“A Theory of Wisdom Needs Theory of Mind”

References

• Ames, D. R. (2004). Strategies for social inference: A similarity contingency model of projection and stereotyping in attribute prevalence estimates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 573–585. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ames, D., & Fiske, S. (2015). Perceived intent motivates people to magnify observed harms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(12), 3599–3605. doi:10.1073/pnas.1501592112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barranti, M., Carlson, E. N., & Côté, S. (2017). How to test questions about similarity in personality and social psychology research: Description and empirical demonstration of response surface analysis. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 465–475. doi:10.1177/1948550617698204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesanz, J. C. (2010). The social accuracy model of interpersonal perception: Assessing individual differences in perceptive and expressive accuracy. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45(5), 853–885. doi:10.1080/00273171.2010.519262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brashier, N. M., & Marsh, E. J. (2020). Judging truth. Annual Review of Psychology, 71(1), 499–515. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brienza, J. P., Kung, F. Y. H., Santos, H. C., Bobocel, D. R., & Grossmann, I. (2018). Wisdom, bias, and balance: Toward a process-sensitive measurement of wisdom-related cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(6), 1093–1126. doi:10.1037/pspp0000171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruya, B., & Ardelt, M. (2018). Wisdom can be taught: A proof-of-concept study for fostering wisdom in the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 58, 106–114. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, E. N. (2016). Meta-accuracy and relationship quality: Weighing the costs and benefits of knowing what people really think about you. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(2), 250–264. doi:10.1037/pspp0000107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakroff, A., Dungan, J., Koster-Hale, J., Brown, A., Saxe, R., & Young, L. (2016). When minds matter for moral judgment: Intent information is neurally encoded for harmful but not impure acts. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(3), 476–484. doi:10.1093/scan/nsv131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crockett, M. J., Kurth-Nelson, Z., Siegel, J. Z., Dayan, P., & Dolan, R. J. (2014). Harm to others outweighs harm to self in moral decision making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(48), 17320–17325. doi:10.1073/pnas.1408988111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1955). Processes affecting scores on “understanding of others” and “assumed similarity. Psychological Bulletin, 52(3), 177–193. doi:10.1037/h0044919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decety, J. (2011). Dissecting the neural mechanisms mediating mpathy. Emotion Review, 3(1), 92–108. doi:10.1177/1754073910374662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epley, N., Keysar, B., Van Boven, L., & Gilovich, T. (2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 327–339. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epley, N., & Waytz, A. (2010). Mind perception. In S. Fiske, D. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 498–541). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. 10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001014.
   Google Scholar
• Exline, J. J., & Hill, P. C. (2012). Humility: A consistent and robust predictor of generosity. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(3), 208–218. doi:10.1080/17439760.2012.671348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyal, T., Steffel, M., & Epley, N. (2018). Perspective mistaking: Accurately understanding the mind of another requires getting perspective, not taking perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(4), 547–571. doi:10.1037/pspa0000115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furr, R. M. (2008). A framework for profile similarity: Integrating similarity, normativeness, and distinctiveness. Journal of Personality, 76(5), 1267–1316. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00521.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, K., & Schein, C. (2012). Two minds vs. two philosophies: Mind perception defines morality and dissolves the debate between deontology and utilitarianism. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 3(3), 405–423. doi:10.1007/s13164-012-0112-5
   Google Scholar
