Generating enabling conditions to strengthen a research-rich teaching profession: lessons from an Australian study

References

• Adie, L., Wyatt-Smith, C., & Harris, L. (2018). Data walls: Privacy, psychological safety,and workload. Newsmonth, 38(6), 6.
   Google Scholar
• BERA-RSA. (2014). Research and the teaching profession. Building the capacity for a self-improving education system. Final report of the BERA-RSA Inquiry into the role of research in teacher education. http://www.bera.ac.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2013/12/BERA-RSA-Research-Teaching-Profession-FULLREPORT-for-web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2014). Evidence based practice in education: Between science and democracy. In Reid A., Hart, E., Peters M. (eds), A companion to research in education (pp. 391–400). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2015). Resisting the seduction of the global education measurement industry: Notes on the social psychology of PISA. Ethics and Education, 10(3), 348–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (eds.). (2012). The SAGE handbook of grounded theory. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M. (2003). Learning and unlearning: The education of teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(5), 28.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1990). Research on teaching and teacher research: The issues that divide. Educational Researcher, 19(2), 2–11.
   Google Scholar
• Furlong, J. (2013). Globalisation, neoliberalism, and the reform of teacher education in England. In The educational forum (Vol. 77, No. 1, pp. 28–50). Taylor & FrancisGroup. doi: 10.1080/00131725.2013.739017
   Google Scholar
• Green, N., Noone, G., & Nolan, A. (2013). Contemporary paradigms of rural teaching: The significance of place. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 23(1), 91–115.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J., Gregory, A., Hoppey, D., & Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2009). Data literacy: Understanding teachers’ data use in a context of accountability and response to intervention. Action in Teacher Education, 31(3), 41–55.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B. (2011). Policy as numbers: Ac/counting for educational research. Australian educational Researcher, 38(4), 355–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., Martino, W., & Rezai-Rashti, G. (2013). Testing regimes, accountabilities and education policy: Commensurate global and national developments. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., & Sellar, S. (2019). Schooling reform in Australia: Legitimation through “Projections” onto Shanghai and East Asian schooling systems. In Understanding PISA’s attractiveness: Critical analyses in comparative policy studies (pp. 49). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Little, J. W. (2012). Understanding data use practice among teachers: The contribution of micro-process studies. American Journal of Education, 118(2), 143–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, C. (2017). Researching practice as education and reform. In Peters, M., Cowie, B., & Menter, I. (Eds), A companion to research in teacher education (pp. 583–595). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, M., & Goos, M. (2017). The place of research in teacher education? An analysis of theAustralian teacher education ministerial advisory group report action now: Classroom ready teachers. In Peters, M., Cowie, B., & Menter, I. (Eds), A companion to research in teacher education (pp. 637650). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mockler, N. (2011). Beyond ‘what works’: Understanding teacher identity as a practical and political tool. Teachers and Teaching, 17(5), 517–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. (2003). The activist teaching profession.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. (2016). Teacher professionalism: Why are we still talking about it? Teachers andTeaching, 22(4), 413–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2016). The global educational reform movement and its impact on schooling. In Mundy, K., Green, A., Lingard, B., & Verger, A. (Eds),The Handbook of Global Education Policy, 128–144. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (2008). Perspectives on evidence-based research in education—What works? Issues in synthesizing educational program evaluations. Educational researcher, 37(1), 5–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TEMAG. (2015). Action now: Classroom ready teachers. Canberra: Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H. (2015). Professional conversations and improvement-focused feedback: A review of the research literature and the impact on practice and student outcomes, prepared for the Australian institute of teaching and school leadership, AITSL,Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• White, S., Down, B., Mills, M., Shore, S., & Woods, A. (2020). Strengthening a research-rich teaching profession: an Australian study. Teaching Education, 1-15.. doi:10.1080/10476210.2020.1737666
   Google Scholar
• White, S. (2016). Teacher education research and education policy makers: An Australian perspective. Journal of Education for Teaching, 42(2), 252–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S., Nuttall, J., Down, B., Shore, S., Woods, A., Mills, M., & Bussey, K. (2018). Strengthening a research-rich teaching profession for Australia. Australian Teacher Education Association (ATEA), Canberra; Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE), Melbourne; Australian Council of Deans of Education, (ACDE)Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Whitty, G. (2006). Education(al) research and education policy making: Is conflict inevitable? British Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 159–176.
   Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K. M. (1995). Beyond the divide of teacher research and academic research. Teachers and Teaching, 1(2), 153–172.
   Google Scholar