References
- Adamson, S. L., Banks, D., Burtch, M., Cox, F., Judson, E., Turley, J. B., Benford, R., & Lawson, A. (2003). Reformed undergraduate instruction and its subsequent impact on secondary school teaching practice and student achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 939–957. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10117
- Ashton, P., & Crocker, L. (1987). Systematic study of planned variations: The essential focus of teacher education reform. Journal of Teacher Education, 38(3), 2–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718703800302
- Aydeniz, M., & Dogan, A. (2016). Exploring the impact of argumentation on preservice science teachers’ conceptual understanding of chemical equilibrium. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(1), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00170F
- Aydeniz, M., & Ozdilek, Z. (2015). Assessing pre-service science teachers’ understanding of scientific argumentation: What do they know about argumentation after four years of college science? Science Education International, 26(2), 217–239.
- Berland, L. K., & McNeill, K. L. (2012). For whom is argument and explanation a necessary distinction? A response to Osborne and Patterson. Science Education, 96(5), 808–813. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21000
- Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers’ beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248719004100307
- Brigandt, I. (2016). Why the difference between explanation and argument matters to science education. Science & Education, 25(3–4), 251–275. https://doi.org/10.7939/R3DN4096K
- Buckland, L. A., & Chinn, C. A. (2010). Model-evidence link diagrams: A scaffold for model-based reasoning. In K. Gomez, L. Lyons, & J. Radinsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th international conference of the learning sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 449–450). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
- Can, S. N., & Saribas, D. (2019). An argumentative tool for facilitating critical evaluation. Science & Education, 28(6), 669–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00068-8
- Cetin, P. S. (2013). Explicit argumentation instruction to facilitate conceptual understanding and argumentation skills. Research in Science & Technological Education, 32(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2013.850071
- Cetin, P. S., Erduran, S., & Kaya, E. (2010). Understanding the nature of chemistry and argumentation: The case of pre-service chemistry teachers. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 11(4), 41–59.
- Chinn, C., & Buckland, L. (2012). Model-based instruction: Fostering change in evolutionary conceptions and epistemic practices. In K. S. Rosengren, E. M. Evans, S. Brem, & G. M. Sinatra (Eds.), Evolution challenges: Integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution (pp. 211–232). Oxford University Press.
- Chinn, C. A., Rinehart, R. W., & Buckland, L. A. (2014). Epistemic cognition and evaluating information: Applying the AIR Model of epistemic cognition. In D. N. Rapp & J. L. G. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 425–453). MIT Press.
- Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000
- Darling-Hammond, L. (2016). Research on teaching and teacher education and its influences on policy and practice. Educational Researcher, 45(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16639597
- Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Teacher learning: What matters? Educational Leadership, 66(5), 46–53.
- Demircioglu, T., & Ucar, S. (2012). The effect of argument-driven inquiry on preservice science teachers’ attitudes and argumentative skills. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46(2012), 5035–5039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.382
- Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. National Academies Press.
- Erduran, S. (2007). Methodological foundations in the study of argumentation in science classrooms. In M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre & S. Erduran (Eds.), Argumentation in science education (pp. 47–69). Springer.
- Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. R. (2014). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education. (D. Zeidler & K. Tobin, Eds.). Springer.
- Erduran, S. (2019). Argumentation in chemistry education: An overview. In S. Erduran (Ed.), Argumentation in chemistry education: Research, policy and practice (pp. 1–10). Royal Society of Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781788012645-00001
- Erduran, S., Ardac, D., & Yakmaci-Guzel, B. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Case studies of preservice secondary science teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75442
- Erduran, S., & Msimanga, A. (2014). Science curriculum reform in South Africa: Lessons for professional development from research on argumentation in science education. Education as Change, 18(sup1), S33–S46. https://doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2014.882266
- Feierabend, T., Jokmin, S., & Eilks, I. (2011). Chemistry teachers’ views on teaching ‘climate change’-an interview case study from research-oriented learning in teacher education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12(1), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1RP90011K
- Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). Helping novices learn to teach: Lessons from an exemplary support teacher. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487101052001003
- Ford, M. J. (2015). Educational implications of choosing “practice” to describe science in the Next Generation Science Standards. Science Education, 99(6), 1041–1048. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21188
- Giere, R. N. (2010). Explaining science: A cognitive approach. University of Chicago Press.
- Hess, D. J., & Collins, B. M. (2018). Climate change and higher education: Assessing factors that affect curriculum requirements. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170(2018), 1451–1458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.215
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2013. Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 3–29). Cambridge University Press.
