Researching Teacher Agency in Elementary School Science using Positioning Theory and Grammar of Agency

References

• Ainley, J., Kos, J., & Nicholas, M. (2008). Participation in science, mathematics and technology in Australian education (ACER research monograph no. 63). Camberwell, Victoria: ACER.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. (2004). Researching teacher agency in primary science: A discursive psychological approach. (Master’s in Education Thesis). Melbourne, Australia: The University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. (2012a). Addressing the balance of agency in a science classroom ( PhD  dissertation).  Melbourne, Australia: The University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. (2012b). Science students’ classroom discourse: Tasha’s umwelt. Research in Science Education, 42(2), 233–259. doi:10.1007/s11165-010-9195-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, J., & Clarke, D. J. (2014). What is ‘agency’? Perspectives in science education research. International Journal of Science Education, 36(5), 735–754. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.825066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, B., Kirkwood, F., & Pearson, V. (1990). Learning in science project (teacher development): The framework. Research in Science Education, 20(1), 31–40. doi:10.1007/BF02620477
   Google Scholar
• Carter, L., & Martin, J. (2017). “I had to take action straight away.” Preservice teachers’ accounts of pro-environmental action. In Science and technology education promoting wellbeing for individuals, societies and environments (pp. 523–537). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Crevola, C. A., & Hill, P. W. (1998). Children’s literacy success strategy: An overview. Melbourne, Australia: Catholic Education Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20, 43–63. doi:10.1111/jtsb.1990.20.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Education Council. (2015). National STEM school education strategy a comprehensive plan for science, technology, engineering and mathematics education in Australia. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. (2015). Recognising and realising teachers’ professional agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 779–784. doi:10.1080/13540602.2015.1044333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. (2016). The dialectic of person and practice: How cultural-historical accounts of agency can inform teacher education. In J. Clandinin & J. Husu (Eds.), International handbook of research on teacher education. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. (2017). Revealing relational work. Working relationally in and across practices, 1–22. doi:10.1017/9781316275184.001
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011). Science education in Europe: National policies, practices and research. Brussels, Belgium: EACEA.
   Google Scholar
• Fleer, M. (2009). Supporting scientific conceptual consciousness or learning in “a roundabout way” in play-based contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 31(8), 1069–1089. doi:10.1080/09500690801953161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleer, M. (2015). Early childhood science teacher education. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 1–9). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H. C. (1975). Truth and method. London, UK: Sheed & Ward.
   Google Scholar
• Garbett, D. (2003). Science education in early childhood teacher education: Putting forward a case to enhance student teachers’ confidence and competence. Research in Science Education, 33(4), 467–481. doi:10.1023/B:RISE.0000005251.20085.62
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. (2016). Transforming science education for the anthropocene. Is it possible? Research in Science Education, 46(2), 187–201. doi:10.1007/s11165-015-9498-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, H., Lee, J., & Boyd, J. (2008). Mathematics education for young children: What it is and how to promote it. Social Policy Report, 22, 1–13. doi:10.1002/j.2379-3988.2008.tb00054.x
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, D., Jirout, L., Dominguez, X., Greenberg, A., Maier, M., & Fuccillo, J. (2009). Science in the preschool classroom: A programmatic research agenda to improve science readiness. Early Education and Development, 20(2), 238–264. doi:10.1080/10409280802595441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. (2000). The teaching and learning of science in primary schools. London, UK: David Fulton Publishers Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Harré, R. (1984). Personal being: A theory for individual psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harré, R. (1990). Exploring the human umwelt. In R. Bhasker (Ed.), Harré and his critics: Essays in honour of Rom Harré with his commentary on them (pp. 297–364). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Harré, R. (2009). The second cognitive revolution. In K. Leidlmair (Ed.), After cognitivism: A reassessment of cognitive science and philosophy (pp. 181–187). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Harrè, R. (2015). Positioning theory. In e. a. E. J. Martin (Ed (Ed), The Wiley handbook of theoretical and philosophical psychology: Methods, approaches, and new directions for social sciences (pp. 263–276). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1999a). The dynamics of social episodes. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory (pp. 1–13). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1999b). Introducing positioning theory. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory (pp. 14–31). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, S.-Y., Torquati, J., & Molfese, V. (2013). Theory guided professional development in early childhood science education (Faculty Publications from CYFS. Paper 29). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cyfsfacpub/29
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, M., & Kerper, R. (1996). Positioning ourselves: Parity and power in collaborative work. Curriculum Inquiry, 26(1), 5–24. doi:10.1080/03626784.1996.11075442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallery, M. (2004). Early years teachers’ late concerns and perceived needs in science: An exploratory study. European Journal of Teacher Education, 27(2), 147–165. doi:10.1080/026197604200023024
   Google Scholar
• Kallery, M. (2014). In quest of teaching quality in preschool science: Teacher views of factors influencing their work. Proceedings of the 9th International conference of the European Science Education Research Association, Nicosia, Cyprus.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296–316. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S. (2010). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. (2016). The grammar of agency: Studying possibilities for student agency in science classroom discourse. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 10, 40–49. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. (2017). Researching primary teachers’ professional agency: Employing interactive ethnography to overcome reluctance to teach science. Research in Science Education, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. (2018). Ontology matters: A commentary on “contribution” to cultural historical activity. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(3), 639–647. doi:10.1007/s11422-017-9809-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J., & Carter, L. (2015). Preservice teacher agency concerning education for sustainability (EfS): A discursive psychological approach. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(4), 560–573. doi:10.1002/tea.v52.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J., & Carter, L. (2018). Finding ways to fill the void: A study of science preservice teachers’ self–Positioning as consumers. In G. Reis, M. P. Mueller, R. A. Luther, L. Siveres, & R. Oliveira (Eds.), Sociocultural perspectives on youth ethical consumerism (pp. 19–32). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J., Keast, S., & Anders, L. (2017). Becoming professionally agentic: Researching pedagogical reasoning in initial teacher education. In J. Nuttall, A. Kostogriz, M. Jones, & J. Martin (Eds.), Teacher education policy and practice (pp. 67–81). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morell, L., & Tytler, R. (1998). Families celebrating science. Investigating, 14, 4–11.
   Google Scholar
• Muhlhaüsler, P., & Harré, R. (1990). Pronouns and people. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Nias, J. (1989). Primary teachers talking. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, P. (2015). Catching the moments—Coteaching to stimulate science in the preschool context. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 296–308. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2015.1060292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, R., & Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in science: The implications of children’s science. London, UK: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Othwaite, W. (1985). Hans-Georg Gadamer. In Q. Skinner (Ed.), The return of grand theory in the human sciences (pp. 21–40). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission. (2012). Schools workforce research report. Canberra, Australia: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera Maulucci, M. S., Brotman, J. S., & Fain, S. S. (2015). Fostering structurally transformative teacher agency through science professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(4), 545–559. doi:10.1002/tea.v52.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shotter, J. (2010). Movements of feeling and moments of judgement: Towards an ontological social constructionism. International Journal of Action Research, 6(1), 16–42.
   Google Scholar
• Skamp, K. (1995). Where does the water go? Investigating, 11(3), 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Skamp, K. (2012). Teaching primary science trial-teacher feedback on the implementation of primary connections and the 5E model. Canberra, Australia: Australian Academy of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Skamp, K. (2017). Teaching primary science constructively. Marrickville, Australia: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. (2015). The impact of a professional development programme on primary teachers’ classroom practice and pupils’ attitudes to science. Research in Science Education, 45, 215–239. doi:10.1007/s11165-014-9420-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spektor-Levy, O., Baruch, Y., & Mevarech, Z. (2013). Science and scientific curiosity in pre-school. The teacher’s point of view. International Journal of Science Education, 35(13), 2226–2253. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.631608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Thulin, S., & Redfors, A. (2017). Student preschool teachers’ experiences of science and its role in preschool. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45(4), 509–520. doi:10.1007/s10643-016-0783-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torquati, J., Cutler, K., Gilkerson, D., & Sarver, S. (2013). Early childhood educators’ perceptions of nature, science, and environmental education. Early Education & Development, 24(5), 721–743. doi:10.1080/10409289.2012.725383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tytler, R. (2014). Attitudes, identity, and aspirations toward science. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, pp. 82–103). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. (2012). Teacher professional development focusing on pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 26–28. doi:10.3102/0013189X11431010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Manen, M. (2016). Researching lived experience, Second edition. doi:10.4324/9781315421056
   Google Scholar
• van Uum, M., & Gravemeijer, K. (2011). Characteristics of effective professional development for primary science and technology. In M. J. de Vries, H. van Kuelen, S. Peters, & J. W. van der Molen (Eds.), Professional development for primary teachers in science and technology: The Dutch VTB-pro project in an international perspective (pp. 237–249). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: SensePublishers.
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Board of Studies. (2000). Science curriculum and standards framework II. Melbourne, Australia: Curriculum Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, L. A., & Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, P. (1996). Researching the art of teaching; ethnography for educational use. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar