Examining teachers’ classroom strategies to understand their goals for student learning around the science practices in the Next Generation Science Standards

References

• Borko, H., & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 473–498. doi:10.3102/00028312026004473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, L. A. (2012). Research on science teacher beliefs. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 477–495). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A., & Stevens, A. L. (1982). Goals and strategies of inquiry teachers. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 65–119). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Elgin, C. Z. (2013). Epistemic agency. Theory and Research in Education, 11(2), 135–152. doi:10.1177/1477878513485173
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399–483. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, M. (2008). ‘Grasp of practice’ as a reasoning resource for inquiry and nature of science understanding. Science & Education, 17(2), 147–177. doi:10.1007/s11191-006-9045-7
   Google Scholar
• Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers’ generative change: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 653–689. doi:10.3102/00028312038003653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrichsen, P., van Driel, J. H., & Abell, S. K. (2011). Taking a closer look at science teaching orientations. Science Education, 95, 358–376. doi:10.1002/sce.20428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutner, T. L., & Markman, A. B. (2017). Applying a goal‐driven model of science teacher cognition to the resolution of two anomalies in research on the relationship between science teacher education and classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(6), 713–736. doi:10.1002/tea.v54.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutner, T. L., Petrosino, A. J., & Salinas, C. (2019). Do preservice science teachers develop goals reflective of science teacher education? A case study of three preservice science teachers. Research in Science Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11165-018-9816-6.
   Google Scholar
• Kawasaki, J., Kwako, A., Sandoval, W. A., Clark, H. F., & Modrek, A. (2019). Changes to science teachers’ instructional practice in response to professional development. Paper presented at the 2019 National Association of Research in Science Teaching Annual Meeting, Baltimore MD.
   Google Scholar
• Manz, E. (2015). Representing student argumentation as functionally emergent from scientific activity. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 553–590. doi:10.3102/0034654314558490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., & Berland, L. (2017). What is (or should be) scientific evidence use in k‐12 classrooms? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(5), 672–689. doi:10.1002/tea.v54.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, J., Michaels, S., & Reiser, B. (2012, November 30). Science standards require a teacher-learning rethink. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2012/11/30/13moon.h32.html?tkn
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for k-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states (Vol. 1: The standards). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 177–196. doi:10.1007/s10972-014-9384-1
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, J. W. (2013). Proficiency in science: Assessment challenges and opportunities. Science, 340(6130), 320–323. doi:10.1126/science.1232065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruitt, S. L. (2014). The next generation science standards: The features and challenges. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 145–156. doi:10.1007/s10972-014-9385-0
   Google Scholar
• Saxe, G. B. (2004). Practices of quantification from a sociocultural perspective. In A. Demetriou & A. Raftopoulos (Eds.), Cognitive developmental change: Theories, models, and measurement (pp. 241–263). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (1999). External reform initiatives and teachers’ efforts to reconstruct their practice: The mediating role of teachers’ zones of enactment. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(2), 143–175. doi:10.1080/002202799183205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar