Qualitative Investigation of RtI Coaches Roles, Responsibilities, and Experiences Supporting Schools Participating in a State Level RtI Implementation Project

References

• Adelman, H. S., & Taylor, L. (2007). Systemic change for school improvement. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 17, 55–77. doi:10.1080/10474410709336590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Averill, J. B. (2002). Matrix analysis as a complementary analytic strategy in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 12(6), 855–866. doi:10.1177/104973230201200611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batsche, G., Elliott, J., Graden, J. L., Grimes, J., Kovaleski, J. F., Prasse, D., ... & Tilly III, W. D. (2005). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
   Google Scholar
• Björn, P. M., Aro, M. T., Koponen, T. K., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. H. (2016). The many faces of special education within RTI frameworks in the United States and Finland. Learning Disability Quarterly, 39(1), 58–66. doi:10.1177/0731948715594787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A., Fleetwood, S., & Roberts, J. M. (2002). The marriage of critical realism and Marxism: Happy, unhappy or on the rocks? In A. Brown, S. Fleetwood, & J. M. Roberts (Eds.), Critical realism and Marxism (pp. 1–22). New Yourk, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C. J., Stroh, H. R., Fouts, J. T., & Baker, D. B. (2005). Learning to change: School coaching for systemic reform (Report prepared for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation). Mill Creek, WA: Fouts & Associates, L.L.C.
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2004). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Calo, K. M., Sturtevant, E. G., & Kopfman, K. M. (2015). Literacy coaches’ perspectives of themselves as literacy leaders: Results from a national study of K–12 literacy coaching and leadership. Literacy Research and Instruction, 54(1), 1–18. doi:10.1080/19388071.2014.941050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., & Pedersen, O. K. (2013). Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(3), 294–320. doi:10.1177/0049124113500475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo, J. M., Dorman, C., Gaunt, B., Hardcastle, B., Justice, K., & March, A. L. (2016). Design research as a mechanism for consultants to facilitate and evaluate educational innovations. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 26(1), 25–48. doi:10.1080/10474412.2015.1039125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, B. G., & Odem, S. L. (2013). Evidence-based practices and implementation science in special education. Exceptional Children, 79(2), 135–144. doi:10.1177/001440291307900201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, C. R., Lyon, A. R., Kubergovic, D., Wright, D. B., & Zhang, Y. (2015). A supportive beliefs intervention to facilitate the implementation of evidence-based practices within a multi-tiered system of supports. School Mental Health, 7, 49–60. doi:10.1007/s12310-014-9139-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A. L., & Garmston, R. J. (2002). Cognitive coaching: A foundation for renaissance schools. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
   Google Scholar
• Danielson, L., Doolittle, J., & Bradley, R. (2007). Professional development, capacity building, and research needs: Critical issues for response to intervention. School Psychology Review, 36, 632–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deussen, T., Coskie, T., Robinson, L., & Autio, E. (2007). “Coach” can mean many things: Five categories of literacy coaches in reading first. Issues & answers (REL 2007-No. 005). Regional Educational Laboratory Northwest.
   Google Scholar
• Durlak, J. (2013). The importance of quality implementation for research, practice, and policy. ASPE Research Brief. US Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, M. P., & Mittman, B. S. (2006). Welcome to implementation science. Implementation Science, 1(1), 1–3. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-1-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erchul, W. P. (2011). School consultation and response to intervention: A tale of two literatures. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 21, 191–208. doi:10.1080/10474412.2011.595198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erchul, W. P. (2015). Put me in, coach: Observations on selected studies implementing supportive interventions to teachers. School Mental Health, 7, 74–79. doi:10.1007/s12310-015-9144-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feger, S., Woleck, K., & Hickman, P. (2004). School-based support. Journal of Staff Development, 2(2), 10–45.
   Google Scholar
• Fixsen, D. L., Blase, K. A., Naoom, S. F., & Wallace, F. (2009). Core implementation components. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(5), 531–540. doi:10.1177/1049731509335549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. M., & Vaughn, S. (2009). Response to intervention: Preventing and remediating academic difficulties. Child Development Perspectives, 3(1), 30–37. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00072.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman, S. G., & Crystal, C. D. (2015). Systems consultation for multitiered systems of supports (MTSS): Implementation issues. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 25, 1–10. doi:10.1080/10474412.2014.963226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J., Sugai, G., Simonsen, B., & Everett, S. (2017). MTSS coaching: Bringing knowing to doing. Theory into Practice, 56(1), 29–37. doi:10.1080/00405841.2016.1241946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, A. (1997). Focus groups. Social Research Update, 19(8), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine. >
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (2002). Student achievement through staff development (3rd ed. ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Killion, J., & Harrison, C. (2017). Taking the lead: New roles for teachers and school based coaches (2nd ed.). Oxford, OH: Learning Forward.
   Google Scholar
• King, D., Neuman, M., Pelchat, J., Potochnik, T., Rao, S., & Thompson, J. (2004). Instructional coaching: Professional development strategies that improve instruction. Providence, RI: Annenberg Institute for School Reform.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, J. (2009). Coaching: The key to translating research into practice lies in continuous, job-embedded learning with ongoing support. Journal of Staff Development, 30(1), 18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kowal, J., & Steiner, L. (2007). Issue brief—Instructional coaching. Washington, DC: The Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement.
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., & Shernoff, E. S. (2004). Evidence-based practice: Promoting evidence-based interventions in school psychology. School Psychology Review, 33(1), 34–48. doi:10.1.1.455.3573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., Volpiansky, P., Clements, M., & Ball, C. (2007). Professional development in implementing and sustaining multitier prevention models: Implications for response to intervention. School Psychology Review, 36, 618–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CS: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kurns, S., & Tilly, W. D. (2008). Response to intervention blueprints: School building level edition. National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
   Google Scholar
• Learning Forward. (2011). Standards for professional learning. Oxford, OH: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Magin, M. M., & Dunsmore, K. (2015). How the framing of instructional coaching as a lever for systemic or individual reform influences the enactment of coaching. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(2), 179–213. doi:10.1177/0013161X14522814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, A. L., Castillo, J. M., Batsche, G. M., & Kincaid, D. (2016). Relationship between systems coaching and problem-solving implementation fidelity in a response-to-intervention model. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 32(2), 147–177. doi:10.1080/15377903.2016.1165326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, A. L., & Gaunt, B. T. (2013). Systems coaching: a model for building capacity. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Florida’s Multitiered System of Supports Project. Retrieved from http://www.floridarti.usf.edu/resources/format/pdf/SystemsCoaching.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. A., McCombs, J. S., Lockwood, J. R., Gershwin, D., & Martorell, F. (2008). Supporting literacy across the sunshine state: A study of Florida middle school reading coaches (Vol. 762). New York, NY: Rand Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh, K., & Goodman, S. (2016). Integrated multi-tiered systems of support: Blending rti and pbis. New York, NY: Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Metz, A., & Bartley, L. (2012). Active implementation frameworks for program success: How to use implementation science to improve outcomes for children. Zero to Three Journal, 32(4), 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (1997). The focus group guidebook (Vol. 1). Sage publications. doi:10.4135/9781483328164
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (1998). Focus groups as qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Neufeld, B., & Roper, D. (2003). Coaching: A strategy for developing instructional capacity—Promises and practicalities. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute Program on Education. Providence, RI: Annenberg Institute for School Reform.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, E. P., & Freeman, E. W. (2012). District-level considerations in supporting and sustaining RtI implementation. Psychology in the Schools, 49(3), 297–310. doi:10.1002/pits.21598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, J. S., Lyon, A. R., Brant, N. E., Warner, C. M., Nadeem, E., Spiel, C., & Wagner, M. (2013 December). Implementation science in school mental health: Key constructs in a developing research agenda. School Mental Health. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s12310-013-9115-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pluymert, K. (2014). Problem-solving foundations for school psychological services. In P. L. Harrison & A. Thomas (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology: Data-based and collaborative decision making. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists, 25-40.
   Google Scholar
• Poglinco, S. M., Bach, A. J., Hovde, K., Rosenblum, S., Saunders, M., & Supovitz, J. A. (2003). The heart of the matter: The coaching model in America’s choice schools. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sansosti, F. J., & Noltemeyer, A. (2008). Viewing response-to-intervention through an educational change paradigm: What can we learn? The California School Psychologist, 13(1), 55–66. doi:10.1007/BF03340942
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, B. K., Arora, P., & Mautone, J. A. (2015). Consultation and coaching to increase the uptake of evidence-based practices: Introduction to the special issue. School Mental Health, 7, 1–5. doi:10.1007/s12310-015-9142-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanklin, N. L. (2006). What are the characteristics of effective literacy coaching? Literacy Coaching Clearinghouse, 1-3.
   Google Scholar
• Sugai, G., & Horner, R. R. (2006). A promising approach for expanding and sustaining school-wide positive behavior support. School Psychology Review, 25(2), 245–259.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. T., Moxley, D. E., Chanter, C., & Boulware, D. (2007). Three techniques for successful literacy coaching. Principal Leadership, 7(6), 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. doi:10.1177/1077800410383121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trubowitz, S. (2004). The why, how, and what of mentoring. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 59–62. doi:10.1177/003172170408600110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tung, R., & Feldman, J. (2001, January). Promoting whole school reform: A closer look at the role of external facilitators. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement (ICSEI), Toronto, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Walpole, S., & McKenna, M. C. (2012). The literacy coach’s handbook: A guide to research-based practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zachariadis, M., Scott, S. V., & Barrett, M. I. (2013). Methodological implications of critical realism for mixed-methods research. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 855–879. doi:10.25300/MISQ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar