Estimation of Organic Carbon Blank Values and Error Structures of the Speciation Trends Network Data for Source Apportionment

References

• Paatero, P. Least Square Formulation of Robust Non-Negative Factor Analysis; Chemometrics Intelligent Lab. Systems. 1997, 37, 23–35.
   Google Scholar
• Malm, W.C., Sisler, J.F.; Huffman, D.; Eldred, R.A.; Cahill, T.A. Spatial and Seasonal Trends in Particle Concentration and Optical Extinction in the United Sates; J. Geophys. Res. 1994, 99, 1347–1370.
   Google Scholar
• Polissar, A.V., Hopke, P.K.; Paatero, P.; Malm, W.C.; Sisler, J.F. Atmospheric Aerosol over Alaska 2. Elemental Composition and Sources; J. Geophys. Res. 1998, 103, 19045–19057.
   Google Scholar
• Song, X.H., Polissar, A.V.; Hopke, P.K. Source of Fine Particle Composition in the Northeastern U.S.; Atmos. Environ. 2001, 35, 5277–5286.
   Google Scholar
• Maykut, N.N.; Lewtas, J.; Kim, E.; Larson, T.V. Source Apportionment of PM2.5 at an Urban IMPROVE Site in Seattle, WA.; Environ. Sci.Technol.2003, 37, 5135–5142.
   Google Scholar
• Technol. 2003, 37, 5135-5142. 6. Kim, E.; Hopke, P.K. Source Apportionment of Fine Particles at Washington, DC Utilizing Temperature Resolved Carbon Fractions; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2004, 54, 773–785.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E.; Hopke, P.K. Improving Source Identification of Fine Particles in a Rural Northeastern US Area Utilizing Temperature Resolved Carbon Fractions; J. Geophys. Res. 2004, 109, D09204.
   Google Scholar
• Extended Semi-Annual Data Summary Report for the Chemical Speciation of PM2.5 Filter Samples Project. RTI/07565/06DS, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Koutrakis, P., Wolfson, J.M.; Slater, J.L.; Brauer, M.; Spengler, J.D. Evaluation of an Annular Denuder/Filter Pack System to Collect Acidic Aerosols and Gases; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1988, 22, 1463–1468.
   Google Scholar
• Hering, S.; Cass, G. The Magnitude of Bias in the Measurement of PM2 . 5 Regression Arising from Volatilization of Particulate Nitrate from Teflon Filters; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1999, 49, 725–733.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, M.E.; Cary, R.A. Elemental Carbon-Based Method for Monitoring Occupational Exposures to Particulate Diesel Exhaust; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 1996, 25, 221–241.
   Google Scholar
• Gundel, L.A., Lee, V.C.; Mahanama, K.R.R.; Stevens, R.K.; Rau, J.A. Direct Determination of the Phase Distributions of Semi-Volatile Poly-cyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Using Annular Denuders; Atmos. Environ. 1995, 29, 1719–1733.
   Google Scholar
• Pankow, J.F.; Mader, B.T. Gas/Solid Partitioning of Semivolatile Organic Compounds (SOCs) to Air Filters. 3. An Analysis of Gas Adsorption Artifacts in Measurements of Atmospheric SOCs and Organic Carbon (OC) When Using Teflon Membrane Filters and Quartz Fiber Filters; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 3422–3432.
   Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Projects Plan Chemical Speciation of PM2.5 Filter Samples; Research Triangle Park, NC, 2004; available at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/spec/rtiqap.pdf (accessed June 1, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Tolocka, M.P.; Solomon, P.A.; Mitchell, W.; Norris, G.A.; Gemmill, D.B.; Wiener, R.W.; Vanderpool, R.W.; Homolya, J.B.; Rice, J. East Versus West in the U.S.: Chemical Characteristics of PM2.5 During the Winter of 1999; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2001, 34, 88–96.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, M.S.; Friedlander, S.K.; Hidy, G. M. A Chemical Element Balance for the Pasadena Aerosol; J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1972, 39, 165–176.
   Google Scholar
• Hopke, P.K. Receptor Modeling in Environmental Chemistry. John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Paatero, P. Least Square Formulation of Robust Non-Negative Factor Analysis; Chemometrics Intelligent Lab. Systems. 1997, 37, 23–35.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, R.C. Current Factor Analysis Models Are Ill-Posed; Atmos. Environ. 1987, 21, 1815–1820.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E.; Chun, C.K.; Paatero, P. Application of Positive Matrix Factorization in Source Apportionment of Particulate Pollutants; Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33, 3201–3212.
   Google Scholar
• Paatero, P.; Hopke, P.K.; Song, X.H.; Ramadan, Z. Understanding and Controlling Rotations in Factor Analytic Models; Chemometrics Intelligent Lab. Systems. 2002, 60, 253–264.
   Google Scholar
• Paatero, P; Hopke, P.K. Discarding or Downweighting High-Noise Variables in Factor Analytic Models; Anal. Chim. Acta. 2003, 490, 277–289.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E.; Hopke, P.K.; Edgerton, E.S. Source Identification of Atlanta Aerosol by Positive Matrix Factorization; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2003, 53, 731–739.
   Google Scholar
• Polissar, A.V.; Hopke, P.K.; Poirot, R.L. Atmospheric Aerosol Over Vermont: Chemical Composition and Sources; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 4604–4621.
   Google Scholar
• Poirot, R.L.; Wishinski, P.R.; Hopke, P.K.; Polissar, A.V. Comparative Application of Multiple Receptor Methods to Identify Aerosol Sources in Northern Vermont; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 4622–4636.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, D.; Wenzel, R.J.; Prather, K.A. Aerosol Time-of-Flight Mass Spec-trometry during the Atlanta Supersite Experiment: 1. Measurements; J. Geophys. Res. 2003, 108, D7.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C.; Houck, J.E. PM2.5 Chemical Source Profiles for Vehicle Exhaust, Vegetative Burning, Geological Material, and Coal Burning in Northwestern Colorado During 1995; Chemosphere. 2001, 43, 1141–1151.
   Google Scholar
• 28. Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C. Source Characterization of Major Emission Sources in the Imperial and Mexicali Valleys Along the US/Mexico Border; Sci. Total Environ. 2001, 276, 33–47.
   Google Scholar
• Small, M.; Germani, M.S.; Small, A.M.; Zoller, W.H.; Moyers, J.L. Airborne Plume Study of Emissions from the Processing of Copper Ores in Southeastern Arizona; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1981, 15, 293–299.
   Google Scholar
• SPECIATE version 3.2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Research Triangle Park, NC. 2002.
   Google Scholar