Publication Cover
Psychological Inquiry
An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory
Volume 29, 2018 - Issue 4
159
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentaries

An Analysis of the Scientific Status and Limitations of the Attitudinal Entropy Framework and an Initial Test of Some of Its Empirical Predictions

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Cone, J., & Ferguson, M. J. (2015). He did what? The role of diagnosticity in revising implicit evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(1), 37–57.
  • Cone, J., Mann, T. C., & Ferguson, M. J. (2017). Changing our implicit minds: How, when, and why implicit evaluations can be rapidly revised. In J. M. Olson (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 56, pp. 131–199). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
  • Corneille, O., & Stahl, C. (2018). Associative attitude learning: A closer look at evidence and how it relates to attitude models. Personality and Social Psychology Review. Advance online publication. doi:1088868318763261
  • De Houwer, J. (2018). Propositional models of evaluative conditioning. Social Psychological Bulletin, 13(3), Article e28046.
  • De Houwer, J. (2009). The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation models. Learning & Behavior, 37(1), 1–20.
  • De Houwer, J. (2014). A propositional model of implicit evaluation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(7), 342–353.
  • De Houwer, J., Gawronski, B., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2013). A functional-cognitive framework for attitude research. European Review of Social Psychology, 24(1), 252–287. doi:10.1080/10463283.2014.892320
  • Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–138.
  • Gardner, H. (1987). The mind’s new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 692–731. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692
  • Hayes, S. C., & Brownstein, A. J. (1986). Mentalism, behavior-behavior relations, and a behavior-analytic view of the purposes of science. The Behavior Analyst, 9(2), 175–190.
  • Hussey, I., Hughes, S., Lai, C., Ebersole, C., Axt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2018). Attitudes 2.0: A large dataset for investigating relations among implicit and explicit attitudes and identity. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449–1147.
  • Melnikoff, D. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2018). The mythical number two. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(4), 280–293. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.001
  • Metzinger, T., & Wiese, W. (2017). Philosophy and predictive processing. Frankfurt am Main: MIND Group.
  • Mitchell, C. J., De Houwer, J., & Lovibond, P. F. (2009). The propositional nature of human associative learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(02), 183–198. doi:10.1017/s0140525x09000855
  • Nosek, B. A., & Hansen, J. J. (2008). The associations in our heads belong to us: Searching for attitudes and knowledge in implicit evaluation. Cognition and Emotion, 22(4), 553–594. doi:10.1080/02699930701438186
  • Otworowska, M., Van Rooij, I., & Kwisthout, J. (2018). Maximizing entropy of the predictive processing framework. PsyArXiv preprints. doi:10.31234/osf.io/5zam7
  • Schwarz, N. (2007). Attitude construction: Evaluation in context. Social Cognition, 25(5), 638–656.
  • Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York, NY: Macmillan.
  • Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 108–131.
  • Van Dessel, P., Hughes, S., & De Houwer, J. (2018). How do actions influence attitudes? An inferential account of the impact of action performance on stimulus evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1088868318795730

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.