Hidden in Plain Sight: The Inconsistent Gender Gaps in STEM and Leadership

References

• Baker, M., & Cornelson, K. (2018). Gender-based occupational segregation and sex differences in sensory, motor, and spatial aptitudes. Demography, 55(5), 1749–1775. doi:10.1007/s13524-018-0706-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., Malzahn, K. A., Campbell, K. M., & Weis, A. M. (2013). Report of the 2012 national survey of science and mathematics education. Horizon Research, Inc. ERIC - ED541798. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S. (2003). The essential difference: Men, women and the truth about autism. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Boucher, K. L., Fuesting, M. A., Diekman, A. B., & Murphy, M. C. (2017). Can I work with and help others in this field? How communal goals influence interest and participation in STEM fields. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 901. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buser, T., Peter, N., & Wolter, S. C. (2017). Gender, competitiveness, and study choices in high school: Evidence from Switzerland. American Economic Review, 107 (5), 125–130. doi:10.1257/aer.p20171017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carli, L. L., Alawa, L., Lee, Y., Zhao, B., & Kim, E. (2016). Stereotypes about gender and science: Women ≠ scientists. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(2), 244–260. doi:10.1177/0361684315622645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalyst. (2020, January 15). Pyramid: Women in S&P 500 Companies. Retrieved from: https://www.catalyst.org/research/women-in-sp-500-companies/
   Google Scholar
• Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1–35. doi:10.1037/bul0000052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colar, A. (2020). Candid’s 2020 nonprofit compensation report finds an increase in female leadership—And an increase in the female pay gap. Retrieved from: https://candid.org/about/press-room/release.
   Google Scholar
• Cortes, P., & Pan, J. (2018). Occupation and gender. In S. L. Averett, L. M. Argys, & S. D. Hoffman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of women and the economy (pp. 425–452). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, T. R. (2020). Sex differences in tech tilt: Support for investment theories. Intelligence, 80, 101437. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2020.101437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekhtyar, S., Weber, D., Helgertz, J., & Herlitz, A. (2018). Sex differences in academic strengths contribute to gender segregation in education and occupation: A longitudinal examination of 167,776 individuals. Intelligence, 67, 84–92. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2017.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Giudice, M. (2018). The evolutionary context of personality development. In D. P. McAdams, R. L Shiner, & J. L. Tackett (Eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 20–39). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Diekman, A. B., Steinberg, M., Brown, E. R., Belanger, A. L., & Clark, E. K. (2017). A goal congruity model of role entry, engagement, and exit: Understanding communal goal processes in STEM gender gaps. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(2), 142–175. doi:10.1177/1088868316642141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.109.3.573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., Nater, C., Miller, D. I., Kaufmann, M., & Sczesny, S. (2020). Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. The American Psychologist, 75(3), 301–315. doi:10.1037/amp0000494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2013). The nature-nurture debates: 25 years of challenges in understanding the psychology of gender. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 340–357. doi:10.1177/1745691613484767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., & Wang, M. T. (2016). What motivates females and males to pursue careers in mathematics and science? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(2), 100–106. doi:10.1177/0165025415616201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101859. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• England, P., Levine, A., & Mishel, E. (2020). Progress toward gender equality in the United States has slowed or stalled. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(13), 6990–6997. doi:10.1073/pnas.1918891117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ethier, M. (2020, November 18). The leading B-schools with the most women. Retrieved from: https://poetsandquants.com/2020/11/18/
   Google Scholar
• Gagliardi, J. S., Espinosa, L. L., Turk, J. M., & Taylor, M. (2017). The American college president study: 2017. Washington, DC: American Council on Education, Center for Policy Research and Strategy; New York, NY: TIAA Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Gerson, K. (2017). There’s no such thing as having it all: Gender, work, & care in an age of insecurity. In S. N. Davis, S. Winslow, & D. J. Maume (Eds.), Gender in the 21 Century: The stalled revolution and the road to equality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, T. E. (2020). Where are all the women superintendents? Retrieved from: https://aasa.org/schooladministratorarticle.aspx?id=14492
   Google Scholar
• Goudreau, J. (2010, June 21). Top 20 industries favored by M.B.A. women. Retrieved from: https://www.forbes.com/2010/06/21/
   Google Scholar
• Graduate Management Admission Council. (2019). Career aspirations: Mba.com prospective students survey 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.gmac.com/market-intelligence-and-research/research-library/admissions-and-application-trends/career-aspirations-mbacom-prospective-students-survey-2019
   Google Scholar
• Heck, I. A., Santhanagopalan, R., Cimpian, A., & Kinzler, K. D. (2021). Understanding the developmental roots of gender gaps in politics. Psychological Inquiry. Advance online publication.
