327
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The Role of Sensemaking in the Organizational Consultation Process in Schools

ORCID Icon, , , , &
Pages 345-368 | Received 01 Sep 2021, Accepted 30 Sep 2022, Published online: 06 Oct 2022

References

  • Allen, C. D., & Penuel, W. R. (2015). Studying teachers’ sensemaking to investigate teachers’ responses to professional development focused on new standards. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(2), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114560646
  • Bertram, R. M., Blase, K. A., & Fixsen, D. L. (2015). Improving programs and outcomes: Implementation frameworks and organization change. Research on Social Work Practice, 25(4), 477–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731514537687
  • Bertram, R., & Kerns, S. (2019). Selecting and implementing evidence-based practice: A practical guide. Springer.
  • Black, W. R., & Shircliffe, B. J. (2013). Negotiating the downward rush: An exploration of school leaders’ strategic implementation of accountability policies. In B. Barnett, A. Shoho, & A. Bowers (Eds.), School and district leadership in an era of accountability (pp. 109–139). Information Age.
  • Blase, K., Van Dyke, M., Fixsen, D., & Bailey, F. W. (2012). Implementation science: Key concepts, themes and evidence for practitioners in educational psychology. In B. Kelly & D. Perkins (Eds.), Handbook of implementation science for psychology in education: How to promote evidence-based practice (pp. 13–36). Cambridge University Press.
  • Brann, K. L., Naser, S. C., & Clough, M. (2022). Organizational consultation to promote equitable school behavioral data practices using the Participatory Culture-Specific Intervention Model. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2022.2078335
  • Bridges, D. (2017). Philosophies in educational research: Epistemology, ethics, politics, and quality. Springer.
  • Butler, T. S., Weaver, A. D., Doggett, R. A., & Watson, T. S. (2002). Countering teacher resistance in behavioral consultation: Recommendations for the school-based consultant. The Behavior Analyst Today, 3(3), 282–288. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099983
  • Castillo, J. M. (2020). The intersection between systems change, implementation science, and human beings: A call to investigate people and context in future systems-level consultation research. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 30(4), 402–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2020.1728283
  • Castillo, J. M., Romer, N., Thoman, S., & Latimer, J. (2021). Systems theory and systems change. In K. K. Kelly, A. Garbacz, & C. A. Albers (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of school psychology research and practice (pp. 254–272). Routledge.
  • Clare, M. (2022). Qualitative research methods render and advance consultation practice: Here’s why that matters. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 32(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2020.1768859
  • Coburn, C. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 145–170. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023002145
  • Coburn, C. E., & Stein, M. K. (2006). Communities of practice theory and the role of teacher professional learning community in policy implementation. In M. I. Honig (Ed.), New directions in education policy implementation (pp. 25–46). State University of New York Press.
  • Cook, C. R., Lyon, A. R., Locke, J., Waltz, T., & Powell, B. J. (2019). Adapting a compilation of implementation strategies to advance school-based implementation research and practice. Prevention Science, 20(6), 914–935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-01017-1
  • Cook, B. G., & Odom, S. L. (2013). Evidence-based practices and implementation science in special education. Exceptional Children, 79(2), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402913079002021
  • Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4(50), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
  • Datnow, A., & Park, V. (2009). Conceptualizing policy implementation: Large-scale reform in an era of complexity. In G. Sykes, B. Schneider, D. Plank, & T. Ford (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 348–361). Routledge.
  • Diem, S., Young, M. D., Welton, A. D., Mansfield, K. C., & Lee, P. L. (2014). The intellectual landscape of critical policy analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(9), 1068–1090. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2014.916007
  • DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Many, T. (2013). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work (2nd ed.). Solution Tree Press.
  • Eagle, J. W., Dowd-Eagle, S. E., Snyder, A., & Holtzman, E. G. (2015). Implementing a multi-tiered system of support (MTSS): Collaboration between school psychologists and administrators to promote systems-level change. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 25(2–3), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2014.929960
  • Erchul, W. P. (2015). Consultation in community, school, and organizational practice. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Erchul, W. P., & Sheridan, S. M. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of research in school consultation (2nd ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Fischer, F., Torgenson, D., Durnova, A., & Orsini, M. (2015). Introduction to critical policy studies. In F. Fischer, D. Torgenson, A. Durnova, & M. Orsini (Eds.), Handbook of critical policy studies (pp. 1–24). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231).
  • Forman, S. G., Shapiro, E. S., Codding, R. S., Gonzales, J. E., Reddy, L. A., Rosenfield, S. A., Sanetti, L. M. H., & Stoiber, K. C. (2013). Implementation science and school psychology. School Psychology Quarterly, 28(2), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000019
  • Freeman, R., Miller, D., & Newcomer, L. (2015). Integration of academic and behavioral MTSS at the district level using implementation science. Learning Disabilities–A Contemporary Journal, 13 1 , 59–72 https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1080597.
  • Fullan, M. (2010). All systems go: The change imperative for whole system reform. Corwin Press.
  • Ganon-Shilon, S., & Schechter, C. (2017). Making sense of school leaders’ sense-making. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(4), 682–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216628536
  • Ganon-Shilon, S., & Schechter, C. (2019b). School principals’ sensemaking of their leadership role during reform implementation. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 22(3), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2018.1450996
  • Ganon-Shilon, S., & Schecter, C. (2019a). No school principal is an island: From individual to school sense-making processes in reform implementation. Management in Education, 33(2), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020618805799
  • Gutkin, T. B., & Curtis, M. J. (2009). School-based consultation: The science and practice of indirect service delivery. In T. B. Gutkin & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (4th ed., pp. 591–635). Wiley.
  • Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2015). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
  • Harry, B. (2008). Collaboration with culturally and linguistically diverse families: Ideal versus reality. Exceptional Children, 74(3), 372–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290807400306
  • Honig, M. I. (2006). Complexity and policy implementation: Challenges and opportunities for the field. In M. I. Honig (Ed.), New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity (pp. 1–23). SUNY Press.
  • Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (2002). Student achievement through staff development (3rd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Lawson, H., Durand, F., Campbell Wilcox, K., Gregory, K., Schiller, K., & Zuckerman, S. (2017). The role of district and school leaders’ trust and communications in the simultaneous implementation of innovative policies. Journal of School Leadership, 27(1), 31–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461702700102
  • Learning Forward. (2011) . Standards for professional learning.
  • Leonard, L., & Leonard, P. (2003). The continuing trouble with collaboration: Teachers talk. Current Issues in Education, 6(15 1–10). http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume6/number15/
  • Little, J. W., & Horn, I. S. (2007). ‘Normalizing’ problems of practice: Converting routine conversations into a resource for learning in professional communities. In L. Stoll & L. K. Seashore (Eds.), Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas. Open University Press 79–92 .
  • Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K. L., & Anderson, S. E. (2010). Investigating the links to improved student learning: Final report of research findings. University of Minnesota.
  • Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.873177
  • McDonnell, L. M., & Weatherford, M. S. (2016). Recognizing the political in implementation research. Educational Researcher, 45(4), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16649945
  • Metz, A. (2016). Practice profiles: A process for capturing evidence and operationalizing innovations. National Implementation Research Network.
  • Metz, A., & Bartley, L. (2012). Active implementation frameworks for program success. Zero to Three, 32(4), 11–18 https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1002634.
  • Meyers, A. B., Meyers, J., Graybill, E. C., Proctor, S. L., & Huddleston, L. (2012). Ecological approaches to organizational consultation and systems change in educational settings. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 22(1–2), 106–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2011.649649
  • Ni, Y., Yan, R., & Pounder, D. (2018). Collective leadership: Principals’ decision influence and the supportive or inhibiting decision influence of other stakeholders. Education Administration Quarterly, 54(2), 216–248. https://doi.org/10.1/7.7/001316X1723427
  • Olswang, L. B., & Prelock, P. A. (2015). Bridging the gap between research and practice: Implementation science. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(6), S1818–S1826. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0305
  • Paul, J. (2005). Introduction to the philosophies of research and criticism in Education and the social sciences. Pearson Publishing.
  • Penuel, W., Riel, M., Krause, A., & Frank, K. (2009). Analyzing teachers’ professional interactions in a school as social capital: A social network approach. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 111(1), 124–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911100102
  • Phillips, D. C., & Burbules, N. C. (2000). Postpositivism and educational research. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Rigby, J. G., Woulfin, S. L., & März, V. (2016). Understanding how structure and agency influence education policy implementation and organizational change. American Journal of Education, 122(3), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1086/685849
  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
  • Rosenfield, S. A., & Gravois, T. A. (1996). Instructional consultation teams: Collaborating for change. Guilford Press.
  • Sabnis, S., Castillo, J. M., & Wolgemuth, J. R. (2020). RTI, equity, and the return to the status quo: Implications for consultants. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 30(3), 285–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2019.1674152
  • Sanetti, L. M., & Collier-Meek, M. A. (2019). Increasing implementation science literacy to address the research-to-practice gap in school psychology. Journal of School Psychology, 76, 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2019.07.008
  • Schechter, C., Shaked, H., Ganon-Shilon, S., & Goldratt, M. (2018). Leadership metaphors: School principals’ sensemaking of a national reform. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 17(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2016.1232836
  • Shirrell, M., Hopkins, M., & Spillane, J. (2018). Educational infrastructure, professional learning, and changes in teachers’ instructional practices and beliefs. Professional Development in Education, 45 4 , 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1452784
  • Siegel, H. (2012). Epistemology and education: An incomplete guide to the social-epistemological issues. Episteme, 1(2), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2004.1.2.129
  • Spillane, J. P., Diamond, J. B., Burch, P., Hallett, T., Jita, L., & Zoltners, J. (2002). Managing in the middle: School leaders and the enactment of accountability policy. Educational Policy, 16(5), 731–762. https://doi.org/10.1177/089590402237311
  • Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Gomez, L. M. (2006). Policy implementation and cognition: The role of human, social, and distributed cognition in framing policy implementation. In M. I. Honig (Ed.), New directions in education policy implementation (pp. 47–64). State University of New York Press.
  • Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003387
  • Stollman, S., Meirink, J., Westenberg, M., & Van Driel, J. (2020). Teachers’ learning and sense-making processes in the context of an innovation: A two-year follow-up study. Professional Development in Education, 48 5 718–733 . https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1744683
  • Vaccarello, C., Kratochwill, T. R., & Asmus, J. M. (2022). Effects of a problem-solving team consultation on the problem-solving process: An evaluation of concept knowledge, implementation integrity, and student outcomes. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2022.2068020
  • Vega, D., Lasser, J., & Fernandez, S. E. (2017). School psychologists’ family-school partnering experiences with Latinos. Psychology in the Schools, 54(2), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21988
  • Walls, J. (2017). Sensemaking in education: Lessons from two cases. Journal of Organizational Theory in Education, 2(1), 1–28 http://web.stanford.edu/group/ojs-jote/cgi-bin/ojs2/index.php/jote/article/viewFile/28/30.
  • Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
  • Young, M. (2008). Bringing knowledge back in: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.