Putting Emotion Regulation in Context: The (Missing) Role of Power Relations, Intergroup Trust, and Groups' Need for Positive Identities in Reconciliation Processes

References

• Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2013). The Big Two in social judgment and behavior. Social Psychology, 44, 61–62. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allpress, J. A., Brown, R., Giner-Sorolla, R., Deonna, J. A., & Teroni, F. (2014). Two faces of group-based shame: Moral shame and image shame differentially predict positive and negative orientations to ingroup wrongdoing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1270–1284. doi:10.1177/0146167214540724
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality”. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47–92). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60382-2
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, F. K., Thai, M., Wohl, M. J. A., White, S., Wright, M.-A., & Hornsey, M. J. (2015). Perpetrator groups can enhance their moral self-image by accepting their own intergroup apologies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 39–50. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergsieker, H. B., Shelton, J. N., & Richeson J. A. (2010). To be liked versus respected: Divergent goals in interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 248–264. doi:10.1037/a0018474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilewicz, M. (2007). History as an obstacle: Impact of temporal-based social categorizations on Polish-Jewish intergroup contact. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 551–563. doi:10.1177/1368430207081540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, R., González, R., Zagefka, H., Manzi, J., & Čehajić, S. (2008). Nuestra culpa: Collective guilt and shame as predictors of reparation for historical wrongdoing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 75–90. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruneau, E. G., & Saxe, R. (2012). The power of being heard: The benefits of ‘perspective-giving’ in the context of intergroup conflict. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 855–866. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnevale, P. J., & Pruitt, D. G. (1992). Negotiation and mediation. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 531–582. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.002531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čehajić-Clancy, S., Effron, D., Halperin, E., Liberman, V., & Ross, L. (2011). Affirmation, acknowledgment of ingroup responsibility, group-based guilt, and support for reparative measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 256–270.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, D. J., Tint, B. S., Wagner, R. V., & Winter, D. D. (2008). Peace psychology for a peaceful world. American Psychologist, 63, 540–552. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.6.540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen-Chen, S., Halperin, E., Crisp, R. J. & Gross, J. J. (2014). Hope in the Middle East: Malleability beliefs, hope, and the willingness to compromise for peace. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 67–75. doi:10.1177/1948550613484499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, M. A., DeHart, T., Richeson, J. A., & Fiedorowicz, L. (2012). Do unto others as others have done unto you? Perceiving sexism influences women's evaluations of stigmatized racial groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1107–1119. doi:10.1177/0146167212445210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derks, B., Scheepers, D., van Laar, C., & Ellemers, N. (2011). The threat vs. challenge of car parking for women: How self-and group affirmation affect cardiovascular responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 178–183. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.08.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derks, B., van Laar, C., & Ellemers, N. (2006). Striving for success in outgroup settings: Effects of contextually emphasizing ingroup dimensions on stigmatized group members’ social identity and performance styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 576–588. doi:10.1177/0146167205283336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derks, B., van Laar, C., & Ellemers, N. (2007). Social creativity strikes back: Improving motivated performance of low status group members by valuing ingroup dimensions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 470–493. doi:10.1002/ejsp.375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derks, B., van Laar, C., & Ellemers, N. (2009). Working for the self or working for the group: How self- versus group affirmation affects collective behavior in low-status groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 183–202. doi:10.1037/a0013068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M. (1961). Some considerations relevant to national policy. Journal of Social Issues, 17, 57–68. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1961.tb01683.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, J., Durrheim, K., & Tredoux, C. (2005). Beyond the optimal contact strategy: A reality check for the contact hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 697–711. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.7.697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Saguy, T. (2007). Another view of “we”: Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 296–330. doi:10.1080/10463280701726132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovidio, J. F., Saguy, T., & Shnabel, N. (2009). Cooperation and conflict within groups: Bridging intragroup and intergroup processes. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 429–449. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01607.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41–113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Du Toit, F., & Doxtader, E. (Eds.). (2010). In the balance: South Africans debate reconciliation. Johannesburg, South Africa: Jacana Media.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. London, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6, 167–191. doi:10.1177/002234336900600301
   Google Scholar
• Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2009). Moral typecasting: Divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 505–520. doi:10.1037/a0013748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2, 271–299. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271
   Google Scholar
• Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future. Prospects, Psychological Inquiry, 26, 1–26. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunn, G. R., & Wilson, A. E. (2011). Acknowledging the skeletons in our closet: The effect of group affirmation on collective guilt, collective shame, and reparatory attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1474–1487. doi:10.1177/0146167211413607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halperin, E., Russell, A. G., Dweck, C. S., & Gross, J. J. (2011). Anger, hatred, and the quest for peace: Anger can be constructive in the absence of hatred. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 55, 274–291. doi:10.1177/0022002710383670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halperin, E., Russell, A. G., Trzesniewski, K. H., Gross, J. J., & Dweck, C. S. (2011). Promoting the peace process by changing beliefs about group malleability. Science, 333, 1767–1769. doi:10.1126/science.1202925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harth, N. S., Hornsey, M. J., & Barlow, F. K. (2011). Emotional responses to rejection of gestures of intergroup reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 815–829. doi:10.1177/0146167211400617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harth, N. S., Leach, C. W., & Kessler, T. (2013). Guilt, anger, and pride about in-group environmental behaviour: Different emotions predict distinct intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 18–26. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imhoff, R., & Banse, R. (2009). Ongoing victim suffering increases prejudice: The case of secondary anti-Semitism. Psychological Science, 20, 1443–1447. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02457.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer, A., & Leach, C. W. (2009). Helping disadvantaged out-groups challenge unjust inequality: The role of group-based emotions. In S. Stürmer & M. Snyder (Eds.), The psychology of prosocial behavior: Group processes, intergroup relations, and helping (pp. 337–353). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, H. C. (2008). Reconciliation from a social-psychological perspective. In A. Nadler, T. Malloy, & J. D. Fisher (Eds.), Social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 15–32). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kudish, S., Cohen-Chen, S., & Halperin, E. (2015). Increasing support for concession-making in intractable conflicts: The role of conflict uniqueness. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 21, 248–263. doi:10.1037/pac0000074
   Google Scholar
• Leidner, B., Tropp, L. R., & Lickel, B. (2013). Bringing science to bear—on peace, not war: Elaborating on psychology's potential to promote peace. American Psychologist, 68, 514–526. doi:10.1037/a0032846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, S., Kteily, N., Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Matthews, M. (2015). Muslims’ emotions toward Americans predict support for Hezbollah and Al Qaeda for threat-specific reasons. Motivation and Emotion, 40, 162–177. doi:10.1007/s11031-015-9510-1
   Google Scholar
• Levy, P. I. (1999). Sanctions on South Africa: What did they do? The American Economic Review, 89, 415–420. doi:10.1257/aer.89.2.415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindner, E. (2006). Making enemies: Humiliation and international conflict. London, UK: Praeger Security International.
   Google Scholar
• McCullough, M. E., Kurzban, R., & Tabak, B. A. (2013). Cognitive systems for revenge and forgiveness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 1–58. doi:10.1017/S0140525×11002160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meierhenrich, J. (2008). Varieties of reconciliation. Law and Social Inquiry, 33, 195–231. doi:10.1111/j.1747-4469.2008.00098.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miron, A. M., Branscombe, N. R., & Biernat, M. (2010). Motivated shifting of justice standards. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(6), 768–779. doi:10.1177/0146167210370031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscovici, S., & Pérez, J. A. (2009). A new representation of minorities as victims. In F. Butera & J. M. Levine (Eds.), Coping with minority status: Responses to exclusion and inclusion (pp. 82–103). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nadler, A. (2012). Intergroup reconciliation: Definitions, processes and future directions. In L. Tropp (Ed.), The Oxford book of intergroup conflict (pp. 291–309). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nadler, A., & Liviatan, I. (2006). Intergroup reconciliation: Effects of adversary's expressions of empathy, responsibility, and recipients’ trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 459–470. doi:10.1177/0146167205276431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadler, A., & Shnabel, N. (2008). Instrumental and socio-emotional paths to Intergroup reconciliation: And the need based model of socio-emotional reconciliation. In A. Nadler, T. Malloy & J. D. Fisher (Eds.), Social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 37–56). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nadler, A., & Shnabel, N. (2015). Intergroup reconciliation: Instrumental and socio-emotional processes and the needs-based model. European Review of Social Psychology, 26, 93–125. doi:10.1080/10463283.2015.1106712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noor, M., Brown, R., Gonzalez, R., Manzi, J., & Lewis, C. A. (2008). On positive psychological outcomes: What helps groups with a history of conflict to forgive and reconcile with each other? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 819–832. doi:10.1177/0146167208315555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noor, M., Brown, J. R., & Prentice, G. (2008). Precursors and mediators of intergroup reconciliation in Northern Ireland: A new model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 481–495. doi:10.1348/014466607×238751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noor, M., Shnabel, N., Halabi, S., & Nadler, A. (2012). When suffering begets suffering: The psychology of competitive victimhood between adversarial groups in violent conflicts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 351–374. doi:10.1177/1088868312440048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osgood, C. E. (1962). An alternative to war or surrender. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paluck, E. L. (2010). Is it better not to talk? Group polarization, extended contact, and perspective taking in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1170–1185. doi:10.1177/0146167210379868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philpot, C. R., & Hornsey, M. J. (2008). What happens when groups say sorry: The effect of intergroup apologies on their recipients. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 474–487. doi:10.1177/0146167207311283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouhana, N. N. (2004). Identity and power in the reconciliation of national conflict. In A. Eagly, R. Baron, & V. Hamilton (Eds.), The social psychology of group identity and social conflict: Theory, application, and practice (pp. 173–187). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Rouhana, N. N. (2008). Reconciling history and equal citizenship in Israel: Democracy and the politics of historical denial. In B. Bashir & W. Kymlicka (Eds.), The politics of reconciliation in multicultural societies (pp. 70–93). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rouhana, N. N. (2011). Key issues in reconciliation: Challenging traditional assumptions on conflict resolution and power dynamics. In D. Bar-Tal (Ed.). Intergroup conflicts and their resolution: A social psychological perspective (pp. 291–314). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saguy, T., Dovidio, J. F., & Pratto, F. (2008). Beyond contact: Intergroup contact in the context of power relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 432–445. doi:10.1177/0146167207311200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saguy, T., Tausch, N., Dovidio, J. F., & Pratto, F. (2009). The irony of harmony: Intergroup contact can produce false expectations for equality. Psychological Science, 20, 114–121. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02261.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagy, S., Kaplan, A., & Adwan, S. (2002). Interpretations of the past and expectations for the future among Israeli and Palestinian youth. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 72, 26–38. doi:10.1037/0002-9432.72.1.26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmader, T., & Mendes, W. B. (2015). Putting feelings in a social context: Three case studies applying Gross's extended model of emotion regulation. Psychological Inquiry, 26, 116–122. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2015.962445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, D. K., Kinias, Z., Major, B., Kim, H. S., & Prenovost, M. (2007). The group as a resource: Reducing biased attributions for group success and failure via group affirmation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1100–1112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shnabel, N., Halabi, S., & Noor, M. (2013). Overcoming competitive victimhood and facilitating forgiveness through re-categorization into a common victim or perpetrator identity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 867–877. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shnabel, N., Halabi, S., & SimanTov-Nachlieli, I. (2015). Group apology under unstable status relations: Perceptions of insincerity hinder reconciliation and forgiveness. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 18, 716–725. doi:10.1177/1368430214546069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shnabel, N., & Nadler, A. (2008). A needs-based model of reconciliation: Satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 116–132. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shnabel, N., & Nadler, A. (2015). The role of agency and morality in reconciliation processes: The perspective of the needs-based model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 477–483. doi:10.1177/0963721415601625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shnabel, N., Nadler, A., Canetti-Nisim, D., & Ullrich, J. (2008). The role of acceptance and empowerment in promoting reconciliation from the perspective of the needs-based model. Social Issues and Policy Review, 2, 159–186. doi:10.1111/j.1751-2409.2008.00014.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shnabel, N., Nadler, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (2014). Beyond need satisfaction: Empowering and accepting messages from third parties ineffectively restore trust and consequent reconciliation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 126–140. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shnabel, N., Nadler, A., Ullrich, J., Dovidio, J. F., & Carmi, D. (2009). Promoting reconciliation through the satisfaction of the emotional needs of victimized and perpetrating group members: The needs-based model of reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1021–1030. doi:10.1177/0146167209336610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shnabel, N., & Noor, M. (2012). Competitive victimhood among Jewish and Palestinian Israelis reflects differential threats to their identities: The perspective of the needs-based model. In K. J. Jonas & T. A. Morton (Eds.), Restoring civil societies: The psychology of intervention and engagement following crisis (pp. 192–207). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell
   Google Scholar
• Shnabel, N., & Ullrich, J. (2013). Increasing intergroup cooperation toward social change by restoring advantaged and disadvantaged groups’ positive identities. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1, 216–238. doi:10.5964/jspp.v1i1.187
   Google Scholar
• Shnabel, N., Ullrich, J., Nadler, A., Dovidio, J. F., & Aydin, A. L. (2013). Warm or competent? Improving intergroup relations by addressing threatened identities of advantaged and disadvantaged groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 482–492. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SimanTov-Nachlieli, I., & Shnabel, N. (2014). Feeling both victim and perpetrator: Investigating duality within the needs-based model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 301–314. doi:10.1177/0146167213510746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SimanTov-Nachlieli, I., Shnabel, N., Aydin, A. L., & Ullrich, J. (2016). Agents of pro-sociality: Affirming conflicting groups’ agency promotes mutual pro-social tendencies. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• SimanTov-Nachlieli, I., Shnabel, N., & Halabi, S. (2015). Winning the victim status can open conflicting groups to reconciliation: Evidence from the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 139–145. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnenschein, N. (2008). An identity challenging dialogue. Haifa, Israel: Pardes Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Sonnenschein, N., & Bekerman, Z. (2010). Who is more humane? An ethnographic account of power struggles in Jewish-Palestinian dialogue encounters. Peace and Conflict Studies, 17, 307–346. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/pcs/vol17/iss2/2
   Google Scholar
• Staub, E. (2006). Reconciliation after genocide, mass killing, or intractable conflict: Understanding the roots of violence, psychological recovery, and steps toward a general theory. Political Psychology, 27, 867–894. doi:10.1111/pops.2006.27.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, D., Landau, M. J., Branscombe, N. R., & Rothschild, Z. K. (2012). Competitive victimhood as a response to accusations of ingroup harm doing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 778–795. doi:10.1037/a0026573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tagar, M. R., Federico, C. M., Halperin, E. (2011). The positive effect of negative emotions in protracted conflict: The case of anger. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 157–164. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Tropp, L. R., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2005). Relationships between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups. Psychological Science, 16, 951–957. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01643.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454–463. doi:10.1177/0146167294205002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutu, D. (1999). No future without forgiveness. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollhardt, J. R. (2009). The role of victim beliefs in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: Risk or potential for peace? Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 15, 135–159. doi:10.1080/10781910802544373
   Google Scholar
• Vollhardt, J. R. (2012). Collective victimization. In L. R. Tropp (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of intergroup conflict (pp. 136–157). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vollhardt, J. R. (2015). Inclusive victim consciousness in advocacy, social movements, and intergroup relations: Promises and pitfalls. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9, 89–120. doi:10.1111/sipr.12011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, R. K. (1995). When does intervention make sense? Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 1, 85–95. doi:10.1207/s15327949pac0101_9
   Google Scholar
• Wohl, M. J. A., Cohen-Chen, S., Halperin, F., Caouette, J., Hayes, N., & Hornsey, M. J. (2015). Belief in the malleability of groups strengthens the tenuous link between a collective apology and intergroup forgiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 714–725. doi:10.1177/0146167215576721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar