Belief Bias and Its Significance for Modern Social Science

References

• Bago, B., & De Neys, W. (2017). Fast logic?: Examining the time course assumption of dual process theory. Cognition, 158, 90–109. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bago, B., Rand, D., & Pennycook, G. (2020). Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, doi:10.31234/OSF.IO/29B4J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. doi:10.1126/science.aaa1160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolsen, T., & Palm, R. (2019). Motivated reasoning and political decision making. In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.923
   Google Scholar
• Calvillo, D. P., Swan, A. B., & Rutchick, A. M. (2019). Ideological belief bias with political syllogisms. Thinking & Reasoning, 1–20. doi:10.1080/13546783.2019.1688188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys, W., & Pennycook, G. (2019). Logic, fast and slow: Advances in dual-process theorizing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(5), 503–509. doi:10.1177/0963721419855658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., Levendusky, M. S., & McLain, A. (2018). No need to watch: How the effects of partisan media can spread via interpersonal discussions. American Journal of Political Science, 62(1), 99–112. doi:10.1111/ajps.12325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, E., & Blank, G. (2018). The echo chamber is overstated: The moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, Communication & Society, 21(5), 729–745. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eady, G., Nagler, J., Guess, A., Zilinsky, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2019). How many people live in political bubbles on social media? Evidence from linked survey and Twitter data. SAGE Open, 9(1), 215824401983270. doi:10.1177/2158244019832705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. T B. T., Barston, J. L., & Pollard, P. (1983). On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 11(3), 295–306. doi:10.3758/BF03196976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T., & Curtis-Holmes, J. (2005). Rapid responding increases belief bias: Evidence for the dual-process theory of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 11(4), 382–389. doi:10.1080/13546780542000005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. doi:10.1177/1745691612460685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gampa, A., Wojcik, S. P., Motyl, M., Nosek, B. A., & Ditto, P. H. (2019). (Ideo)logical reasoning: Ideology impairs sound reasoning. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(8), 1075–1083. doi:10.1177/1948550619829059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guess, A., Nyhan, B., Lyons, B., & Reifler, J. (2019). Avoiding the echo chamber about echo chambers: Why selective exposure to like-minded political news is less prevalent than you think. Retrieved from https://kf-site-production.s3.amazonaws.com/media_elements/files/000/000/133/original/Topos_KF_White-Paper_Nyhan_V1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Handley, S. J., & Trippas, D. (2015). Dual processes and the interplay between knowledge and structure: A new parallel processing model. Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory, 62, 33–58. doi:10.1016/bs.plm.2014.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D., Peters, E., Dawson, E., & Slovic, P. (2017). Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government. Behavioural Public Policy, 1(1), 54–86. doi:10.1017/bpp.2016.2
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Lelkes, Y. (2019). Policy over party: Comparing the effects of candidate ideology and party on affective polarization. Political Science Research and Methods, doi:10.1017/psrm.2019.18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098–2109. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, C. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163–203. http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/bul/109/2/163/. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markovits, H., Nantel, G. (1989). The belief bias effect in the production and evaluation of logical conclusions. Memory & Cognition, 17, 11–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. L., & Webster, J. G. (2017). The myth of partisan selective exposure: A portrait of the online political news audience. Social Media + Society, 3(3), 205630511772931. doi:10.1177/2056305117729314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39–50. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tappin, B. M., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. (2019a). Rethinking the link between cognitive sophistication and politically motivated reasoning. PsyArXiv Working Paper, 1–53. doi:10.31234/OSF.IO/YUZFJ
   Google Scholar
• Tappin, B. M., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019b). Thinking clearly about causal inferences of politically motivated reasoning: Why paradigmatic study designs often undermine causal inference. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 81–87.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, M. C. (1928). The effect of changed material on ability to do formal syllogistic reasoning. Archives of Psychology, 16, 83.
   Google Scholar