The biopolitical function of disgust: ethical and political implications of biopedagogies of disgust in anti-colonial education

References

• Åhäll, L. (2018). Affect as methodology: Feminism and the politics of emotion. International Political Sociology, 12(1), 36–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourassa, G. (2017). Ain’t no makin’ it in the age of austerity: The making and taking of educational life. The Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 39(3), 329–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2006). Regulating aversion: Tolerance in the age of identity and empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. A., & Fessler, D. (2015). The role of disgust in norms, and of norms in disgust research: Why liberals shouldn’t be morally disgusted by moral disgust. Topoi, 34(2), 483–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough, P. (2007). The affective turn: Theorizing the social. In P. Clough & J. Halley (Eds.), Introduction (pp. 1–33). Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cvetkovich, C. (2012). Depression: A public feeling. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darwin, C. (1904). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. (Ed. F. Darwin). London: John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (1997). Critical whiteness studies: Looking behind the mirror. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2001). Critical race theory. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dernikos, B., Leso, N., McCall, S., & Nicollini, S. (Eds.). (2020). Mapping the affective turn in education: Theory, research, and pedagogies. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dietrich, R. (2017). The biopolitical logics of settler colonialism and disruptive relationality. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 17(1), 67–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixson, A., & Rousseau, C. (Eds.). (2006). Critical race theory in education: All God’s children got a song. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dollimore, J. (2001). Sexual disgust. In T. Dean & C. Lane (Eds.), Homosexuality and psychoanalysis (pp. 367–386). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2003). Society must be defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975-1976. New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-1979. New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Francombe-Webb, J., Rich, E., & De Pian, L. (2014). I move like you … But different: Biopolitics and embodied methodologies. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 14(5), 471–482.
   Google Scholar
• Guibilini, A. (2016). What in the world is moral disgust? Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 94(2), 227–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guibilini, A. (2018). Disgust. In H. LaFollette (Ed.), International encyclopedia of ethics. Oxford, UK: Wiley & Sons. published online 30 June 2018. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee846.
   Google Scholar
• Harwood, V. (2009). Theorizing biopedagogies. In J. Wright & V. Harwood (Eds.), Biopolitics and the obesity epidemic (pp. 15–30). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmings, C. (2012). Affective solidarity: Feminist reflexivity and political transformation. Feminist Theory, 13(2), 147–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, D. (2011). Yuck! The nature and moral significance of disgust. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krebs, A. (2010). Multiculturalism and colonial continuity: The function of disgust in the politics of recognition. In C. Lammert & K. Sarkowsky (Eds.), Travelling concepts: Negotiating diversity in Canada and Europe (pp. 83–106). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of horror: An essay of abjection. (trans. S. Roudiez). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuntsman, A. (2009). “With a shade of disgust”: Affective politics of sexuality and class in memoirs of the Stalinist Gulag. Slavic Review, 68(2), 308–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahy, D., & Malins, P. (2015). Biopedagogical assemblages: Exploring school drug education in action. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 15(5), 398–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledesma, M. C., & Calderón, D. (2015). Critical race theory in education: A review of past literature and a look to the future. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(3), 206–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, T. (2006). The school as an exceptional space: Rethinking education from the perspective of the biopedagogical. Educational Theory, 56(2), 159–176.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, T. (2009). Education and the immunization paradigm. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 28(6), 485–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2015). The pedagogy of disgust: The ethical, moral and political implications of using disgust in public health campaigns. Critical Public Health, 25(1), 4–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maldonado-Torres, N. (2007). On the coloniality of being. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 240–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2015a). Politics of affect. London: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2015b). Q & A with Brian Massumi. by Laura Sell. Duke University Press blog. https://dukeupress.wordpress.com/2015/08/19/qa-with-brian-massumi/
   Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W. (2011). The darker side of western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. (2004). Disgust: The gatekeeper emotion. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, W. I. (1997). The anatomy of disgust. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ngai, S. (2005). Ugly feelings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (2004). Hiding form humanity: Disgust, shame, and the law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (2010). From disgust to humanity: Sexual orientation and constitutional law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rail, G., & Jette, S. (2015). Reflections on biopedagogies and/of public health: On bio-others, rescue missions, and social justice. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 15(5), 327–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainbow, P., & Rose, N. (2006). Biopower today. BioSocieties, 1(2), 195–217.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, M. (2017). The disgust of Donald Trump. Continuum, 31(6), 747–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, D. (2019). The evolution of affect theory: The humanities, the sciences, and the study of power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skeggs, B. (2004). Class, self, culture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stoler, A. (1995). Race and the education of desire: Foucault’s History of Sexuality and the colonial order of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tate, S. (2013). Racial affective economies, disalienation and ‘race made ordinary’. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37(13), 2475–2490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorov, S. (1985). The conquest of America: The question of the Other. New York: Harper Colophon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, I. (2013). Revolting subjects: Social abjection and resistance in neoliberal Britain. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Vlieghe, J. (2013). Beyond biopolitics: A biopedagogical perspective on corporeal experience. Interchange, 44(3–4), 257–273.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. M., Hanna, M. O., & Li, M. (2019). Imagining and enacting liberatory pedagogical praxis in a politically divisive era. Equity & Excellence in Education, 52(2–3), 346–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, J. (2009). Biopower, biopedagogies & the obesity epidemic. In J. Wright & V. Harwood (Eds.), Biopolitics and the obesity epidemic (pp. 1–14). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wynter, S. (2003). Unsettling the coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom: Towards the human, after Man, its overrepresentation—An argument. CR: The New Centennial Review, 3(3), 257–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yancy, G. (Ed.). (2008). Black bodies, white gazes: The continuing significance of race. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2013). Critical pedagogy and emotion: Working through troubled knowledge in posttraumatic societies. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 176–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2014). The place of emotion in teacher reflection: Elias, Foucault, and critical emotional reflexivity. Power & Education, 6(2), 210–222.
   Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2018). Reinventing critical pedagogy as decolonizing pedagogy: The education of empathy. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 40(5), 404–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2019a). The affective dimension of everyday resistance: Implications for critical pedagogy in engaging with neoliberalism’s educational impact. Critical Studies in Education, 1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2019.1617180
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2019b). Encouraging shared responsibility without invoking collective guilt: Exploring pedagogical responses to portrayals of suffering and injustice in the classroom. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 27(3), 403–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2020). Re-conceptualizing complicity in the social justice classroom: Affect, politics and anti-complicity pedagogy. Pedagogy, Culture, & Society, 28(2), 317–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar