826
Views
61
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Technical Paper

New York State Urban and Rural Measurements of Continuous PM2.5 Mass by FDMS, TEOM, and BAM

, , &
Pages 372-383 | Published online: 29 Feb 2012

References

  • McMurry, P.H. A Review of Atmospheric Aerosol Measurements; Atmos. Environ. 2000, 34, 1959-1999.
  • Pang, Y.; Ren, R.; Obeidi, F.; Hastings, R.; Eatough, D.J.; Wilson, W. Semi-Volatile Species in PM2.5: Comparison of Integrated and Continuous Samplers for PM2.5 Research or Monitoring; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2001, 51, 25-36.
  • Pang, Y.; Eatough, N.L.; Eatough, D.J. PM2.5 Semivolatile Organic Material at Riverside, California: Implications for the PM2.5 Federal Reference Method Sampler; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 277-288.
  • Hering, S.; Cass, G. The Magnitude of the Bias in the Measurement of PM2.5 Arising from the Volatilization of Particulate Nitrate from Teflon Filters; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1999, 49, 725-733.
  • Chow, J.C. Measurement Methods to Determine Compliance with Ambient Air Quality Standards for Suspended Particles; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1995, 45, 320-382.
  • Kim, B.M.; Teffera, S.; Zeldin, M.D. Characterization of PM2.5 and PM10 in the South Coast Air Basin of Southern California: Part 2-Temporal Variations; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2000, 50, 2045-2059.
  • Schwab, J.J.; Spicer, J.; Demerjian, K.L.; Ambs, J.L.; Felton, H.D. Long-Term Field Characterization of Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance and Modified Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance Samplers in Urban and Rural New York State Locations; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2004, 54, 1264-1280.
  • Lee, J.H.; Hopke, P.K.; Holsen, T.M.; Lee, D-W.; Jaques, P.A.; Sioutas,C.; Ambs, J.L. Performance Evaluation of Continuous PM2.5 Mass Concentration Monitors; J. Aerosol. Sci. 2005, 36, 95-109.
  • Wittig, A.E.; Anderson, N.; Khlystov, A.Y.; Pandis, S.N.; Davidson, C.; Robinson, A.L. Pittsburgh Air Quality Study Overview; Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38, 3107-3125.
  • Lilienfield, P. Beta-Absorption-Impactor Aerosol Mass Monitor; J. Am. Ind. Hygiene Assoc. 1970, 31, 722-729.
  • Husar, R.B. Atmospheric Particulate;. Mass Monitoring with a Beta Radiation Detector; Atmos. Environ. 1974, 8, 183-188.
  • Chueinta, W.; Hopke, P.K. Beta Gauge for Aerosol Mass Measurement; Aerosol. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 840-843.
  • Park, S.S.; Kim, Y.J.; Lee, K.W.; Chun, K.J.; Lee, J.Y.; Lim, Y.S.; Han, J.S. Development of an Automated Beta Gauge Particulate Sampler with Filter Cassette Mechanism; Aerosol. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 844-851.
  • Frank, N.H. Retained Nitrate, Hydrated Sulfate and Carbonaceous Mass in Federal Reference Method PM2.5 for Six Eastern U.S. Cities; J.Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2006, 56, 500-511.
  • Grover, B.D.; Kleinman, M.; Eatough, N.L.; Eatough, D.J.; Hopke, P.K.; Long, R.W.; Wilson, W.E.; Meyer, M.B.; Ambs, J.L. Measurement of Total PM2.5 Mass (Nonvolatile plus Semi-Volatile) with the FDMS TEOM Monitor; J. Geophys. Res. 2004, 110D:D07S03, doi:10.1029/2004JD004995.
  • Patashnick, H.; Rupprecht, G.; Ambs, J.L.; Meyer, M.B. Development of a Reference Standard for Particulate Matter Mass in Ambient Air; Aerosol. Sci. Technol. 2001, 34, 42-45.
  • Schwab, J.J.; Hogrefe, O.; Demerjian, K.L.; Ambs, J.L. Laboratory Characterization of Modified Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance Samplers; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2004, 54, 1254-1263.
  • Hering, S.; Fine, P.M.; Sioutas, C.; Jaques, P.A.; Ambs, J.L.; Hogrefe, O.; Demerjian, K.L. Field Assessment of the Dynamics of Particulate Nitrate Vaporization Using Differential TEOM and Automated Nitrate Monitors; Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38, 5183-5192.
  • Jaques, P.A.; Ambs, J.L.; Grant, W.L.; Sioutas, C. Field Evaluation of the Differential TEOM Monitor for Continuous PM2.5 Mass Concentrations; Aerosol. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38(S1), 49-59.
  • Mehadi, A.A.; Popejoy, C.A.; Cook, J.P. Selection of PM10 and PM2.5 Continuous Monitors for California Air Quality Standards. In Symposium on Air Quality Measurements and Technology-2002 (CD-ROM); A&WMA: Pittsburgh, PA, 2003.
  • Kenny, L.C.; Gussman, R.; Meyer, M. Development of a Sharp-Cut Cyclone for Ambient Aerosol Monitoring Applications; Aerosol. Sci. Technol. 2000, 32, 338-358.
  • Chung, A.; Chang, D.P.Y.; Kleeman, M.J.; Perry, K.D.; Cahill, T.A.; Dutcher, D.; McDougall, E.M;. Stroud, K. Comparison of Real-Time Instruments Used to Monitor Airborne Particulate Matter; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2001, 51, 109-120.
  • Hauck, H.; Berner, A.; Gomiscek, B.; Stopper, S.; Puxbaum. H., Kundi, M., Preining, O. On the Equivalence of Gravimentric PM data with TEOM and Beta-Attenuation Measurments; J. Aerosol. Sci. 2004, 35, 1135-1149.
  • List of Designated Reference and Equivalent Methods; available on U.S. Environmental Protection Agency web site http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/criteria/ref804.pdf (accessed March 2005).
  • Patashnick, H.; Rupprecht, E.G. Continuous PM-10 Measurements Using the Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1991, 41, 1079-1083.
  • National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Final Rule. CFR, Part 50. Fed. Regist., 1997, 62 (138), 38651-38701.
  • Revised Requirements for Designation of Reference and Equivalent Methods for PM2.5 and Ambient Air Quality Surveillance for Particulate Matter; Final Rule. CFR, Parts 53 and 58. Fed. Regist., 1997, 62 (138), 38763-38854.
  • Monitoring PM2.5 in Ambient Air Using Designated Reference or Class I Equivalent Methods; In Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems; Volume II, Part 2, Section 2.12; EPA-600/R-94/038b; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 1998.
  • Noble, C.A.; Vanderpool, R.W.; Peters, T.M.; McElroy, F.F.; Gemmill, D.B.; Wiener, R.W. Federal Reference and Equivalent Methods for Measuring Fine Particulate Matter; Aerosol. Sci. Technol. 2001, 34, 457-464.
  • Peters, T.M.; Norris, G.A.; Vanderpool, R.W.; Gemmill, D.B.; Wiener, R.W.; Murdoch, R.W.; McElroy, F.F.; Pitchford, M. Field Performance of PM2.5 Federal Reference Method Sampler; Aerosol. Sci. Technol. 2001, 34, 433-443.
  • Solomon, P.A., et al. Comparison of Integrated Samplers for Mass and Composition during the 1999 Atlanta Supersite Project; J. Geophys. Res. 2003, 108D: 8423, doi:10.1029/2001JD001218.
  • Demokritou, P.; Kavouras, I.G.; Harrison, D.; Koutrakis, P. Development and Evaluation of an Impactor for a PM2.5 Speciation Sampler;J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2001, 51, 514-523.
  • Birch, M.E. Elemental Carbon (Diesel Particulate): Method 5040. In NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM), 4th ed.; Cassinelli M.E., O’Connor, P.F., Eds.; National Institute for Occupational Health and Safety; Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 1999.
  • Birch, M.E.; Cary, R.A. Elemental Carbon-Based Method for Monitoring Occupational Exposures to Particulate Diesel Exhaust; Aerosol. Sci. Technol. 1996, 25, 221-241.
  • Archived Air-Quality Data; available on the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation web site, http://www.anr.state.vt.us/air/Monitoring/htm/FDMS.htm (accessed October 2005).
  • Schwab, J.J., Felton, H.D., Demerjian, K.L. Aerosol Chemical Composition in New York State from Integrated Filter Samples: Urban/Rural and Seasonal Contrasts; J. Geophys. Res. 2004, 109D:D16S05, doi: 10.1029/2003JD004078.
  • Clegg, S.L., Brimblecombe, P., Wexler, A.S. A Thermodynamic Model of the System H+-NH4 +-SO4 2−-NO3 −- H2O at Tropospheric Temperatures; J. Phys. Chem. 1998, 102A, 2137-2154.
  • Turpin, B.J.; Lim, H.-J. Species Contributions to PM2.5 Mass Concen trations: Revisiting Common Assumptions for Estimating Organic Mass; Aerosol. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 602-610.
  • Zhang, X.; McMurry, P.H. Evaporative Losses of Fine Particulate Nitrates during Sampling; Atm. Environ. 1992, 26, 3305-3312.
  • Mozurkewich, M. The Dissociation Constant of Ammonium Nitrate and Its Dependence on Temperature, Relative Humidity and Particle Size; Atm. Environ. 1993, 27, 261-270.
  • Chang, M.; Sioutas, C;. Kim, S., Gong, H. Jr., Linn, W. Reduction of Nitrate Losses from Filter and Impactor Samples by Means of Concentration Enrichment; Atm. Environ. 2000, 34, 85-98.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.