Comparison of Measured Total Suspended Particulate Matter Concentrations Using Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance and a Total Suspended Particulate Sampler

References

• List of Designated Promulgated Test Methods; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Research Triangle Park, NC, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• McClure, J.; Jerez, S.; Zhang, Y. An Isokinetic Total Suspended Particulate Sampler for Measurement of Emissions from Confinement Animal Buildings. In Proceedings of the 97th Annual Meeting & Exhibition of A&WMA; A&WMA: Pittsburgh, PA; Paper AM-213.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M.; Lijek, J.; Ono, D.M. Continuous PM10 Measurements in a Woodsmoke Environment, PM10 Standards and Non-Traditional Particulate Control; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1992, 21, 24-38.
   Google Scholar
• Ayers, G.P.; Keywood, M.D.; Gras, J.L. TEOM vs. Manual Gravimetric Methods for Determination of PM2.5 Aerosol Mass Concentrations; Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33, 3717-3721.
   Google Scholar
• Soutar, A.; Watt, M.; Cherrie, J.W.; Seaton, A. Comparisons Between Personal PM10 Sampling Head and the Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance; Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33, 4373-4377.
   Google Scholar
• Price, M.; Bulpitt, S.; Meyer, M.B.A. Comparison of PM10 Monitors at a Kerbside Site in the Northeast of England; Atmos. Environ. 2003, 35, 4425-4434.
   Google Scholar
• Charron, A.; Harrison, R.M.; Moorcroft, S.; Booker, J. Quantitative Interpretation of Divergence Between PM10 and PM2.5 Mass Measurement by TEOM and Gravimetric (Partisol) Instruments; Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38, 415-423.
   Google Scholar
• List of Designated Reference and Equivalent Methods; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; National Exposure Research Laboratory: Research Triangle Park, NC, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Product Bulletin, Sample Inlets; Rupprecht and Patashnick Co, Inc.: Albany, NY, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Hinz, T.; Linke, S.A. Comprehensive Experimental Study of Aerial Pollutants and Emissions From Livestock Buildings, Part I: Methods; J. Agric. Eng. Res. 1998, 70, 111-118.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, T.T.; Heber, A.J.; Ni, J.Q.; Gallien, J.X.; Xin, H. Air Quality Measurements at a Laying Hen House: Particulate Matter Concentrations and Emissions; Keener, H., Ed; In Proceedings of Air of Air Pollution from Agricultural Operations III; American Society of Agricultural Engineers: St. Joseph, MI; Paper 701P1403.
   Google Scholar
• Patashnick, H.; Rupprecht, E. Continuous PM10 Measurements Using the Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1991, 41, 1079-1083.
   Google Scholar
• Baltensperger, U.; Weingartner, E.; Burtscher, H.; Keskinen, J. Dynamic Mass and Surface Area Measurements; In Aerosol Measurement: Principles, Techniques, and Applications; Baron, P.; Willeke, K., Eds.; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, 2001; pp 387-418.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X.; Zhang, Y. Development of a Critical Airflow Venturi for air Sampling; J. Agric. Eng. Res. 1999, 73, 257-264.
   Google Scholar
• Donham, K; Cumro, D. Setting Maximum Dust Exposure Levels for People and Animals in Livestock Facilities; In Proceedings of International Symposium on Dust Control in Animal Production Facilities; American Society of Agricultural Engineers: St. Joseph, MI, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Hinds, W.C. Aerosol Technology: Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, 1982; pp 187-210.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. Indoor Air Quality Engineering; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2005; pp 207-247.
   Google Scholar