Performance and Diagnostic Evaluation of Ozone Predictions by the Eta-Community Multiscale Air Quality Forecast System during the 2002 New England Air Quality Study

References

• Guideline for Developing Ozone Forecasting Program; EPA-454/R-99-009; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Research Triangle Park, NC, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Chameides, W.L.; Saylor, R.D.; Cowling, E.B. Ozone Pollution in the Rural United States and the New NAAQS Science, 1997, 276, 916.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, K.; Eder, B.K.; Stein, A.F.; Grell, G.A.; Peckham, S.E.; Mchenry, J. The New England Air Quality Forecasting Pilot Program: Development of an Evaluation Protocol and Performance Benchmark; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2005, 55, 1782-1796.
   Google Scholar
• Mathur, R.; Kang, D.; Yu, S.C.; Schere, K.L.; Pleim, J.; Young, J.; Pouliot, G.; Otte, T. Atmospheric Particulate Matter Forecasts with the Eta-CMAQ Modeling System: towards Development of a Real-Time System and Assessment of Model Performance. Presentation at the 4th Annual CMAS Models-3 Users’ Conference, September 26–28, 2005, UNC-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; available at http://www.cmascenter.org/conference/2005/ppt/1_11.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E.; Black, T.; Deaven, D.; Dimego, G.; Zhao, Q.; Baldwin, M.; Junker, N.; Lin, Y. Changes to the Operational “Early” Eta Analysis/Forecast System at the National Centers for Environmental Estimation; Weather Forecast, 1996, 11, 391-413.
   Google Scholar
• Byun, D.W.; Ching, J.K.S., Eds.; Science Algorithms of the EPA Models-3 Community Multi-Scale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System; EPA/600/R-99/030; Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Research Triangle Park, NC, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Otte, T.L.; Pouliot, G.; Pleim, J.E.; Young, J.O.; Schere, K.L.; Wong, D.C.; Lee, P.C.S., Tsidulko, M.; Mcqueen, J.T.; Davidson, P.; Mathur, R.; Chuang, H.-Y.; Dimego, G.; Seaman, N.L. Linking the Eta Model with the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System to Build a Real-Time National Air Quality Forecasting System; Weather Forecast, 2005, 20, 367-384.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, S.C.; Kasibhatla, P.S.; Wright, D.L.; Schwartz, S.E.; Mcgraw, R.; Deng, A. Moment-Based Simulation of Microphysical Properties of Sulfate Aerosols in the Eastern United States: Model Description, Evaluation and Regional Analysis; J. Geophys. Res. 2003, 108, 4353.
   Google Scholar
• Eder, B.K.; Davis, J.M.; Bloomfield, P. An Automated Classification Scheme Designed to Better Elucidate the Dependence of Ozone on Meteorology; J. Appl. Meteorol. 1994, 33, 1182-1199.
   Google Scholar
• Grifin, R.J.; Johnson, C.A.; Talbot, R.W.; Mao, H.; Russo, R.S.; Zhou, Y.; Sive, B.C. Quantification of Ozone Formation Metrics at Thompson Farm during the New England Air Quality Study (NEAQS) 2002; J. Geophys. Res. 2004, 109(D24302), DOI 10.1029/2004JD005344.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R.; Tuazon, E.C.; Macleod, H.; Aschmann, S.M.; Winer, A.W. The Gas-Phase Reaction of Chlorine Nitrate with Water Vapor; Geophys. Res. Lett. 1986, 13, 117-120.
   Google Scholar
• Hjorth, J.; Ottobrini, G.; Cappellani, F.; Restelli, G. A Fourier Transform Infrared Study of the Rate Constant of the Homogeneous Gas-Phase Reaction N2O5+H2O and Determination of Absolute Infrared Band Intensities of N2O5 and HNO3; J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 1565-1568.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R.; Winer, A.W; Pitts, J.N. Estimation of Nighttime N2O5 Concentrations from Ambient NO2 and NO3 Radical Concentrations in and the Role of N2O5 in Night-Time Chemistry; Atmos. Environ 1986, 20, 331-339.
   Google Scholar
• Wahner, A.; Mentel, T.F.; Sohn, M. Gas-Phase Reaction of N2O5 with Water Vapor: Importance of Heterogeneous Hydrolysis of N2O5 and Surface Desorption of HNO3 in a Large Teflon Chamber; Geophys. Res. Lett. 1998, 25, 2169-2172.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, J.A.; Wooldridge, P.J.; Cohen, R.C.; Martinez, M.; Harder, H.; Brune, W.H.; Williams, E.J.; Roberts, J.M.; Fehsenfeld, F.C.; Hall, S.R.; Shetter, R.E.; Wert, B.P.; Fried, A. Ozone Production Rates as a Function of NOx Abundances and HOx Production Rates in the Nashville Urban Plume. J. Geophys. Res. 2002, 107, DOI 10.1029/
   Google Scholar
• 2001JD00932. 16. Demore, W.B.; Sander, S.P.; Howard, C.J.; Ravishankara, A.R.; Golden, D.M.; Kolb, C.E.; Hampson, R.F.; Kurylo, M.J.; Molina, M.J. Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Stratospheric Modeling; Evaluation 12; NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology: Pasadena, CA, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, C.M.; Fast, J.D.; Springston, S.R.; Larson, R.J.; Spicer, C.W.; Doskey, P.V.; Hubbe, J.M.; Plastridge, R. Formation Mechanisms and Chemical Characteristics of Elevated Photochemical Layers over the Northeast United States. J. Geophys. Res. 1998, 103, 10631-10647.
   Google Scholar
• Aneja, V.P.; Mathur, R.; Arya, S.P.; Li, Y.; Murray, G.C.; Manuszak, T.L. Coupling the Vertical Distribution of Ozone in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34, 2324-2329.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, M.; Jacob, D.J.; Munger, J.W.; Parrish, D.D.; Doddridge, B.G. Relationship of Ozone and Carbon Monoxide over North America; J. Geophys. Res. 1994, 99, 14565-14573.
   Google Scholar
• Mao, H.; Talbot, R. O3 and CO in New England: Temporal Variations and Relationships; J. Geophys. Res., 2004, 109.
   Google Scholar
• Tonnesen, G.S.; Dennis, R.L. Analysis of Radical Propagation Efficiency to Assess Ozone Sensitivity to Hydrocarbons and NOx: Part II: Long-Lived Species as Indicators or Ozone Concentration Sensitivity; J. Geophys. Res. 2000, 105, 9227-9241
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, J.R.; Dennis, R.L.; Tonnesen, G.S. Diagnostic Evaluation of Numerical Air Quality Models with Specialized Ambient Observations: Testing the Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System (CMAQ) at Selected SOS 95 Ground Sites; Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 1185-1198.
   Google Scholar
• Olszyna, K.J.; Bailey, E.M.; Simonaitis, R.; Meagher, J.F. O3 and NOy Relationships at a Rural Site; J. Geophys. Res. 1994, 99, 14557-14563
   Google Scholar