Perceptually Mediated Preferences and Prejudices

References

• Adams, R. B., Ambady, N., Nakayama, K., & Shimojo, S. (2010). The science of social vision. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). Effects of fluency on psychological distance and mental construal (or why New York is a large city, but New York is a civilized jungle). Psychological Science, 19, 161–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anstis, S., Verstraten, F. A., & Mather, G. (1998). The motion aftereffect. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 111–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apicella, C. L., Little, A. C., & Marlowe, F. W. (2007). Facial averageness and attractiveness in an isolated population of hunter-gatherers. Perception, 36, 1813–1820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcetis, E., & Lassiter, G. D. (2010). Social psychology of visual perception. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belke, B., Leder, H., Strobach, T., & Carbon, C. C. (2010). Cognitive fluency: High-level processing dynamics in art appreciation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4, 214–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakemore, C. T., & Campbell, F. W. (1969). On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. The Journal of Physiology, 203, 237–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbon, C. C., & Ditye, T. (2012). Face adaptation effects show strong and long-lasting transfer from lab to more ecological contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, #3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford, C. W. G., & Rhodes, G. (2005). Fitting the mind to the world: Adaptation and after-effects in high-level vision. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• D'Alessandro, L. M., & Norwich, K. H. (2009). Loudness adaptation measured by the simultaneous dichotic loudness balance technique differs between genders. Hearing Research, 247, 122–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, D. T., Hansen, A. R., Wang, W., Yan, F., & Zhang, J. (2015). Change in misperception of child's body weight among parents of American preschool children. Childhood Obesity, 11, 384–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Halberstadt, J., & Rhodes, G. (2000). The attractiveness of nonface averages: Implications for an evolutionary explanation of the attractiveness of average faces. Psychological Science, 11, 285–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halberstadt, J., & Winkielman, P. (2014). Easy on the eyes, or hard to categorize: Classification difficulty decreases the appeal of facial blends. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 175–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaacowitz, D. M., & Choi, Y. (2011). The malleability of age-related positive gaze preferences: training to change gaze and mood. Emotion, 11, 90–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. C., Thomson, C. W., & Frincke, G. (1960). Word values, word frequency, and visual duration thresholds. Psychological Review, 67, 332–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, C. M., & Rhodes, M. G. (2002). Making sense and nonsense of experience: Attributions in memory and judgment. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 41, 293–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laham, S. M., Koval, P., & Alter, A. L. (2012). The name-pronunciation effect: Why people like Mr. Smith more than Mr. Colquhoun. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 752–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lev-Ari, S., & Keysar, B. (2010). Why don't we believe non-native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1093–1096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lick, D. J., Bryant, G. A., & Johnson, K. L. (2016). Social evaluative implications of sensory adaptation to human voices. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Lick, D. J., Hunger, J. M., Tomiyama, A. J., & Johnson, K. L. (2016). Harnessing visual adaptation to understand and combat weight bias. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Lick, D. J., & Johnson, K. L. (2016). Straight until proven gay: A systematic bias toward straight categorizations in sexual orientation perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 801–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lick, D. J., & Johnson, K. L. (2015). The interpersonal consequences of processing ease: Fluency as a metacognitive foundation for prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 143–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lick, D. J., & Johnson, K. L. (2014a). Recalibrating gender perception: Face aftereffects and the perceptual underpinnings of gender-related biases in social perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1259–1276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lick, D. J., & Johnson, K. L. (2014b). “You can't tell just by looking!” Beliefs in the diagnosticity of visual cues predict response biases in social categorization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1494–1506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lick, D. J., & Johnson, K. L. (2013). Fluency of visual processing explains prejudiced evaluations following categorization of concealable identities. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 419–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lick, D. J., Johnson, K. L., & Rule, N. O. (2015). Disfluent processing helps to explain anti- bisexual prejudice. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 39, 257–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, A. C., Feinberg, D. R., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2013). Adaptation to faces and voices: Unimodal, cross-modal, and sex-specific effects. Psychological Science, 24, 2297–2305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, D., & Macrae, C. N. (2007). A face with a cue: Exploring the inevitability of person categorization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 806–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). The secret life of fluency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 237–241.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, A. R. (2011). Intergroup fluency: A metacognitive approach to intergroup perception (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (Order No. 3496948).
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. P., Scovil, S. J., Carmichael, M. E., & Hall, S. E. (2007). Adaptation of central pitch- specific mechanisms. Perception, 36, 918–930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pliner, P. (1982). The effects of mere exposure on liking for edible substances. Appetite, 3, 283–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1964). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353–363.
   Google Scholar
• Principe, C. P., & Langlois, J. H. (2012). Shifting the prototype: Experience with faces influences affective and attractiveness preferences. Social Cognition, 30, 109–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, G., & Jeffery, L. (2006). Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity. Vision Research, 46, 2977–2987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, G., Jeffery, L., Watson, T. L., Clifford, C. W. G., & Nakayama, K. (2003). Fitting the mind to the world: Face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects. Psychological Science, 14, 558–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, M., Paolini, S., & Crisp, R. J. (2010). A processing fluency explanation of bias against migrants. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 21–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, H., & Schwarz, N. (2008). If it's hard to read, it's hard to do: Processing fluency affects effort prediction and motivation. Psychological Science, 19, 986–988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, H., & Schwarz, N. (2009). If it's difficult to pronounce, it must be risky: Fluency, familiarity, and risk perception. Psychological Science, 20, 135–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, T. (1991). Representation and process in face recognition. In J. Cronley-Dillon & R. J. Watt (Eds.), Pattern recognition by man and machine: Vol. 14. Vision and visual dysfunction (pp. 107–124). Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Vingilis-Jaremko, L., & Maurer, D. (2013). The influence of averageness on children's judgments of facial attractiveness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115, 624–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, M. A. (2012). Evolving concepts of sensory adaptation. F1000 Biology Reports, 4, 1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Webster, M. A., Kaping, D., Mizokami, Y., & Duhamel, P. (2004). Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature, 428, 557–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkielman, P., Halberstadt, J., Fazendeiro, T., & Catty, S. (2006). Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind. Psychological Science, 17, 799–806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T., & Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 189–217). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar