179
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Technical Paper

Air Quality Modeling and Decisions for Ozone Reduction Strategies

, &
Pages 1558-1573 | Published online: 01 Mar 2012

References

  • Guidance on the Use of Models and Other Analyses in Attainment Demonstrations for the 8- hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS); Draft Final, February 17, 2005; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Research Triangle Park, NC, 2005.
  • Roth, P.M. A Qualitative Approach to Evaluating the Anticipated Reliability of a Photochemical Air Quality Simulation Model for a Selected Application;J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1999,49 , 1050-1059.
  • Roth, P.M.; Tesche, T.W.; Reynolds, S.D. A Critical Review of Regulatory Air Quality Modeling for Tropospheric Ozone; American Petroleum Institute: Washington, DC, 1998.
  • An Assessment of Tropospheric Ozone Pollution: A North American Perspective; Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources, North American Research Strategy for Tropospheric Ozone (NARSTO), National Academy Press: Washington, DC; 2000.
  • Solomon, P.A.; Cowling, E.; Hidy, G.M.; Furiness, C. Comparison of Scientific Findings from Major Ozone Field Studies in North America and Europe; Atmos. Environ. 2000, 34, 1885-1920.
  • Russell, A.G.; Dennis, R. NARSTO Critical Review of Photochemical Models and Modeling; Atmos. Environ. 2000, 34, 2283-2324.
  • Sawyer, R.F.; Harley, R.A.; Cadle, S.H.; Norbeck, J.M.; Slott, R.S.; Bravo, H.A. Mobile Sources Critical Review: 1998 NARSTO Assessment; Atmos. Environ. 2000, 34, 2161-2181.
  • Guidance for Regulatory Application of the Urban Airshed Model (UAM); Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Research Triangle Park, NC, 1991.
  • Guidance on the Use of Modeling Results to Demonstrate Attainment of the NAAQS; EPA-454/B-95–007; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Research Triangle Park, NC, 1996.
  • Morris, R.E.; et al. Assessment of the Adequacy of the Baton Rouge UAM Application for the Determination of Ozone Attainment Control Strategies; ENVIRON International Corporation: Novato, CA, 1995.
  • Morris, R.E.; et al. Evaluation of the EPA Regional Oxidant Model for the July 2–13, 1988 Ozone Episode; Systems Applications, International: San Rafael, CA, 1993.
  • Schere, K.L. EPA Regional Oxidant Model: ROM1 Evaluation for 3–4 August 1979; EPA/600/3–86/032; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Research Triangle Park, NC, 1986.
  • Schere, K.L.; Wayland, R.A. EPA Regional Oxidant Model (ROM2.0): Evaluation on 1980 NEROS Data Bases; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Research Triangle Park, NC, 1989.
  • Reynolds, S.D.; Roth, P.M.; Tesche, T.W. A Process for the Stressful Evaluation of Photochemical Model Performance; Envair: San Rafael, CA, 1994.
  • The 1994 State Implementation Plan for the Atlanta Ozone Nonattainment Area; Air Protection Branch, Georgia Department of Natural Resources: Atlanta, GA, 1994.
  • Douglas, S.G.; et al. Comparison of the UAM-IV and UAM-V Photochemical Models for Three Atlanta-Area Ozone Episodes; Systems Applications: San Rafael, CA, 1994.
  • Ozone Transport Assessment Group Modeling Protocol; Version 3.0, Ozone Transport Assessment Group: St. Louis, MO, 1996.
  • Ozone Transport Assessment Group Modeling Report; Version 1.1; Ozone Transport Assessment Group: St Louis, MO, 1997.
  • Douglas, S.G.; et al. Application of the UAM to Baton Rouge, Louisiana for Three Additional Multi-Day Ozone Episodes: Volume III: Diagnostic/Sensitivity Analyses and Model Performance Evaluation; SYSAPP-95/079; Systems Applications: San Rafael, CA, 1995.
  • Modeling of Ground-Level Ozone in the Lower Fraser Valley; Canadian 1996 NOx/Volatile Organic Compound Science Assessment; Lower Fraser Valley Modeling and Measurement Working Group: Lower Fraser Valley, BC, 1997.
  • Modeling of Ground-level Ozone in the Lower Fraser Valley–Appendices; Canadian 1996 NOx/Volatile Organic Compound Science Assessment; Lower Fraser Valley Modeling and Measurement Working Group: Lower Fraser Valley, BC, 1997.
  • Douglas, S.G.; et al. UAM Modeling Analysis of the Cincinnati-Hamilton Multistate Moderate Ozone Nonattainment Area; SYSAPP-95/059; Systems Applications: San Rafael, CA, 1995.
  • San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District. The Ozone Attainment Demonstration Plan; San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District: Fresno, CA, 1994.
  • DaMassa, J; Tanrikulu, S.; Ranzieri, A.; Niccum, L. Performance Evaluation of SAQM in Central California and Attainment Demonstration for the August 3–6, 1990 Ozone Episode; California Air Resources Board: Sacramento, CA, 1996.
  • Revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Control of Ozone Air Pollution: 1993 Rate-of-Progress SIP for Dallas/Fort Worth, El Paso, Beaumont/Port Arthur, and Houston/Galveston Nonattainment Areas; Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission: Austin, TX, 1994.
  • Sillman, S; Al-Wali, K.; Marsik, F.J.; Nowatski, P.; Samson, P.J.; Rodgers, M.O.; Garland, L.J.; Martinez, J.E.; Stoneking, C.; Imhoff, R.E.; Lee, J.-H.; Weinstein-Lloyd, J.B.; Newman, L.; Aneja, V. Photochemistry of Ozone Formation in Atlanta, GA-Models and Measurements; Atmos. Environ. 1995, 29, 3055-3066.
  • Chameides, W.L.; Cowling, E.B. The State of the Southern Oxidants Study (SOS); North Carolina State University: Raleigh, NC, 1996.
  • Mexico City Air Quality Research Initiative; Report 12699 (UC-902); Instituto Mexicano del Petroleo and Los Alamos National Laboratory: Los Alamos, NM, 1994.
  • Evaluation of the UAM-V Photochemical Grid Model in the Lake Michigan Region; Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium: Des Plaines, IL, 1994.
  • Lake Michigan Ozone Study: Lake Michigan Ozone Control Program; Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium: Des Plaines, IL, 1995.
  • Modeling Protocol for New York Airshed; New York Department of Environmental Conservation: Albany, NY, 1992.
  • Modelling of Ground-level Ozone in the Windsor-Quebec City Corridor and in the Southern Atlantic Region; Canadian 1996 NOx/Volatile Organic Compound Science Assessment; WQC Corridor and Southern Atlantic Region Working Group: Quebec City, Quebec, 1997.
  • Tesche, T. W.; et al. Photochemical Modeling Analysis of the Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley Ozone Nonattainment Area: Volume VI-Attainment Demonstration; Alpine Geophysics: Ft. Wright, KY, 1997.
  • Ozone Attainment Demonstration for the Metro-East Nonattainment Area; Illinois Environmental Protection Agency: Springfield, IL, 1994.
  • State Implementation Plan: St. Louis Ozone Nonattainment Area Photo-chemical Grid Modeling; Missouri Department of Natural Resources: St. Louis, MO, 1995.
  • Sacramento Area Modeling Analysis for the 1994 State Implementation Plan; California Air Resources Board: Sacramento, CA, 1995.
  • Douglas, S.G.; Shepard, S.B.; Haney, J.L. Photochemical Modeling of the Broader Sacramento Area: Base-Case Modeling Analysis; SYSAPP-93/056; Systems Applications: San Rafael, CA, 1993.
  • Air Quality Management Plan; South Coast Air Quality Management District: Diamond Bar, CA, 1991.
  • 1994 Air Quality Management Plan; South Coast Air Quality Management District: Diamond Bar, CA, 1994.
  • 1997 Air Quality Management Plan; South Coast Air Quality Management District: Diamond Bar, CA, 1996.
  • Fitzner, C.; Reynolds, S.; Michaels, H.; Wagner, K.; Wolff, G. Enhancement of UAM Performance in the Southeast Michigan Ozone Study Through the Consideration of Field Measurements. Presented at the 88th Annual Meeting & Exhibition of Air & Waste Management Association; A&WMA: San Antonio, TX, 1995; Paper No. 95-RP113B.05.
  • Reynolds, S.; Michaels, H. Southeast Michigan Ozone Study: UAM Results for 10–11 August 1993; Envair: San Rafael, CA, 1994.
  • Reynolds, S.; Michaels, H. Southeast Michigan Ozone Study: UAM Results for 4–7 July 1988 and 1–3 August 1988; Envair: San Rafael, CA, 1994.
  • Fujita, E.M.; Croes, B.E.; Bennett, C.L.; Lawson, D.R.; Lurmann, F.W.; Main, H.H. Comparison of Emission Inventory and Ambient Concentration Ratios of CO, NMOG, and NOx in California’s South Coast Air Basin; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1992,42, 264-276.
  • Fujita, E.M.; Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C.; Lu, Z. Validation of the Chemical Mass Balance Receptor Model Applied to Hydrocarbon Source Apportionment in the Southern California Air Quality Study; Enivron. Sci. Technol. 1994, 28, 1633-1649.
  • Fujita, E.M.; Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C.; Magliano, K.L. Receptor Model and Emissions Inventory Source Apportionments of Nonmethane Organic Gases in California’s San Joaquin Valley and San Francisco Bay Area; Atmos. Environ. 1995, 29, 3019-3035.
  • Whitten, G.Z.; Moore, G.E.; Wilson, G.M. UAM(CB4) Photochemical Modeling of the August 7–8, 1984 Ozone Episode in Kern County; SYSAPP-91/011; Systems Applications International: San Rafael, CA, 1991.
  • Winner, D.A.; Cass, G.R. Modeling the Long-Term Frequency Distribution of Regional Ozone Concentrations; Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33, 431-451.
  • Tesche, T.W.; et al. Comparative Evaluation of the SAQM and UAM-V Models for the 13–21 July 1991 OTAG Episode; Alpine Geophysics: Covington, KY, 1997.
  • Blanchard, C.L.; Lurmann, F.W.; Roth, P.M.; Jeffries, H.E.; Korc, M. The Use of Ambient Data to Corroborate Analyses of Ozone Control Strategies; Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33, 369-381.
  • Draft Guidance on the Use of Models and Other Analyses in Attainment Demonstrations for the 8-hr Ozone NAAQS; Draft (May 1999); U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Research Triangle Park, NC, 1999.
  • Hanna, S.R.; Chang, J.C.; Fernau, M.E. Monte Carlo Estimates of Uncertainties in Predictions by a Photochemical Grid Model (UAM-IV) due to Uncertainties in Input Variables; Atmos. Environ. 1998, 32, 3619-3628.
  • Hanna, S.R.; Lu, Z.; Frey, H.C.; Wheeler, N.; Vukuvich, J.; et al. Uncertainties in Predicted Ozone Concentrations Due to Input Uncertainties for the UAM-V Photochemical Grid Model Applied to the July 1995 OTAG Domain; Atmos. Environ. 2001, 35, 891-903.
  • Biswas, J.; Rao, S.T. Uncertainties in Episodic Ozone Modeling Stemming from Uncertainties in the Meteorological Fields; J. Applied Meteor. 2001, 40, 117-136.
  • Moore, G.E.; Londergan, R.J. Sampled Monte Carlo Uncertainty Analysis for Photochemical Grid Models; Atmos. Environ. 2001, 35, 4863-4876.
  • User’s Guide Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions (CAMx) Version 4.00; ENVIRON International Corporation: Novato, CA, 2003; ENVIRON International Corporation Web site. http://www.camx. com (accessed August 30, 2005)
  • Byun, D.W.; Ching, J.K.S. Science Algorithms of the EPA Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System; EPA/600/R-99/030; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Research Triangle Park, NC, 1999.
  • Chang, J.S.; Jin, S.; Li, Y.; Beauharnois, M.; Lu, C.-H.; Huang, H.-C.; Huang, S,; Tanrikulu, S.; DaMassa, J. The SARMAP Air Quality Model (SAQM); State University of New York: Albany, NY, 1997.
  • Kumar, N.; Odman, M.T.; Russell, A.G. Multiscale Air Quality Modeling: Application to Southern California; J. Geophys. Res. 1994, 99, 5385-5397.
  • Odman, M.T.; Ingram, C.L. Multiscale Air Quality Simulation Platform (MAQSIP): Source Code Documentation and Validation, MCNC Technical Report ENV-96TR002–v1.0; MCNC: Research Triangle Park, NC, 1996.
  • Liu, G.; Hogrefe, C.; Rao, S.T. Evaluating the Performance of Regional-Scale Meteorological Models: Effects of Clouds Simulation on Temperature Prediction; Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 1425-1433.
  • Arnold, J.R.; Dennis, R.L.; Tonnesen, G.S. Diagnostic Evaluation of Numerical Air Quality Models with Specialized Ambient Observations: Testing the Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System (CMAQ) at Selected SOS 95 Ground Sites; Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 1185-1198.
  • Sistla, G.; Zhou, N.; Hao, W.; Ku, J.-Y.; Rao, S.T.; et al. Effects of Uncertainties in Meteorological Inputs on UAM Predictions and Ozone Control Strategies; Atmos. Environ. 1996, 30, 2011-2025.
  • Sistla, G.; Hao, W.; Ku, J.-Y.; Kallos, G.; Lagouvardos, K.; Papadopoulos, A.; Zhang, K.; Mao, H.; Rao, S.T. An Operational Evaluation of Two Regional-Scale Ozone Air Quality Modeling Systems over the Eastern United States; Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 2001, 82, 945-964.
  • Sistla, G;. Civerolo, K.; Hao, W.; Rao, S.T. A Comparison of Measured and Simulated Ozone Concentrations in the Rural Areas of the Eastern United States During Summer 1995; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2001, 51, 374-386.
  • Biswas, J.; Hogrefe, C.; Rao, S.T.; Hao, W.; Sistla, G. Evaluating the Performance of Regional-Scale Photochemical Modeling Systems: Part III. Precursor Predictions; Atmos. Environ. 2001, 35, 6129-6149.
  • Hogrefe, C;. Rao, S.T.; Kasibhatla, P.; Hao, W.; Sistla, G.; Mathur, R.; McHenry, J. Evaluating the Performance of Regional-Scale Photo-chemical Modeling Systems: Part II. Ozone Predictions; Atmos. Environ. 2001, 35, 4175-4188.
  • Daum, P. An Overview of TexAQS 2000; Brookhaven National Laboratory: Upton, NY, 2002.
  • Li, S.-M. Project Plan for the Pacific 2001 Field Study; Pacific Northwest Laboratory Web site. http://www.pnl.gov/pnw2001/ (accessed August 30, 2005).
  • Fujita, E.; Campbell, D.; Keislar, R.; Bowen, J.; Tanrikulu, S.; Ranzieri, A.; et al. Central California Ozone Study-Volume III. Summary of Field Operations; Desert Research Institute: Reno, NV, 2001.
  • Fujita, E.; Green, M.; Keislar, R.; Koracin, D.; Moosmuller, H.; Watson, J. SCOS97-NARSTO Southern California Ozone Study and Aerosol Study-Volume III: Summary of Field Study; Desert Research Institute: Reno, NV, 1999.
  • NARSTO-Canada East; North American Research Strategy for Tropospheric Ozone Web site. http://www.cgenv.com/Narsto/ (accessed August 30, 2005).
  • Revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Control of Ozone Air Pollution: Post-1999 Rate-of-Progress and Attainment Demonstration Follow-up SIP for the Houston/Galveston Ozone Nonattainment Area; Texas Commission on Environmental Quality: Austin, TX, 2002.
  • Reynolds, S.D.; Meszler, D.; Causley, M.; Arons, D.; Diem, J.; Roth, P. Independent Peer Review of Photochemical Modeling; Envair: San Rafael, CA, 2002.
  • Roth, P.M.; Tesche, T.W.; Reynolds, S.D. Guidelines for Evaluating the Performance of the SARMAP Model, Envair: San Rafael, CA; and Alpine Geophysics: Covington, KY, 1996.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.