   Google Scholar
• Heilman, M. E., & Caleo, S. (2018). Combatting gender discrimination: A lack of fit framework. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(5), 725–744. doi:10.1177/1368430218761587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, S., & Ginther, D. (2018). Women and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). In S. L. Averett. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Women and the Economy (pp. 1–49). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 616–642. doi:10.1037/a0023557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie, S. J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347(6219), 262–265. doi:10.1126/science.1261375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levanon, A., & Grusky, D. B. (2016). The persistence of extreme gender segregation in the twenty-first century. American Journal of Sociology, 122(2), 573–619. doi:10.1086/688628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, A., Hartmann, B. S., & Larson, R. (2018). A quarter century of participation in school-based extracurricular activities: Inequalities by race, class, gender and age? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(6), 1299–1316. doi:10.1007/s10964-018-0838-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M., Cimpian, A., & Leslie, S. J. (2015). Women are underrepresented in fields where success is believed to require brilliance. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 235. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. I., & Halpern, D. F. (2014). The new science of cognitive sex differences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(1), 37–45. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.10.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. I., Nolla, K. M., Eagly, A. H., & Uttal, D. H. (2018). The development of children’s gender-science stereotypes: A meta-analysis of 5 decades of U.S. Draw-A-Scientist studies. Child Development, 89(6), 1943–1955. doi:10.1111/cdev.13039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, M. L. (2016). Vocational interests in the United States: Sex, age, ethnicity, and year effects. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(5), 604–615. doi:10.1037/cou0000164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation. (2019a). Employed scientists and engineers, by occupation, highest degree level, and sex: 2017 (Table 9–5). Retrieved from: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19304/data.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation. (2019b). Survey of earned doctorates. Table 14. Retrieved from: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf21308/data.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation. (2020). The state of U.S. Science & engineering: 2020: Figure 6. Retrieved from: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20201/u-s-s-e-workforce.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, D. P., & Newton, L. D. (1992). Young children’s perceptions of science and the scientist. International Journal of Science Education, 14(3), 331–348. doi:10.1080/0950069920140309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederle, M. (2017). A gender agenda: A progress report on competitiveness. American Economic Review, 107(5), 115–119. doi:10.1257/aer.p20171066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Political Parity. (2020). Research inventory on women and politics. Retrieved from: https://cawp.rutgers.edu/research/research_inventory
   Google Scholar
• Prediger, D. J. (1982). Dimensions underlying Holland’s hexagon: Missing link between interests and occupations? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 21(3), 259–287. doi:10.1016/0001-8791(82)90036-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, J. (2017). Gender quotas for women in national politics: A comparative analysis across development thresholds. Social Science Research, 66, 82–101. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.01.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadowski, I., & Zawistowska, A. (2020). The net effect of ability tilt in gendered STEM-related choices. Intelligence, 80, 101439. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2020.101439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. C., Holman, M. R., Diekman, A. B., & McAndrew, T. (2016). Power, conflict, and community: How gendered views of political power influence women’s political ambition. Political Psychology, 37(4), 515–531. doi:10.1111/pops.12268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart-Williams, S., & Halsey, L. G. (2021). Men, women and STEM: Why the differences and what should be done? European Journal of Personality, 35(1), 3–39. doi:10.1177/0890207020962326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, R., & Rounds, J. (2015). All STEM fields are not created equal: People and things interests explain gender disparities across STEM fields. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 189. https://doi.org/10.1037/t02466-000. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, R., Rounds, J., & Armstrong, P. I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 135(6), 859–884. doi:10.1037/a0017364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taie, S., & Goldring, R. (2019). Characteristics of public and private elementary and secondary school principals in the United States: Results from the 2017–18 national teacher and principal survey first look (NCES 2019-141). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, B. K., Fischer, R. A., Di Costa, S., Roestorf, A., Harbour, K., Hardiman, P., & Barry, J. A. (2018). Sex differences in children’s toy preferences: A systematic review, meta‐regression, and meta‐analysis. Infant and Child Development, 27(2), e2064. doi:10.1002/icd.2064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2020). Labor force statistics from the current population survey (Tables 11 and 18). Retrieved from: https://www.bls.gov/cps/
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (1973). Statistical abstract of the United States (1973, 94th Ed.). Table 375. Retrieved from: https://www.census.gov/library/publications/1973/compendia/statab/94ed.html
   Google Scholar
• Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817–835. doi:10.1037/a0016127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. B., Eaton, A. A., & Skagerberg, E. (2015). Occupational segregation and psychological gender differences: How empathizing and systemizing help explain the distribution of men and women into (some) occupations. Journal of Research in Personality, 54, 30–39. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar