Hazardous Air Pollution from Mobile Sources: A Comparison of Alternative Fuel and Reformulated Gasoline Vehicles

REFERENCES

• National Air Pollutant Emission Trends; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Black, F.M. “Control of motor vehicle emissions—The U.S. experience,” Crit. Rev. in Environ. Control. 1991, 21, 373–410.
   Google Scholar
• LeBlanc, D.C.; Saunders, F.M.; Meyer, M.D.; Guensler, R. “Driving pattern variability and impacts on vehicle carbon monoxide emissions,” Transportation Res. Record 1995, 1472, 45–52.
   Google Scholar
• Stump, F.D.; Knapp, K.T.; Ray, W.D.; Siudak, P.D.; Snow, R.F. “Influence of oxygenated fuels on the emissions from three pre-1985 light-duty passenger vehicles,” J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1994, 44, 781–786.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchstetter, T.W.; Singer, B.C.; Harley, R.A.; Kendall, G.R.; Chan, W. “Impact of oxygenated gasoline use on California light-duty vehicle emissions,” Environ. Sci. Technol. 1996, 30, 661–670.
   Google Scholar
• Winebrake, J.J. “Another challenge for energy/environmental strategists: Federal laws affecting vehicle fleets,” Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environ. 1994, 13, 52-67.
   Google Scholar
• 7. Alternatives to Traditional Transportation Fuels 1996; U.S. Department of Energy. U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 1997; DOE/EIA-0585(94)/1.
   Google Scholar
• 8. Annual Energy Outlook, 1994; U.S. Department of Energy. U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Winebrake, J.J.; Farrell, A.E. “The AFV credit program and its role in future market development,” Transportation Res.: Part D—Transport and the Environ. 1997, 2, 125–132.
   Google Scholar
• Gabele, P. “Exhaust emissions from in-use alternative fuel vehicles,” J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1995, 45, 770–777.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, K.J.; Bailey, B.K.; Coburn, T.C.; Clark, W.; Eudy, L.; Lissiuk, P. “FTP emissions test results from flexible-fuel methanol Dodge Spirits and Ford Econoline vans,” SAE Technical Paper Series 1996, 961090,207–230.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, K.J.; Bailey, B.K.; Coburn, T.C.; Eudy, L.; Lissiuk, P. “Round 1
   Google Scholar
• emissions test results from compressed natural gas vans and gasoline controls operating in the U.S. federal fleet,” SAE Technical Paper Series 1996, 961091, 233–248.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, K.J.; Bailey, B.K.; Coburn, T.C.; Clark, W.; Lissiuk, P. “Federal test procedure emissions test results from ethanol variable-fuel vehicle Chevrolet Luminas,” SAE Technical Paper Series 1996, 961092, 249–268.
   Google Scholar
• Motor Vehicle-Related Air Toxics Study; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Mobile Sources. U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 1993; EPA-420-R–93–005.
   Google Scholar
• Gabele, P. “Characterization of emissions from a variable gaso-line/methanol fueled car,” J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1990, 40, 296–304.
   Google Scholar
• Definition of a Low-Emission Motor Vehicle in Compliance with the Mandates of Health and Safety Code Section 39037.05; California Air Resources Board. Mobile Source Division. CARB: El Monte, CA, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Proposed Reactivity Adjustment Factors for Transitional Low-Emission Vehicles: Technical Support Document; California Air Resources Board.Mobile Source Division. CARB: El Monte, CA, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Emissions and Air Quality Modeling Results from Methanol/Gasoline Blends in Prototype Flexible/Variable Fuel Vehicles; Technical Bulletin No. 7; Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program. Coordinating Research Council: Atlanta, GA, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Emissions of Three Dedicated-Methanol Vehicles; Technical Bulletin No. 10; Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program. Coordinating Research Council: Atlanta, GA, 1992.
   Google Scholar