The Effect of Reformulated Gasoline on Ambient Carbon Monoxide Concentrations in Southeastern Wisconsin

References

• Keislar, R.; Bowen, J.; Fujita, E.; Lawson, D.; Pierson, W. Effect of Oxygenated Fuels on Ambient Carbon Monoxide Concentrations in Provo, Utah, USA; Int. J. Vehicle Design 1997, 18, 379–390.
   Google Scholar
• Supplemental Notice of Proposed Guidance on Establishment of Control Periods under Section 211 (m) of the Clean Air Act as Amended; 57 FR 4408, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Code of Federal Regulations, Section 80, Part 41, Title 40, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Wisconsin Department of Commerce fuel tests laboratory records.
   Google Scholar
• Fed. Regist. 2001, 66 (137), 37156–37165.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchstetter, T.; Singer, R.; Harley, R.; Kendall, G.; Chan, W. Impact of Oxygenated Gasoline Use on California Light-Duty Vehicle Emissions; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1996, 30, 661–670.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchstetter, T.W.; Singer, B.C.; Harley, R.S.; Kendall, G.R.; Traverse, M. Impact of California Reformulated Gasoline on Motor Vehicle Emissions. 1. Mass Emission Rates; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33, 318–328.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, G.; Stedman, D. On-Road CO Emission Measurement Comparisons for the 1988–1989 Colorado Oxy-Fuels Program; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1990, 24, 843–847.
   Google Scholar
• Interagency Assessment of Oxygenated Fuels; National Science and Technology Council, Committee on Environment and Natural Resources: Washington, DC, June 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, K.; Stump, F.; Tejada, S. The Effect of Ethanol Fuel on the Emissions of Vehicles over a Wide Range of Temperatures; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1998, 48, 646–653.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, J., Farina, R. Emissions from Light-Duty Vehicles Operating on Oxygenated Fuels at Low Ambient Temperatures: A Review of Published Studies; Soc. Automotive Engineers Transactions; SAE Number 952403; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Dolislager, L. The Effect of California’s Wintertime Oxygenated Fuels Program on Ambient Carbon Monoxide Concentrations; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1997, 47, 775–783.
   Google Scholar
• Mannino, D.; Etzel, R. Are Oxygenated Fuels Effective? An Evaluation of Ambient Carbon Monoxide Concentrations in 11 Western States, 1986–1992; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1996, 46, 20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L.; Lanning, J.; Wilkes, E. Effects of Using Oxygenated Fuels on Carbon Monoxide, Formaldehyde and Acetaldehyde Concentrations in Denver. Presented at the 90th Annual Conference & Exhibition of A&WMA, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, June 1997; Paper 97-RP139.05.
   Google Scholar
• Ozone-Forming Potential of Reformulated Gasoline; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Model 48 GFC Ambient CO Analyzer Instruction Manual; Thermal Environmental Instruments, Inc.: Franklin, MA, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Wisconsin Administrative Code NR 485, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, B.; Kirchstetter, T.; Harley, R.; Kendall, G.; Hesson, J. A Fuel-Based Approach to Estimating Motor Vehicle Cold-Start Emissions; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1999, 49, 125–135.
   Google Scholar
• Main, H.; Roberts, P.; Reiss, R. Analysis of Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Station (PAMS) Data to Evaluate a Reformulated Gasoline (RFG) Effect; Final Report STI-997350–1774-FR2; Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Mobile Sources: Washington, DC, April 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Rendahl, C. Remote Vehicle Emissions Sensing Feasibility Studies. In Measurement of Toxic and Related Air Pollutants: Proceedings of an International Specialty Conference, May 7–9, 1996, Research Triangle Park, NC; A&WMA: Pittsburgh, PA, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Heatherington, G. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Milwaukee, WI. personal communication, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Evaluating Vehicle Emissions Inspection and Maintenance Programs; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Stedman, D.; Bishop, G.; Slott, R. Repair Avoidance and Evaluating Inspection and Maintenance Programs; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32, 1544–1545.
   Google Scholar