Defining and designing impact consciousness in teacher education

References

• Allen, J., & Wright, S. E. (2014). Integrating theory and practice in the pre-service teacher education practicum. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 20(2), 136–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anagnostopolous, D., Smith, E. R., & Basmadjian, K. G. (2007). Bridging the university-school divide: Horizontal expertise and the ‘two-worlds pitfall.’. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(2), 138–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2016b). Recognising the impact of great teaching: National certified teacher month. Retrieved from https://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/certification-resources/halt/nctm-toolkit_final.pdf?sfvrsn=2
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2016c). Evaluating impact: Multiple measures and sources of data. Melbourne, VIC. Retrieved from: https://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/feedback/documents/aitsl-evaluating-impact.pdf?sfvrsn=4
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2011). Australian professional standards for teachers. Melbourne: AITSL. Retrieved from https://www.aitsl.edu.au/teach/standards
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2015). Classroom Ready: Demonstrating the Impact on Student Learning of Initial Teacher Education Programs: Position Paper. Melbourne: AITSL. Retrieved from https://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/aitsl-eoi-position-paper.pdf?sfvrsn=eefbec3c_0
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2016a). Guidance for the Accreditation of Initial Teacher Programs in Australia. Melbourne: AITSL. Retrieved from https://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/initial-teacher-education-resources/guidance-for-the-accreditation-of-initial-teacher-education-in-australia.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2017). TEMAG evaluation: Stakeholder perspectives on progress (Report prepared by PTL Consulting Pty Ltd). Melbourne: AITSL.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, A., & Van Eerde, H. A. A. (2015). An introduction to design based research with an example from statistics education. In A. Bikner- Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Doing qualitative research: Methodology and methods in mathematics education (pp. 429–466). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497–511.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., Sleep, L., Boerst, T. A., & Bass, H. (2009). Combining the development of practice and the practice of development in teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 458–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blikstad-Balas, M. (2013). Vague concepts in the educational sciences: Implications for researchers. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(5), 528–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2008). Teacher preparation and student achievement: NBER working paper 14314. Cambridge, MA: NBER. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w14314
   Google Scholar
• Brett, P., Fitzallen, N., Kilpatrick, S., Mainsbridge, C., Reynolds, B., Kertesz, J., & Thomas, S. (2016). Evidence of impact of pre-service and graduate teachers: Shifting the conversation. AARE Conference 2016, Melbourne. Retrieved from http://www.aare.edu.au/publications-database.php/10625/evidence-of-impact-of-pre-service-and-graduate-teachers-shifting-the-conversation
   Google Scholar
• Brett, P., Fitzallen, N., Kilpatrick, S., Morrison, C., Mainsbridge, C., Reynolds, B., … Quentin-Baxter, M. (2018). Learning the Words: Supervising teachers and the language of impact in an initial teacher education programme. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(8), 105–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadley, T., Ledger, S., & Sharplin, E. (2013). New frontiers or old certainties: The pre-service teacher internship. In D. Lynch & T. Yeigh (Eds.), Teacher education in Australia: Investigations into programming, practicum and partnerships (pp. 94–108). Brisbane: Oxford Global Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burn, K., & Mutton, T. (2015). A review of ‘research-informed clinical practice’ in initial teacher education. Oxford Review of Education, 41(2), 217–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M. (2004). Defining the outcomes of teacher education: What’s social justice got to do with it? Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 193–212.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conroy, J., Hulme, M., & Menter, I. (2013). Developing a ‘clinical’ model for teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 39(5), 557–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2014). Strengthening clinical preparation: The holy grail of teacher education. Peabody Journal of Education, 89(4), 547–561.
   Google Scholar
• Design Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Diez, M. E. (2010). It is complicated: Unpacking the flow of teacher education’s impact on student learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(5), 441–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinham, S. (2015). Issues and perspectives relevant to the development of an approach to the accreditation of initial teacher education in Australia based on evidence of impact: A paper prepared for the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. Melbourne: AITSL.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, T., & Knipe, S. (2016). Policy reform: Testing times for teacher education in Australia. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 48(4), 358–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, C. A., & Gillette, M. (2006). A candid talk to teacher educators about effectively preparing teachers who can teach everyone’s children. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 292–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guha, R., Hyler, M. E., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). The power and potential of teacher residencies. Phi Delta Kappan, 98(8), 31–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning: Maximizing impact on learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2015). The applicability of visible learning to higher education. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(1), 79–91.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2016). Shifting away from distractions to improve Australia’s schools: Time for a reboot. ACEL monograph 54. Strawberry Hills, NSW: ACEL.
   Google Scholar
• Heeneman, S., Pool, A. O., Schuwirth, L. W. T., Van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Driessen, E. W. (2015). The impact of programmatic assessment on student learning: Theory versus practice. Medical Education, 49(5), 487–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennissen, P., Beckers, H., & Moerkerke, G. (2017). Linking practice to theory in teacher education: A growth in cognitive structures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 314–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrington, J., & Reeves, T. (2011). Using design principles to improve pedagogical practice and promote student engagement. Proceedings of ASCILITE - Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference 2011 (pp. 594–601). Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/43599/
   Google Scholar
• Hoadley, C. M. (2004). Methodological alignment in design-based research. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 203–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, D. (2004). The practice of design-based research: Uncovering the interplay between design, research, and the real-world context. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 235–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearns, S., & Hart, N. (2017). Narratives of ‘doing, knowing, being and becoming’: Examining the impact of an attachment-informed approach within initial teacher education. Teacher Development, 21(4), 511–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby, S. N., McCombs, J. S., Barney, H., & Naftel, N. (2006). Reforming teacher education: Something old, something new. Santa Monica: Rand Education. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2006/RAND_MG506.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mahar, J.-A., & Strobert, B. (2010). The use of 360-degree feedback compared to traditional evaluative feedback for the professional growth of teachers in K-12 education. Planning and Changing, 41(3/4), 147–160.
   Google Scholar
• Mathewson Mitchell, D., & Reid, J. (2017). (Re)turning to practice in teacher education: Embodied knowledge in learning to teach. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 23(1), 42–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, D. (2015). An approach to the accreditation of initial teacher education programs based on evidence of the impact of learning teaching: A paper prepared for the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. Melbourne: AITSL.
   Google Scholar
• McBer, H. (2000). Research into teacher effectiveness: A model of teacher effectiveness. Research Report No. 216. Retrieved from http://ateneu.xtec.cat/wikiform/wikiexport/_media/formgest/equips_directius/st02/bloc_5/5_rr216investigacio_professors_eficients.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. Milton Park: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, L., Dickson, B., Rickart, F., Dinham, S., Conroy, J., & Davis, R. (2015). Teaching as a clinical profession: Translational practices in teacher education – An international perspective. Journal of Education for Teaching, 41(5), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, C., & Ballantyne, J. (2016). Social justice and teacher education: A systematic review of empirical work in the field. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(4), 263–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, P, & Koehler, J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuttall, J., Kostogriz, A., Jones, M., & Martin, J. (Eds.). (2017). Teacher education policy and practice: Evidence of impact, impact of evidence. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ronfeldt, M. (2015). Field placement schools and instructional effectiveness. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(4), 304–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149.
   Google Scholar
• Schuwirth, L. W. T., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2011). Programmatic assessment: From assessment of learning to assessment for learning. Medical Teacher, 33(6), 478–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinkels, M. F. J., Koopman, M., & Beijaard, D. (2013). Student teachers’ development of learning-focused conceptions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 26–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group (TEMAG). (2014). Action now: Classroom ready teachers. Retrieved from http://www.studentsfirst.gov.au/teacher-education-ministerial-advisory-group
   Google Scholar
• Van der Vleuten, C. P. M., Schuwirth, L. W. T., Driessen, E. W., Dijkstra, J., Tigelaar, D., Baartman, L. J. K., & Van Tartwijk, J. (2012). A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose. Medical Teacher, 34(3), 205–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Vleuten, C. P. M., Schuwirth, L. W. T., Driessen, E. W., Govaerts, M. J. B., & Heeneman, S. (2015). Twelve tips for programmatic assessment. Medical Teacher, 37(7), 641–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gasse, R., Vanlommel, K., Vanhoof, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2016). Teacher collaboration on the use of pupil learning outcome data: A rich environment for professional learning? Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 387–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, C., & Santagata, R. (2015). Preservice teachers’ learning to generate evidence-based hypotheses about the impact of mathematics teaching on learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(1), 21–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K. (2012). The turn once again towards practice-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(5), 376–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar