Training teachers for twenty-first century creative and critical thinking: Australian implications from an international study

References

• Amabile, T. M. (1995). KEYS: Assessing the climate for creativity. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Arts Council Wales. (2015). Creative learning through the arts: An action plan for Wales 2015–2020. Cardiff: Department for Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2016a). NAPLAN. Retrieved from http://reports.acara.edu.au
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2016b). Australian curriculum general capabilities/critical and creative thinking. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/generalcapabilities/critical-and-creative-thinking/introduction/introduction
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. (2016). Creative Australia. Retrieved from http://creativeaustralia.arts.gov.au
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2011a). Accreditation of initial teacher education programs in Australia Ð standards and procedures. Retrieved April 4, 2013, from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/verve/_resources/Accreditation_of_initial_teacher_education.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2011b). Teaching teachers for the future. Retrieved April 4, 2013, from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/ttf/ttf-project.html
   Google Scholar
• Born, G. (2005). On musical mediation: Ontology, technology and creativity. Twentieth-century Music, 2(01), 7–36.10.1017/S147857220500023X
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology in question. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2003). Grounded theory. In J. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 81–110). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, N., Oh, E., Kwon, J., Kim, H., Chi, E., & Hong, W. (2011). A study on the improvement of secondary school education to bring up students’ creative talents. KICE research report. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 15(3), 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Cowdroy, R., & de Graaff, E. (2005). Assessing highly‐creative ability1. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(5), 507–518.10.1080/02602930500187113
   Google Scholar
• Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools. Abingdon: Routledge.10.4324/9780203357965
   Google Scholar
• Craft, A. (2008). Tensions in creativity and education. In G. Claxton, A. Craft, & H. Gardner (Eds.), Creativity, wisdom, and trusteeship: Exploring the role of education (pp. 16–34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creative Australia. ( see Australian Government / Creative Australia above)
   Google Scholar
• Creative Victoria. (2015). Creative state global city: Creative industries taskforce report 2015. Retrieved from http://www.strategy.creative.vic.gov.au/application/files/8414/4857/8019/Taskforce_Report_updateder.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Creative Victoria. (2016). Creative industries, commerce and the creative economy: What has been achieved. Retrieved from http://creativeaustralia.arts.gov.au/archived/module/creative-australia-pathways/theme-connecting-to-national-life-for-a-social-and-economic-dividend/pathway-creative-industries-commerce-and-the-creative-economy/creative-industries-commerce-and-the-creative-economy-what-has-been-achieved/
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2008). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Curriculum Development Council. (2001). Learning to learn: The way forward in curriculum development. Hong Kong: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• de Bruin, L. R. (2016). Expert practitioner voices: A phenomenological inquiry into teaching, learning and collaborating in musical improvisation. Melbourne: Unpublished Doctoral thesis, Monash University.
   Google Scholar
• Flew, T. (2012). Creative industries: Culture and policy. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gaunt, H. (2008). One-to-one tuition in a conservatoire: The perceptions of instrumental and vocal teachers. Psychology of Music, 36(2), 215–245.10.1177/0305735607080827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2014). The creative turn. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.10.1007/978-94-6209-551-9
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2016). Creativity and education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-57224-0
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., & Ammermann, M. (2016). The changing face of creativity in Australian education. Teaching Education, 27(1), 103–113.10.1080/10476210.2015.1077379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House of Commons, Education and Skills Committee. (2007). Creative partnerships and the curriculum: Eleventh report of session 2006–2007. Great Britain: Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Climate for creativity: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 19(1), 69–90.10.1080/10400410709336883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, B. & Craft, A. (2006). Creative learning and possibility thinking. In B. Jeffrey (Ed.), Creative learning practices: European experiences (pp. 73–91). London: The Tufnell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, B., & Claxton, G. (2009). Wider skills for learning: What are they, how can they be cultivated, how could they be measured and why are they important for innovation?. London: NESTA.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2002). Navigating moments. In M. Zournazi (Ed.), Hope: New philosophies for change (pp. 210–243). Sydney: Pluto.
   Google Scholar
• Matusov, E., & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2014). Democratic dialogic education for and from authorial agency: An interview with Professor Eugene Matusov. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 10(1), 9–26.10.5964/ejop.v10i1.762
   Google Scholar
• Ministerial Council for Education, Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs. (2008). The Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians. Retrieved from http://www.mceecdya.edu.au/mceecdya/melbourne_declaration,25979.html
   Google Scholar
• McWilliam, E., & Haukka, S. (2008). Educating the creative workforce: New directions for twenty‐first century schooling. British Educational Research Journal, 34(5), 651–666.10.1080/01411920802224204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, S. (2009). What role does commitment play among writers with different levels of creativity? Creativity Research Journal, 21(2-3), 243–257.10.1080/10400410902861331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Staff Development Council. (2001). NSDC standards for staff development. Retrieved from http://www.nsdc.org/library/standards2001.html
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2012). Creative problem-solving: Students skills in tackling real-life problems (Volume V). Paris: PISA/OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 35–61). New-York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pothoulaki, M., MacDonald, R., & Flowers, P. (2012). An interpretative phenomenological analysis of an improvisational music therapy program for cancer patients. Journal of Music Therapy, 49(1), 45–67.10.1093/jmt/49.1.45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. (2004). Retrieved from www.qca.org.uk/creativity
   Google Scholar
• Robson, C. (2002). The analysis of qualitative data. In C. Robson (Ed.), Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner- researchers (pp. 455–499). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, S. E. (2013). Chaos of textures or ‘Tapisserie’? A model for creative teacher education curriculum design. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(11), 87–102. doi:10.14221/ajte.2013v38n11.2
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A. (Ed.). (2015). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taddei, F. (2009). Training creative and collaborative knowledge-builders: A major challenge for 21st century education. OECD Background Paper. Retrieved from http://cri-paris.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/ocde-francois-taddei-fev2009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1930/1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, & E. Souberman, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R. (2007). Dialogic education and technology: Expanding the space of learning. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-71142-3
   Google Scholar