The Multiple Inference Model of Social Perception: Two Conceptual Problems and Some Thoughts on How to Resolve Them

References

• Collins, A. M., and Loftus, E. F., 1975. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fein, S., 1996. Effects of suspicion on attributional thinking and the correspondence bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1164–1184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L., 1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.
   Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., 2003. Implicational schemata and the correspondence bias: On the diagnostic value of situationally constrained behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1154–1171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., 2004. Theory-based bias correction in dispositional inference: The fundamental attribution error is dead, long live the correspondence bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 15, 183–217.
   Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., Alshut, E., Grafe, J., Nespethal, J., Ruhmland, A., and Schulz, L., 2002. Processes of judging known and unknown persons: How the first impression influences the processing of new information. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 33, 25–34.
   Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., and Bodenhausen, G. V., 2006. Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., LeBel, E. P., and Peters, K. R., 2007. What do implicit measures tell us? Scrutinizing the validity of three common assumptions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 181–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., Peters, K. R., and Strack, F., 2008. Cross-cultural differences vs. universality in cognitive dissonance: A conceptual reanalysis. In Sorrentino, R. M., and Yamaguchi, S. (Eds.) , Handbook of motivation and cognition across cultures. New York: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., and Strack, F., 2004. On the propositional nature of cognitive consistency: Dissonance changes explicit, but not implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 535–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D. T., Pelham, B. W., and Krull, D. S., 1988. On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 733–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ham, J., and Vonk, R., 2003. Smart and easy: Co-occurring activation of spontaneous trait inferences and spontaneous situational inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 434–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, D. L., 1998. Dispositional and attributional inferences in person perception. In Darley, J. M., and Cooper, J. (Eds.) , Attribution and social interaction. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G. H., 1965. The inference to the best explanation. Philosophical Review, 74, 88–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heider, F., 1958. The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T., 1996. Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In Higgins, E. T., and Kruglanski, A. W. (Eds.) , Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, E. E., 1991. Interpersonal perception. New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, E. E., and Davis, K. E., 1965. From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.) , Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, E. E., and Harris, V. A., 1967. The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H., 1972. Causal schemata and the attribution process. In Jones, E. E., Kanouse, D. E., Kelley, H. H., Nisbett, R. E., Valins, S., and Weiner, B. (Eds.) , Attribution: perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H., 1973. The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist., 28, 107–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krull, D. S., 1993. Does the grist change the mill? The effect of the perceiver's inferential goal on the process of social inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 340–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krull, D. S., and Erickson, D. J., 1995. Judging situations: On the effortful process of taking dispositional information into account. Social Cognition, 13, 417–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malle, B. F., 1999. How people explain behavior: A new theoretical framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 23–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quattrone, G. A., 1982. Overattribution and unit formation: When behavior engulfs the person. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 593–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quine, W. V. O., and Ullian, J. S., 1978. The web of belief, . New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Read, S. J., and Marcus-Newhall, A. R., 1993. Explanatory coherence in social explanations: A parallel distributed processing account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 429–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeder, G. D., and Brewer, M. B., 1979. A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 86, 61–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeder, G. D., Hesson-McInnis, M., Krohse, J. O., and Scialabba, E. A., 2001. Inferences about effort and ability. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1225–1235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeder, G. D., Kumar, S., Hesson-McInnis, M. S., and Trafimow, D., 2002. Inferences about the morality of an aggressor: The role of perceived motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 789–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeder, G. D., Monroe, A. E., and Pryor, J. B., 2008. Impressions of Milgram's obedient teachers. Situational cues inform inferences about motives and traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeder, G. D., Vonk, R., Ronk, M. J., Ham, J., and Lawrence, M., 2004. Dispositional inference: Multiple inferences about motive-related traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 530–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roese, N. J., and Sherman, J. W., 2007. Expectancy. In Kruglanski, A. W., and Higgins, E. T. (Eds.) , Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, . New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Strack, F., and Deutsch, R., 2004. Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thagard, P., 1989. Explanatory coherence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 435–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., 1986. Identification and inferential processes in dispositional attribution. Psychological Review., 93, 239–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., and Gaunt, R., 2000. Processing alternative explanations of behavior: Correction or integration?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 344–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uleman, J. S., Saribay, S. A., and Gonzalez, C. M., 2008. Spontaneous inferences, implicit impressions, and implicit theories. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 329–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigboldus, D. H. J., Dijksterhuis, A., and van Knippenberg, A., 2003. When stereotypes get in the way: Stereotypes obstruct stereotype-inconsistent trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 470–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., and Schooler, T. Y., 2000. A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar