Meteorological Factors of Ozone Predictability at Houston, Texas

REFERENCES

• Ryan, W.F.; Doddridge, B.G.; Dickerson, R.R.; Morales, R.M., Hallock, K.A.; Roberts, P.T.; Blumenthal, D.L.; Anderson, J.A.; Civerolo, K.L. “Pollutant transport during a regional O3 episode in the Mid-Atlantic States,” J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1998, 48, 786–797.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, S.F. “Characterization of ambient ozone levels in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park,” J. Appl. Meteor. 1994, 33, 465–472.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J.M.; Eder, B.K.; Nychka, D.; Yang, Q. “Modeling the effects of meteorology on ozone in Houston using cluster analysis and generalized additive models,” Atmos. Environ. 1998, 32, 2505–2520.
   Google Scholar
• Comrie, A.C. “Comparing neural networks and regression models for ozone forecasting,” J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1997, 47, 653–663.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. National Air Pollutant Emission Trends, 1990-1994; EPA-454/R-95-011; Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Research Triangle Park, NC, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, G.D.; Carnovale, F.; Cope, M.E.; Johnson, G.M. “The evaluation of some photochemical smog reaction mechanisms—I. Temperature and initial composition effects,” Atmos. Environ. 1992, 26A, 625–641.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G.M. A Simple Model for Predicting the Ozone Concentration of Ambient Air. In Proceedings of the 8th International Clean Air Conference; Hartmann, H.F.; O'Heare, J.N.; Chiodo, J.; Gillis, R., Eds; Clean Air Society of Australia and New Zealand: Melbourne, Australia, May 7-11, 1984, pp 715–731.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G.M.; Quigley, S.M. A Universal Monitor for Photochemical Smog. In Proceedings of the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Air and Waste Management Association, Anaheim, CA, June 25-30, 1989; Paper 89-29.8.
   Google Scholar
• Azzi, M.; Johnson, G.M. “Notes on the Derivation, The Integrated Empirical Rate Model, Version 2.2.” Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization Division of Coal and Energy Technology, P.O. Box 136, North Ryde, NSW 2113, Australia; March 20, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Azzi, M.; Johnson, G.M. “Airtrak: new developments,” Clean Air 1993, 27, 191–193.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatram, A.; Karamchandani, P.; Pai, P.; Goldstein, R. “The development and application of a simplified ozone modeling system (SOMS),” Atmos. Environ. 1994, 28, 3665–3678.
   Google Scholar
• Tonnesen, S.; Jeffries, H.E. “Inhibition of odd oxygen production in the carbon bond four and generic reaction set mechanisms,” Atmos. Environ. 1994, 28, 1339–1349.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, T.Y.; Chock, D.P.; Nance, B.I.; Winkler, S.L. “A photochemical extent parameter to aid ozone air quality management,” Atmos. Environ. 1997, 3i, 2787–2794.
   Google Scholar
• Wratt, D.S.; Hadfield, M.G.; Jones, M.; Johnson, G.M. Predicting the Impact of a Proposed Gas-Fired Power Station on Photochemical Pollution Levels around Auckland. In Proceedings, 10th International Conference of the Clean Air Society of Australia and New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand, 1990, pp 159–164.
   Google Scholar
• Gery, M.W.; Whitten, G.Z.; Killus, J.P.; Dodge, M.C. “A photochemical kinetics mechanism for urban and regional scale computer modeling,” J. Geophys. Res. 1989, 94(D10), 12925–12956.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, P.; Royle, J.A.; Steinberg, L.J.; Yang, Q. “Accounting for meteorological effects in measuring urban ozone levels and trends,” Atmos. Environ. 1996, 30, 3067–3077.
   Google Scholar
• Robeson, S.M.; Steyn, D.G. “Evaluation and comparison of statistical forecast models for daily maximum ozone concentrations,” Atmos. Environ. 1990, 245, 303–312.
   Google Scholar
• Schere, K.L.; Demerjian, K.L. A Photochemical Box Model for Urban Air Quality Simulation. In Proceedings, 4th Joint Conference on Sensing of Environmental Pollutants, American Chemical Society, Columbus, Ohio, 1978, pp 427–433.
