-9
   Google Scholar
• Gardiner, W., & Robinson, K. (2012). Peer field placements with preservice teachers: Negotiating the challenges of professional collaboration. Professional Educator, 35(2), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results from the PCK summit. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–42). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez-Zwiep, S. (2008). Elementary teachers’ understanding of students’ science misconceptions: Implications for practice and teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(5), 437–454. doi:10.1007/s10972-008-9102-y
   Google Scholar
• Gropengiesser, H., Harms, U., & Kattmann, U. (2013). Fachdidaktik Biologie [Didactics of biology]. Cologne, Germany: Aulis Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Grossmann, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York, NY: Teacher College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunckel, K. L. (2017). Mediators of a preservice teacher’s use of the inquiry-application instructional model. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(1), 79–100. doi:10.1007/s10972-010-9223-y
   Google Scholar
• Gyllenpalm, J., & Wickman, P. Ä. (2011a). The uses of the term hypothesis and the inquiry emphasis conflation in science teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 33(14), 1993–2015. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.538938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyllenpalm, J., & Wickman, P. Ä. (2011b). Experiments and the inquiry emphasis conflation in science teacher education. Science Education, 95(5), 908–926. doi:10.1002/sce.20446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halim, L., & Meerah, S. M. (2002). Science trainee teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and its influence on physics teaching. Research in Science and Technology Education, 20, 215–225. doi:10.1080/0263514022000030462
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. (1999). Effective teaching of science. A review of research. Using Research Series, 21. Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Council for Research in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Henze, I., & Van Driel, J. H. (2015). Toward a more comprehensive way to capture PCK in its complexity. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education  (pp. 120–134). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. (1993). Re-thinking old ways: Towards a more critical approach to practical work in school science. Studies in Science Education, 22(1), 85–142. doi:10.1080/03057269308560022
   Google Scholar
• Hooker, T. (2013). Peer coaching: A review of the literature. Waikato Journal of Education, 18(2), 129–139. doi:10.15663/wje.v18i2
   Google Scholar
• Käpylä, M., Heikkinen, J. P., & Asunta, T. (2009). Influence of content knowledge on pedagogical content knowledge: The case of teaching photosynthesis and plant growth. International Journal of Science Education, 31(10), 1395–1415. doi:10.1080/09500690802082168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KMK. (2004). Bildungsstandards im Fach Biologie für den mittleren Bildungsabschluss [Educational standards for Biology]. München, Neuwied: Luchterhand.
   Google Scholar
• KMK. (2008). Ländergemeinsame inhaltliche Anforderungen für die Fachwissenschaften und Fachdidaktiken in der Lehrerbildung [Content requirements for subject-related studies and subject-related didactics in teacher training which apply to all Laender]. Retrieved from http://kmk.org/fileadmin/veroeffentlichungen_beschluesse/2008/2008_10_16-Fachprofile-Lehrerbildung.pdf
   Google Scholar
• König, J., Buchholtz, C., & Dohmen, D. (2015). Analyse von schriftlichen Unterrichtsplanungen: Empirische Befunde zur didaktischen Adaptivität als Aspekt der Planungskompetenz angehender Lehrkräfte [Analysis of written lesson plans: Empirical findings on didactic adaptability as an aspect of the planning competence of prospective teachers]. Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft, 18(2), 375–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krämer, P., Nessler, S. H., & Schlüter, K. (2015). Teacher students’ dilemmas when teaching science through inquiry. Research in Science & Technological Education, 33(3), 325–343. doi:10.1080/02635143.2015.1047446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreis, A. (2012). Produktive Unterrichtsbesprechungen: Lernen im Dialog zwischen Mentoren und angehenden Lehrpersonen [Productive lesson planning dialogues: Learning in dialogue between mentors and prospective teachers]. Bern, Switzerland: Haupt.
   Google Scholar
• Kreis, A., Schnebel, S. & Musow, S. (2017). What do pre-service teachers talk about in collaborative lesson planning dialogues? Results of an intervention study with content-focused peer coaching.In A. Kreis & S. Schnebel (Eds.), Lehrerbildung auf dem Prüfstand. Sonderheft “Peer Coaching in der praxissituierten Ausbildung von Lehrpersonen,” (pp. 80–106). Landau, Germany: Verlag Empirische Pädagogik.
   Google Scholar
• Kreis, A., & Staub, F. (2017). Kollegiales Unterrichtscoaching. Ein Instrument zur praxissituierten Unterrichtsentwicklung [Content focused peer coaching. A tool for lesson development situated in teaching practice]. Cologne, Germany: Carl Link Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kuckartz, U. (2016). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung [Qualitative content analysis. Methods, practice, computer support]. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz Juventa.
   Google Scholar
• Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805–820. doi:10.1037/a0032583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E., Brown, M. N., Luft, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2007). Assessing beginning secondary science teachers’ PCK: Pilot year results. School Science and Mathematics, 107(2), 52–60. doi:10.1111/ssm.2007.107.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, J. (1996). Developing reflective practice. Learning about teaching and learning through modelling. London, UK: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, J. (2014). Developing understandings of practice: Science teacher learning. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, volume II (pp. 811–829). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, H.-L. (2010). Research on peer coaching in preservice teacher education – A review of literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 748–753. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, J. (2007). Erkenntnisgewinnung als wissenschaftliches Problemlösen [Scientific inquiry as method to scientifically solve questions]. In D. Krüger & H. Vogt (Eds.), Theorien in der biologiedidaktischen Forschung (pp. 177–186). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken [Qualitative content analysis: Basics and procedures]. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Melville, W., Fazio, X., Bartley, A., & Jones, D. (2008). Experiences and reflection: Preservice science teachers’ capacity for teaching inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19, 477–494. doi:10.1007/s10972-008-9104-9
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R., Tiberghien, A., & Le Maréchal, J.-F. (2002). Varieties of labwork: A way of profiling labwork tasks. In D. Psillos & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Teaching and learning in the science laboratory (pp. 9–20). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council NRC. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academic Press. doi:10.17226/13165
   Google Scholar
• Ovens, A. (2004). Using peer coaching and action research to structure the practicum: An analysis of student teacher perceptions. Journal of Physical Education New Zealand, 37(1), 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2007). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261–284. doi:10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psillos, D., & Niedderer, H. (Eds.). (2006). Teaching and learning in the science laboratory. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W. M., Lawless, D., & Masciotra, D. (2001). Spielraum and teaching. Curriculum Inquiry, 31(2), 183–207. doi:10.1111/0362-6784.00191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruys, I., Van Keer, H., & Aelterman, A. (2012). Examining pre-service teacher competence in lesson planning pertaining to collaborative learning. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 349–379. doi:10.1080/00220272.2012.675355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, R. M., & Plasman, K. (2011). Science teacher learning progressions. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 530–565. doi:10.3102/0034654311423382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seel, A. (1997). Von der Unterrichtsplanung zum konkreten Lehrerhandeln - Eine Untersuchung zum Zusammenhang von Planung und Durchführung von Unterricht bei Hauptschullehrerstudentinnen [From lesson planning to practical teaching. An investigation into the relationship between the planning and the carrying out of a lesson among students training for secondary school teachers]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 25(3), 257–273.
   Google Scholar
• Smit, R., Weitzel, H., Blank, R., Rietz, F., Tardent, J., & Robin, N. (2017). Interplay of secondary pre-service teacher content knowledge (CK), pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) and attitudes regarding scientific inquiry teaching within teacher training. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(4), 1–23. doi:10.1080/02635143.2017.1353962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spörhase, U. (2012). Biologie-Didaktik: Praxishandbuch für die Sekundarstufe I und II [Didactics of biology. Practical handbook for lower and upper secondary education]. Berlin, Germany: Cornelsen Scriptor.
   Google Scholar
• Staub, F. (2015). Fachspezifisches Unterrichtscoaching [Content focused coaching]. In H. G. Rolff (Ed.), Handbuch Unterrichtsentwicklung (pp. 476–489). Weinheim, Basel: Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Staub, F., West, L., & Bickel, D. (2003). What is content focused coaching? In W. Lucy & C. S. Fritz (Eds.), Content focused coaching. Transforming mathematics lessons (pp. 1–17). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Stender, A., Brückmann, M., & Neumann, K. (2017). Transformation of topic-specific professional knowledge into personal pedagogical content knowledge through lesson planning. International Journal of Science Education, 39(12), 1690–1714. doi:10.1080/09500693.2017.1351645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurlings, M., & Brok, P. (2017). Learning outcomes of teacher professional development activities: A meta-study. Educational Review, 69(5), 554–576. doi:10.1080/00131911.2017.1281226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673–695. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerman, D. A. (1991). Expert and novice teacher decision making. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 292–305. doi:10.1177/002248719104200407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M. (2004). Folk theories of ‘inquiry’: How preservice teachers reproduce the discourse and practices of an atheoretical scientific method. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 481–512.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, H.-G., Joung, Y. J., & Kim, M. (2012). The challenges of science inquiry teaching for pre-service teachers in elementary classrooms: Difficulties on and under the scene. Research in Science Education, 42(3), 589–608. doi:10.1007/s11165-011-9212-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwart, R. C., Wubbels, T., Bergen, T. C. M., & Bolhuis, S. (2007). Experienced teacher learning within the context of reciprocal peer coaching. Teachers and Teaching, 13(2), 165–187. doi:10.1080/13540600601152520
   Google Scholar