• Gray, K., Young, L., & Waytz, A. (2012). Mind perception is the essence of morality. Psychological Inquiry, 23(2), 101–124. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2012.651387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossmann, I., Brienza, J. P., & Bobocel, D. R. (2017). Wise deliberation sustains cooperation. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(3), 0061. doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gweon, H., Young, L. L., & Saxe, R. (2011). Theory of mind for you, and for me: Behavioral and neural similarities and differences in thinking about beliefs of the self and other. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 33(33), 2492–2497.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M., Park, B., & Young, L. (2020). The psychology of motivated versus rational impression updating. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(2), 101–111. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchener, K. S. (1983). Cognition, metacognition, and epistemic cognition: A three-level model of cognitive processing. Human Development, 26, 222–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krumrei-Mancuso, E. J. (2017). Intellectual humility and prosocial values: Direct and mediated effects. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(1), 13–28. doi:10.1080/17439760.2016.1167938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krumrei-Mancuso, E. J., & Rouse, S. V. (2016). The development and validation of the comprehensive intellectual humility scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(2), 209–221. doi:10.1080/00223891.2015.1068174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaBouff, J. P., Rowatt, W. C., Johnson, M. K., Tsang, J.-A., & Willerton, G. M. (2012). Humble persons are more helpful than less humble persons: Evidence from three studies. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(1), 16–29. doi:10.1080/17439760.2011.626787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M., Sul, S., & Kim, H. (2018). Social observation increases deontological judgments in moral dilemmas. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(6), 611–621. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees, J., & Cikara, M. (2020). Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(3), 279–286. doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0766-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, K. L., Hodges, S. D., Laurent, S. M., Srivastava, S., & Biancarosa, G. (2012). Reading between the minds: The use of stereotypes in empathic accuracy. Psychological Science, 23(9), 1040–1046. doi:10.1177/0956797612439719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malle, B. F., Knobe, J. M., & Nelson, S. E. (2007). Actor-observer asymmetries in explanations of behavior: New answers to an old question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(4), 491–514. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malloy, T. E., Albright, L., Kenny, D. A., Agatstein, F., & Winquist, L. (1997). Interpersonal perception and metaperception in nonoverlapping social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(2), 390–398. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, J., & Knobe, J. (2018). The psychological representation of modality. Mind & Language, 33(1), 65–94. doi:10.1111/mila.12165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakoczy, H., Wandt, R., Thomas, S., Nowak, J., & Kunzmann, U. (2018). Theory of mind and wisdom: The development of different forms of perspective-taking in late adulthood. British Journal of Psychology, 109(1), 6–24. doi:10.1111/bjop.12246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeder, G. D., Vonk, R., Ronk, M. J., Ham, J., & Lawrence, M. (2004). Dispositional attribution: Multiple inferences about motive-related traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(4), 530–544. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rom, S. C., Weiss, A., & Conway, P. (2017). Judging those who judge: Perceivers infer the roles of affect and cognition underpinning others’ moral dilemma responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 44–58. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(3), 279–301. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schein, C., & Gray, K. (2016). Moralization and harmification: The dyadic loop explains how the innocuous becomes harmful and wrong. Psychological Inquiry, 27(1), 62–65. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2016.1111121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schein, C., & Gray, K. (2018). The theory of dyadic morality: Reinventing moral judgment by redefining harm. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(1), 32–39. doi:10.1177/1088868317698288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vazire, S., & Carlson, E. N. (2010). Self-knowledge of personality: Do people know themselves. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(8), 605–620. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00280.x
   Google Scholar
• Vazire, S., & Carlson, E. N. (2011). Others sometimes know us better than we know ourselves. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(2), 104–108. doi:10.1177/0963721411402478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waytz, A., Young, L. L., & Ginges, J. (2014). Motive attribution asymmetry for love vs. Hate drives intractable conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(44), 15687–15692. doi:10.1073/pnas.1414146111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72(3), 655–684. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, T. V., & Kenny, D. A. (2011). The truth and bias model of judgment. Psychological Review, 118(2), 357–378. doi:10.1037/a0022936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, L., & Tsoi, L. (2013). When mental states matter, when they don’t, and what that means for morality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(8), 585–604. doi:10.1111/spc3.12044
   Google Scholar
• Zaki, J., Bolger, N., & Ochsner, K. (2008). It takes two: The interpersonal nature of empathic accuracy. Psychological Science, 19(4), 399–404. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02099.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar