231
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Slovak Science teachers’ TPACK and Their Attitudes Toward Educational Technologies

, , ORCID Icon &

References

  • Abbitt, J. T. (2011a). An investigation of the relationship between self-efficacy beliefs about technology integration and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) among preservice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(4), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2011.10784670
  • Abbitt, J. T. (2011b). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge in preservice teacher education: A review of current methods and instruments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782573
  • Adamčák, Š., & Nemec, M. (2016). Informovanosť žiakov základných škôl o globálnom polohovom systéme a hre geocaching vo vybraných mestách a obciach východného Slovenska. Studia Sportiva, 10(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.5817/StS2016-2-11
  • Akyuz, D. (2018). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through performance assessment. Computers & Education, 125, 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.012
  • Almås, A. G., & Krumsvik, R. (2007). Digitally literate teachers in leading edge schools in Norway. Journal of In-Service Education, 33(4), 479–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580701687864
  • Almerich, G., Orellana, N., Suárez-Rodríguez, J., & Díaz-García, I. (2016). Teachers’ information and communication technology competences: A structural approach. Computers & Education, 100, 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.002
  • Altun, T., & Akyildiz, S. (2017). Investigating student teachers’technological pedagogical content knowledge (tpack) levels based on some variables. European Journal of Education Studies. https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejes/article/view/681
  • Andaloro, G., Bellomonte, L., & Sperandeo‐Mineo, R. M. (1997). A computer‐based learning environment in the field of Newtonian mechanics. International Journal of Science Education, 19(6), 661–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970190604
  • Andres, P., & Svoboda, P. (2018), September. Development of digital competences of teachers of social sciences at secondary vocational schools. In International conference on interactive collaborative learning, pp. 720–731. Springer, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11935-5_68%20.
  • Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT–TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006
  • Anthony, L. (2019). Physical dimensions of children’s touchscreen interactions: Lessons from five years of study on the MTAGIC project. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 128, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.02.005
  • Archambault, L. M., & Barnett, J. H. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1656–1662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009
  • Babanazarovich, N. H. (2021). Using of innovative educational technologies in the improvement of ecological thinking by pupils in the field of biology sciences. International Journal of Innovative Analyses and Emerging Technology, 1(6), 84–88. https://openaccessjournals.eu/index.php/ijiaet/article/view/619/598
  • Balanskat, A., Blamire, R., & Kefala, S. (2007). The ICT impact report. A review of studies of ICT impact on schools in Europe. European Schoolnet, Consultado el 5 de junio de 2009. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/unpan/unpan037334.pdf
  • Bal, M. S., & Karademir, N. (2013). Sosyal Bilgiler öğretmenlerinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (TPAB) konusunda öz-değerlendirme seviyelerinin belirlenmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34(2), 15–32.
  • Baran, E., Canbazoglu Bilici, S., Albayrak Sari, A., & Tondeur, J. (2019). Investigating the impact of teacher education strategies on preservice teachers’ TPACK. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12565
  • Basnet, B., Basson, M., Hobohm, C., & Cochrane, S. (2012, January). Students’ self-assessment of assignments-is it worth it? In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference (AaeE 2012). University of Southern Queensland.
  • Baxter, J. A., & Lederman, N. G. (1999). Assessment and measurement of pedagogical content knowledge. In Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 147–161). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/0-306-47217-1_6
  • Becta. (2004). A review of the research literature on barriers to the uptake of ICT by teachers. BECTA. http://publications.becta.org.uk/displa.cfm
  • Benali, M., Kaddouri, M., & Azzimani, T. (2018). Digital competence of Moroccan teachers of English. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 14(2). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/184691/
  • Bilici, S. C., Yamak, H., Kavak, N., & Guzey, S. S. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge self-efficacy scale (TPACK-SeS) for pre-service science teachers: Construction, validation, and reliability. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 52, 37–60. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1060363
  • Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(3), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75275
  • Blonder, R., Jonatan, M., Bar-Dov, Z., Benny, N., Rap, S., & Sakhnini, S. (2013). Can you tube it? Providing chemistry teachers with technological tools and enhancing their self-efficacy beliefs. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(3), 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00001J
  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables (Vol. 210). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 8(1). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/188018/
  • Caballé, S., Xhafa, F., & Barolli, L. (2010). Using mobile devices to support online collaborative learning. Mobile Information Systems, 6(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/935169
  • Caraballo, G. (2012). The effect of the use assistive technology on english reading comprehension of students with learning differences. University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras (Puerto Rico).
  • Cavas, B., Cavas, P., Karaoglan, B., & Kisla, T. (2009). A study on science teachers’ attitudes toward information and communications technologies in education. Online Submission, 8(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED505935
  • Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 31–51. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/jeductechsoci.16.2.31.pdf
  • Chai, C. S., Ng, E. M., Li, W., Hong, H. Y., & Koh, J. H. (2013). Validating and modelling technological pedagogical content knowledge framework among Asian preservice teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.174
  • Chen, Y. C. (2017). Empirical study on the effect of digital game-based instruction on students’ learning motivation and achievement. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3177–3187. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00711a
  • Cheng, Y.-H., Cheng, J.-T., & Chen, D.-J. (2012). The effect of multimedia computer assisted instruction andLearning style on learning achievement. WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications, 9(1), 24–35. http://www.wseas.us/journal/pdf/information/2012/54-286.pdf
  • Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2008). Self-report measures and findings for information technology attitudes and competencies. International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 349–365). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9_21
  • Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2016). Validating the technology proficiency self-assessment questionnaire for 21st century learning (TPSA C-21). Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(1), 20–31. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21532974.2016.1242391
  • Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2017). Validating the technology proficiency self-assessment questionnaire for 21st century learning (TPSA C-21). Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2016.1242391
  • Chu, S. K. W., Reynolds, R. B., Tavares, N. J., Notari, M., & Lee, C. W. Y. (2021). 21st century skills development through inquiry-based learning from theory to practice. Springer International Publishing.
  • Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2010). The second educational revolution: Rethinking education in the age of technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00339.x
  • Crosby, M. E., & Iding, M. K. (1997). The influence of a multimedia physics tutor and user differences on the development of scientific knowledge. Computers & Education, 29(2–3), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(97)00024-9
  • Dabbagh, N., Marra, R. M., & Howland, J. L. (2018). Meaningful online learning: Integrating strategies, activities, and learning technologies for effective designs. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315528458
  • Demkanin, P., Horváth, P., Chalupková, S., & Šuhajová, Z. (2021). Fyzika pre 2. ročník gymnázia a 6. ročník gymnázia s osemročným štúdiom. Patria I., spol. s r.o.
  • Demkanin, P., & Horváthová, M. (2021). Fyzika pre 3. ročník gymnázia a 7. ročník gymnázia s osemročným štúdiom. Patria I., spol. s r.o.
  • Dewi, S. R., Nurmilawati, M., & Budiretnani, D. A. (2017). Improving of scientific literacy ability using discovery learning model at the seventh grade students of state JHS 3 ngronggot, Nganjuk-Indonesia. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 3(3), 266–271. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v3i3.4597
  • Dong, Y., Xu, C., Chai, C. S., & Zhai, X. (2020). Exploring the structural relationship among teachers’ technostress, technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), computer self-efficacy and school support. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29, 147–157. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40299-019-00461-5
  • Dyrberg, N. R., Treusch, A. H., & Wiegand, C. (2017). Virtual laboratories in science education: Students’ motivation and experiences in two tertiary biology courses. Journal of Biological Education, 51(4), 358–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.1257498
  • Dziuban, C. D., & Shirkey, E. C. (1974). When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules. Psychological Bulletin, 81(6), 358. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036316
  • Efe, R. (2011). Science student teachers and educational technology: Experience, intentions, and value. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 228–240. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/jeductechsoci.14.1.228.pdf
  • Elliott, K., Sweeney, K., Galea, V., Irving, H., & Johnson, E. (2008). Scientific inquiry: Where is it in the educational technology landscape? ASCILITE 2008-The Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, 283–286. https://sdu.sk/1wX
  • Elstad, E., & Christophersen, K. A. (2017). Perceptions of digital competency among student teachers: Contributing to the development of student teachers’ instructional self-efficacy in technology-rich classrooms. Education Sciences, 7(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7010027
  • Erdogan, A., & Sahin, I. (2010). Relationship between math teacher candidates’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) and achievement levels. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2707–2711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.400
  • Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4.
  • Farrokhi, F., & Mahmoudi-Hamidabad, A. (2012). Rethinking convenience sampling: Defining quality criteria. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.4.784-792
  • Finstad, K. (2010). Response interpolation and scale sensitivity: Evidence against 5-point scales. Journal of Usability Studies, 5(3), 104–110. https://lnk.sk/fckp
  • Friedrichsen, P. J., Abell, S. K., Pareja, E. M., Brown, P. L., Lankford, D. M., & Volkmann, M. J. (2009). Does teaching experience matter? Examining biology teachers’ prior knowledge for teaching in an alternative certification program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 46(4), 357–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20283
  • From, J. (2017). Pedagogical digital competence–between values, knowledge and skills. Higher Education Studies, 7(2), 43–50. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1140642
  • Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: A guide for non-statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 10(2), 486. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.3505
  • Ghomi, M., & Redecker, C. (2019, May). Digital competence of educators (DigCompedu): Development and evaluation of a self-assessment instrument for teachers’ digital competence. In CSEDU (1) (pp. 541–548). https://doi.org/10.5220/0007679005410548
  • Gilkes, A. L. (2020). Teachers’ Knowledge and Self-Efficacy Beliefs as Factors Affecting Technology Integration Practices [ Doctoral dissertation]. Walden University. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2452340806?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true
  • Gökçek, T., Günes, G., & Gençtürk, E. (2013). Evaluation of Primary School Teachers’ technological self-efficacy. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(1). https://www.acarindex.com/dosyalar/makale/acarindex-1423904253.pdf
  • Gonzales, A. L. (2018). Exploring technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) and self-efficacy belief of senior high school biology teachers in Batangas City. The Palawan Scientist, 10(1), 29–47. https://www.palawanscientist.org/tps/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/3_Gonzales_-Palawan-Scientist_2018.pdf
  • Gopinathan, P. (2022). Educational technology in physical education and sports. Sports Educational Technologies.
  • Graham, L. (2008). Teachers are digikids too: The digital histories and digital lives of young teachers in English primary schools. Literacy, 42(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9345.2008.00476.x
  • Graham, R. C., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L., St Clair, L., & Harris, R. (2009). Measuring the TPACK confidence of inservice science teachers. Tech Trends, 53(5), 70–79. http://galleries.lakeheadu.ca/uploads/4/0/5/9/4059357/measureing_tpack_confidence.pdf
  • Gregussová, M., & Kováčiková, D. (2008). Sú naše deti vo virtuálnom prostredí v bezpečí. Bratislava: Výskumný ústav detskej psychológie a patopsychológie. http://www.zodpovedne.sk/download/prieskum_na_detoch-bezpecne_na_internete.pdf
  • Haji, S. A. (2015). Science teachers’ attitudes towards the use of information and communication technology in secondary schools in Cameroon. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 2348–3164. https://bit.ly/3CvnHZi
  • Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
  • Haystead, M. W., & Marzano, R. J. (2009). Meta-analytic synthesis of studies conducted at marzano research laboratory on instructional strategies. Marzano Research Laboratory. http://yescharteracademy.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Appendix-1D-Marzano-Instructional-Strategies-Report.pdf
  • Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567–1579. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946
  • Hennessy, S. (2000). Graphing investigations using portable (palmtop) technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16(3), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2729.2000.00136.x
  • Heubeck, B. G., & Neill, J. T. (2000). Confirmatory factor analysis and reliability of the mental health inventory for Australian adolescents. Psychological Reports, 87(2), 431–440. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2000.87.2.431
  • Higgins, S., Xiao, Z., & Katsipataki, M. (2012). The impact of digital technology on learning: A summary for the education endowment foundation. Full Report. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED612174
  • Hochberg, K., Kuhn, J., & Müller, A. (2018). Using smartphones as experimental tools—effects on interest, curiosity, and learning in physics education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(5), 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9731-7
  • Hollis, C., Morriss, R., Martin, J., Amani, S., Cotton, R., Denis, M., & Lewis, S. (2015). Technological innovations in mental healthcare: Harnessing the digital revolution. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 206(4), 263–265. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.113.142612
  • Hong, J. E. (2016). Social studies teachers’ views of ICT integration. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 6(1), 32–48. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/rigeo/issue/40906/493015
  • Ibrahim, D. S. A. (2016). Secondary school teacher’s characteristics and their attitudes toward the utilisation of information and communication technology (ICT) in teaching in Kano and Jigawa States, Nigeria. http://41.204.161.209/handle/11295/100996
  • Jacob, J. (2017). Reliability: How? when? what? International Journal of Advances in Nursing Management, 5(4), 372–374. https://doi.org/10.5958/2454-2652.2017.00080.4
  • Jang, S. J., & Tsai, M. F. (2012a). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese elementary mathematics and science teachers with respect to use of interactive whiteboards. Computers & Education, 59(2), 327–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.003
  • Jang, S. J., & Tsai, M. F. (2012b). Reasons for using or not using interactive whiteboards: Perspectives of Taiwanese elementary mathematics and science teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(8). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.781
  • Jang, S. J., & Tsai, M. F. (2013). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese secondary school science teachers using a new contextualized TPACK model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.282
  • Jashari, X., Fetaji, B., Nussbaumer, A., & Gütl, C. (2020, February). Assessing digital skills and competencies for different groups and devising a conceptual model to support teaching and training. In International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (pp. 982–995). Springer, Cham. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-52575-0_82
  • Jeet-Kaur, R., & Sharma, S. (2013). Managing students’ attitude towards science through computer assisted instruction. International Indexed & Refereed Research Journal, 4(40), 79–81. http://www.ssmrae.com/admin/images/3f20b0d829066e08848fe002516716f1.pdf
  • Jimoyiannis, A. (2010). Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers professional development. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1259–1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.022
  • Jimoyiannis, A., & Komis, V. (2001). Computer simulations in physics teaching and learning: A case study on students’ understanding of trajectory motion. Computers & Education, 36(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(00)00059-2
  • Jimoyiannis, A., & Komis, V. (2006). Exploring secondary education teachers’ attitudes and beliefs towards ICT in education. THEMES in Education, 7(2), 181–204. https://shorturl.at/ouxJ0
  • Jimoyiannis, A., & Komis, V. (2007). Examining teachers’ beliefs about ICT in education: Implications of a teacher preparation programme. Teacher Development, 11(2), 149–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530701414779
  • Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48–59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26458506
  • Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G., & Wachira, P. (2008). Computer technology integration and student learning: Barriers and promise. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(6), 560–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9123-5
  • Klassen, R. M., & Tze, V. M. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12, 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.06.001
  • Kler, S. (2014). ICT integration in teaching and learning: Empowerment of education with technology. Issues and Ideas in Education, 2(2), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.15415/iie.2014.22019
  • Kline, T. J. (2005). Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483385693
  • Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/29544/
  • Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 101–111). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9
  • Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2014). Demographic factors, TPACK constructs, and teachers’ perceptions of constructivist-oriented TPACK. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 185–196. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/jeductechsoci.17.1.185.pdf
  • Krumsvik, R. J. (2011). Digital competence in the Norwegian teacher education and schools. Högre utbildning, 1(1), 39–51. https://hogreutbildning.se/index.php/hu/article/view/874
  • Kulkarni, P. D. (2000). Educational technology in improving quality of engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2000/v13i4/112252
  • Lee, M. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Exploring teachers’ perceived self efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge with respect to educational use of the World Wide Web. Instructional Science, 38(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9075-4
  • Lemon, N., & Garvis, S. (2016). Pre-service teacher self-efficacy in digital technology. Teachers & Teaching, 22(3), 387–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1058594
  • Leung, H. (2012). Analysts earnings forecasts distribution. International Journal of Banking and Finance, 8(3), 37–53. https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/ijbf/article/view/8428
  • Li, S., Liu, Y., & Su, Y. S. (2022). Differential analysis of teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) abilities according to teaching stages and educational levels. Sustainability, 14(12), 7176. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127176
  • Lin, T. C., Tsai, C. C., Chai, C. S., & Lee, M. H. (2013). Identifying science teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(3), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9396-6
  • López-Belmonte, J., Pozo-Sánchez, S., Fuentes-Cabrera, A., & Trujillo-Torres, J. M. (2019). Analytical competences of teachers in big data in the era of digitalized learning. Education Sciences, 9(3), 177. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030177
  • Luu, K., & Freeman, J. G. (2011). An analysis of the relationship between information and communication technology (ICT) and scientific literacy in Canada and Australia. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1072–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.008
  • Maderick, J. A., Zhang, S., Hartley, K., & Marchand, G. (2016). Preservice teachers and self-assessing digital competence. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(3), 326–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115620432
  • Maeng, J. L., Mulvey, B. K., Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2013). Preservice teachers’ TPACK: Using technology to support inquiry instruction. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(6), 838–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9434-z
  • Magaña, S. (2017). Disruptive classroom technologies: A framework for innovation in education. Corwin Press.
  • Magaña, S., & Marzano, R. J. (2014). Using polling technologies to close feedback gaps. Educational Leadership, 71(6), 83–83. https://www.lindareedclassroom.com/teaching-resources/ewExternalFiles/Using%20Polling%20Techniques%20to%20Close%20Feedback%20Gaps.pdf
  • Mahyuddin, R., Elias, H., Cheong, L. S., Muhamad, M. F., Noordin, N., & Abdullah, M. C. (2006). The relationship between students’ self efficacy and their English language achievement. Malaysian Journal of Educators and Education, 21, 61–71. https://sdu.sk/Vg1
  • Mai, M. Y., & Hamzah, M. (2016). Primary science teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in Malaysia. European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research, 6(2), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v6i2.p167-179
  • Manfra, M. M., & Hammond, T. C. (2006). Teachers’ instructional choices with student-created digital documentaries: Case studies. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(2), 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2008.10782530
  • McDonald, B., & Boud, D. (2003). The impact of self-assessment on achievement: The effects of self-assessment training on performance in external examinations. Assessment in Education Principles, Policy & Practice, 10(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594032000121289
  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  • Morales, C., Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2008). Self-efficacy ratings of technology proficiency among teachers in Mexico and Texas. Computers in the Schools, 25(1–2), 126–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380560802158004
  • Mutluoğlu, A. (2012). İlköğretim Matematik öğretmenlerinin öğretim stili tercihlerine göre teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgilerinin incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • Newhouse, C. P. (2002). A framework to articulate the impact of ICT on learning in schools. special educational service.
  • Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006
  • Orlando, J., & Attard, C. (2016). Digital natives come of age: The reality of today’s early career teachers using mobile devices to teach mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-015-0159-6
  • Owusu, K. A., Monney, K. A., Appiah, J. Y., & Wilmot, E. M. (2010). Effects of computer-assisted instruction on performance of senior high school biology students in Ghana. Computers & Education, 55(2), 904–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.001
  • Özgün-Koca, S. A. (2009). The views of preservice teachers about the strengths and limitations of the use of graphing calculators in mathematics instruction. Journal of Technology & Teacher Education, 17(2), 203–227. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/26268/
  • Ozudogru, M., & Ozudogru, F. (2019). Technological pedagogical content knowledge of mathematics teachers and the effect of demographic variables. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.512515
  • Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis of the approaches to teaching inventory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(2), 405–419. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X43571
  • Rafi, M., JianMing, Z., & Ahmad, K. (2019). Technology integration for students’ information and digital literacy education in academic libraries. Information Discovery and Delivery, 47(4), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-07-2019-0049
  • Rashidov, A. S. (2022). Using of problem educational technologies in the development of students’creative and logical thinking skills. Berlin Studies Transnational Journal of Science and Humanities, 2(1.5 Pedagogical sciences). https://www.berlinstudies.de/index.php/berlinstudies/article/view/372
  • Reid-Griffin, A. (2003). Technology: A tool for science learning. Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal, 6(2), 1–4. https://sdu.sk/cxiR
  • Ross, J. A., Hogaboam-Gray, A., & Hannay, L. (1999). Predictors of teachers’ confidence in their ability to implement computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 21(1), 75–97. https://doi.org/10.2190/CGXF-YYJE-47KQ-MFA
  • Rozell, E. J., & Gardner, W. L., III. (1999). Computer-related success and failure: A longitudinal field study of the factors influencing computer-related performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(98)00030-2
  • Russell, M., O’Dwyer, L. M., Bebell, D., & Tao, W. (2007). How teachers’ uses of technology vary by tenure and longevity. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37(4), 393–417. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.37.4.d
  • Sadik, A. (2006). Factors influencing teachers’ attitudes toward personal use and school use of computers: New evidence from a developing nation. Evaluation Review, 30(1), 86–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X05276688
  • Sahin, I. (2011). Development of survey of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(1), 97–105. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ926558
  • Sardegna, V. G., Lee, J., & Kusey, C. (2018). Self‐efficacy, attitudes, and choice of strategies for English pronunciation learning. Language Learning, 68(1), 83–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12263
  • Schmidt, D., Baran, E., Thompson, A., Koehler, M., Punya, M., & Shin, T. (2009, March). Examining preservice teachers’ development of technological pedagogical content knowledge in an introductory instructional technology course. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 4145–4151). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/31308/
  • Schrum, L., & Levin, B. B. (2016). Educational technologies and twenty-first century leadership for learning. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 19(1), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2015.1096078
  • Semerci, A., & Aydin, M. K. (2018). Examining high school teachers’ attitudes towards ICT use in education. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(2), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2018.139.7
  • Shanmugam, K., & Balakrishnan, B. (2019). Motivation in information communication and technology-based science learning in Tamil schools. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1), 141–152. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jpii/article/view/16564
  • Shapkaa, J., & Ferrarib, M. (2003). Computer-related attitudes and actions of teacher candidates. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 319–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00059-6
  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175860
  • Spiteri, M., & Chang Rundgren, S. N. (2020). Literature review on the factors affecting primary teachers’ use of digital technology. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9376-x
  • Stokes, S. (2002). Visual literacy in teaching and learning: A literature perspective. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 1(1), 10–19. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.136.7248&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  • Thornton, R. K., & Sokoloff, D. R. (1990). Learning motion concepts using real‐time microcomputer‐based laboratory tools. American Journal of Physics, 58(9), 858–867. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.16350
  • Usluel, Y. A. S. E. M. İ. N., Mumcu, F., & Demiraslan, Y. (2007). ICT in the learning-teaching process: Teachers’ views on the integration and obstacles. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi-Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 32. https://avesis.hacettepe.edu.tr/yayin/e6d071be-88a3-4527-be59-0813ac297c45/ict-in-the-learning-teaching-process-teachers-views-on-the-integration-and-obstacles
  • Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673–695. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1998-10282-004
  • Vekiri, I., & Chronaki, A. (2008). Gender issues in technology use: Perceived social support, computer self-efficacy and value beliefs, and computer use beyond school. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1392–1404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.01.003
  • Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge–a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
  • Wake, D., & Whittingham, J. (2013). Teacher candidates’ perceptions of technology supported literacy practices. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 13(3), 175–206. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/42101/
  • Wikan, G., & Molster, T. (2011). Norwegian secondary school teachers and ICT. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(2), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2010.543671
  • Winter, E., Costello, A., O’Brien, M., & Hickey, G. (2021). Teachers’ use of technology and the impact of covid-19. Irish Educational Studies, 40(2), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.1916559
  • Yalcinalp, S., & Avci, Ü. (2019). Creativity and emerging digital educational technologies: A systematic review. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 18(3), 25–45. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1223768
  • Yeh, Y. F., Hsu, Y. S., Wu, H. K., Hwang, F. K., & Lin, T. C. (2014). Developing and validating technological pedagogical content knowledge‐practical (TPACK‐practical) through the delphi survey technique. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(4), 707–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12078
  • Yildirim, S. (2007). Current utilization of ICT in Turkish basic education schools: A review of teacher’s ICT use and barriers to integration. International Journal of Instructional Media, 34(2), 171. https://users.metu.edu.tr/soner/InternationalJournals/8.pdf

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.