   Google Scholar
• Eliassen, A.; Hov, O.; Isaksen, I.S.A.; Saltbones, J.; Stordal, F. “A Lagrangian long-range transport model with atmospheric boundary layer chemistry,” J. Appl. Meteor. 1982, 21, 1645–1661.
   Google Scholar
• Draxler, R.R.; Hess, G.D. Description of the HYSPLIT_4 Modeling System. NOAA Technical Memorandum; ERL ARL-224; Silver Spring, MD,December 1997, 24 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Draxler, R.R.; Hess, G.D. “An Overview of the HYSPLIT_4 Modelling System for Trajectories, Dispersion, and Deposition,” Aust. Meteor. Mag. 1998, 47, 295–308.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, L.K.; Berkowitz, C.M.; Carmichael, G.R.; Easter, R.C.; Fairweather, G.; Ghan, S.J.; Hales, J.M.; Leung, L.R.; Pennell, J.M.; Potra, F.A.; Saylor, R.D.; Tsang, T.T. “The current state and future direction of Eulerian models in simulating the tropospheric chemistry and transport of trace species: a review,” Atmos. Environ. 1995, 29, 189–222.
   Google Scholar
• Rolph, G.D.; Draxler, R.R.; de Pena, R.G. “Modeling sulfur concentrations and depositions in the United States during ANATEX,” Atmos.Environ. 1992, 26A, 73–93.
   Google Scholar
• Chock, D.P.; Winkler, S.L. “A particle grid air quality modeling approach, 2. Coupling with chemistry,” J. Geophys. Res. 1994, 99, 10331041.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The 1985 NAPAP Emissions Inventory (Version 2): Development of the Annual Data and Modular Tapes; EPA-600/7-89-012a; Research Triangle Park, NC, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, D.J.; Logan, J.A.; Yevich, R.M.; Gardner, G.M.; Spivakovsky, C.M.; Wofsy, S.C.; Munger, J.W.; Sillman, S.; Prather, M.J.; Rodgers, M.O.; Westberg, H.; Zimmerman, P.R. “Simulation of summertime ozone over North America,” J. Geophys. Res. 1993, 98, 14797–14816.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M.F.; Henderson-Sellers, A. “A global archive of land cover and soils data for use in general circulation climate models,” J. Clim. 1985, 5, 119–143.
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, E.; Black, T.L.; Deaven, D.G.; DiMego, G.J.; Zhao, Q.; Baldwin, M.; Junker, N.W.; Lin, Y. “Changes to the operational 'early' Eta analysis/forecast system at the National Centers for Environmental Prediction,” Wea. and Forecast. 1996, 11, 391–413.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, W.F. “Forecasting severe ozone episodes in the Baltimore metropolitan area,” Atmos. Environ. 1995, 29, 2387–2398.
   Google Scholar
• Stohl, A. “Computation, accuracy and applications of trajectories—a review and bibliography,” Atmos. Environ. 1998, 32, 947–966.
   Google Scholar
• Kahl, J.D.W. “On the prediction of trajectory model error,” Atmos. Environ. 1996, 30, 2945–2957.
   Google Scholar
• Co-operative Programme for Monitoring and Evaluation of the Long-Range Transmission of Air Pollutants in Europe (EMEP). Calculations of Tropospheric Ozone and Comparison with Observations; MSC-W Status Report 1998, Norwegian Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 43, Blindern, N-0313, Oslo, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, D. “Photochemical model calculations over Europe for two extended summer periods: 1985 and 1989. Model results and comparisons with observations,” Atmos. Environ. 1993, 27A, 921–943.
   Google Scholar
• Gaza, R.S. “Mesoscale meteorology and high ozone in the Northeast United States,” J. Appl. Meteor. 1998, 37, 961–977.
   Google Scholar
• Azzi, M.; Johnson, G.M.; Cope, M. An Introduction to the Generic Reaction Set Photochemical Smog Mechanism. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Clean Air Society of Australia and New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand, 1992, pp 451–462.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, M.E. Personal communication, Melbourne, Australia, April 1997.
   Google Scholar