References
- Bulgren, J., & Ellis, J. D. (2012). Argumentation and evaluation intervention in science classes: Teaching and learning with Toulmin. In M. S. Kline (Ed.), Perspectives on scientific argumentation: Theory, practice, and research (pp. 135–154). Springer.
- Cebrián-Robles, D., Franco-Mariscal, A. J., & Blanco-López, Á. (2018). Preservice elementary science teachers’ argumentation competence: Impact of a training programme. Instructional Science, 46(5), 789–817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9446-4
- Dawson, V., & Carson, K. (2018). Introducing argumentation about climate change socioscientific issues in a disadvantaged school. Research in Science Education, 50, 863–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9715-x
- Dawson, V. M., & Venville, G. (2010). Teaching strategies for developing students’ argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high school genetics. Research in Science Education, 40(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9104-y
- Department for Education. (2014). The national curriculum in England framework document. Department for Education.
- Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
- Duschl, R. (2007). Quality argumentation and epistemic criteria. In S. Erduran & M. Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 159–175). Springer.
- Engeström, Y. (2005). Developmental work research: Expanding activity theory into practice. Lehmanns Media.
- Erduran, S. (2007). Methodological foundations in the study of argumentation in science classrooms. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 47–70). Springer.
- Erduran, S. (Ed.). (2019). Argumentation in chemistry education: Research, policy and practice. Royal Society of Chemistry.
- Erduran, S., Simon, S. & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.200126 doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
- Gray, R., & Kang, N.-H. (2014). The structure of scientific arguments by secondary science teachers: Comparison of experimental and historical science topics. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.715779
- Grimes, P., McDonald, S., & van Kampen, P. (2019). “We‘re getting somewhere”: Development and implementation of a framework for the analysis of productive science discourse. Science Education, 103(1), 5–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21485
- Henderson, B. J., McNeill, K. L., Gonzalez-Howard, M., Close, K., & Evans, M. (2017). Key challenges and future directions for educational research on scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21412
- Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodriguez, A. B., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). “Doing the Lesson” or “Doing Science”: Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757–792. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<757::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-F
- Kelly, G., & Takao, A. (2002). Epistemic levels in argument: An analysis of university oceanography students’ use of evidence in writing. Science Education, 86(3), 314–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10024
- Kelly, G. J., Druker, S., & Chen, C. (1998). Students’ reasoning about electricity: Combining performance assessments with argumentation analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 20(7), 849–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200707
- Kim, M., & Roth, W. M. (2018). Dialogical argumentation in elementary science classrooms. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 13(4), 1061–1085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9846-9
- Kolsto, S. D., & Ratcliffe, M. (2007). Social aspects of argumentation. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 117–136). Springer.
- Koomen, H. M., Rodriguez, E., Hoffman, A., Petersen, C., & Oberhauser, K. (2018). Authentic science with citizen science and student-driven science fair projects. Science Education, 102(3), 593–644. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21335
- Lazarou, D. (2009). Learning to TAP: An effort to scaffold students’ argumentation in Science. In G. Cakmakci & M. F. Taşar (Eds.), Contemporary science education research: scientific literacy and social aspects of science (pp. 43–50). Pege.
- Lazarou, D. (2012). Using cultural-historical activity theory to promote argumentation in primary science education (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Bristol.
- Lazarou, D., Erduran, S., & Sutherland, R. (2017). Argumentation in science education as an evolving concept: Following the object of activity. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 14, 51-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.05.003
- Lazarou, D., Sutherland, R., & Erduran, S. (2016). Argumentation in science education as a systemic activity: An activity-theoretical perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 79, 150–156. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2016.07.008
- Lin, Y. R. (2018). The influences of contextualized media on students’ science attitudes, knowledge, and argumentation learning through online game‐based activities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(6), 884–898. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12297
- Littenberg-Tobias, J., Beheshti, E., & Staudt, C. (2016). To customize or not to customize? Exploring science teacher customization in an online lesson portal. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(3), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21300
- Manz, E., & Renga, I. P. (2017). Understanding how teachers guide evidence construction conversations. Science Education, 101(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21282
- McNeill, K. L. (2009). Teachers’ use of curriculum to support students in writing scientific arguments to explain phenomena. Science Education, 93(2), 233–268. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20294
- McNeill, K. L., Gonzalez-Howard, M., Katsh-Singer, R., & Loper, S. (2017). Moving beyond pseudoargumentation: Teachers’ enactments of an educative science curriculum focused on argumentation. Science Education, 101(3), 426–457. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21274
- McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2008). Scientific explanations: Characterizing and evaluating the effects of teachers’ instructional practices on student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20201
- McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. S. (2011). Supporting grade 5–8 students in constructing explanations in science: The claim, evidence, and reasoning framework for talk and writing. Pearson.
- McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students’ construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153–191. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1502_1
- Murphy, P. K., Green, A. J., Allen, E., Baszczewski, S., Swearingen, A., Wei, L., & Butler, M. A. (2018). Fostering high school students’ conceptual understanding and argumentation performance in science through quality talk discussions. Science Education, 102(6), 1239–1264. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21471
- Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290570
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
- Nielsen, J. A. (2013). Dialectical features of students’ argumentation: A critical review of argumentation studies in science education. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 371–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9266-x
- Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035 10 doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
- Parsons, A. S., Vaughn, M., Scales, Q. R., Gallagher, A. M., Parsons, W. A., Davis, G. S., Pierczynski, M., & Allen, M. (2018). Teachers’ instructional adaptations: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 88(2), 205–242. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317743198
- Passmore, M. C., & Svoboda, J. (2012). Exploring opportunities for argumentation in modelling classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1535–1554. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.577842
- Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. P. (2011). Argument-driven inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study. Science Education, 95(2), 217–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20421
- Sionti, M., Ai, H., Rosé, P. C., & Resnick, L. (2012). A framework for analyzing development of argumentation through classroom discussions. In N. Pinkwart & B. M. McLaren (Eds.), Educational technologies for teaching argumentation skills (pp. 28–55). Bentham Science Publishers.
- Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1958)
- van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., & Kruiger, T. (1987). Handbook of argumentation theory: A critical survey of classical backgrounds and modern studies. Foris.