Publication Cover
Psychological Inquiry
An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory
Volume 29, 2018 - Issue 2
4,575
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Target Article

Cognitive Consistency Theory in Social Psychology: A Paradigm Reconsidered

, , , , , & show all

References

  • Abelson, R. P. A. E., McGuire, W. J., Newcomb, T. M., Rosenberg, M. J., & Tannenbaum, R. H. (1968). Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
  • Aronson, E. (1968). Dissonance theory: Progress and problems. In R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, & R. H. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (pp. 5–27). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
  • Aronson, E. (1992). The return of the repressed: Dissonance theory makes a comeback. Psychological Inquiry, 3(4), 303–311.
  • Aronson, E., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1962). Performance expectancy as a determinant of actual performance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 178–182.
  • Aronson, E., & Mills, J. (1959). The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59(2), 177–181.
  • Avnet, T., & Higgins, E. T. (2003). Locomotion, assessment, and regulatory fit: Value transfer from “how” to “what”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(5), 525–530.
  • Ayduk, Ö., Gyurak, A., Akinola, M., & Mendes, W. B. (2013). Consistency over flattery: Self-verification processes revealed in implicit and behavioral responses to feedback. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(5), 538–545.
  • Bosson, J. K., & Swann, W. B. (1999). Self-liking, self-competence and the quest for self-verification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 412–422.
  • Brehm, J. W. (1956). Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 52(3), 384–389.
  • Brehm, J. W., & Cohen, A. R. (1962). Explorations in cognitive dissonance. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Buechel, E. C., Zhang, J., Morewedge, C. K., & Vosgerau, J. (2014). More intense experiences, less intense forecasts: Why people overweight probability specifications in affective forecasts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(1), 20–36.
  • Burke, P. J., & Harrod, M. M. (2005). Too much of a good thing? Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(4), 359–374.
  • Bush, G., Luu, P., & Posner, M. I. (2000). Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(6), 215–222.
  • Canon, L. K. (1964). Self-confidence and selective exposure to information. In L. Festinger (Ed.), Conflict, decision, and dissonance (Vol. 3, pp. 83–97). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Cooper, J., & Fazio, R. H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 229–266.
  • Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1996). Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty. Cognition, 58(1), 1–73.
  • Deutsch, M., & Krauss, R. M. (1965). Theories in social psychology. Oxford, UK: Basic Books.
  • de Vries, M., Holland, R. W., Chenier, T., Starr, M. J., & Winkielman, P. (2010). Happiness cools the warm glow of familiarity psychophysiological evidence that mood modulates the familiarity-affect link. Psychological Science, 21(3), 321–328.
  • Dostoevsky, F. (1864). Notes from the Underground. St. Petersburg, Russia: Epoch.
  • Dutton, D. G., & Aron, A. P. (1974). Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 510–517.
  • Feather, N. T. (1982). Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row.
  • Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance (Vol. 2). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 58(2), 203–210.
  • Festinger, L., Riecken, H. W., & Schachter, S. (1956). When prophecy fails: A social and psychological study of a modern group that predicted the end of the world. London, UK: Pinter & Martin.
  • Frey, D., & Wicklund, R. A. (1978). A clarification of selective exposure: The impact of choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14(1), 132–139.
  • Frijda, N. H. (2004). Emotions and action. In A. S. R. Manstead, N. Frijda & A. Fischer (Eds.), Feelings and emotions: The Amsterdam symposium (pp. 158–173). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gawronski, B., & Strack, F. (2004). On the propositional nature of cognitive consistency: Dissonance changes explicit, but not implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(4), 535–542.
  • Gawronski, B., & Strack, F. (Eds.). (2012). Cognitive consistency: A fundamental principle in social cognition. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Giesler, R. B., Josephs, R. A., & Swann, W. B. Jr. (1996). Self-verification in clinical depression: the desire for negative evaluation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 358–368.
  • Gigerenzer, G., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2017). Cassandra's regret: The psychology of not wanting to know. Psychological Review, 124(2), 179–196.
  • Gilbert, D. T., & Jones, E. E. (1986). Perceiver-induced constraint: Interpretations of self-generated reality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 269–280.
  • Gillebaart, M., Förster, J., & Rotteveel, M. (2012). Mere exposure revisited: The influence of growth versus security cues on evaluations of novel and familiar stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 699–714.
  • Golub, S. A., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2009). Anticipating one's troubles: The costs and benefits of negative expectations. Emotion, 9(2), 277–281.
  • Greenwald, A. G., & Ronis, D. L. (1978). Twenty years of cognitive dissonance: Case study of the evolution of a theory. Psychological Review, 85(1), 53–57.
  • Hansen, J., & Topolinski, S. (2011). An exploratory mindset reduces preference for prototypes and increases preference for novel exemplars. Cognition and Emotion, 25(4), 709–716.
  • Hardin, C. D., & Higgins, E. T. (1996). Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition. Handbook of motivation and cognition, Vol. 3. The interpersonal context (pp. 28–84). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Harmon‐Jones, E., Amodio, D. M., & Harmon‐Jones, C. (2009). Action‐based model of dissonance: A review, integration, and expansion of conceptions of cognitive conflict. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 119–166.
  • Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319–340.
  • Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280–1300.
  • Higgins, E. T. (2012). Beyond pleasure and pain: How motivation works. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Hirose, Y., & Kitada, T. (1985). Actors' and observers' attributions of responsibility and attitude change in the forced-compliance situation. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 56(5), 262–268.
  • Hoffrage, U., Krauss, S., Martignon, L., & Gigerenzer, G. (2015). Natural frequencies improve Bayesian reasoning in simple and complex inference tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 6.
  • Hoshino-Browne, E., Zanna, A. S., Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., Kitayama, S., & Lackenbauer, S. (2005). On the cultural guises of cognitive dissonance: The case of easterners and westerners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 294–310.
  • Ilgen, D. R., & Gunn, J. D. (1976). Affective consequences of disconfirming performance expectations. The Journal of Social Psychology, 100(2), 245–255.
  • Jones, E. E., & Gerard, H. (1967). Foundations of social psychology. Oxford, UK: Wiley.
  • Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881–919.
  • Kitayama, S., Snibbe, A. C., Markus, H. R., & Suzuki, T. (2004). Is there any “free” choice? Self and dissonance in two cultures”. Psychological Science, 15(8), 527–533.
  • Knill, D. C., Kersten, D., & Yuille, A. (1996). Introduction: A Bayesian formulation of visual perception. Perception as Bayesian Inference, 1, 1–21.
  • Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases. New York, NY: Plenum.
  • Kruglanski, A. W., Atash, M., DeGrada, E., Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., & Webster, D. M. (1997). Psychological theory testing versus psychometric nay-saying: Comment on Neuberg et al.'s (1997) critique of the Need for Closure Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(5), 1005–1016.
  • Kruglanski, A. W., & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19(5), 448–468.
  • Kudo, T., & Mitsui, H. (1974). The magnitude of incentive, timing and attitude change. Japanese Psychological Review, 17(4), 384–402.
  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Labroo, A. A., & Kim, S. (2009). The instrumentality heuristic: Why metacognitive difficulty is desirable during goal pursuit. Psychological Science, 20, 127–134.
  • Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. S. (1944). Level of aspiration. In J. M. Hunt (Ed.), Personality and the behavior disorders (pp. 333–378). Oxford, England: Ronald Press.
  • Linder, D. E., Cooper, J., & Jones, E. E. (1967). Decision freedom as a determinant of the role of incentive magnitude in attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6(3), 245–254.
  • Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098–2109.
  • Mandler, G. (1989). Affect and learning: Causes and consequences of emotional interactions. In D. B. McLeod & V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving (pp. 3–19). New York, NY: Springer Verlag.
  • Markman, K. D., & Beike, D. R. (2012). Regret, consistency, and choice: An opportunity X mitigation framework. Cognitive Consistency: A Fundamental Principle in Social Cognition, 305–325.
  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.
  • Martinie, M.-A., Joule, R.-V., Milland, L., Olive, T., & Capa, R. (2013). Evidence that dissonance arousal is initially undifferentiated and only later labeled as negative. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 767–770.
  • McGraw, A. P., Mellers, B. A., & Ritov, I. (2004). The affective costs of overconfidence. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17(4), 281–295.
  • McGraw, A. P., Mellers, B. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (2005). Expectations and emotions of Olympic athletes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(4), 438–446.
  • Mellers, B. A. (2000). Choice and the relative pleasure of consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 126(6), 910–924.
  • Mellers, B. A., Schwartz, A., Ho, K., & Ritov, I. (1997). Decision affect theory: Emotional reactions to the outcomes of risky options. Psychological Science, 8(6), 423–429.
  • Mellers, B., Schwartz, A., & Ritov, I. (1999). Emotion-based choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(3), 332–345.
  • Meyer, W. U., Reisenzein, R., & Schützwohl, A. (1997). Toward a process analysis of emotions: The case of surprise. Motivation and Emotion, 21(3), 251–274.
  • Mitchell, T. R. (1982). Motivation: New directions for theory, research, and practice. Academy of Management Review, 7(1), 80–88.
  • Mu, Y., Kitayama, S., Han, S., & Gelfand, M. J. (2015). How culture gets embrained: Cultural differences in event-related potentials of social norm violations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(50), 15348–15353.
  • Noordewier, M. K., & Breugelmans, S. M. (2013). On the valence of surprise. Cognition &Amp; Emotion, 27(7), 1326–1334.
  • Noordewier, M. K., Topolinski, S., & Van Dijk, E. (2016). The temporal dynamics of surprise. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(3), 136–149.
  • Pelham, B. W. (1991). On confidence and consequence: The certainty and importance of self-knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 518–530.
  • Pelham, B. W., & Swann, W. B. Jr. (1994). The juncture of intrapersonal and interpersonal knowledge: Self-certainty and interpersonal congruence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(4), 349–357.
  • Pepitone, A. (1968). The problem of motivation in consistency models. In R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, & W. J. Mcguire (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (pp. 319–326). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
  • Plaks, J. E., & Stecher, K. (2007). Unexpected improvement, decline, and stasis: A prediction confidence perspective on achievement success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(4), 667–684.
  • Pocheptsova, A., Labroo, A. A., & Dhar, R. (2010). Making products feel special: When metacognitive difficulty improves product evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(6), 1059–1069.
  • Proulx, T., & Heine, S. J. (2008). The case of the transmogrifying experimenter affirmation of a moral schema following implicit change detection. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1294–1300.
  • Proulx, T., & Inzlicht, M. (2012). The five “A” s of meaning maintenance: Finding meaning in the theories of sense-making. Psychological Inquiry, 23(4), 317–335.
  • Proulx, T., & Major, B. (2013). A raw deal: Heightened liberalism following exposure to anomalous playing cards. Journal of Social Issues, 69(3), 455–472.
  • Randles, D., Heine, S. J., & Santos, N. (2013). The common pain of surrealism and death acetaminophen reduces compensatory affirmation following meaning threats. Psychological Science, 24(6), 966–973.
  • Read, S. J., & Simon, D. (2012). Parallel constraint satisfaction as a mechanism for cognitive consistency. Cognitive Consistency: A Fundamental Principle in Social Cognition, 66–86.
  • Reisenzein, R. (2000). The subjective experience of surprise. In H. Bless and J. P. Forgas (Eds.), The message within: The role of subjective experience in social cognition and behavior (pp. 262–279). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
  • Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178.
  • Sanada, T., & Norbeck, E. (1975). Prophecy continues to fail a Japanese sect. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 6(3), 331–345.
  • Shepperd, J. A., & McNulty, J. K. (2002). The affective consequences of expected and unexpected outcomes. Psychological Science, 13(1), 85–88.
  • Sjastad, H., Baumeister, R. F., & Ent, M. (2016). People underestimate the sweetness of high-hanging fruit: Evidence for a sour-grape effect in future thinking. Unpublished manuscript, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
  • Sleegers, W. W., Proulx, T., & van Beest, I. (2015). Extremism reduces conflict arousal and increases values affirmation in response to meaning violations. Biological Psychology, 108, 126–131.
  • Stone, J. (2012). Consistency as a basis for behavioral interventions: Using hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance to motivate behavior change. Cognitive Consistency: A Fundamental Principle in Social Cognition, 326–347.
  • Swann, W. B., Jr. (1990). To be adored or to be known? The interplay of self-enhancement and self-verification. In E. T. Higgins, & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior, (Vol. 2, pp. 408–448). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press
  • Swann, W. B. (1997). The trouble with change: Self-verification and allegiance to the self. Psychological Science, 8(3), 177–180.
  • Swann, W. B. Jr. (2011). Self-verification theory. In P. A. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 23–42). New York, NY: Sage Publications.
  • Swann, W. B., Jr., & Pelham, B. W. (2002). Who wants out when the going gets good? Psychological investment and preference for self-verifying college roommates. Self and Identity, 1(3), 219–233.
  • Swann, W. B., Jr., Wenzlaff, R. M., & Tafarodi, R. W. (1992a). Depression and the search for negative evaluations: More evidence of the role of self-verification strivings. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101(2), 314–317.
  • Swann, W. B., Jr., Wenzlaff, R. M., Krull, D. S., & Pelham, B. W. (1992b). The allure of negative feedback: Self-verification strivings among depressed persons. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101(2), 293–306.
  • Tenenbaum, J. B., Griffiths, T. L., & Kemp, C. (2006). Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(7), 309–318.
  • Tolman, E. C. (1955). Principles of performance. Psychological Review, 62(5), 315–326.
  • Topolinski, S., Erle, T. M., & Reber, R. (2015). Necker’s smile: Immediate affective consequences of early perceptual processes. Cognition, 140, 1–13.
  • Topolinski, S., Likowski, K. U., Weyers, P., & Strack, F. (2009). The face of fluency: Semantic coherence automatically elicits a specific pattern of facial muscle reactions. Cognition and Emotion, 23(2), 260–271.
  • Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009a). The analysis of intuition: Processing fluency and affect in judgments of semantic coherence. Cognition and Emotion, 23(8), 1465–1503.
  • Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009b). Scanning the “fringe” of consciousness: What is felt and what is not felt in intuitions about semantic coherence”. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(3), 608–618.
  • Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2015). Corrugator activity confirms immediate negative affect in surprise. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 134–150.
  • Townsend, S. S., Major, B., Sawyer, P. J., & Mendes, W. B. (2010). Can the absence of prejudice be more threatening than its presence? It depends on one's worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(6), 933–947.
  • Unkelbach, C., & Greifeneder, R. (2013). Thinking about "experiences of thinking": Fluency in six principles. In C. Unkelbach & R. Greifeneder (Eds.), The experience of thinking: How the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behaviour (pp. 257–261). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Valenzuela, A., Mellers, B., & Strebel, J. (2010). Pleasurable surprises: A cross-cultural study of consumer responses to unexpected incentives. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 792–805.
  • Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Webber, D., Zhang, R., Schimel, J., & Blatter, J. (2016). Finding death in meaninglessness: Evidence that death-thought accessibility increases in response to meaning threats. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55, 144–161.
  • Wilson, T. D., Wheatley, T. P., Kurtz, J. L., Dunn, E. W., & Gilbert, D. T. (2004). When to fire: Anticipatory versus postevent reconstrual of uncontrollable events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(3), 340–351.
  • Winkielman, P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 989.
  • Winkielman, P., Halberstadt, J., Fazendeiro, T., & Catty, S. (2006). Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind. Psychological Science, 17(9), 799–806.
  • Winkielman, P., Huber, D. E., Kavanagh, L., & Schwarz, N. (2012). Fluency of consistency: When thoughts fit nicely and flow smoothly. Cognitive Consistency: A Fundamental Principle in Social Cognition, 89–111.
  • Wood, J. V., Heimpel, S. A., Newby-Clark, I. R., & Ross, M. (2005). Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory: Self-esteem differences in the experience and anticipation of success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(5), 764–780.
  • Yoshizaki, S., Ishii, S., & Ishii, K. (1975). The effects of reward magnitude and choice freedom on opinion change. Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15(1), 35–44.
  • Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2), 1–27.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.