666
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

‘Hitting a brick wall’: using conceptual metaphorical theory to explore teachers’ conceptions of learning in Computer Science

ORCID Icon
Pages 305-318 | Received 20 Jul 2021, Accepted 30 Jul 2022, Published online: 07 Sep 2022

References

  • Alger, C. L. (2009). Secondary teachers’ conceptual metaphors of teaching and learning: Changes over the career span. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 743–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.10.004
  • Aliusta, G. O., & Özer, B. (2017). Student-centred learning (SCL): Roles changed? Teachers and Teaching, 23(4), 422–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1205014
  • Barradell, S. (2013). The identification of threshold concepts: A review of theoretical complexities and methodological challenges. Higher Education, 65(2), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9542-3
  • Boustedt, J., Eckerdal, A., McCartney, R., Moström, J. E., Ratcliffe, M., Sanders, K., & Zander, C. (2007). Threshold concepts in computer science: Do they exist and are they useful? ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 39(1), 504–508. https://doi.org/10.1145/1227504.1227482
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. SAGE.
  • De Guerrero, M. C., & Villamil, O. S. (2002). Metaphorical conceptualizations of ESL teaching and learning. Language Teaching Research, 6(2), 95–120. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168802lr101oa
  • Doyle, T. (2008). Helping students learn in a learner-centred environment. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
  • Fluck, A., Webb, M., Cox, M., Angeli, C., Malyn-Smith, J., Voogt, J., et al (2016). Arguing for computer science in the school curriculum. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 38–46. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/jeductechsoci.19.3.38
  • Fosnot, C. T., & Perry, R. S. (1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and Practice, 2(1), 8–33.
  • Frieze, C., & Quesenberry, J. L. (2013). From difference to diversity: Including women in the changing face of computing. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer Science education (SIGCSE ‘13). Association for computing machinery, New York, NY, USA, 445–450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2445196.2445327
  • Gleeson, J., Klenowski, V., & Looney, A. (2020). Curriculum change in Australia and Ireland: A comparative study of recent reforms. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(4), 478–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2019.1704064
  • Guzdial, M. (2020). Talking about race in CS education. Communications of the ACM, 64(1), 10–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3433921
  • Hager, P. (2008). Learning and metaphors. Medical Teacher, 30 (7), 679–686. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(3), 241-260 https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113519130
  • Keiler, L. S. (2018). Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(34), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0131-6
  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago press.
  • Lynch, K. (1987). Dominant ideologies in Irish educational thought: Consensualism, essentialism and meritocratic individualism. Economic and Social Review, 18(2), 101–122. http://hdl.handle.net/2262/68612
  • McCormack, O., Gleeson, J., & O’Donoghue, T. (2020). An analysis of national newspaper coverage relating to the Leaving Certificate programme in two newspapers in the Republic of Ireland. Irish Educational Studies, 39(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2019.1664314
  • Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practicing within the disciplines. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving Student Learning − Theory and Practice Ten Years On (pp. 412–424). Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
  • Munby, H. (1987). Metaphor and teachers’ knowledge. Research in the Teaching of English, 29(4), 377–397. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40171124
  • Olofson, M., & Garnett, B. (2018). Measuring the impact of professional development for student-centred pedagogies: A mixed-methods study. Professional Development in Education, 44(3), 342–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2017.1347805
  • Ottestad, G., & Gudmundsdottir, G. (2018). ICT policy in primary and secondary education in Europe. J. Voogt, G. Knezek, R. Christensen, & K.-W. Lai Eds., Handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education. s1343–1363. Springer.
  • Pappas, I. O., Giannakos, M. N., & Jaccheri, L. (2016, July). Investigating factors influencing students’ intention to dropout computer science studies. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on innovation and technology in Computer Science education (pp. 198–203).
  • Patchen, T., & Crawford, T. (2011). From gardeners to tour guides: The epistemological struggle revealed in teacher-generated metaphors of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(3), 286–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487110396716
  • Rountree, J., & Rountree, N. (2009, January). Issues regarding threshold concepts in computer science. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Australasian conference on computing education-volume 95 (pp. 139–146).
  • Sentance, S., & Csizmadia, A. (2015). Teachers’ perspectives on successful strategies for teaching Computing in school. In IFIP TC3 working conference 2015: A new culture of learning: computing and next generations http://www.ifip2015.mii.vu.lt/proceedings#.WFpvmlzgmqQ
  • Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027002004
  • Smyth, E., & Banks, J. (2012). High stakes testing and student perspectives on teaching and learning in the Republic of Ireland. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 24(4), 283–306.
  • Tamim, S. R., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Definitions and uses: Case study of teachers implementing project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(2), 72–101. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1323
  • Tannehill, D., & MacPhail, A. (2014). What examining teaching metaphors tells us about pre-service teachers’ developing beliefs about teaching and learning. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 19(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2012.732056
  • Van Gorp, M. J., & Grissom, S. (2001). An empirical evaluation of using constructive classroom activities to teach introductory programming. Computer Science Education, 11(3), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1076/csed.11.3.247.3837
  • Vihavainen, A., Airaksinen, J., & Watson, C. (2014, July). A systematic review of approaches for teaching introductory programming and their influence on success. In Proceedings of the tenth annual conference on International computing education research (pp. 19–26).
  • Wang, J., Hong, H., Ravitz, J., & Hejazi Moghadam, S. (2016). Landscape of K-12 Computer Science education in the U.S.: Perceptions, access, and barriers. Proceedings of the 47th ACM technical symposium on Computing Science education, 645–650. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839509.2844628
  • Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centred teaching. Jossey-Bass.