- Kaya, E. (2013). Argumentation practices in classroom: Pre-service teachers' conceptual understanding of chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education,35(7), 1139–1158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.770935
- Kilinc, A., Demiral, U., & Kartal, T. (2017). Resistance to dialogic discourse in SSI teaching: The effects of an argumentation‐based workshop, teaching practicum, and induction on a preservice science teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(6), 764–789. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21385
- Koenig, K., Schen, M., & Bao, L. (2012). Explicitly targeting pre-service teacher scientific reasoning abilities and understanding of the nature of science through an introductory science course. Science Educator, 21(2), 1–9.
- Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge University Press.
- Kuhn, D., & Pearsall, S. (2000). Developmental origins of scientific thinking. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1(1), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327647JCD0101N_11
- Lombardi, D., Bailey, J. M., Bickel, E. S., & Burrell, S. (2018). Scaffolding scientific thinking: Students’ evaluations and judgments during Earth science knowledge construction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54, 184-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.06.008
- Lombardi, D., Bickel, E. S., & Bailey, J. M. (2018). High school students’ evaluations, plausibility (re)appraisals, and knowledge about topics in Earth science. Science Education, 102, 153–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21315
- Lombardi, D., Nussbaum, E. M., & Sinatra, G. M. (2016). Plausibility judgments in conceptual change and epistemic cognition. Educational Psychologist,51(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1113134
- Lombardi, D., Sibley, B., & Carroll, K. (2013). What's the alternative? Using model-evidence link diagrams to weigh alternative models in argumentation. The Science Teacher,80(5), 50.
- Lombardi, D., & Sinatra, G. M. (2012). College students’ perceptions about the plausibility of human-induced climate change. Research in Science Education,42(2), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9196-z
- Lombardi, D., Sinatra, G. M., & Nussbaum, E. M. (2013). Plausibility reappraisals and shifts in middle school students' climate change conceptions. Learning and Instruction, 27, 50-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.03.001
- McNeill, K. L., Katsh-Singer, R., González-Howard, M., & Loper, S. (2016). Factors impacting teachers’ argumentation instruction in their science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 38(12), 2026–2046. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1221547
- National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
- Osana, H. P., & Seymour, J. R. (2004). Critical thinking in preservice teachers: A rubric for evaluating argumentation and statistical reasoning. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(4–6), 473–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610512331383529
- Osborne, J. F., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035
- Osborne, J. F., & Patterson, A. (2011). Scientific argument and explanation: A necessary distinction? Science Education, 95(4), 627–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20438
- Pluta, W. J., Chinn, C. A., & Duncan, R. G. (2011). Learners’ epistemic criteria for good scientific models. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 486–511. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20415
- Roth, W. M., & Lee, Y. J. (2007). „Vygotsky's neglected legacy„: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research,77(2), 186–232. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654306298273
- Sadler, T. D. (2006). Promoting discourse and argumentation in science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(4), 323–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-006-9025-4
- Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: Socio‐scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260802681839
- Sadler, T. D., Chambers, F. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 387–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000119456
- Saka, M., & Saribaş, D. (2019). Investigation of preservice teachers’ model-evidence link evaluation levels related to GDO. Sakarya University Journal of Education,9(2), 224–242.
- Salmon, W. C. (1994). Causality without counterfactuals. Philosophy of Science, 61(2), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/289801
- Saribas, D. & Akdemir, Z. G. (2019). Using an innovative tool in science education: examining pre-service elementary teachers’ evaluation levels on the topic of wetlands. International Journal of Science Education,41(1), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1536302
- Saribas, D., & Akdemir, Z. G. (2020). Action research on pre-service elementary teachers’ understandings of the scientific method and the use of evidence in a science and technology teaching course. Research in Science & Technological Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020
- Saribas, D., Ceyhan, G. D., & Lombardi, D. (2019). Zooming in on scientific practices and evidence-based explanations during teaching NOS: A study in pre-service teacher education program. Elementary Education Online, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2019.527626
- Saribas, D. & Saka, M. (2018). Examination of preservice teachers’ levels of understanding and evaluation related to model-evidence related to climate change. Trakya Journal of Education,8(4), 655–670. https://doi.org/10.24315/trkefd.408264
- Sinatra, G. M., & Chinn, C. A. (2011). Thinking and reasoning in science: Promoting epistemic conceptual change. In K. Harris, C. B. McCormick, G. M. Sinatra, & J. Sweller (Eds.), Educational psychology: Contributions to education (Vol. 1, pp. 257–282). American Psychological Association.
- Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1997). Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 342–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.342
- Vaughan, A. (2020, March 4) Major science journal retracts study blaming climate change on the sun. Environment Pages. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2236103-major-science-journal-retracts-study-blaming-climate-change-on-the-sun/
- Xie, Q., & So, W. W. M. (2012). Understanding and practice of argumentation: A pilot study with Mainland Chinese pre-service teachers in secondary science classrooms. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 13(2), 1–20.