Perception of Practical Activities by Chemistry Teachers

References

• Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945–1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701749305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahams, I., & Reiss, M. J. (2012). Practical work: Its effectiveness in primary and secondary schools in England. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(8), 1035–1055. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akuma, F. V., & Callaghan, R. (2019). A systematic review characterizing and clarifying intrinsic teaching challenges linked to inquiry-based practical work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(5), 619–648. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy: A project 2061 report. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T. R. (2007). Bridging the educational research-teaching practice gap. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 35(6), 465–470. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appleton, K. (2002). Science activities that work: Perceptions of primary school teachers. Research in Science Education, 32(3), 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020878121184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. C., Kremer, K., & Mayer, J. (2014). Understanding students’ experiments—what kind of support do they need in inquiry tasks? International Journal of Science Education, 36(16), 2719–2749. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.930209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, L. A. (2017). Adaptation of know, want to know, and learned chart for problem-based learning. Journal of Nursing Education, 56(8), 506–508. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20170712-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and Children, 46(2), 26–29.
   Google Scholar
• Baur, A., & Emden, M. (2021). How to open inquiry teaching? An alternative teaching scaffold to foster students’ inquiry skills. Chemistry Teacher International, 3(1), 20190013. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2019-0013
   Google Scholar
• Bertusso, F. R., Terhaag, M. M., & Malacarne, V. (2020). The use of practical classes in science teaching: Challenges and possibilities. Revista Práxis Educacional, 16(39), 318–336. https://doi.org/10.22481/praxisedu.v16i39.6380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boesdorfer, S. B., & Livermore, R. A. (2018). Secondary school chemistry teacher’s current use of laboratory activities and the impact of expense on their laboratory choices. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00159B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulton-Lewis, G. M., Smith, D. J. H., McCrindle, A. R., Burnett, P. C., & Campbell, K. J. (2001). Secondary teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning. Learning and Instruction, 11(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00014-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Application of Q methodology in political science. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caleon, I. S., Tan, Y. S. M., & Cho, Y. H. (2018). Does teaching experience matter? The beliefs and practices of beginning and experienced physics teachers. Research in Science Education, 48(1), 117–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9562-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capps, D. K., & Crawford, B. A. (2013). Inquiry-based instruction and teaching about nature of science: Are they happening? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 497–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9314-z
   Google Scholar
• Capps, D. K., Shemwell, J. T., & Young, A. M. (2016). Over reported and misunderstood? A study of teachers’ reported enactment and knowledge of inquiry-based science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 38(6), 934–959. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1173261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobber, M., Zwart, R., Tanis, M., & van Oers, B. (2017). Literature review: The role of the teacher in inquiry-based education. Educational Research Review, 22, 194–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyzioglu, B., Demirdag, B., Ates, A., Cobanoglu, I., & Altun, E. (2011). Chemistry teachers’ perceptions on laboratory applications: Izmir Sample. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 11(2), 1024–1029.
   Google Scholar
• Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2012). Spring cleaning for the “messy” construct of teachers’ beliefs: What are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us? In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, S. Graham, J. M. Royer, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, vol. 2: Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors (pp. 471–499). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review in Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganajova, M., Sotakova, I., Lukac, S., Jeskova, Z., Jurkova, V., & Orosova, R. (2021). Formative assessment as a tool to enhance the development of inquiry skills in science education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(2), 204–222. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Carmona, A., Criado, A. M., & Cruz-Guzmán, M. (2018). Prospective primary teachers’ prior experiences, conceptions, and pedagogical valuations of experimental activities in science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(2), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9773-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gericke, N., Högström, P., & Wallin, J. (2022). A systematic review of research on laboratory work in secondary school. Studies in Science Education, 59(2), 245–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2022.2090125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasson, E. G. (1989). The effects of hands-on and teacher demonstration laboratory methods on science achievement in relation to reasoning ability and prior knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(2), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660260204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halawa, S., Hsu, Y.-S., Zhang, W.-X., Kuo, Y.-R., & Wu, J.-Y. (2020). Features and trends of teaching strategies for scientific practices from a review of 2008–2017 articles. International Journal of Science Education, 42(7), 1183–1206. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1752415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. (Ed.). (2015). Working with big ideas of science education. Science education Programme. The science education Programme (SEP) of IAP. https://www.interacademies.org/publication/working-big-ideas-science-education
   Google Scholar
• Haury, D. L., & Rillero, P. (1994). Perspectives of hands-on science teaching. ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., & Kind, P. (2012). Learning in and from science laboratories. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & K. McRobbie (Eds.), International handbook on science education (pp. 189–207). Springer Dorbrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_15
   Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., Kipnis, M., & Abrahams, I. (2013). How to learn in and from the chemistry laboratory. In I. Eilks & A. Hofstein (Eds.), Teaching chemistry- a studybook: A practical guide and textbook for student teachers, teacher trainees, and teachers (pp. 153–182). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-140-5
   Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. (2003). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoy Woolfolk, A. (2004). Educational psychology. Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Kerlinger, F. N. (1972). Základy výzkumu chování. Foundations of Behavioral Research. Academia.
   Google Scholar
• Koballa, T., Jr., Graber, W., Coleman, D. C., & Kemp, A. C. (2000). Prospective gymnasium teachers’ conceptions of chemistry learning and teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 22(2), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900289967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotul’áková, K. (2021). Identifying teachers’ beliefs prior to CPD training focusing on an Inquiry-based approach in science education. Research in Science Education, 51(S1), 183–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9841-0
   Google Scholar
• Kotuľáková, K. (2020). Identifying beliefs held by preservice chemistry teachers in order to improve instruction during their teaching courses. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(3), 730–748. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00190E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarowitz, R., & Naim, R. (2014). Learning the cell structures with three-dimensional models: Students’ achievement by methods, type of school and questions’ cognitive level. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(4), 500–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9409-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazonder, A. W., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681–718. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leden, L., Hansson, L., & Ideland, M. (2020). The mangle of school science practice: Teachers’ negotiations of two nature of science activities at different levels of contextualization. Science Education, 104(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughran, J. (2014). Professionally developing as a teacher educator. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114533386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, J. C., Smart, J. B., & Alston, D. M. (2016). Inquiry-based instruction: A possible solution to improving Student learning of both science concepts and scientific practices. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(5), 777–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9718-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeon, B., & Thomas, D. B. (2013). Q methodology. SAGE Publication, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Militello, M., & Benham, M. K. P. (2010). ‘Sorting out” collective leadership: How Q-methodology can be used to evaluate leadership development. The Leadership Quart, 21(4), 620–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, E., Manz, E., Russ, R., Stroupe, D., & Berland, L. (2018). Addressing the epistemic elephant in the room: Epistemic agency and the next generation science standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 1053–1075. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, J. A. (2013). Exploring exemplary elementary teachers’ conceptions and implementation of inquiry science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 573–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9302-3
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165.NRC
   Google Scholar
• Next Generation Science Standards. (n.d.). Retrieved March 10, 2021, from https://www.nextgenscience.org/
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• PQMethod. (2014). http://schmolck.org/qmethod/pqmanual.htm#view
   Google Scholar
• Qadar, R., Samsiah, S., & Haryanto, Z. (2018). The use of affective and cognitive assessment on the learning of mirrors and lenses through the Inquiry laboratory approach. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 4(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v4i1.3046
   Google Scholar
• Ramlo, S. E., & Newman, I. (2011). Q methodology and its position in the mixed-methods continuum. Operant Subjectivity, 34(3), 172–191. 10.22488/okstate.11.100594
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102–119). Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henriksson, H., & Hemmo, V. (2007). Science education Now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Roehrig, G. H., Kruse, R. A., & Kern, A. (2007). Teacher and school characteristics and their influence on curriculum implementation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 883–907. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolph, J. L. (2005). Epistemology for the masses: The origins of “the scientific method” in American schools. History of Education Quarterly, 45(3), 341–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5959.2005.tb00039.x
   Google Scholar
• RVP – Rámcové vzdělávací programy. [Czech National Curriculum]. (2021). http://www.nuv.cz/file/4983/
   Google Scholar
• Savasci, F., & Berlin, D. F. (2012). Science teacher beliefs and classroom practice related to constructivism in different school settings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(1), 65–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9262-z
   Google Scholar
• Schmolck, P., & Atkinson, J. (1997). PQMethod (2.33). http://schmolck.userweb.mwn.de/qmethod.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(4), 610–645. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seda Cetin, P., Eymur, G., Southerland, S. A., Walker, J., & Whittington, K. (2018). Exploring the effectiveness of engagement in a broad range of disciplinary practices on learning of Turkish high-school chemistry students. International Journal of Science Education, 40(5), 473–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1432914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175860
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Diamand, J. B., Walker, L. J., Halverson, R., & Jita, L. (2011). Urban school leadership for elementary science instruction: Identifying and activating resources in an undervalued school subject. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 918–940. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1039
   Google Scholar
• Strimaitis, A. M., Southerland, S. A., Sampson, V., Enderle, P., & Grooms, J. (2017). Promoting equitable biology lab instruction by engaging all students in a broad range of science practices: An exploratory study. School Science and Mathematics, 117(3), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12212
   Google Scholar
• ŠVP – Štátny vzdelávací program [Slovak National Curriculum]. (2015). https://www.minedu.sk/data/att/7500.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Upahi, J. E., Ramnarain, U., & Abdussalam, A. A. (2019). Investigating the laboratory experiences of chemistry teachers. In Pixel (Ed.), New perspectives in science education (pp. 44–51). Pixel - International Education and Training Institution.
   Google Scholar
• van Driel, J. H., Berry, A., & Meirink, J. (2014). Research on science teacher knowledge. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 848–870). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203097267
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, L. M., Jacquez, F., Deters, A., & Boards, A. (2022). Group-level assessment (GLA) as a methodological tool to facilitate science education. Research in Science Education, 52(2), 539–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09960-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2012). Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method, and interpretation. SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Zacharia, Z., & Barton, A. C. (2004). Urban middle‐school students’ attitudes toward a defined science. Science Education, 8(2), 197–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10110
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, Z., & Geelan, D. (2013). Chinese secondary physics teachers’ beliefs and instructional decisions in relation to inquiry-based teaching. The Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 17(2), 1–24.
   Google Scholar