References
- Barton, A. C., Tan, E., & Birmingham, D. J. (2020). Rethinking high-leverage practices in justice-oriented ways. Journal of Teacher Education, 1, 18. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022487119900209
- Basu, S. J., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2007). Developing a sustained interest in science among urban minority youth. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 466–489. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20143
- Bouillion, L. M., & Gomez, L. M. (2001). Connecting school and community with science learning: Real world problems and school-community partnerships as contextual scaffolds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 878–898. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1037
- Brkich, K. L. (2014). Urban fifth graders’ connections-making between formal earth science content and their lived experiences. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(1), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9505-8
- Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 50–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20269
- Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2010). We be burnin! Agency, identity, and science learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 187–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903530044
- Calabrese Barton, A. C., Tan, E., & Rivet, A. (2008). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Education Research Journal, 45(1), 68–103. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207308641
- Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D. M., & Grant, T. (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1109–1136. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20440
- Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737025002119
- Colley, C., & Windschitl, M. (2016). Rigor in elementary science students’ discourse: The role of responsiveness and supportive conditions for talk. Science Education, 100(6), 1009–1038. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21243
- Duschl, R. A. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268–291. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07309371
- Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Processing fieldnotes: Coding and memoing (Chapter 6). In Author (Ed.), Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (pp. 142–168). University of Chicago Press.
- Green, J. L., Camilli, G., & Elmore, P. B. (2006). Complementary methods in education research. American Educational Research Association.
- Gutiérrez, K., Baquedano-Lopez, P., & Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, & Activity: An International Journal, 6(4), 286–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039909524733
- Gutiérrez, K. D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.43.2.3
- Hogg, L., & Volman, M. (2020). A synthesis of funds of identity research: Purposes, tools, pedagogical approaches, and outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 90(6), 862–895. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0034654320964205
- Jackson, K., Garrison, A., Wilson, J., Gibbons, L., & Shahan, E. (2013). Exploring relationships between setting up complex tasks and opportunities to learn in conducting whole-class discussions in middle-grade mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(4), 646–682. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.4.0646
- Kang, H., Calabrese Barton, A., Tan, E., Simpkins, S., Rhee, H., & Turner, C. (2018). How do middle school girls of color develop STEM identities? Middle school girls’ participation in science activities and identification with STEM careers. Science Education, 103(2), 418–439. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21492
- Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). But that’s just good teaching! Theory Into Practice, 34(3), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849509543675
- Lehrer, R., Schauble, L., & Lucas, D. (2008). Supporting development of the epistemology of inquiry. Cognitive Development, 23(4), 512–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.09.001
- Lopez, F. A. (2017). Altering the trajectory of the self-fulfilling prophecy: Asset-based pedagogy and classroom dynamics. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(2), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116685751
- McNeill, K. L., & Pimentel, D. S. (2009). Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation. Science Education, 94(2), 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20364
- Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
- Moje, E. B., Ciechanowski, K. M., Kramer, K., Ellis, L., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working toward a third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(1), 38–70. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.39.1.4
- Moje, E. B., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., & Marx, R. W. (2001). “Maestro, what is quality?”: Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 469–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1014
- Moll, L. C. (1992). Bilingual classroom studies and community analysis: Some recent trends. Educational Researcher, 21(2), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X021002020
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
- Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244
- Patton, M. Q. (2003). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE.
- Rivet, A. R., & Krajcik, J. S. (2008). Contextualizing instruction: Leveraging students’ prior knowledge and experiences to foster understanding of middle school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20203
- Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
- Sohmer, R., Michaels, S., O’Connor, M. C., & Resnick, L. (2009). Guided construction of knowledge in the classroom: The trioka of talk, tasks, and tools. In B. Scharwz, T. Dreyfus, & R. Hershkowitz (Eds.), Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction (pp. 105–129). Routledge.
- Stroupe, D. (2014). Examining classroom science practice communities: How teachers and students negotiate epistemic agency and learn science-as-practice. Science Education, 98(3), 487–516. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21112
- Suárez, E. (2020). “Estoy explorando science”: Emerging bilingual students problematizing electrical phenomena through translanguaging. Science Education, 104(5), 791–826. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21588
- Thompson, J., Hagenah, S., Kang, H., Stroupe, D., Braaten, M., Colley, C., & Windschitl, M. (2016). Rigor and responsiveness in classroom activity. Teachers College Record.
- Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A. S., & Hudicourt-barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 529–552. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1017
- Wolcott, H. F. (1997). Ethnographic research in education. In R. M. Jaeger (Ed.), Complimentary methods for research in education 2e (pp. 327–364). American Educational Research Association.
- Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). SAGE.